Online Effects of Beta-tACS Over the Left Prefrontal Cortex on Phonological Decisions

Effects of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation on balance and gait in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates cortical oscillations and influences behavior.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the effects of cerebellar theta (5 Hz) and gamma (50 Hz) tACS on human balance and gait through kinematic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen right-handed healthy subjects participated in three randomized motor tasks: postural standing (PS), gait initiation (GI), and gait cycle (GC). Participants underwent theta-, gamma-, or sham-tACS over the cerebellum while kinematic data were collected using a force platform and an 8-camera optoelectronic system.

RESULTS

Theta-tACS significantly influenced motor behavior during PS and GC, but not GI. Specifically, it reduced the Maximum Radius, Total Trace Length, Longitudinal Range, and Area during PS, and decreased Stride Width during GC. In contrast, cerebellar gamma-tACS had no significant effect on any kinematic parameters across the tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebellar theta-tACS may enhance postural stability and gait control in healthy individuals. We hypothesize that theta-tACS may entrain theta-resonant neurons in the cerebellar cortex, affecting motor control networks involved in balance and gait.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study highlights tACS's potential as a non-invasive treatment for balance and gait disorders associated with cerebellar dysfunction.

High-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation matching individual frequency of somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations can modulate the somatosensory system through thalamocortical pathway

tACS (transcranial alternating current stimulation) is a technique for modulating brain activity through electrical current. Its effects depend on cortical entrainment, which is most effective when transcranial alternating current stimulation matches the brain's natural rhythm. High-frequency oscillations produced by external stimuli are useful for studying the somatosensory pathway. Our study aims to explore transcranial alternating current stimulation's impact on the somatosensory system when synchronized with individual high-frequency oscillation frequencies. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled study with 14 healthy participants. The study had three phases: Individualized transcranial alternating current stimulation (matching the individual's high-frequency oscillation rhythm), Standard transcranial alternating current stimulation (600 Hz), and sham stimulation. We measured early and late HFO components after median nerve electrical stimulation at three time points: before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 10 min after transcranial alternating current stimulation (T2). Compared to Sham and Standard stimulation Individualized transcranial alternating current stimulation significantly enhanced high-frequency oscillations, especially the early component, immediately after stimulation and for at least 15 min. No other effects were observed for other high-frequency oscillation measures. In summary, our study provides initial evidence that transcranial alternating current stimulation synchronized with an individual's high-frequency oscillation frequency can precisely and time-specifically modulate thalamocortical activity. These insights may pave the way for innovative, personalized neuromodulation methods for the somatosensory system.

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Multiple Effects on Cognition

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are widely used tools for the study and rehabilitation of cognitive functions. Different NIBS approaches aim to enhance or impair different cognitive processes. The methodological focus for achieving this has been on stimulation protocols that are considered either inhibitory or facilitatory. However, despite more than three decades of use, their application is based on incomplete and overly simplistic conceptualizations of mechanisms of action. Such misconception limits the usefulness of these approaches in the basic science and clinical domains. In this review, we challenge this view by arguing that stimulation protocols themselves are neither inhibitory nor facilitatory. Instead, we suggest that all induced effects reflect complex interactions of internal and external factors. Given these considerations, we present a novel model in which we conceptualize NIBS effects as an interaction between brain activity and the characteristics of the external stimulus. This interactive model can explain various phenomena in the brain stimulation literature that have been considered unexpected or paradoxical. We argue that these effects no longer seem paradoxical when considered from the viewpoint of state dependency.

Effects of θ High Definition-Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex on the Dominance of Attention Focus in Standing Postural Control

Attention focus affects performance in postural control while standing, and it is divided into internal focus (IF) and external focus (EF). Each individual has a predominant attention focus, and research has revealed that the dominance of attention focus may be an acquired trait. However, the impact of non-invasive brain stimulation on attention-focus dominance remains unexplored in the current literature. Here, we examined the effect of high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) on θ waves in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) on standing postural control tasks in an EF condition for IF- and EF-dominant groups. The effect of θ HD-tACS on the ACC differed between IF- and EF-dominant groups, and θ HD-tACS in the IF-dominant group decreased the performance of standing postural control under the EF condition. The forced activation of the ACC with θ HD-tACS may have conversely reduced the activity of brain regions normally activated by the IF-dominant group. Additionally, the activation of ACC prioritized visual information processing and suppressed the superficial sensory processing that is normally potentially prioritized by the IF-dominant group. These results highlight the importance of changing the type of rehabilitation and sports training tasks to account for the individual's dominance of attention focus.

Offline 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation over the right inferior frontal gyrus increases theta activity during a motor response inhibition task

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) play an important role in motor inhibitory control. The aim of the study was to use theta frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to modulate brain activity in the rIFG and preSMA and to test the effects of stimulation using a motor response inhibition task.

METHODS

In four sessions, 20 healthy participants received tACS at 6 Hz over preSMA or rIFG, or 20 Hz over rIFG (to test frequency specificity), or sham stimulation before task processing. After each type of stimulation, the participants performed the Go/NoGo task with simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) recording.

RESULTS

By stimulating rIFG and preSMA with 6 Hz tACS, we were not able to modulate either behavioral performance nor the EEG correlate. Interestingly, 20 Hz tACS over the rIFG significantly increased theta activity, however without behavioral effects. This increased theta activity did not coincide with the stimulation area and was localized in the fronto-central and centro-parietal areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of a control frequency is crucial to test for frequency specificity. Our findings are in accordance with previous studies showing that after effects of tACS are not restricted to the stimulation frequency but can also occur in other frequency bands.

The left inferior frontal gyrus is causally linked to vocal feedback control: evidence from high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation

Current models of speech motor control propose a role for the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in feedforward control of speech production. There is evidence, however, that has implicated the functional relevance of the left IFG for the neuromotor processing of vocal feedback errors. The present event-related potential (ERP) study examined whether the left IFG is causally linked to auditory feedback control of vocal production with high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS). After receiving active or sham HD-tACS over the left IFG at 6 or 70 Hz, 20 healthy adults vocalized the vowel sounds while hearing their voice unexpectedly pitch-shifted by ±200 cents. The results showed that 6 or 70 Hz HD-tACS over the left IFG led to larger magnitudes and longer latencies of vocal compensations for pitch perturbations paralleled by larger ERP P2 responses than sham HD-tACS. Moreover, there was a lack of frequency specificity that showed no significant differences between 6 and 70 Hz HD-tACS. These findings provide first causal evidence linking the left IFG to vocal pitch regulation, suggesting that the left IFG is an important part of the feedback control network that mediates vocal compensations for auditory feedback errors.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates cortical processing of somatosensory information in a frequency- and time-specific manner

Neural oscillations can be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). However, direct evidence of tACS effects at the cortical level in humans is still limited. In a tACS-electroencephalography co-registration setup, we investigated the ability of tACS to modulate cortical somatosensory information processing as assessed by somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). To better elucidate the neural substrates of possible tACS effects we also recorded peripheral and spinal SEPs components, high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), and long-latency reflexes (LLRs). Finally, we studied whether changes were limited to the stimulation period or persisted thereafter. SEPs, HFOs, and LLRs were recorded during tACS applied at individual mu and beta frequencies and at the theta frequency over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Sham-tACS was used as a control condition. In a separate experiment, we assessed the time course of mu-tACS effects by recording SEPs before (T0), during (T1), and 1 min (T2) and 10 min (T3) after stimulation. Mu-tACS increased the amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs compared to both sham and theta-tACS. No differences were found between sham, beta-, and theta-tACS conditions. Also, peripheral and spinal SEPs, P25, HFOs, and LLRs did not change during tACS. Finally, mu-tACS-induced modulation of N20 amplitude specifically occurred during stimulation (T1) and vanished afterwards (i.e., at T2 and T3). Our findings suggest that TACS applied at the individual mu frequency is able to modulate early somatosensory information processing at the S1 level and the effect is limited to the stimulation period.

Brain Circuits Involved in the Development of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence From Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

It has been well-documented that the brain changes in states of chronic pain. Less is known about changes in the brain that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain. Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests a shift from brain regions involved in nociceptive processing to corticostriatal brain regions that are instrumental in the processing of reward and emotional learning in the transition to the chronic state. In addition, dysfunction in descending pain modulatory circuits encompassing the periaqueductal gray and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex may also be a key risk factor for pain chronicity. Although longitudinal imaging studies have revealed potential predictors of pain chronicity, their causal role has not yet been determined. Here we review evidence from studies that involve non-invasive brain stimulation to elucidate to what extent they may help to elucidate the brain circuits involved in pain chronicity. Especially, we focus on studies using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques [e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), particularly its repetitive form (rTMS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)] in the context of musculoskeletal pain chronicity. We focus on the role of the motor cortex because of its known contribution to sensory components of pain via thalamic inhibition, and the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex because of its role on cognitive and affective processing of pain. We will also discuss findings from studies using experimentally induced prolonged pain and studies implicating the DLPFC, which may shed light on the earliest transition phase to chronicity. We propose that combined brain stimulation and imaging studies might further advance mechanistic models of the chronicity process and involved brain circuits. Implications and challenges for translating the research on mechanistic models of the development of chronic pain to clinical practice will also be addressed.