Influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of levosulpiride in healthy subjects

Development and validation of a reversed-phase HPLC-UV method for simultaneous determination of levosulpiride and omeprazole in human plasma: Applicability of the method for evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions

Levosulpiride and omeprazole are co-prescribed for gastrointestinal disorders associated with depression and anxiety. Objective of the study was to develop a sensitive, robust and simple method for simultaneous analysis of levosulpiride and omeprazole in human plasma and applicability of the method in determination of pharmacokinetics drug-drug interaction. In the presented study, a reversed-phase HPLC-UV method was developed for the simultaneous determination of levosulpiride and omeprazole using pantoprazole as the internal standard. Experimental conditions were optimized and the developed method was validated as per standard guidelines (USP and ICH). Furthermore, the developed method was applied for evaluation of pharmacokinetics drug-drug interaction between levosulpiride (50 mg) and omeprazole (40 mg) in healthy human volunteers. Sharpsil C8 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm), Ultisil C8 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm) and Agilent C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) were evaluated as stationary phase. The best resolution was achieved with Agilent C18 (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm) column and was selected for further study. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) in 60:40 by volume, and was pumped at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Detector wavelength was set at 280 nm. Levosulpiride and omeprazole were extracted from human plasma with ethyl acetate and dichloromethane (4:1, v/v). The calibration curves for both levosulpiride (5-150 ng/mL) and omeprazole (10-1500 ng/mL) were linear. The lower limit of quantification and limit of detection for levosulpiride were 5 and 2 ng/mL, while for omeprazole these were 10 and 3 ng/mL, respectively. Pharmacokinetics analysis showed that co-administration of omeprazole increased the AUC and Cmax of levosulpiride, while the clearance was reduced. Both the changes were insignificant. Similarly, no significant change in the pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole was observed with co-administration of levosulpiride.

Bioequivalence of a New Oral Levosulpiride Formulation Compared With a Standard One in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

A monocentric, single-dose, open-label, 2-way, crossover randomized study was conducted by the San Matteo Phase I Clinical Trial Unit and Experimental Therapy (Pavia, Italy) to assess the bioequivalence and the systemic tolerability of a new oral formulation of levosulpiride (tablet 25 mg: test) versus a commercially available formulation on the Italian market (tablet 25 mg: reference).

METHODS

Thirty-five healthy adult volunteers, men (n = 19) and women (n = 16), aged between 18 and 55 years were screened and 32 of them were enrolled in the study. After having signed the written informed consent, each subject received a single oral dose of Test or Reference product with 250 mL of natural mineral water, in fasting conditions, interspersed with a 6-day washout period Blood samples were collected up to 36 hours after drug administration: the drug plasma levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters included peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time corresponding to Cmax (tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) or to the last sampling time assessment (AUC0-36), the elimination rate constant (ke), and the terminal half-life (t1/2). Safety was measured by pre- and post-treatment specific biochemical investigations, physical examination, electrocardiogram, occurrence of adverse events, and any information on patients' withdrawal.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratio Test/Reference (90% confidence interval) for levosulpiride was 103.0% (95.8-110.8) for AUC0-36, 103.6% (95.9-111.9) for AUC0-∞, and 104.3% (94.9-114.6) for Cmax. ke and t1/2 were 0.07 (SD: 0.02) and 9 hours (8-12) for both the formulations. Clearance (L/h) was 29.6 (±13.5) and 30.7 (±14.2) for the test and the reference product, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the acceptance criteria required by the drug regulatory agency (European Medicines Agency, EMA) for bioequivalence prescribe limits of 80%-120% for untransformed data and 80%-125% for "ln" transformed data, we can confirm that the 2 formulations are bioequivalent, in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.

Comparison of solvent-wetted and kneaded l-sulpiride-loaded solid dispersions: Powder characterization and in vivo evaluation

The purpose of this study was to compare the powder properties, solubility, dissolution and oral absorption of solvent-wetted (SWSD) and kneaded (KNSD) l-sulpiride-loaded solid dispersions. The SWSD and KNSD were prepared with silicon dioxide, sodium laurylsulfate and D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) using a spray dryer and high shear mixer, respectively. Their powder properties, solubility, dissolution and oral absorption were assessed compared to l-sulpiride powder. The drug in SWSD was in the amorphous state; however, in KNSD, it existed in the crystalline state. The SWSD with a drug/sodium laurylsulphate/TPGS/silicon dioxide ratio of 5/1/2/12 gave the higher drug solubility and dissolution compared to the KNSD with the same composition. The oral absorption of drug in the SWSD was 1.4 fold higher than the KNSD and 3.0 fold higher than the l-sulpiride powder (p<0.05) owing to better solubility and reduced crystallinity. Furthermore, the SWSD at the half dose was bioequivalent of commercial l-sulpiride-loaded product in rats. Thus, the SWSD with more improved oral absorption would be recommended as an alternative for the l-sulpiride-loaded oral administration.

Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms of ABCB1 (MDR1, P-Glycoprotein) on Drug Disposition and Potential Clinical Implications: Update of the Literature

ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1; P-glycoprotein; multidrug resistance protein 1) is an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent efflux transporter located in the plasma membrane of many different cell types. Numerous structurally unrelated compounds, including drugs and environmental toxins, have been identified as substrates. ABCB1 limits the absorption of xenobiotics from the gut lumen, protects sensitive tissues (e.g. the brain, fetus and testes) from xenobiotics and is involved in biliary and renal secretion of its substrates. In recent years, a large number of polymorphisms of the ABCB1 [ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 1] gene have been described. The variants 1236C>T (rs1128503, p.G412G), 2677G>T/A (rs2032582, p.A893S/T) and 3435C>T (rs1045642, p.I1145I) occur at high allele frequencies and create a common haplotype; therefore, they have been most widely studied. This review provides an overview of clinical studies published between 2002 and March 2015. In summary, the effect of ABCB1 variation on P-glycoprotein expression (messenger RNA and protein expression) and/or activity in various tissues (e.g. the liver, gut and heart) appears to be small. Although polymorphisms and haplotypes of ABCB1 have been associated with alterations in drug disposition and drug response, including adverse events with various ABCB1 substrates in different ethnic populations, the results have been majorly conflicting, with limited clinical relevance. Future research activities are warranted, considering a deep-sequencing approach, as well as well-designed clinical studies with appropriate sample sizes to elucidate the impact of rare ABCB1 variants and their potential consequences for effect sizes.

Pharmacokinetics of levosulpiride after single and multiple intramuscular administrations in healthy Chinese volunteers

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of levosulpiride in humans after single and multiple intramuscular injections. Six males and six females received single dose of either 25 mg or 50 mg levosulpiride, or multiple doses of 25 mg every 12 h for 5 consecutive days. In the single 25 mg study, the mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) was 441 ng/mL, the mean area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 36 h (AUC_0–36) was 1724 ng h/mL, and the mean elimination half-life (t_1/2) was 7.0 h. In the single 50 mg study, the mean C_max was 823 ng/mL, the mean AUC_0–36 was 3748 ng·h/mL, and the mean t_1/2 was 6.8 h. After multiple doses of 25 mg levosulpiride, the average plasma concentration (C_av) was 136 ng/mL, the fluctuation index (DF) was 3.60, and the accumulation ratio (R) was 1.2. Levosulpiride injections appeared to be well tolerated by the subjects, and can be used for successive administration.

Impact of drug transporter pharmacogenomics on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability - considerations for drug development

INTRODUCTION

Drug transporter proteins are expressed on the cell membrane, regulating substrate exposure in systemic circulation and/or peripheral tissues. Genetic polymorphism of drug transporter genes encoding these proteins could alter the functional activity and/or protein expression, having effects on absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME), efficacy and adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide the reader with an overview of the pharmacogenetics (PGx) of 12 membrane transporters. The clinical literature is summarized as to the quantitative significance on pharmacokinetics (PK) and implications on pharmacodynamics (PD) and adverse effects, due to transporter influence on intracellular drug concentrations.

EXPERT OPINION

Unlike polymorphisms for cytochrome P450s (CYPs) resulting in large magnitude of PK variation, genetic mutations for membrane transporters are typically less than threefold alteration in systemic PK for drugs with a few exceptions. However, substantially greater changes in intracellular drug levels may result. We are aware of 1880 exome variants in 12 of the best-studied transporters to date, and nearly 40% of these change the amino acid. However, the functional consequences of most of these variants remain to be determined, and have only been empirically evaluated for a handful. To the extent that genetic polymorphisms impact ADME, it is a variable that will contribute to ethnic differences due to substantial frequency differences for the known variants.

Influence of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of risperidone in healthy subjects with CYP2D6*10/*10

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate the combined influence of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 and CYP2D6 genes on risperidone pharmacokinetics.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Seventy-two healthy Korean volunteers receiving a single oral dose of 2 mg risperidone were included in this study.

KEY RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between the ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes for the pharmacokinetic parameters (peak serum concentration) of risperidone and the active moiety (risperidone and its main metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone). There were no significant differences in the area under the serum concentration-time curves of risperidone and the active moiety among the ABCB1 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T genotypes. However, the peak serum concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curves were significantly different among the ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes in CYP2D6*10/*10.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings indicate that polymorphisms of ABCB1 3435C>T in individuals with CYP2D6*10/*10, which has low metabolic activity, could play an important role in the potential adverse effects or toxicity of risperidone.

Functional significance of genetic polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein (MDR1, ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2)

Recent pharmacogenomic/pharmacogenetic (PGx) studies have disclosed important roles for drug transporters in the human body. Changes in the functions of drug transporters due to drug/food interactions or genetic polymorphisms, for example, are associated with large changes in pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of substrate drugs, leading to changes in drug response and side effects. This information is extremely useful not only for drug development but also for individualized treatment. Among drug transporters, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are expressed in most tissues in humans, and play protective roles; reducing drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, enhancing drug elimination into bile and urine, and impeding the entry of drugs into the central nervous system and placenta. In addition to PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) issues, ABC transporters are reported as etiologic and prognostic factors (or biomarkers) for genetic disorders. Although a consensus has not yet been reached, clinical studies have demonstrated that the PGx of ABC transporters influences the overall outcome of pharmacotherapy and contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of certain disorders. This review explains the impact of PGx in ABC transporters in terms of PK/PD, focusing on P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).