1
|
A link between agrin signalling and Ca v3.2 at the neuromuscular junction in spinal muscular atrophy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18960. [PMID: 36347955 PMCID: PMC9643518 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23703-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
SMN protein deficiency causes motoneuron disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). SMN-based therapies improve patient motor symptoms to variable degrees. An early hallmark of SMA is the perturbation of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a synapse between a motoneuron and muscle cell. NMJ formation depends on acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clustering triggered by agrin and its co-receptors lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) and transmembrane muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) signalling pathway. We have previously shown that flunarizine improves NMJs in SMA model mice, but the mechanisms remain elusive. We show here that flunarizine promotes AChR clustering in cell-autonomous, dose- and agrin-dependent manners in C2C12 myotubes. This is associated with an increase in protein levels of LRP4, integrin-beta-1 and alpha-dystroglycan, three agrin co-receptors. Furthermore, flunarizine enhances MuSK interaction with integrin-beta-1 and phosphotyrosines. Moreover, the drug acts on the expression and splicing of Agrn and Cacna1h genes in a muscle-specific manner. We reveal that the Cacna1h encoded protein Cav3.2 closely associates in vitro with the agrin co-receptor LRP4. In vivo, it is enriched nearby NMJs during neonatal development and the drug increases this immunolabelling in SMA muscles. Thus, flunarizine modulates key players of the NMJ and identifies Cav3.2 as a new protein involved in the NMJ biology.
Collapse
|
2
|
DePew AT, Mosca TJ. Conservation and Innovation: Versatile Roles for LRP4 in Nervous System Development. J Dev Biol 2021; 9:9. [PMID: 33799485 PMCID: PMC8006230 DOI: 10.3390/jdb9010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As the nervous system develops, connections between neurons must form to enable efficient communication. This complex process of synaptic development requires the coordination of a series of intricate mechanisms between partner neurons to ensure pre- and postsynaptic differentiation. Many of these mechanisms employ transsynaptic signaling via essential secreted factors and cell surface receptors to promote each step of synaptic development. One such cell surface receptor, LRP4, has emerged as a synaptic organizer, playing a critical role in conveying extracellular signals to initiate diverse intracellular events during development. To date, LRP4 is largely known for its role in development of the mammalian neuromuscular junction, where it functions as a receptor for the synaptogenic signal Agrin to regulate synapse development. Recently however, LRP4 has emerged as a synapse organizer in the brain, where new functions for the protein continue to arise, adding further complexity to its already versatile roles. Additional findings indicate that LRP4 plays a role in disorders of the nervous system, including myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease, demonstrating the need for further study to understand disease etiology. This review will highlight our current knowledge of how LRP4 functions in the nervous system, focusing on the diverse developmental roles and different modes this essential cell surface protein uses to ensure the formation of robust synaptic connections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy J. Mosca
- Department of Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yan M, Guo A, Chen P, Jing H, Ren D, Zhong Y, Wu Y, Fei E, Lai X, Zou S, Wang S. LRP4 LDLα repeats of astrocyte enhance dendrite arborization of the neuron. Mol Brain 2020; 13:166. [PMID: 33302985 PMCID: PMC7730773 DOI: 10.1186/s13041-020-00708-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) is essential for inducing the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) formation in muscle fibers, and LRP4 plays a critical role in dendritic development and synaptogenesis in the central nervous system (CNS). As a single transmembrane protein, LRP4 contains an enormously sizeable extracellular domain (ECD), containing multiple LDLα repeats in the N-terminal of ECD. LRP4 only with extracellular domain acts as a similar mechanism of full-length LRP4 in muscles to stimulate acetylcholine receptor clustering. In this study, we elucidated that LDLα repeats of LRP4 maintained the body weight and survival rate. Dendritic branches of the pyramidal neurons in Lrp4-null mice with LRP4 LDLα repeats residue were more than in Lrp4-null mice without residual LRP4 domain. Supplement with conditioned medium from LRP4 LDLα overexpression cells, the primary culture pyramidal neurons achieved strong dendritic arborization ability. Besides, astrocytes with LRP4 LDLα repeats residue could promote pyramidal neuronal dendrite arborization in the primary co-cultured system. These observations signify that LRP4 LDLα repeats play a prominent underlying role in dendrite arborization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Yan
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Amin Guo
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Peng Chen
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hongyang Jing
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Dongyan Ren
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yanzi Zhong
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yongqiang Wu
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Erkang Fei
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xinsheng Lai
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Suqi Zou
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Shunqi Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. .,Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|