Cortical and Subcortical Projections from Granular Insular Cortex Receiving Orofacial Proprioception

Cerebellar Nuclei Receiving Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals through the Mossy Fiber Pathway from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus in Rats

Proprioception from muscle spindles is necessary for motor function executed by the cerebellum. In particular, cerebellar nuclear neurons that receive proprioceptive signals and send projections to the lower brainstem or spinal cord play key roles in motor control. However, little is known about which cerebellar nuclear regions receive orofacial proprioception. Here, we investigated projections to the cerebellar nuclei from the supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5), which conveys the orofacial proprioception arising from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). Injections of an anterograde tracer into the Su5 resulted in a large number of labeled axon terminals bilaterally in the dorsolateral hump (IntDL) of the cerebellar interposed nucleus (Int) and the dorsolateral protuberance (MedDL) of the cerebellar medial nucleus. In addition, a moderate number of axon terminals were ipsilaterally labeled in the vestibular group Y nucleus (group Y). We electrophysiologically detected JCMS proprioceptive signals in the IntDL and MedDL. Retrograde tracing analysis confirmed bilateral projections from the Su5 to the IntDL and MedDL. Furthermore, anterograde tracer injections into the external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives other proprioceptive input from forelimb/neck muscles, resulted in only a limited number of ipsilaterally labeled terminals, mainly in the dorsomedial crest of the Int and the group Y. Taken together, the Su5 and ECu axons almost separately terminated in the cerebellar nuclei (except for partial overlap in the group Y). These data suggest that orofacial proprioception is differently processed in the cerebellar circuits in comparison to other body-part proprioception, thus contributing to the executive function of orofacial motor control.

Sensorimotor regulation of facial expression - An untouched frontier

Facial expression is a critical form of nonverbal social communication which promotes emotional exchange and affiliation among humans. Facial expressions are generated via precise contraction of the facial muscles, guided by sensory feedback. While the neural pathways underlying facial motor control are well characterized in humans and primates, it remains unknown how tactile and proprioceptive information reaches these pathways to guide facial muscle contraction. Thus, despite the importance of facial expressions for social functioning, little is known about how they are generated as a unique sensorimotor behavior. In this review, we highlight current knowledge about sensory feedback from the face and how it is distinct from other body regions. We describe connectivity between the facial sensory and motor brain systems, and call attention to the other brain systems which influence facial expression behavior, including vision, gustation, emotion, and interoception. Finally, we petition for more research on the sensory basis of facial expressions, asserting that incomplete understanding of sensorimotor mechanisms is a barrier to addressing atypical facial expressivity in clinical populations.

Exercise Influences the Brain's Metabolic Response to Chronic Cocaine Exposure in Male Rats

Cocaine use is associated with negative health outcomes: cocaine use disorders, speedballing, and overdose deaths. Currently, treatments for cocaine use disorders and overdose are non-existent when compared to opioid use disorders, and current standard cocaine use disorder treatments have high dropout and recidivism rates. Physical exercise has been shown to attenuate addiction behavior as well as modulate brain activity. This study examined the differential effects of chronic cocaine use between exercised and sedentary rats. The effects of exercise on brain glucose metabolism (BGluM) following chronic cocaine exposure were assessed using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Compared to sedentary animals, exercise decreased metabolism in the SIBF primary somatosensory cortex. Activation occurred in the amygdalopiriform and piriform cortex, trigeminothalamic tract, rhinal and perirhinal cortex, and visual cortex. BGluM changes may help ameliorate various aspects of cocaine abuse and reinstatement. Further investigation is needed into the underlying neuronal circuits involved in BGluM changes and their association with addiction behaviors.

Neuroimaging meta-analysis of brain mechanisms of the association between orofacial pain and mastication

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are characterized by pain and impaired masticatory functions. The Integrated Pain Adaptation Model (IPAM) predicts that alterations in motor activity may be associated with increased pain in some individuals. The IPAM highlights the diversity of patients' responses to orofacial pain and suggests that such diversity is related to the sensorimotor network of the brain. It remains unclear whether the pattern of brain activation reflects the diversity of patients' responses underlying the association between mastication and orofacial pain.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to compare the spatial pattern of brain activation, as the primary outcome of neuroimaging studies, between studies of mastication (i.e. Study 1: mastication of healthy adults) and studies of orofacial pain (i.e. Study 2: muscle pain in healthy adults and Study 3: noxious stimulation of the masticatory system in TMD patients).

METHODS

Neuroimaging meta-analyses were conducted for two groups of studies: (a) mastication of healthy adults (Study 1, 10 studies) and (b) orofacial pain (7 studies), including muscle pain in healthy adults (Study 2) and noxious stimulation of the masticatory system in TMD patients (Study 3). Consistent loci of brain activation were synthesized using Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) with an initial cluster-forming threshold (p < .05) and a threshold of cluster size (p < .05, familywise error-corrected).

RESULTS

The orofacial pain studies have shown consistent activation in pain-related regions, including the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula (AIns). A conjunctional analysis of mastication and orofacial pain studies showed joint activation at the left AIns, the left primary motor cortex and the right primary somatosensory cortex.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analytical evidence suggests that the AIns, as a key region in pain, interoception and salience processing, contributes to the pain-mastication association. These findings reveal an additional neural mechanism of the diversity of patients' responses underlying the association between mastication and orofacial pain.

Attenuated facial movement in depressed women is associated with symptom severity, and nucleus accumbens functional connectivity

It is assumed that mood can be inferred from one's facial expression. While this association may prove to be an objective marker for mood disorders, few studies have explicitly evaluated this linkage. The facial movement responses of women with major depressive disorder (n = 66) and healthy controls (n = 46) under emotional stimuli were recorded using webcam. To boost facial movements, the naturalistic audio-visual stimuli were presented. To assess consistent global patterns across facial movements, scores for facial action units were extracted and projected onto principal component using principal component analysis. The associations of component for facial movements with functional brain circuitry was also investigated. Clusters of mouth movements, such as lip press and stretch, identified by principal component analysis, were attenuated in depressive patients compared to those in healthy controls. This component of facial movements was associated with depressive symptoms, and the strengths of resting brain functional connectivity between nucleus accumbens and both posterior insular cortex and thalamus. The evaluation of facial movements may prove to be a promising quantitative marker for assessing depressive symptoms and their underlying brain circuitry.

Activation of the VpdmVGLUT1-VPM pathway contributes to anxiety-like behaviors induced by malocclusion

Occlusal disharmony has a negative impact on emotion. The mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Vme) neurons are the primary afferent nuclei that convey proprioceptive information from proprioceptors and low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament and jaw muscles in the cranio-oro-facial regions. The dorsomedial part of the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus (Vpdm) and the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) of thalamus have been proven to be crucial relay stations in ascending pathway of proprioception. The VPM sends numerous projections to primary somatosensory areas (SI), which modulate emotion processing. The present study aimed to demonstrate the ascending trigeminal-thalamic-cortex pathway which would mediate malocclusion-induced negative emotion. Unilateral anterior crossbite (UAC) model created by disturbing the dental occlusion was applied. Tract-tracing techniques were used to identify the existence of Vme-Vpdm-VPM pathway and Vpdm-VPM-SI pathway. Chemogenetic and optogenetic methods were taken to modulate the activation of Vpdm^VGLUT1 neurons and the Vpdm-VPM pathway. Morphological evidence indicated the involvement of the Vme-Vpdm-VPM pathway, Vpdm-VPM-SI pathway and Vpdm^VGLUT1-VPM pathway in orofacial proprioception in wild-type mice and vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (^VGLUT1): tdTomato mice, respectively. Furthermore, chemogenetic inhibition of Vpdm^VGLUT1 neurons and the Vpdm-VPM pathway alleviated anxiety-like behaviors in a unilateral anterior crossbite (UAC) model, whereas chemogenetic activation induced anxiety-like behaviors in controls and did not aggravate these behaviors in UAC mice. Finally, optogenetic inhibition of the Vpdm^VGLUT1-VPM pathway in VGLUT1-IRES-Cre mice reversed UAC-induced anxiety comorbidity. In conclusion, these results suggest that the Vpdm^VGLUT1-VPM neural pathway participates in the modulation of malocclusion-induced anxiety comorbidity. These findings provide new insights into the links between occlusion and emotion and deepen our understanding of the impact of occlusal disharmony on brain dysfunction.

Exercise Modulates Brain Glucose Utilization Response to Acute Cocaine

Exercise, a proven method of boosting health and wellness, is thought to act as a protective factor against many neurological and psychological diseases. Recent studies on exercise and drug exposure have pinpointed some of the neurological mechanisms that may characterize this protective factor. Using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging techniques and the glucose analog [¹⁸F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG), our team sought to identify how chronic aerobic exercise modulates brain glucose metabolism (BGluM) after drug-naïve rats were exposed to an acute dose of cocaine. Using sedentary rats as a control group, we observed significant differences in regional BGluM. Chronic treadmill exercise treatment coupled with acute cocaine exposure induced responses in BGluM activity in the following brain regions: postsubiculum (Post), parasubiculum (PaS), granular and dysgranular insular cortex (GI and DI, respectively), substantia nigra reticular (SNR) and compact part dorsal tier (SNCD), temporal association cortex (TeA), entopenduncular nucleus (EP), and crus 1 of the ansiform lobule (crus 1). Inhibition, characterized by decreased responses due to our exercise, was found in the ventral endopiriform nucleus (VEn). These areas are associated with memory and various motor functions. They also include and share connections with densely dopaminergic areas of the mesolimbic system. In conclusion, these findings suggest that treadmill exercise in rats mediates brain glucose response to an acute dose of cocaine differently as compared to sedentary rats. The modulated brain glucose utilization occurs in brain regions responsible for memory and association, spatial navigation, and motor control as well as corticomesolimbic regions related to reward, emotion, and movement.

The Cerebellar Cortex Receives Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus via the Mossy Fiber Pathway in Rats

Proprioceptive sensory information from muscle spindles is essential for the regulation of motor functions. However, little is known about the motor control regions in the cerebellar cortex that receive proprioceptive signals from muscle spindles distributed throughout the body, including the orofacial muscles. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the pattern of projections in the rat cerebellar cortex derived from the supratrigeminal nucleus (Su5), which conveys orofacial proprioceptive information from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). Injections of an anterograde tracer into the Su5 revealed that many bilateral axon terminals (rosettes) were distributed in the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex (including the simple lobule B, crus II and flocculus) in a various sized, multiple patchy pattern. We could also detect JCMS proprioceptive signals in these cerebellar cortical regions, revealing for the first time that they receive muscle proprioceptive inputs in rats. Retrograde tracer injections confirmed that the Su5 directly sends outputs to the cerebellar cortical areas. Furthermore, we injected an anterograde tracer into the external cuneate nucleus (ECu), which receives proprioceptive signals from the forelimb and neck muscle spindles, to distinguish between the Su5- and ECu-derived projections in the cerebellar cortex. The labeled terminals from the ECu were distributed predominantly in the vermis of the cerebellar cortex. Almost no overlap was seen in the terminal distributions of the Su5 and ECu projections. Our findings demonstrate that the rat cerebellar cortex receives orofacial proprioceptive input that is processed differently from the proprioceptive signals from the other regions of the body.

Orofacial musculoskeletal pain: An evidence-based bio-psycho-social matrix model

Pain is a multidimensional experience comprising sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions. Clinical and research findings have demonstrated a complex interplay between social burdens, individual coping strategies, mood states, psychological disorders, sleep disturbances, masticatory muscle tone, and orofacial musculoskeletal pain. Accordingly, current classification systems for orofacial pain require psychosocial assessments to be an integral part of the multidimensional diagnostic process. Here, we review evidence on how psychosocial and biological factors may generate and perpetuate musculoskeletal orofacial pain. Specifically, we discuss studies investigating a putative causal relationship between stress, bruxism, and pain in the masticatory system. We present findings that attribute brain structures various roles in modulating pain perception and pain-related behavior. We also examine studies investigating how the nervous and immune system on cellular and molecular levels may account for orofacial nociceptive signaling. Furthermore, we review evidence pointing towards associations between orofacial musculoskeletal pain and neuroendocrine imbalances, sleep disturbances, and alterations of the circadian timing system. We conclude with several proposals that may help to alleviate orofacial pain in the future.

Widespread corticopetal projections from the oval paracentral nucleus of the intralaminar thalamic nuclei conveying orofacial proprioception in rats

The oval paracentral nucleus (OPC) was initially isolated from the paracentral nucleus (PC) within the intralaminar thalamic nuclei in rats. We have recently shown that the rat OPC receives proprioceptive inputs from jaw-closing muscle spindles (JCMSs). However, it remains unknown which cortical areas receive thalamic inputs from the OPC, and whether the cortical areas receiving the OPC inputs are distinct from those receiving inputs from the other intralaminar nuclei and sensory thalamic nuclei. To address this issue, we injected an anterograde tracer, biotinylated dextranamine (BDA), into the OPC, which was electrophysiologically identified by recording of proprioceptive inputs from the JCMSs. Many BDA-labeled axonal fibers and terminals from the OPC were ipsilaterally observed in the rostral and rostroventral regions of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), the rostral region of the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), and the most rostrocaudal levels of the granular insular cortex (GI). In contrast, a BDA injection into the caudal PC, which was located slightly rostral to the OPC, resulted in ipsilateral labeling of axonal fibers and terminals in the rostrolateral region of the medial agranular cortex and the rostromedial region of the lateral agranular cortex. Furthermore, injections of a retrograde tracer, Fluorogold, into these S1, S2, and GI regions, resulted in preferential labeling of neurons in the ipsilateral OPC among the intralaminar and sensory thalamic nuclei. These findings reveal that the rat OPC has widespread, but strong corticopetal projections, indicating that there exist divergent corticopetal pathways from the intralaminar thalamic nucleus, which process JCMS proprioceptive sensation.

Ascending projection of jaw-closing muscle-proprioception to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei in rats

An invasive intralaminar thalamic stimulation and a non-invasive application of oral splint are both effective in treating tic symptoms of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). Therefore, these two treatments may exert some influence on the same brain region in TS patients. We thus hypothesized that the proprioceptive input arising from the muscle spindles of jaw-closing muscles (JCMSs), known to be increased by the application of oral splint, is transmitted to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei. To test this issue, we morphologically and electrophysiologically examined the thalamic projections of proprioceptive input from the JCMSs to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei of rats. We first injected an anterograde tracer, biotinylated dextranamine, into the electrophysiologically identified supratrigeminal nucleus, which is known to receive proprioceptive inputs from the JCMSs via the trigeminal mesencephalic neurons. A moderate number of biotinylated dextranamine-labeled axon terminals were bilaterally distributed in the oval paracentral nucleus (OPC) of the intralaminar thalamic nuclei. We also detected electrophysiological responses to the electrical stimulation of bilateral masseter nerves and to sustained jaw-opening in the OPC. After injection of retrograde tracer (cholera toxin B subunit or Fluorogold) into the OPC, neuronal cell bodies were retrogradely labeled in the rostrodorsal portion of the bilateral supratrigeminal nucleus. Here, we show that proprioceptive inputs from the JCMSs are conveyed to the OPC in the intralaminar nuclei via the supratrigeminal nucleus. This study can help to understand previously unrecognized pathways of proprioception ascending inputs from the brainstem to the thalamus, which may contribute to treatments of TS patients.