Blockade of α2-adrenoceptors induces Arc gene expression in rat brain in a glutamate receptor-dependent manner: a combined qPCR, in situ hybridisation and immunocytochemistry study

Effects of the putative lithium mimetic ebselen on pilocarpine-induced neural activity

Lithium, commonly used to treat bipolar disorder, potentiates the ability of the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine to induce seizures in rodents. As this potentiation by lithium is reversed by the administration of myo-inositol, the potentiation may be mediated by inhibition of inositol monophosphatase (IMPase), a known target of lithium. Recently, we demonstrated that ebselen is a 'lithium mimetic' in regard to behaviours in both mice and man. Ebselen inhibits IMPase in vitro and lowers myo-inositol in vivo in the brains of mice and men, making ebselen the only known inhibitor of IMPase, other than lithium, that penetrates the blood-brain barrier. Our objective was to determine the effects of ebselen on sensitization to pilocarpine-induced seizures and neural activity. We administered ebselen at different doses and time intervals to mice, followed by injection of a sub-seizure dose of pilocarpine. We assessed seizure and neural activity by a subjective seizure rating scale, by monitoring tremors, and by induction of the immediate early gene c-fos. In contrast to lithium, ebselen did not potentiate the ability of pilocarpine to induce seizures. Unexpectedly, ebselen inhibited pilocarpine-induced tremor as well as pilocarpine-induced increases in c-fos mRNA levels. Both lithium and ebselen inhibit a common target, IMPase, but only lithium potentiates pilocarpine-induced seizures, consistent with their polypharmacology at diverse molecular targets. We conclude that ebselen does not potentiate pilocarpine-induced seizures and instead, reduces pilocarpine-mediated neural activation. This lack of potentiation of muscarinic sensitization may be one reason for the lack of side-effects observed with ebselen treatment clinically.

Pridopidine: Overview of Pharmacology and Rationale for its Use in Huntington's Disease

Despite advances in understanding the pathophysiology of Huntington’s disease (HD), there are currently no effective pharmacological agents available to treat core symptoms or to stop or prevent the progression of this hereditary neurodegenerative disorder. Pridopidine, a novel small molecule compound, has demonstrated potential for both symptomatic treatment and disease modifying effects in HD. While pridopidine failed to achieve its primary efficacy outcomes (Modified motor score) in two trials (MermaiHD and HART) there were consistent effects on secondary outcomes (TMS). In the most recent study (PrideHD) pridiopidine did not differ from placebo on TMS, possibly due to a large enduring placebo effect.

This review describes the process, based on in vivo systems response profiling, by which pridopidine was discovered and discusses its pharmacological profile, aiming to provide a model for the system-level effects, and a rationale for the use of pridopidine in patients affected by HD. Considering the effects on brain neurochemistry, gene expression and behaviour in vivo, pridopidine displays a unique effect profile. A hallmark feature in the behavioural pharmacology of pridopidine is its state-dependent inhibition or activation of dopamine-dependent psychomotor functions. Such effects are paralleled by strengthening of synaptic connectivity in cortico-striatal pathways suggesting pridopidine has potential to modify phenotypic expression as well as progression of HD. The preclinical pharmacological profile is discussed with respect to the clinical results for pridopidine, and proposals are made for further investigation, including preclinical and clinical studies addressing disease progression and effects at different stages of HD.

Interdependent adrenergic receptor regulation of Arc and Zif268 mRNA in cerebral cortex

Norepinephrine is a neurotransmitter that signals by stimulating the α1, α2 and β adrenergic receptor (AR). We determined the role of these receptors in regulating the immediate early genes, Activity Regulated Cytoskeleton Associated Protein (Arc) and Zif268 in the rat cerebral cortex. RX821002, an α2-AR antagonist, produced Arc and Zif268 elevations across cortical layers. Next we examined the effects of delivering RX821002 with an α1-AR antagonist, prazosin, and a β-AR antagonist, propranolol. RX821002 given with a prazosin and propranolol cocktail, or with each of these antagonists individually, decreased Arc and Zif268 to saline-treated control levels in most cortical layers. Arc and Zif268 levels were also similar to saline-treated control levels when rats were given a prazosin and propranolol cocktail alone, or when each of these antagonists were delivered individually. Taken together, these data reveal that α2-AR uniquely exert a tonic inibitory regulation of both Arc and Zif268 compared to α1 and β-AR. However, the ability of RX821002 to increase Arc and Zif268 is interdependent with α1 and β-AR signaling.

The dopaminergic stabilizers pridopidine and ordopidine enhance cortico-striatal Arc gene expression

The dopaminergic stabilizers pridopidine [4-(3-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1-propylpiperidine] and ordopidine [1-ethyl-4-(2-fluoro-3-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)piperidine] inhibit psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity, and stimulate behaviour in states of hypoactivity. While both compounds act as dopamine D2 receptor antagonists in vitro, albeit with low affinity, their specific state-dependent behavioural effect profile is not shared by D2 receptor antagonists in general. To further understand the neuropharmacological effects of pridopidine and ordopidine, and how they differ from other dopaminergic compounds in vivo, we assessed the expression of activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein/activity-regulated gene 3.1 (Arc), an immediate early gene marker associated with synaptic activation, in the frontal cortex and striatum. Furthermore, monoamine neurochemistry and locomotor activity were assessed. The effects of pridopidine and ordopidine were compared to reference dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists, as well as the partial dopamine D2 agonist aripiprazole. Pridopidine and ordopidine induced significant increases in cortical Arc expression, reaching 2.2- and 1.7-fold levels relative to control, respectively. In contrast, none of the reference dopamine D1 and D2 compounds tested increased cortical Arc expression. In the striatum, significant increases in Arc expression were seen with both pridopidine and ordopidine as well as the dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, remoxipride and haloperidol. Interestingly, striatal Arc expression correlated strongly and positively with striatal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, suggesting that antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors increases Arc expression in the striatum. In conclusion, the concurrent increase in cortical and striatal Arc expression induced by pridopidine and ordopidine appears unique for the dopaminergic stabilizers, as it was not shared by the reference compounds tested. The increase in cortical Arc expression is hypothesized to reflect enhanced N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor-mediated signalling in the frontal cortex, which could contribute to the state-dependent locomotor effects of pridopidine and ordopidine.