Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

The influence of hemorrhage presentation on clinical outcomes of curative embolisation in 125 cerebellar arteriovenous malformations

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the influence of periprocedural hemorrhage and clinical outcomes with an endovascular therapeutic strategy for cerebellar arteriovenous malformations (cAVMs).

METHODS

From December 2006 to January 2018, 125 cAVMs were classified as types I-IV and received endovascular embolization via Onyx or Glubran 2. The risk factors of hemorrhage were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic analyses. A modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate the neurological function before and 1 year after the operation. Results Of 125 patients, 63 had type I cAVMs, 2 type II cAVMs, 48 type III cAVMs, and 12 type IV cAVMs. A total of 88 (70.4%) patients had clinical manifestations of intracranial hemorrhage. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR, 2.276; 95% CI, 1.132 - 5.663), flow-related aneurysm (OR, 2.845; 95% CI, 1.265 - 6.248), lesion size (OR, 3.005; 95% CI, 1.119 - 5.936), and the number of feeding arteries (OR, 0.105; 95% CI, 0.081 - 0.312) were still the significant independent risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage. During a 1-year follow-up, 109 patients (87.2%) had good outcomes (mRS 0 - 2), 12 patients (9.6%) had poor outcomes (mRS 3 - 4), 4 patients (3.2%) died, and 3 patients had intracranial hemorrhage due to the incomplete embolization of cAVMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular embolization is a feasible treatment for cAVMs. Age, flow-related aneurysm, lesion size, and the number of feeding arteries are the significant risk factors of periprocedural hemorrhage. Moreover, the lesion characteristics must be given full consideration when using Onyx or Glubran 2 before cAVMs embolization.

Case Study of a Complex Neurovascular Disorder: Choroidal Arteriovenous Malformation

This study conducts an in-depth analysis of the management of a complex arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in a 44-year-old individual, who initially manifested with acute left hemiparesis and progressively declined into a comatose state. Diagnostic neuroimaging identified a substantial right fronto-temporal intraparenchymal hematoma via a CT scan. Cerebral angiography further elucidated a choroidal AVM originating from the anterior choroidal artery, accompanied by intranidal aneurysms. The elected treatment strategy was the surgical excision of the AVM. The procedure achieved complete removal of the intracranial AVM, situated in a neurologically sensitive region, leading to notable neurological recovery. This study thoroughly explores and critically evaluates a wide spectrum of treatment approaches for intracranial arteriovenous malformations, including novel endovascular therapies. Despite extensive discourse on AVM in contemporary literature, this report is among the few documenting the treatment of a choroidal AVM via a microsurgical technique, and highlights various therapeutic options.

A case of brain arteriovenous malformation treated by high-pressure cooker technique assisted with anhydrous alcohol embolization: A case report

RATIONALE

Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) are a relatively rare but very dangerous developmental abnormality of the blood vessels. Intracranial hemorrhage is the most common clinical manifestation of BAVMs, and has a high rate of rebleeding, disability, and mortality, which has a serious impact on patients' quality of life and working ability. Endovascular intervention was a new technique that emerged in recent years. Anhydrous ethanol embolization has been used with satisfactory results in the treatment of peripheral arteriovenous malformations, but there is a lack of practice in the treatment of BAVMs. We tried to treat BAVMs by embolizing malformed vessels with anhydrous alcohol in order to provide a safe and effective treatment for more patients with BAVMs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was admitted to our hospital in the emergency department with "sudden onset of headache for more than 4 hours." At the time of admission, the patient was clearly conscious, not mentally alert, spoke fluently, and had a normal level of orientations. The direct and indirect responses to light were blunted. The patient's muscle strength, muscle tone, and sensation of the extremities were normal. National Institute of Health stroke scale score was 1. Head computed tomography at the onset suggested a right occipital hemorrhage and hematoma formation.

DIAGNOSES

Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) were suspected based on preoperative imaging findings.

INTERVENTIONS

After obtaining the consent of the patient and their family members, we performed whole brain angiography to determine the location of the lesion, and then, with the help of high-pressure cooker technology, targeted embolization of interventional BAVM was performed. The high-pressure cooker technology was achieved through spring coils, and the embolic material was anhydrous ethanol.

OUTCOMES

The surgery was successful, and the patient recovered well without recurrence.

LESSON

The successful performance of this surgery illustrates the feasibility of anhydrous ethanol-targeted ablation for BAVMs.

Microsurgery versus Microsurgery With Preoperative Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative embolization has traditionally been regarded as a safe and effective adjunct to microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM). However, there is currently no high-level evidence to ascertain this presumption.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of microsurgery (MS) vs microsurgery with preoperative embolization (E + MS) in patients with bAVM through systematic review.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was bAVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative bleeding (mL), complications, worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality. The pooled proportions of outcomes were calculated through the logit transformation method. The odds ratio (OR) of categorical data and mean difference of continuous data were estimated through the Mantel-Haenszel and the inverse variance methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight patients were treated by microsurgery alone, and 1088 were treated by microsurgery with preoperative embolization, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in AVM obliteration (94.1% vs 95.6%, OR = 1.15 [0.63-2.11], P = .65), mortality (1.7% vs 2%, OR = 0.88 [0.30-2.58], P = .82), procedural complications (18.2% vs 27.2%, OR = 0.47 [0.19-1.17], P = .10), worsened mRS (21.2% vs 18.5%, OR = 1.08 [0.33-3.54], P = .9), and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = 182.89 [-87.76, 453.55], P = .19).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in AVM obliteration, mortality, complications, worse mRS, and intraoperative blood loss between MS and E + MS groups. For AVMs where MS alone has acceptable results, it is reasonable to bypass unnecessary preoperative embolization given higher postoperative complication risk.

Radiosurgery as a microsurgical adjunct: outcomes after microsurgical resection of intracranial arteriovenous malformations previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Microsurgical resection of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be aided by staged treatment consisting of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by resection in a delayed fashion. This approach is particularly useful for high Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade lesions because radiosurgery can reduce flow through the AVM, downgrade the SM rating, and induce histopathological changes that additively render the AVM more manageable for resection. The authors present their 28-year experience in managing AVMs with adjunctive radiosurgery followed by resection.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated for cerebral AVMs at their institution between January 1990 and August 2019. All patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (with or without embolization), followed by resection, were included in the study. Of 1245 patients, 95 met the eligibility criteria. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess relationships between key variables and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The majority of lesions treated (53.9%) were high grade (SM grade IV-V), 31.5% were intermediate (SM grade III), and 16.6% were low grade (SM grade I-II). Hemorrhage was the initial presenting sign in half of all patients (49.5%). Complete resection was achieved among 84% of patients, whereas 16% had partial resection, the majority of whom received additional radiosurgery. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 were achieved in 79.8% of patients, and 20.2% had poor (mRS scores 3-6) outcomes. Improved (44.8%) or stable (19%) mRS scores were observed among 63.8% of patients, whereas 36.2% had a decline in mRS scores. This includes 22 patients (23.4%) with AVM hemorrhage and 6 deaths (6.7%) outside the perioperative period but prior to AVM obliteration.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a useful adjunct in the presurgical management of cerebral AVMs. Multimodal therapy allowed for high rates of AVM obliteration and acceptable morbidity rates, despite the predominance of high-grade lesions in this series of patients.

Association between draining vein diameters and intracranial arteriovenous malformation hemorrhage: a multicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE

Intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) cause hemorrhage, and the role of draining vein diameters in rupture risk is controversial. The aims of the present study were to investigate the variables related with intracranial AVM rupture and to examine the association of draining vein diameters and AVM hemorrhage.

METHODS

Two hundred three patients were included in this study, of which 117 (57%) had unruptured AVMs, and 86 (43%) had ruptured AVMs.

RESULTS

In an adjusted (multivariate) analysis, the variables significantly associated with AVM hemorrhagic presentation were age (OR per year increase 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99, p = 0.007), a deep nidus compared with superficial nidus (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.13-9.06, p = 0.028), the nidus diameter (OR per each mm increase 0.95, 95%CI 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001), a single draining vein compared with multiple draining veins (OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.02-4.50, p = 0.044), the draining vein diameter (OR per mm increase 1.52, 95%CI 1.26-1.83, p < 0.001), and a draining vein diameter ≥ 5 mm compared with < 5 mm (OR 5.80, 95%CI 2.70-12.47, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, after adjusted analysis, the variables associated with intracranial AVM hemorrhagic presentation were a young age, a small nidus diameter, a deeply located nidus, a single draining vein, and large draining vein diameters. A draining vein diameter cutoff ≥ 5 mm was positively associated with the risk of AVM rupture. A large and prospective study is now necessary to confirm if draining vein diameter is a risk factor for AVM hemorrhage.

Combined Microsurgery and Endovascular Intervention in One-Stop for Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation: The Efficacy of a Hybrid Operation

To investigate the efficacy of a hybrid operation combining microsurgical resection and endovascular interventions in a one-stop treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received a hybrid operation, and patients receiving a non-hybrid operation. The hybrid operation group consisted of microsurgical resection with intraoperative angiography, or endovascular embolization. The non-hybrid operation group consisted of microsurgical resection or endovascular embolization, or microsurgery combined with embolization in multiple steps. Comprehensive clinical data was collected for all patients, including preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score, Spetzler-Martin grade, rehemorrhagia, image follow-up, and 6-month outcomes of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. This study included 22 cases in the hybrid operation group. The remnants were noted on intraoperative angiography in the four patients that were resected within the same session. The non-hybrid group consisted of 52 patients. There were no statistical differences between the two groups with GCS and Spetzler-Martin grade score. The mortality rate in the hybrid operation group was 4.5%, which was lower than the 7.6% obtained in the control group. No patients experienced post-operation rehemorrhagia in the hybrid operation group, but five cases occurred in the control group. The follow-up radiological cure rates were 100% in the hybrid group and 65.9% in the control group. The rate of good outcome was 81.8% in the hybrid operation group and 69.2% in the control group, although there was no significant difference. The hybrid operation is a safe and efficacious strategy for treating cerebral AVMs.

Single-stage planning for total cure of grade III-V brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization alone or in combination with microsurgical resection

PURPOSE

There are no established guidelines for treatment of Spetzler-Martin grade III-V brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). The purpose of this study is to report our institutional experience in total obliteration/eradication of grade III-V bAVMs by single-stage planning of embolization combined with microsurgical resection when necessary.

METHODS

All patients harboring Spetzler-Martin (S-M) grade III-V bAVMs treated with single-stage planning between January 2006 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. This treatment paradigm is applicable only to surgically accessible bAVMs and does not include deep-seated bAVMs. Indications for treatment, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed based on modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were identified. Seventeen patients (54.8%) presented with hemorrhage, 10 (32.3%) with seizures, 3 (9.7%) with headaches, and 1 (3.2%) with progressive neurological deficit. Based on S-M grading system, 25 patients (80.6%) harbored grade III bAVM, 5 patients had grade IV bAVMs (16.1%), and 1 patient (3.2%) had a grade V bAVM. There were no treatment-related complications in 24/31 (77.4%) patients. Of the total of seven patients with complications, four patients had clinical deterioration. The long-term (> 6-month), non-disabling morbidity (mRS ≤ 2) rate was 6.5%. The long-term, disabling morbidity rate was 3.2% with a mortality of 3.2%. Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved in 30/31 (96.8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage treatment strategy can be considered as an alternative to multistage embolization prior to surgery in grade III-V bAVMs. In this study, a high rate of total obliteration with relatively low rates of permanent morbidity and mortality was achieved.

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging of Vascular Malformations

Vascular malformations pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to the broad differential diagnosis as well as common utilization of inadequate or inaccurate classification systems among healthcare providers. Therapeutic approaches to these lesions vary based on the type, size, and extent of the vascular anomaly, necessitating accurate diagnosis and classification. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) is an effective modality for classifying vascular anomalies due to its ability to delineate the extent and anatomic relationship of the malformation to adjacent structures. In addition to anatomical mapping, the complete evaluation of vascular anomalies includes hemodynamic characterization. Dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography provides information regarding hemodynamics of vascular anomalies, differentiating high- and low-flow vascular malformations. Radiologists must identify the MRI features of vascular malformations for better diagnosis and classification.

The role of microsurgical resection and radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) present unique challenges to cerebrovascular specialists. Management of these lesions begins with assessing their natural history. Intervention with the goal of complete obliteration requires some component of microsurgical techniques or radiosurgery. Clinicians must weigh observation and acceptance of the natural history of these lesions versus intervention on a case-by-case basis. Microsurgical resection and radiosurgery are both well-validated tools used in selectively treating cerebral AVMs. This manuscript offers a general review of the management of cerebral AVMs with multimodality treatment recommendations.

Endovascular and microsurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Current recommendations

Background:

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be a heterogeneous pathological entity whose management requires a complex decision-making process due to the risks associated with their treatment and natural history. Despite the recently published conclusions of the aborted Randomized Trial of Brain Unruptured AVMs (ARUBA) trial, the authors of this article believe multimodality intervention in general and microsurgical resection in particular continue to play a major role in the management of carefully selected ruptured or unruptured AVMs.

Methods:

The authors provide an overview of their methodology for endovascular intervention and microsurgical resection and share their technical nuances for successful embolization and microsurgical resection of AVMs with special emphasis on complication avoidance.

Results:

The authors have achieved successful outcomes in embolization and resection of cerebral AVMs when using their methodology.

Conclusions:

These lesions are among the most technically difficult pathological entities handled by the cerebrovascular specialist, and an overview of technical concepts to help systematize this challenging and variable endeavor can improve the safety of their treatment.

Management of intracranial aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations

Intracranial or brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) are some of the most interesting and challenging lesions treated by the cerebrovascular neurosurgeon. It is generally believed that the combination of BAVMs and intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is associated with higher hemorrhage rates at presentation and higher rehemorrhage rates and thus with a more aggressive course and natural history. There is wide variation in the literature on the prevalence of BAVM-associated aneurysms (range 2.7%–58%), with 10%–20% being most often cited in the largest case series. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with unruptured BAVMs and coexisting IAs has been reported to be 7% annually, compared with 2%–4% annually for those with BAVM alone. Several different classification systems have been applied in an attempt to better understand the natural history of this combination of lesions and implications for treatment. Independent of the classification used, it is clear that a few subtypes of aneurysms have a direct hemodynamic correlation with the BAVM itself. This is exemplified by the fact that the presence of a distal flow-related or an intranidal aneurysm appears to be associated with an increased hemorrhage risk, when compared with an aneurysm located on a vessel with no direct supply to the BAVM nidus. Debate still exists regarding the etiology of the association between those two vascular lesions, the subsequent implications for patients’ risk of hemorrhagic stroke, and finally the determination of which patients warrant treatment and when. The ultimate goals of the treatment of a BAVM associated with an IA are to prevent hemorrhage, avoid stepwise neurological deterioration, and eliminate the mortality risk associated with recurrent hemorrhagic events. The treatment is only justifiable if the risks associated with an intervention are lower than or equivalent to the long-term risks of disability or mortality caused by the lesion itself. When faced with this difficult decision, a few questions need to be answered by the treating neu-rosurgeon: What is the mode of presentation? What is the symptomatic lesion? Which one of the lesions bled? What is the relationship between the BAVM and IA? Is it possible to safely treat both BAVM and IA? The objective of this review is to discuss the demographics, natural history, classification, and strategies for management of BAVMs associated with IAs.