Motor Unit Recruitment is Altered When Acute Experimental Pain is Induced at a Site Distant to the Contracting Muscle

The effect of trunk position and pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trunk position and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies. Nineteen healthy participants (10 men and 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 yr, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions (neutral, 45°, and 90° trunk flexion) and under three conditions (no pain, caudal pain, and cranial pain). Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain condition on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side (P < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with the no pain condition on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistribution of lumbar extensor muscles were observed in different trunk positions, potentially due to changes in their mechanical advantage. The results complement the current pain-adaptation theory by illustrating individual spatial redistributions of activation within lumbar extensor muscles during pain. The study found no clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation.

Exercise-induced pain within endurance exercise settings: Definitions, measurement, mechanisms and potential interventions

Pain can be defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with or resembling that associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Though consistent with this definition, different types of pain result in different behavioural and psychophysiological responses. For example, the transient, non-threatening, acute muscle pain element of exercise-induced pain (EIP) is entirely different from other pain types like delayed onset muscle soreness, muscular injury or chronic pain. However, studies often conflate the definitions or assume parity between distinct pain types. Consequently, the mechanisms through which pain might impact exercise behaviour across different pain subcategories may be incorrectly assumed, which could lead to interventions or recommendations that are inappropriate. Therefore, this review aims to distinguish EIP from other subcategories of pain according to their aetiologies and characteristics, thereby providing an updated conceptual and operational definition of EIP. Secondly, the review will discuss the experimental pain models currently used across several research domains and their relevance to EIP with a focus on the neuro-psychophysiological mechanisms of EIP and its effect on exercise behaviour and performance. Finally, the review will examine potential interventions to cope with the impact of EIP and support wider exercise benefits. HIGHLIGHTS: What is the topic of this review? Considerations for future research focusing on exercise-induced pain within endurance exercise settings. What advances does it highlight? An updated appraisal and guide of research concerning exercise-induced pain and its impact on endurance task behaviour, particularly with reference to the aetiology, measurement, and manipulation of exercise-induced pain.

Ultrasound-guided gluteal nerves electrical stimulation to enhance strength and power in individuals with chronic knee pain: a randomized controlled pilot trial

Introduction

Various pathophysiological contexts can be accompanied by weakness, arthrogenic muscle inhibition, and even disability. In this scenario, peripheral nerve stimulation has been studied not only for pain management but also for the improvement of neuromuscular parameters. For this purpose, the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) has typically been investigated, but recently, the use of ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (pPNS) has gained popularity. In this regard, electrical stimulation has a predisposition to activate Type II muscle fibers and has been shown to be capable of generating short-term potentiation by increasing calcium sensitivity. However, the evidence of pPNS applied in humans investigating such variables is rather limited.

Objectives

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of the methodology and explore the potential of pPNS in enhancing hip extension performance in individuals suffering from knee pain, comparing it with TENS.

Methods

Twelve participants were divided into pPNS and TENS groups, undergoing pre- and post-intervention assessments of peak concentric power (W), strength (N), execution speed (m/s), and one-repetition maximum (1RM) (kg) estimation. For pPNS, two needles were positioned adjacent to the superior and inferior gluteal nerves under ultrasound guidance. For TENS, electrodes were positioned between the posterosuperior iliac spine and the ischial tuberosity, and halfway between the posterosuperior iliac spine and the greater trochanter. The interventions consisted of 10 stimulations of 10 s at a frequency of 10 Hz with a pulse width of 240 μs, with rest intervals of 10 s between stimulations.

Results

Peripheral nerve stimulation significantly improved concentric power at 30% (p = 0.03) and 50% (p = 0.03) of 1RM, surpassing TENS, which showed minimal changes. No significant strength differences were observed post-intervention in either group.

Conclusion

This work presents evidence where pPNS applied to the gluteal nerves results in an enhanced performance of hip extension at submaximal loads. However, this improvement does not seem to be reflected in short-term changes in the estimation of the 1RM by the force-velocity profile.

The Strategy of the Brain to Maintain the Force Production in Painful Contractions-A Motor Units Pool Reorganization

A common symptom in neuromuscular diseases is pain, which changes human movement in many ways. Using the decomposed electromyographic signal, we investigate the strategy of the brain in recruiting different pools of motor units (MUs) to produce torque during induced muscle pain in terms of firing rate (FR), recruitment threshold (RT) and action potential amplitude (MUAP_AMP). These properties were used to define two groups (G1/G2) based on a K-means clusterization method. A 2.0 mL intramuscular hypertonic (6%) or isotonic (0.9%) saline solution was injected to induce pain or act as a placebo during isometric and isokinetic knee extension contractions. While isometric torque decreases after pain induction with hypertonic solution, this does not occur in isokinetic torque. This occurs because the MUs re-organized after the injection of both solutions. This is supported by an increase in RT, in both G1 and G2 MUs. However, when inducing pain with the hypertonic solution, RT increase is exacerbated. In this condition, FR also decreases, while MUAP_AMP increases only for G1 MUs. Therefore, this study proposes that the strategy for maintaining force production during pain is to recruit MUs with higher RT and MUAP_AMP.