1
|
Lacroix A, Proteau-Lemieux M, Côté S, Near J, Hui SC, Edden RA, Lippé S, Çaku A, Corbin F, Lepage JF. Multimodal assessment of the GABA system in patients with fragile-X syndrome and neurofibromatosis of type 1. Neurobiol Dis 2022; 174:105881. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
2
|
Caux-Dedeystère A, Allart E, Morel P, Kreisler A, Derambure P, Devanne H. Late cortical disinhibition in focal hand dystonia. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 54:4712-4720. [PMID: 34061422 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In writer's cramp (WC), a form of focal hand dystonia, cortical GABAergic inhibitory mechanisms are altered and may cause involuntary tonic contractions while writing. The objective of this study was to explore the time course of long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) that involves gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-B transmission and late cortical disinhibition (LCD) (that combines GABA-A and GABA-B mechanisms) in patients with WC and in control subjects. A double pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol was used to evoke LICI and LCD while the subjects either gripped a cylinder between their thumb and index fingers or relaxed all their upper limb muscles. We measured the ratio between primed and unprimed motor evoked potential in the first dorsal interosseous at interstimulus intervals ranging between 60 and 300 ms. Though the cortical silent period was not different between the groups, LICI lasted longer in patients with WC, that is, LCD was delayed for more than 30 ms and reached a higher level. In addition to the alteration of inhibitory mechanism mediated by GABA-B transmission, LCD which probably involves presynaptic inhibition is also modified in patients with WC with possible consequences on the activity of primary motor cortex inhibitory and excitatory circuits which control the hand muscles.caus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Caux-Dedeystère
- ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Univ Littoral Côte d'Opale, Univ Lille, Univ Artois, Calais, France
| | - Etienne Allart
- Rééducation Neurologique Cérébrolésion, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Pierre Swynghedauw, Lille, France.,univ Lille, UMR-S-1172 lilncog, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Morel
- ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Univ Littoral Côte d'Opale, Univ Lille, Univ Artois, Calais, France
| | - Alexandre Kreisler
- Neurologie & Pathologie du Mouvement, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France
| | - Philippe Derambure
- univ Lille, UMR-S-1172 lilncog, Lille, France.,Neurophysiologie Clinique, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France
| | - Hervé Devanne
- ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Univ Littoral Côte d'Opale, Univ Lille, Univ Artois, Calais, France.,Neurophysiologie Clinique, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mooney RA, Ackerley SJ, Rajeswaran DK, Cirillo J, Barber PA, Stinear CM, Byblow WD. The Influence of Primary Motor Cortex Inhibition on Upper Limb Impairment and Function in Chronic Stroke: A Multimodal Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019; 33:130-140. [PMID: 30744527 DOI: 10.1177/1545968319826052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability owing largely to motor impairment and loss of function. After stroke, there may be abnormalities in γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory function within primary motor cortex (M1), which may have implications for residual motor impairment and the potential for functional improvements at the chronic stage. OBJECTIVE To quantify GABA neurotransmission and concentration within ipsilesional and contralesional M1 and determine if they relate to upper limb impairment and function at the chronic stage of stroke. METHODS Twelve chronic stroke patients and 16 age-similar controls were recruited for the study. Upper limb impairment and function were assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale and Action Research Arm Test. Threshold tracking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols were used to examine short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition and late cortical disinhibition. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to evaluate GABA concentration. RESULTS Short-interval intracortical inhibition was similar between patients and controls ( P = .10). Long-interval intracortical inhibition was greater in ipsilesional M1 compared with controls ( P < .001). Patients who did not exhibit late cortical disinhibition in ipsilesional M1 were those with greater upper limb impairment and worse function ( P = .002 and P = .017). GABA concentration was lower within ipsilesional ( P = .009) and contralesional ( P = .021) M1 compared with controls, resulting in an elevated excitation-inhibition ratio for patients. CONCLUSION These findings indicate that ipsilesional and contralesional M1 GABAergic inhibition are altered in this small cohort of chronic stroke patients. Further study is warranted to determine how M1 inhibitory networks might be targeted to improve motor function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John Cirillo
- 1 The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Combined endogenous and exogenous disinhibition of intracortical circuits augments plasticity induction in the human motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1027-1040. [PMID: 30894281 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motor imagery (MI) engages cortical areas in the human brain similar to motor practice. Corticospinal excitability (CSE) is facilitated during but not after MI practice. We hypothesized that lasting CSE changes could be achieved by associatively pairing this endogenous modulation with exogenous stimulation of the same intracortical circuits. METHODS We combined MI with a disinhibition protocol (DIS) targeting intracortical circuits by paired-pulse repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in one main and three subsequent experiments. The follow-up experiments were applied to increase effects, e.g., by individualizing inter-stimulus intervals, adding neuromuscular stimulation and expanding the intervention period. CSE was captured during (online) and after (offline) the interventions via input-output changes and cortical maps of motor evoked potentials. A total of 35 healthy subjects (mean age 26.1 ± 2.6 years, 20 females) participated in this study. RESULTS A short intervention (48 stimuli within ∼90s) increased CSE. This plasticity developed rapidly, was associative (with MIon, but not MIoff or REST) and persisted beyond the intervention period. Follow-up experiments revealed the relevance of individualizing inter-stimulus intervals and of consistent inter-burst periods for online and offline effects, respectively. Expanding this combined MI/DIS intervention to 480 stimuli amplified the sustainability of CSE changes. When concurrent neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied, the plasticity induction was cancelled. CONCLUSIONS This novel associative stimulation protocol augmented plasticity induction in the human motor cortex within a remarkably short period of time and in the absence of active movements. The combination of endogenous and exogenous disinhibition of intracortical circuits may provide a therapeutic backdoor when active movements are no longer possible, e.g., for hand paralysis after stroke.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jordan HT, Stinear CM. Effects of bilateral priming on motor cortex function in healthy adults. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120:2858-2867. [PMID: 30281376 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00472.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral priming is a rehabilitation adjuvant that can improve upper limb motor recovery poststroke. It uses a table-top device to couple the upper limbs together such that active flexion and extension of one wrist leads to passive movement of the opposite wrist in a mirror symmetric pattern. Bilateral priming increases corticomotor excitability (CME) in the primary motor cortex (M1) of the passively driven wrist; however, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this increase remain unclear. This study explored these mechanisms by using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right M1 and recording motor-evoked potentials from the passively driven left extensor carpi radialis of healthy adults. Intracortical measures were recorded before and 5 and 35 min after a single 15-min session of priming. One-millisecond short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, late cortical disinhibition (LCD), and intracortical facilitation were recorded with a posterior-anterior (PA) intracortical current, whereas CME and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) were recorded with both PA and anterior-posterior (AP) currents. CME with PA stimulation was also recorded ~1 h postpriming. PA CME was elevated 35 min postpriming and remained elevated ~1 h postpriming. LCD decreased, and AP SICF increased at both 5 and 35 min postpriming. However, these changes in LCD and AP SICF are unlikely to be the cause of the increased PA CME because of the differing timelines of their effects and AP and PA currents activating separate interneuron circuits. These results suggest that bilateral priming does not increase CME through alterations of the intracortical circuits investigated here. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to measure how bilateral priming modulates corticomotor excitability with posterior-anterior and anterior-posterior intracortical currents, 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition, late cortical disinhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical facilitation. We found corticomotor excitability with a posterior-anterior current increased by 35 min until ~1 h postpriming. Short-interval intracortical facilitation with an anterior-posterior current was greater for at least 35 min postpriming. This provides further insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying bilateral priming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry T Jordan
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand
| | - Cathy M Stinear
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ruddy K, Balsters J, Mantini D, Liu Q, Kassraian-Fard P, Enz N, Mihelj E, Subhash Chander B, Soekadar SR, Wenderoth N. Neural activity related to volitional regulation of cortical excitability. eLife 2018; 7:e40843. [PMID: 30489255 PMCID: PMC6294548 DOI: 10.7554/elife.40843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To date there exists no reliable method to non-invasively upregulate or downregulate the state of the resting human motor system over a large dynamic range. Here we show that an operant conditioning paradigm which provides neurofeedback of the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), enables participants to self-modulate their own brain state. Following training, participants were able to robustly increase (by 83.8%) and decrease (by 30.6%) their MEP amplitudes. This volitional up-versus down-regulation of corticomotor excitability caused an increase of late-cortical disinhibition (LCD), a TMS derived read-out of presynaptic GABAB disinhibition, which was accompanied by an increase of gamma and a decrease of alpha oscillations in the trained hemisphere. This approach paves the way for future investigations into how altered brain state influences motor neurophysiology and recovery of function in a neurorehabilitation context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Ruddy
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
- Institute of NeuroscienceTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Joshua Balsters
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
- Department of PsychologyRoyal Holloway University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Dante Mantini
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
- Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research GroupKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Quanying Liu
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
- Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research GroupKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | | - Nadja Enz
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | - Ernest Mihelj
- Neural Control of Movement LabETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | | | - Surjo R Soekadar
- Applied Neurotechnology LaboratoryUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
- Clinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Center (NWFZ), Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyCharité – University Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bauer PR, de Goede AA, Stern WM, Pawley AD, Chowdhury FA, Helling RM, Bouet R, Kalitzin SN, Visser GH, Sisodiya SM, Rothwell JC, Richardson MP, van Putten MJAM, Sander JW. Long-interval intracortical inhibition as biomarker for epilepsy: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain 2018; 141:409-421. [PMID: 29340584 PMCID: PMC5837684 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cortical excitability, as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electromyography, is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and follow-up of epilepsy. We report on long-interval intracortical inhibition data measured in four different centres in healthy controls (n = 95), subjects with refractory genetic generalized epilepsy (n = 40) and with refractory focal epilepsy (n = 69). Long-interval intracortical inhibition was measured by applying two supra-threshold stimuli with an interstimulus interval of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ms and calculating the ratio between the response to the second (test stimulus) and to the first (conditioning stimulus). In all subjects, the median response ratio showed inhibition at all interstimulus intervals. Using a mixed linear-effects model, we compared the long-interval intracortical inhibition response ratios between the different subject types. We conducted two analyses; one including data from the four centres and one excluding data from Centre 2, as the methods in this centre differed from the others. In the first analysis, we found no differences in long-interval intracortical inhibition between the different subject types. In all subjects, the response ratios at interstimulus intervals 100 and 150 ms showed significantly more inhibition than the response ratios at 50, 200 and 250 ms. Our second analysis showed a significant interaction between interstimulus interval and subject type (P = 0.0003). Post hoc testing showed significant differences between controls and refractory focal epilepsy at interstimulus intervals of 100 ms (P = 0.02) and 200 ms (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between controls and refractory generalized epilepsy groups or between the refractory generalized and focal epilepsy groups. Our results do not support the body of previous work that suggests that long-interval intracortical inhibition is significantly reduced in refractory focal and genetic generalized epilepsy. Results from the second analysis are even in sharper contrast with previous work, showing inhibition in refractory focal epilepsy at 200 ms instead of facilitation previously reported. Methodological differences, especially shorter intervals between the pulse pairs, may have contributed to our inability to reproduce previous findings. Based on our results, we suggest that long-interval intracortical inhibition as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography is unlikely to have clinical use as a biomarker of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prisca R Bauer
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands
| | - Annika A de Goede
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, MIRA – Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - William M Stern
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, SL9 0RJ, UK
| | - Adam D Pawley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Fahmida A Chowdhury
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Robert M Helling
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Romain Bouet
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 - CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bât. 452), 95 Bd Pinel, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Stiliyan N Kalitzin
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerhard H Visser
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands
| | - Sanjay M Sisodiya
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, SL9 0RJ, UK
| | - John C Rothwell
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Mark P Richardson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Michel J A M van Putten
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, MIRA – Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Josemir W Sander
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands
- Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, SL9 0RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mooney RA, Cirillo J, Byblow WD. GABA and primary motor cortex inhibition in young and older adults: a multimodal reliability study. J Neurophysiol 2017; 118:425-433. [PMID: 28424294 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00199.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of healthy aging on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) within primary motor cortex (M1) remain poorly understood. Studies have reported contrasting results, potentially due to limitations with the common assessment technique. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of healthy aging on M1 GABA concentration and neurotransmission using a multimodal approach. Fifteen young and sixteen older adults participated in this study. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to measure M1 GABA concentration. Single-pulse and threshold-tracking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols were used to examine cortical silent period duration, short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), and late cortical disinhibition (LCD). The reliability of TMS measures was examined with intraclass correlation coefficient analyses. SICI at 1 ms was reduced in older adults (15.13 ± 2.59%) compared with young (25.66 ± 1.44%; P = 0.002). However, there was no age-related effect for cortical silent period duration, SICI at 3 ms, LICI, or LCD (all P > 0.66). The intersession reliability of threshold-tracking measures was good to excellent for both young (range 0.75-0.96) and older adults (range 0.88-0.93). Our findings indicate that extrasynaptic inhibition may be reduced with advancing age, whereas GABA concentration and synaptic inhibition are maintained. Furthermore, MRS and threshold-tracking TMS provide valid and reliable assessment of M1 GABA concentration and neurotransmission, respectively, in young and older adults.NEW & NOTEWORTHY γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) in primary motor cortex was assessed in young and older adults using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and threshold-tracking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Older adults exhibited reduced extrasynaptic inhibition (short-interval intracortical inhibition at 1 ms) compared with young, whereas GABA concentration and synaptic inhibition were similar between age groups. We demonstrate that magnetic resonance spectroscopy and threshold-tracking provide valid and reliable assessments of primary motor cortex GABA concentration and neurotransmission, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan A Mooney
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand; and.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John Cirillo
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand; and.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Winston D Byblow
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand; and .,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chong BWX, Stinear CM. Modulation of motor cortex inhibition during motor imagery. J Neurophysiol 2017; 117:1776-1784. [PMID: 28123007 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00549.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) is similar to overt movement, engaging common neural substrates and facilitating the corticomotor pathway; however, it does not result in excitatory descending motor output. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess inhibitory networks in the primary motor cortex via measures of 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and late cortical disinhibition (LCD). These measures are thought to reflect extrasynaptic GABAA tonic inhibition, postsynaptic GABAB inhibition, and presynaptic GABAB disinhibition, respectively. The behavior of 1-ms SICI, LICI, and LCD during MI has not yet been explored. This study aimed to investigate how 1-ms SICI, LICI, and LCD are modulated during MI and voluntary relaxation (VR) of a target muscle. Twenty-five healthy young adults participated. TMS was used to assess nonconditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, 1-ms SICI, 100- (LICI100) and 150-ms LICI, and LCD in the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and right abductor digiti minimi during rest, MI, and VR of the hand. Compared with rest, MEP amplitudes were facilitated in APB during MI. SICI was not affected by task or muscle. LICI100 decreased in both muscles during VR but not MI, whereas LCD was recruited in both muscles during both tasks. This indicates that VR modulates postsynaptic GABAB inhibition, whereas both tasks modulate presynaptic GABAB inhibition in a non-muscle-specific way. This study highlights further neurophysiological parallels between actual and imagined movement, which may extend to voluntary relaxation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to investigate how 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, and late cortical disinhibition are modulated during motor imagery and voluntary muscle relaxation. We present novel findings of decreased 100-ms long-interval intracortical inhibition during voluntary muscle relaxation and increased late cortical disinhibition during both motor imagery and voluntary muscle relaxation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cathy M Stinear
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mooney RA, Coxon JP, Cirillo J, Glenny H, Gant N, Byblow WD. Acute aerobic exercise modulates primary motor cortex inhibition. Exp Brain Res 2016; 234:3669-3676. [PMID: 27590480 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4767-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Aerobic exercise can enhance neuroplasticity although presently the neural mechanisms underpinning these benefits remain unclear. One possible mechanism is through effects on primary motor cortex (M1) function via down-regulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The aim of the present study was to examine how corticomotor excitability (CME) and M1 intracortical inhibition are modulated in response to a single bout of moderate intensity aerobic exercise. Ten healthy right-handed adults were participants. Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over left M1 to obtain motor-evoked potentials in the right flexor pollicis brevis. We examined CME, cortical silent period (SP) duration, short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI, LICI), and late cortical disinhibition (LCD), before and after acute aerobic exercise (exercise session) or an equivalent duration without exercise (control session). Aerobic exercise was performed on a cycle ergometer for 30 min at a workload equivalent to 60 % of maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak; heart rate reserve = 75 ± 3 %, perceived exertion = 13.5 ± 0.7). LICI was reduced at 10 (52 ± 17 %, P = 0.03) and 20 min (27 ± 8 %, P = 0.03) post-exercise compared to baseline (13 ± 4 %). No significant changes in CME, SP duration, SICI or LCD were observed. The present study shows that GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition may be down-regulated after acute aerobic exercise. The potential effects this may have on M1 plasticity remain to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan A Mooney
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James P Coxon
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John Cirillo
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Helen Glenny
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicholas Gant
- Exercise Neurometabolism Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Winston D Byblow
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. .,Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cirillo J, Byblow WD. Threshold tracking primary motor cortex inhibition: the influence of current direction. Eur J Neurosci 2016; 44:2614-2621. [DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John Cirillo
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory; Department of Exercise Sciences and Centre for Brain Research; University of Auckland; Private Bag 92019 Auckland 1142 New Zealand
| | - Winston D. Byblow
- Movement Neuroscience Laboratory; Department of Exercise Sciences and Centre for Brain Research; University of Auckland; Private Bag 92019 Auckland 1142 New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|