1
|
Preziosa P, Filippi M, Rocca MA. New approaches to lesion assessment in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2025:00019052-990000000-00242. [PMID: 40377692 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize recent advancements in artificial intelligence-driven lesion segmentation and novel neuroimaging modalities that enhance the identification and characterization of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, emphasizing their implications for clinical use and research. RECENT FINDINGS Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning approaches, are revolutionizing MS lesion assessment and segmentation, improving accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency. Artificial intelligence-based tools now enable automated detection not only of T2-hyperintense white matter lesions, but also of specific lesion subtypes, including gadolinium-enhancing, central vein sign-positive, paramagnetic rim, cortical, and spinal cord lesions, which hold diagnostic and prognostic value. Novel neuroimaging techniques such as quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), χ-separation imaging, and soma and neurite density imaging (SANDI), together with PET, are providing deeper insights into lesion pathology, better disentangling their heterogeneities and clinical relevance. SUMMARY Artificial intelligence-powered lesion segmentation tools hold great potential for improving fast, accurate and reproducible lesional assessment in the clinical scenario, thus improving MS diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment response assessment. Emerging neuroimaging modalities may contribute to advance the understanding MS pathophysiology, provide more specific markers of disease progression, and novel potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Preziosa
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
- Neurorehabilitation Unit
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Falet JPR, Nobile S, Szpindel A, Barile B, Kumar A, Durso-Finley J, Arbel T, Arnold DL. The role of AI for MRI-analysis in multiple sclerosis-A brief overview. Front Artif Intell 2025; 8:1478068. [PMID: 40265105 PMCID: PMC12011719 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1478068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has played a crucial role in the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment optimization of multiple sclerosis (MS). It is an essential component of current diagnostic criteria for its ability to non-invasively visualize both lesional and non-lesional pathology. Nevertheless, modern day usage of MRI in the clinic is limited by lengthy protocols, error-prone procedures for identifying disease markers (e.g., lesions), and the limited predictive value of existing imaging biomarkers for key disability outcomes. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have underscored the potential for AI to not only improve, but also transform how MRI is being used in MS. In this short review, we explore the role of AI in MS applications that span the entire life-cycle of an MRI image, from data collection, to lesion segmentation, detection, and volumetry, and finally to downstream clinical and scientific tasks. We conclude with a discussion on promising future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre R. Falet
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven Nobile
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Aliya Szpindel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Berardino Barile
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amar Kumar
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Joshua Durso-Finley
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tal Arbel
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Douglas L. Arnold
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alomair OI. Conventional and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Brain. Cureus 2025; 17:e79914. [PMID: 40171349 PMCID: PMC11960029 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disease, and each MS patient exhibits different clinical symptoms that are reflected in their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. Each MS lesion should be interpreted carefully and evaluated in conjunction with a clinical examination. MRI plays a major role in evaluating how MS lesions are aggregated in the central nervous system and how they change over time. There are several conventional MRI biomarkers of MS that could be utilized to evaluate each MS phenotype. MRI is useful for clinical decisions, aiding in the determination of disease-modifying treatment or disease prognosis. Despite its higher sensitivity, MRI provides low specificity due to the heterogeneity of MS lesions. However, advanced MRI biomarkers show promise in terms of defining MS lesions, as each imaging biomarker correlates differently with the clinical scenario of each MS phenotype. The aim of this review is to summarise the current state of MRI biomarkers for MS in the brain and how they relate to neurological disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman I Alomair
- Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reeves JA, Bartnik A, Mohebbi M, Ramanathan M, Bergsland N, Jakimovski D, Wilding GE, Salman F, Schweser F, Weinstock‐Guttman B, Hojnacki D, Eckert S, Bagnato F, Dwyer MG, Zivadinov R. Determinants of long-term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2025; 12:267-279. [PMID: 39556505 PMCID: PMC11822801 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Baseline paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) load predicts disease progression in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Understanding how PRLs relate to other known MS-related factors, and the practical utility of PRLs in clinical trials, is crucial for informing clinical decision-making and guiding development of novel disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). METHODS This study included 152 pwMS enrolled in a larger prospective, longitudinal cohort study who had 3T MRI scans and clinical assessments at baseline and 5- or 10-year follow-ups. PRLs were identified on baseline 3T quantitative susceptibility maps and classified as persisting, disappearing, or newly appearing at follow-up. The relationships between PRL evolution and clinical, radiological, environmental, and genetic characteristics were assessed, and clinical trial sample sizes were estimated using PRL appearance or disappearance as outcome measures. RESULTS DMT use was associated with lower odds of new PRL appearance (for high-efficacy DMTs: odds ratio = 0.088, p = 0.024), but not disappearance. Current smoking status was associated with greater baseline PRL number (B = 0.527 additional PRLs, p = 0.013). A 24-month clinical trial in people with progressive MS for a DMT that doubles the rate of PRL rim disappearance would require an estimated 118 people with progressive MS per group at 80% statistical power. INTERPRETATION Early MS diagnosis and subsequent DMT initiation may reduce new chronic active inflammation. However, the utility of PRL disappearance or new PRL appearance as outcome measures in clinical trials is limited by potentially large sample sizes that are needed for moderate efficacy drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack A. Reeves
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Alexander Bartnik
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Maryam Mohebbi
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Murali Ramanathan
- Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesState University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Niels Bergsland
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Dejan Jakimovski
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Gregory E. Wilding
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health ProfessionsState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Fahad Salman
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Ferdinand Schweser
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Clinical Translational Science InstituteUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | | | - David Hojnacki
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Svetlana Eckert
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Francesca Bagnato
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of NeurologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
- Department of Neurology, Nashville VA Medical CenterTennessee Valley Healthcare SystemNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Michael G. Dwyer
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Clinical Translational Science InstituteUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Clinical Translational Science InstituteUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martire MS, Moiola L, Maggi P, Borrelli S, Novati V, Martinelli V, Rocca MA, Vezzulli P, Falini A, Filippi M, Absinta M. Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2025:13524585251314358. [PMID: 39891406 DOI: 10.1177/13524585251314358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI. METHODS SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was "almost perfect" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T. CONCLUSION The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sofia Martire
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Translational Neuropathology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Maggi
- Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of NeuroScience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Serena Borrelli
- Neuroinflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of NeuroScience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Maria A Rocca
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vezzulli
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Falini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuropathology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dal-Bianco A, Oh J, Sati P, Absinta M. Chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: classification, terminology, and clinical significance. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241306684. [PMID: 39711984 PMCID: PMC11660293 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241306684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS), increasing disability is considered to occur due to persistent, chronic inflammation trapped within the central nervous system (CNS). This condition, known as smoldering neuroinflammation, is present across the clinical spectrum of MS and is currently understood to be relatively resistant to treatment with existing disease-modifying therapies. Chronic active white matter lesions represent a key component of smoldering neuroinflammation. Initially characterized in autopsy specimens, multiple approaches to visualize chronic active lesions (CALs) in vivo using advanced neuroimaging techniques and postprocessing methods are rapidly emerging. Among these in vivo imaging correlates of CALs, paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are defined by the presence of a perilesional rim formed by iron-laden microglia and macrophages, whereas slowly expanding lesions are identified based on linear, concentric lesion expansion over time. In recent years, several longitudinal studies have linked the occurrence of in vivo detected CALs to a more aggressive disease course. PRLs are highly specific to MS and therefore have recently been incorporated into the MS diagnostic criteria. They also have prognostic potential as biomarkers to identify patients at risk of early and severe disease progression. These developments could significantly affect MS care and the evaluation of new treatments. This review describes the latest knowledge on CAL biology and imaging and the relevance of CALs to the natural history of MS. In addition, we outline considerations for current and future in vivo biomarkers of CALs, emphasizing the need for validation, standardization, and automation in their assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assunta Dal-Bianco
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, Vienna 1090, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pascal Sati
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Neuropathology Lab, Neuro Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaitán MI, Marquez RV, Ayerbe J, Reich DS. Imaging Outcomes for Phase 2 Trials Targeting Compartmentalized Inflammation. Mult Scler 2024; 30:48-60. [PMID: 39658905 PMCID: PMC11637223 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241301303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
This comprehensive review aims to explore imaging outcome measures targeting compartmentalized inflammation in Phase 2 clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS). The traditional primary imaging outcomes used in Phase 2 MS trials, new or enhancing white matter lesions on MRI, target the effects of peripheral inflammation, but the widespread inflammation behind a mostly closed blood-brain barrier is not captured. This review discusses several emerging imaging technologies that could be used as surrogate markers of compartmentalized inflammation, targeting chronic active lesions, meningeal inflammation, and innate immune activation within the normal-appearing white matter and gray matter. The integration of specific imaging outcomes into Phase 2 trials can provide a more accurate assessment of treatment efficacy, ultimately contributing to the development of more effective therapies for MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María I Gaitán
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rocio V Marquez
- Department of Neurology, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jeremias Ayerbe
- Department of Neurology, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel S Reich
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Toru Asahina A, Lu J, Chugh P, Sharma S, Sharma P, Tan S, Kovoor J, Stretton B, Gupta A, Sorby-Adams A, Goh R, Harroud A, Clarke MA, Evangelou N, Patel S, Dwyer A, Agzarian M, Bacchi S, Slee M. Prognostic significance of paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 129:110810. [PMID: 39232367 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
The diagnostic potential of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) has been previously established; however, the prognostic significance of these lesions has not previously been consistently described. This study aimed to establish the prognostic role of PRLs in MS with respect to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and rates of disability progression. Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and reference lists of selected articles were searched up to 29/04/2023. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42023422052). 7 studies were included in the final review. All of the eligible studies found that patients with PRLs tend to have higher baseline EDSS scores. Longitudinal assessments revealed greater EDSS progression in patients with PRLs over time in most studies. However, the effect of location of PRLs within the central nervous system were not assessed across the studies. Only one study investigated progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and showed that this clinical entity occurred in a greater proportion in patients with PRLs. This review supports PRLs as a predictor of EDSS progression. This measure has widespread applicability, however further multicentre studies are needed. Future research should explore the impact of PRLs on silent disability, PIRA, take into account different MS phenotypes and the topography of PRLs in prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adon Toru Asahina
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia.
| | - Joe Lu
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Pooja Chugh
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Srishti Sharma
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Prakriti Sharma
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Sheryn Tan
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Joshua Kovoor
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Aashray Gupta
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia
| | - Annabel Sorby-Adams
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Department of Neurology and the Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Rudy Goh
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA 5112, Australia
| | - Adil Harroud
- McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Margareta A Clarke
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikos Evangelou
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandy Patel
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Andrew Dwyer
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia; South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Marc Agzarian
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia; South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Department of Neurology and the Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Mark Slee
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, SA 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen L, Ren Z, Clark KA, Lou C, Liu F, Cao Q, Manning AR, Martin ML, Luskin E, O'Donnell CM, Azevedo CJ, Calabresi PA, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Oh J, Papinutto N, Bilello M, Song JW, Kaisey M, Sicotte NL, Reich DS, Solomon AJ, Ontaneda D, Sati P, Absinta M, Schindler MK, Shinohara RT. Multicenter validation of automated detection of paramagnetic rim lesions on brain MRI in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2024; 34:750-757. [PMID: 39410780 DOI: 10.1111/jon.13242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2024] [Revised: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 11/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are an MRI biomarker of chronic inflammation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). PRLs may aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS. However, manual identification of PRLs is time-consuming and prone to poor interrater reliability. To address these challenges, the Automated Paramagnetic Rim Lesion (APRL) algorithm was developed to automate PRL detection. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of APRL for detecting PRLs in a multicenter setting. METHODS We applied APRL to a multicenter dataset, which included 3-Tesla MRI acquired in 92 participants (43 with MS, 14 with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/radiologically isolated syndrome [RIS], 35 without RIS/CIS/MS). Subsequently, we assessed APRL's performance by comparing its results with manual PRL assessments carried out by a team of trained raters. RESULTS Among the 92 participants, expert raters identified 5637 white matter lesions and 148 PRLs. The automated segmentation method successfully captured 115 (78%) of the manually identified PRLs. Within these 115 identified lesions, APRL differentiated between manually identified PRLs and non-PRLs with an area under the curve (AUC) of .73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [.68, .78]). At the subject level, the count of APRL-identified PRLs predicted MS diagnosis with an AUC of .69 (95% CI: [.57, .81]). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated APRL's capability to differentiate between PRLs and lesions without paramagnetic rims in a multicenter study. Automated identification of PRLs offers greater efficiency over manual identification and could facilitate large-scale assessments of PRLs in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyun Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zheng Ren
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kelly A Clark
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Fang Liu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Quy Cao
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abigail R Manning
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Melissa L Martin
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elaina Luskin
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carly M O'Donnell
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina J Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Peter A Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Roland G Henry
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Erin E Longbrake
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nico Papinutto
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jae W Song
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marwa Kaisey
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew K Schindler
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bagnato F, Sati P, Hemond CC, Elliott C, Gauthier SA, Harrison DM, Mainero C, Oh J, Pitt D, Shinohara RT, Smith SA, Trapp B, Azevedo CJ, Calabresi PA, Henry RG, Laule C, Ontaneda D, Rooney WD, Sicotte NL, Reich DS, Absinta M. Imaging chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement. Brain 2024; 147:2913-2933. [PMID: 38226694 PMCID: PMC11370808 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic active lesions (CAL) are an important manifestation of chronic inflammation in multiple sclerosis and have implications for non-relapsing biological progression. In recent years, the discovery of innovative MRI and PET-derived biomarkers has made it possible to detect CAL, and to some extent quantify them, in the brain of persons with multiple sclerosis, in vivo. Paramagnetic rim lesions on susceptibility-sensitive MRI sequences, MRI-defined slowly expanding lesions on T1-weighted and T2-weighted scans, and 18-kDa translocator protein-positive lesions on PET are promising candidate biomarkers of CAL. While partially overlapping, these biomarkers do not have equivalent sensitivity and specificity to histopathological CAL. Standardization in the use of available imaging measures for CAL identification, quantification and monitoring is lacking. To fast-forward clinical translation of CAL, the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative developed a consensus statement, which provides guidance for the radiological definition and measurement of CAL. The proposed manuscript presents this consensus statement, summarizes the multistep process leading to it, and identifies the remaining major gaps in knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Bagnato
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
- Department of Neurology, Nashville VA Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Neuroimaging Program, Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Christopher C Hemond
- Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | | | - Susan A Gauthier
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Daniel M Harrison
- Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Department of Neurology, Baltimore VA Medical Center, VA Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Caterina Mainero
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada
| | - David Pitt
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Seth A Smith
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Bruce Trapp
- Department on Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Christina J Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
| | - Peter A Calabresi
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Roland G Henry
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Cornelia Laule
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - William D Rooney
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Translational Neuropathology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, 20132, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naval-Baudin P, Pons-Escoda A, Castillo-Pinar A, Martínez-Zalacaín I, Arroyo-Pereiro P, Flores-Casaperalta S, Garay-Buitron F, Calvo N, Martinez-Yélamos A, Cos M, Martínez-Yélamos S, Majós C. The T1-dark-rim: A novel imaging sign for detecting smoldering inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173:111358. [PMID: 38340569 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs), usually identified in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), are a promising prognostic biomarker of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, SWI is not routinely performed in clinical practice. The objective of this study is to define a novel imaging sign, the T1-dark rim, identifiable in a standard 3DT1 gradient-echo inversion-recovery sequence, such as 3D T1 turbo field echo (3DT1FE) and explore its performance as a SWI surrogate to define PRLs. METHODS This observational cross-sectional study analyzed MS patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including 3DT1TFE and SWI. Rim lesions were evaluated in 3DT1TFE, processed SWI, and SWI phase and categorized as true positive, false positive, or false negative based on the value of the T1-dark rim in predicting SWI phase PRLs. Sensitivity and positive predictive values of the T1-dark rim for detecting PRLs were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 80 rim lesions were identified in 63 patients (60 in the SWI phase and 78 in 3DT1TFE; 58 true positives, 20 false positives, and two false negatives). The T1-dark rim demonstrated 97% sensitivity and 74% positive predictive value for detecting PRLs. More PRLs were detected in the SWI phase than in processed SWI (60 and 57, respectively). CONCLUSION The T1-dark rim sign is a promising and accessible novel imaging marker to detect PRLs whose high sensitivity may enable earlier detection of chronic active lesions to guide MS treatment escalation. The relevance of T1-dark rim lesions that are negative on SWI opens up a new field for analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Naval-Baudin
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer de Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Albert Pons-Escoda
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer de Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Castillo-Pinar
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Martínez-Zalacaín
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Arroyo-Pereiro
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer de Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Neurological Diseases and Neurogenetic Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susanie Flores-Casaperalta
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francis Garay-Buitron
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nahum Calvo
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Martinez-Yélamos
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer de Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Neurological Diseases and Neurogenetic Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Cos
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergio Martínez-Yélamos
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer de Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Neurological Diseases and Neurogenetic Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Majós
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Diagnòstic Per La Imatge (IDI), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Centre Bellvige, Carrer de Feixa Llarga SN, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Faustino R, Lopes C, Jantarada A, Mendonça A, Raposo R, Ferrão C, Freitas J, Mateus C, Pinto A, Almeida E, Gomes N, Marques L, Palavra F. Neuroimaging characterization of multiple sclerosis lesions in pediatric patients: an exploratory radiomics approach. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1294574. [PMID: 38370435 PMCID: PMC10869542 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1294574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system (CNS), is a common condition in young adults, but it can also affect children. The aim of this study was to construct radiomic models of lesions based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, T2-weighted-Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery), to understand the correlation between extracted radiomic features, brain and lesion volumetry, demographic, clinical and laboratorial data. Methods The neuroimaging data extracted from eleven scans of pediatric MS patients were analyzed. A total of 60 radiomic features based on MR T2-FLAIR images were extracted and used to calculate gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). The principal component analysis and ROC analysis were performed to select the radiomic features, respectively. The realized classification task by the logistic regression models was performed according to these radiomic features. Results Ten most relevant features were selected from data extracted. The logistic regression applied to T2-FLAIR radiomic features revealed significant predictor for multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion detection. Only the variable "contrast" was statistically significant, indicating that only this variable played a significant role in the model. This approach enhances the classification of lesions from normal tissue. Discussion and conclusion Our exploratory results suggest that the radiomic models based on MR imaging (T2-FLAIR) may have a potential contribution to characterization of brain tissues and classification of lesions in pediatric MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Faustino
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculty of Science, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Biomedical Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine NICiTeS, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cristina Lopes
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Afonso Jantarada
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Mendonça
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rafael Raposo
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cristina Ferrão
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joana Freitas
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Constança Mateus
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Pinto
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ellen Almeida
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Gomes
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Liliana Marques
- Neuroimaging and Biomedicine Research Group, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research Unit, CrossI&D: Lisbon Research Center, Portuguese Red Cross Higher Health School (ESSCVP), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Filipe Palavra
- Centre for Child Development – Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abou Mrad T, Naja K, Khoury SJ, Hannoun S. Central vein sign and paramagnetic rim sign: From radiologically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:2912-2918. [PMID: 37350369 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has led to an increase in incidental findings in the central nervous system. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is a condition where imaging reveals lesions suggestive of demyelinating disease without any clinical episodes consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). The prognosis for RIS patients is uncertain, with some remaining asymptomatic while others progress to MS. Several risk factors for disease progression have been identified, including male sex, younger age at diagnosis, and spinal cord lesions. This article reviews two promising biomarkers, the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim sign (PRS), and their potential role in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS and RIS. Both CVS and PRS have been shown to be accurate diagnostic markers in MS, with high sensitivity and specificity, and have been useful in distinguishing MS from other disorders. Further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the clinical utility of these biomarkers in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Abou Mrad
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Kim Naja
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Samia J Khoury
- Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Salem Hannoun
- Medical Imaging Sciences Program, Division of Health Professions, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Present and future of the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis: the imaging perspective. J Neurol 2023; 270:1286-1299. [PMID: 36427168 PMCID: PMC9971159 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11488-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved considerably. The 2017 McDonald criteria show high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting a second clinical attack in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and allow an earlier diagnosis of MS. They have been validated, are evidence-based, simplify the clinical use of MRI criteria and improve MS patients' management. However, to limit the risk of misdiagnosis, they should be applied by expert clinicians only after the careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Recently, new MRI markers have been proposed to improve diagnostic specificity for MS and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis. The central vein sign and chronic active lesions (i.e., paramagnetic rim lesions) may increase the specificity of MS diagnostic criteria, but further effort is necessary to validate and standardize their assessment before implementing them in the clinical setting. The feasibility of subpial demyelination assessment and the clinical relevance of leptomeningeal enhancement evaluation in the diagnostic work-up of MS appear more limited. Artificial intelligence tools may capture MRI attributes that are beyond the human perception, and, in the future, artificial intelligence may complement human assessment to further ameliorate the diagnostic work-up and patients' classification. However, guidelines that ensure reliability, interpretability, and validity of findings obtained from artificial intelligence approaches are still needed to implement them in the clinical scenario. This review provides a summary of the most recent updates regarding the application of MRI for the diagnosis of MS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Martire MS, Moiola L, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Absinta M. What is the potential of paramagnetic rim lesions as diagnostic indicators in multiple sclerosis? Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:829-837. [PMID: 36342396 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2143265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In multiple sclerosis (MS), paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) on MRI identify a subset of chronic active lesions (CALs), which have been linked through clinical and pathological studies to more severe disease course and greater disability accumulation. Beside their prognostic relevance, increasing evidence supports the use of PRL as a diagnostic biomarker. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the most recent updates regarding the MRI pathophysiology of PRL, their prevalence in MS (by clinical phenotypes) vs mimicking conditions, and their potential role as diagnostic MS biomarkers. We searched PubMed with terms including 'multiple sclerosis' AND 'paramagnetic rim lesions' OR 'iron rim lesions' OR 'rim lesions' for manuscripts published between January 2008 and July 2022. EXPERT OPINION Current research suggests that PRL can improve the diagnostic specificity and the overall accuracy of MS diagnosis when used together with the dissemination in space MRI criteria and the central vein sign. Nevertheless, future prospective multicenter studies should further define the real-world prevalence and specificity of PRL. International guidelines are needed to establish methodological criteria for PRL identification before its implementation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Rocca
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Absinta
- Division of Neuroscience, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
La Rosa F, Wynen M, Al-Louzi O, Beck ES, Huelnhagen T, Maggi P, Thiran JP, Kober T, Shinohara RT, Sati P, Reich DS, Granziera C, Absinta M, Bach Cuadra M. Cortical lesions, central vein sign, and paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis: Emerging machine learning techniques and future avenues. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103205. [PMID: 36201950 PMCID: PMC9668629 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The current diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) lack specificity, and this may lead to misdiagnosis, which remains an issue in present-day clinical practice. In addition, conventional biomarkers only moderately correlate with MS disease progression. Recently, some MS lesional imaging biomarkers such as cortical lesions (CL), the central vein sign (CVS), and paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL), visible in specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, have shown higher specificity in differential diagnosis. Moreover, studies have shown that CL and PRL are potential prognostic biomarkers, the former correlating with cognitive impairments and the latter with early disability progression. As machine learning-based methods have achieved extraordinary performance in the assessment of conventional imaging biomarkers, such as white matter lesion segmentation, several automated or semi-automated methods have been proposed as well for CL, PRL, and CVS. In the present review, we first introduce these MS biomarkers and their imaging methods. Subsequently, we describe the corresponding machine learning-based methods that were proposed to tackle these clinical questions, putting them into context with respect to the challenges they are facing, including non-standardized MRI protocols, limited datasets, and moderate inter-rater variability. We conclude by presenting the current limitations that prevent their broader deployment and suggesting future research directions.
Collapse
Key Words
- ms, multiple sclerosis
- mri, magnetic resonance imaging
- dl, deep learning
- ml, machine learning
- cl, cortical lesions
- prl, paramagnetic rim lesions
- cvs, central vein sign
- wml, white matter lesions
- flair, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- mprage, magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo
- gm, gray matter
- wm, white matter
- psir, phase-sensitive inversion recovery
- dir, double inversion recovery
- mp2rage, magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echoes
- sels, slowly evolving/expanding lesions
- cnn, convolutional neural network
- xai, explainable ai
- pv, partial volume
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco La Rosa
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Maxence Wynen
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; ICTeam, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Louvain Inflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin S Beck
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Till Huelnhagen
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Maggi
- Louvain Inflammation Imaging Lab (NIL), Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neurology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neurology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Philippe Thiran
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kober
- Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martina Absinta
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meritxell Bach Cuadra
- CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Switzerland; Radiology Department, Lausanne University and University Hospital, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kolb H, Al-Louzi O, Beck ES, Sati P, Absinta M, Reich DS. From pathology to MRI and back: Clinically relevant biomarkers of multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103194. [PMID: 36170753 PMCID: PMC9668624 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Focal lesions in both white and gray matter are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Histopathological studies have helped define the main underlying pathological processes involved in lesion formation and evolution, serving as a gold standard for many years. However, histopathology suffers from an intrinsic bias resulting from over-reliance on tissue samples from late stages of the disease or atypical cases and is inadequate for routine patient assessment. Pathological-radiological correlative studies have established advanced MRI's sensitivity to several relevant MS-pathological substrates and its practicality for assessing dynamic changes and following lesions over time. This review focuses on novel imaging techniques that serve as biomarkers of critical pathological substrates of MS lesions: the central vein, chronic inflammation, remyelination and repair, and cortical lesions. For each pathological process, we address the correlative value of MRI to MS pathology, its contribution in elucidating MS pathology in vivo, and the clinical utility of the imaging biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadar Kolb
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel,Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel.
| | - Omar Al-Louzi
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin S. Beck
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA,Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCSS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy,Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang H, Nguyen TD, Zhang J, Marcille M, Spincemaille P, Wang Y, Gauthier SA, Sweeney EM. QSMRim-Net: Imbalance-aware learning for identification of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions on quantitative susceptibility maps. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 34:102979. [PMID: 35247730 PMCID: PMC8892132 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Chronic active multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions are characterized by a paramagnetic rim at the edge of the lesion and are associated with increased disability in patients. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an MRI technique that is sensitive to chronic active lesions, termed rim + lesions on the QSM. We present QSMRim-Net, a data imbalance-aware deep neural network that fuses lesion-level radiomic and convolutional image features for automated identification of rim + lesions on QSM. METHODS QSM and T2-weighted-Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) MRI of the brain were collected at 3 T for 172 MS patients. Rim + lesions were manually annotated by two human experts, followed by consensus from a third expert, for a total of 177 rim + and 3986 rim negative (rim-) lesions. Our automated rim + detection algorithm, QSMRim-Net, consists of a two-branch feature extraction network and a synthetic minority oversampling network to classify rim + lesions. The first network branch is for image feature extraction from the QSM and T2-FLAIR, and the second network branch is a fully connected network for QSM lesion-level radiomic feature extraction. The oversampling network is designed to increase classification performance with imbalanced data. RESULTS On a lesion-level, in a five-fold cross validation framework, the proposed QSMRim-Net detected rim + lesions with a partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (pROC AUC) of 0.760, where clinically relevant false positive rates of less than 0.1 were considered. The method attained an area under the precision recall curve (PR AUC) of 0.704. QSMRim-Net out-performed other state-of-the-art methods applied to the QSM on both pROC AUC and PR AUC. On a subject-level, comparing the predicted rim + lesion count and the human expert annotated count, QSMRim-Net achieved the lowest mean square error of 0.98 and the highest correlation of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92). CONCLUSION This study develops a novel automated deep neural network for rim + MS lesion identification using T2-FLAIR and QSM images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Zhang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thanh D Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinwei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Melanie Marcille
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Yi Wang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Susan A Gauthier
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Sweeney
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE) Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|