Inclusion body myositis with granuloma formation in muscle tissue

Refining the clinical and therapeutic spectrum of granulomatous myositis from a large cohort of patients

OBJECTIVES

Granulomatous myositis (GM) is a rare entity whose precise clinical features and therapeutic outcomes have not yet been well defined. Given the limited evidence, data from a large cohort of patients is needed to aid in the recognition and management of this condition.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our institutional databases to identify patients who had myositis and non-caseating granuloma on muscle biopsy (GM). We collected data on clinical and diagnostic features, management, and outcomes of these cases and compared them with inclusion body myositis (IBM) controls.

RESULTS

22 GM patients were identified and subdivided into 3 main groups: 13 patients with GM and sarcoidosis (6 of whom subsequently developed suspected or confirmed IBM), 7 patients with idiopathic isolated GM (2 of whom subsequently developed confirmed IBM), 2 patients with GM and Crohn's disease. Patients with GM and sarcoidosis without IBM, as well as patients with isolated GM, exhibited variable clinical presentation ranging from myalgia to mostly symmetrical proximo-distal weakness, with most showing complete or at least partial response to therapies. Patients with GM associated with Crohn's disease had only mild clinical impairment and good therapeutic outcomes. Conversely, patients with GM and IBM presented more severe asymmetric proximo-distal muscle weakness, increased occurrence of dysphagia and poor treatment response, similar to IBM controls.

CONCLUSIONS

A frequent association of GM with IBM and/or sarcoidosis was demonstrated in our cohort. When associated with IBM, GM led to treatment refractoriness and more severe clinical impairment, unlike the other GM groups which showed satisfactory outcomes in most cases.

Granulomatous myositis: characteristics and outcome from a monocentric retrospective cohort study

Granulomatous myositis is a clinical-pathological entity, which has been rarely reported, mostly described in sarcoidosis. Currently, no clear and simple prognostic factor has been identified to predict granulomatous myositis evolution. The clinical, anatomopathological, imaging, and biological characteristics of 26 patients with granulomatous myositis were retrospectively collected to describe clinical presentation and outcomes of this condition. Twenty-six patients with granulomatous myositis were included (14 males) with a median age of symptom onset of 65 years. 54 % of patients presented a severe form of the disease defined as a Rankin score ≥2 at last follow-up visit or a progressive form of the disease (no improvement under treatment). Etiology were sarcoidosis (n = 14), inclusion body myositis (n = 4), autoimmune disease (n = 1), hematological malignancy (n = 1), and idiopathic (n = 6). Distal deficit and amyotrophy were more frequent among those with a severe disease. Corticosteroids led to improvement in 75 % of cases, but 66 % of responders relapsed. Methotrexate appeared as a promising second line therapy with clinical improvement in 50 % of patients, and no relapse in responders. Granulomatous myositis is often a severe and difficult-to-treat disease in which patients frequently progress towards severe disability. The presence of muscle atrophy and distal weakness appears to be frequently associated with a severe form of the disease.

Granulomatous myopathy: Sarcoidosis and beyond

Non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation is a rare but easily recognized histopathological finding in skeletal muscle biopsy. A limited number of diseases are known to be associated with non-necrotizing granulomatous myopathy. Once identified, a careful evaluation for evidence of extramuscular granulomatosis and other signs suggestive of sarcoidosis is warranted as about half of the patients have sarcoid myopathy. In addition, the presence of granulomatous myopathy should trigger a search for clinical and pathological clues of inclusion body myositis (IBM), which accounts for most of the remaining patients and can coexist with sarcoidosis. Recognizing the features of IBM in patients with granulomatous myopathy can potentially spare the patients from unnecessary exposure to immunosuppressive therapies. In patients whose granulomatous myopathy remain unexplained, further investigations should aim at identifying myasthenia gravis and other autoimmune disorders, especially those known to cause granulomatous inflammation in other organs. Laboratory investigations should include acetylcholine receptor, antimitochondrial, antineutrophil cytoplasmic, thyroglobulin, and thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies. In the appropriate clinical context, exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors and chronic graft-vs-host disease can be causes of granulomatous myopathy. In cases of unexplained granulomatous myopathy, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma should be considered and careful histopathological examination for atypical cells and appropriate immunostaining is crucial. Identifying the etiology of granulomatous myopathy in each patient can guide appropriate treatment.

Sarcoidosis, granulomas and myopathy syndromes: A clinical-pathology review

Muscle involvement in sarcoidosis is common by pathologic analysis, but symptomatic disorders are less frequent. Sarcoidosis-related muscle pathology includes non-caseating granulomas, muscle fiber changes that are diffuse or anatomically related to granulomas, and perimysial connective tissue with histiocyte-associated damage. The mechanisms by which granulomas form, enlarge and damage muscle tissues are incompletely understood. Sarcoidosis-related clinical syndromes with muscle involvement include: chronic myopathies with proximal weakness; nodular disorders; subacute onset disorders involving proximal or eye muscles; myalgia or fatigue syndromes; and, possibly, inclusion body myositis-like disorders. Corticosteroid treatment may benefit some syndromes, but clinical trials are necessary.

Inclusion body myositis and associated diseases: an argument for shared immune pathologies

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most prevalent idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) affecting older adults. The pathogenic hallmark of IBM is chronic inflammation of skeletal muscle. At present, we do not classify IBM into different sub-entities, with the exception perhaps being the presence or absence of the anti-cN-1A-antibody. In contrast to other IIM, IBM is characterized by a chronic and progressive disease course. Here, we discuss the pathophysiological framework of IBM and highlight the seemingly prototypical situations where IBM occurs in the context of other diseases. In this context, understanding common immune pathways might provide insight into the pathogenesis of IBM. Indeed, IBM is associated with a distinct set of conditions, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C-two conditions associated with premature immune cell exhaustion. Further, the pathomorphology of IBM is reminiscent of other muscle diseases, notably HIV-associated myositis or granulomatous myositis. Distinct immune pathways are likely to drive these commonalities and senescence of the CD8+ T cell compartment is discussed as a possible mechanism of pathogenesis. Future effort directed at understanding the co-occurrence of IBM and associated diseases could prove valuable to better understand the enigmatic IBM pathophysiology.

Clinical characteristics and outcome in muscular sarcoidosis: a retrospective cohort study and literature review

We evaluated the clinical features and treatment response of patients with muscular sarcoidosis. A retrospective cohort of 12 patients showed muscle weakness in 11 and myalgia in seven. One had focal myositis. Four had a negative medical history for sarcoidosis. Muscle imaging showed muscle edema in all and replacement of muscle tissue by fat in half of patients. Muscle biopsy showed non-caseating granulomas in six of nine patients and inflammation without granulomas in three. None of the muscle biopsies showed features of inclusion body myositis. Imaging in three patients without muscle biopsy showed focal intramuscular masses or a 'tiger man' appearance typical for muscular sarcoidosis. Treatment consisted of glucocorticoids in 11, additional methotrexate or azathioprine in seven and infliximab in two patients. Half of the patients had symptoms leading to substantial disability (modified Rankin scale score >1) at last follow-up. A literature review of articles describing more than one muscular sarcoidosis patient published in the last 25 years identified 153 additional patients. We found muscular sarcoidosis to be a rare and often disabling disease which may be recognized by typical muscle imaging characteristics and add focal myositis to the muscular phenotypes of sarcoidosis.

Granulomatosis-associated myositis: High prevalence of sporadic inclusion body myositis

OBJECTIVE

To refine the predictive significance of muscle granuloma in patients with myositis.

METHODS

A group of 23 patients with myositis and granuloma on muscle biopsy (granuloma-myositis) from 8 French and Belgian centers was analyzed and compared with (1) a group of 23 patients with myositis without identified granuloma (control-myositis) randomly sampled in each center and (2) a group of 20 patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) without identified granuloma (control-sIBM).

RESULTS

All but 2 patients with granuloma-myositis had extramuscular involvement, including signs common in sarcoidosis that were systematically absent in the control-myositis and the control-sIBM groups. Almost half of patients with granuloma-myositis matched the diagnostic criteria for sIBM. In these patients, other than the granuloma, the characteristics of the myopathy and its nonresponse to treatment were similar to the control-sIBM patients. Aside from 1 patient with myositis overlapping with systemic sclerosis, the remaining patients with granuloma-myositis did not match the criteria for a well-defined myositis subtype, suggesting pure sarcoidosis. Matching criteria for sIBM was the sole feature independently associated with nonresponse to myopathy treatment in patients with granuloma-myositis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with granuloma-myositis should be carefully screened for sIBM associated with sarcoidosis in order to best tailor their care.

Chronic sarcoid myopathy mimicking sporadic inclusion body myositis

The patient was an 81-year-old woman. At age 73, she developed difficulties in climbing stairs and swallowing, and became unable to open bottles at age 74. She had been walking with a cane since age 76. Accidental chest X-ray findings showed bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy at age 78. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) was elevated. Lymphocyte proliferation was prominent in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Sarcoidosis was suspected, but she was followed without treatment due to lack of respiratory symptoms. She became unable to walk without assistance at age 80 and visited our hospital with a complaint of gait disturbance at age 81. Moderate diffuse muscle atrophy in extremities was evident. Muscle weakness of finger flexion and knee extension were remarkable. The muscle involvement pattern was similar to sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). However, radiographically, rectus femoris and semitendinosus muscles are selectively preserved. This radiogaphic finding was consistent with chronic sarcoid myopathy (CSM). We reached a final diagnosis of CSM based on the presence of granulomas in the muscle biopsy specimen, BHL in fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, the previous finding of elevated ACE, and bronchoscopy results. In conclusion, CSM is a treatable disease and should thus be differentiated from sIBM. This should not be done solely based on clinical findings, but instead, muscle biopsy should be performed. Moreover, muscle selectivity may be useful in distinguishing between CSM and sIBM.

Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis of sporadic inclusion body myositis: a case series

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM) is a progressive, skeletal muscle disease with poor prognosis. However, establishing the final diagnosis is difficult because of the lack of clear biomarkers in the blood serum and very slow development of clinical symptoms. Moreover, most other organs function normally without any disturbance. Here, in patients with this untreatable disease, we have underlined the importance of immunohistochemical and ultrastructural assessment of skeletal muscle in patients diagnosed with s-IBM. The goal of this study was to identify the distribution of specific antigens and to determine morphological features in order to localize pathological protein aggregates, rimmed vacuoles, and loss of myofibrils, which are key elements in the diagnosis of s-IBM. All studied patients were between 48 and 83 years of age and were hospitalized in the Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine between 2011 and 2016. Anamneses revealed an accelerated progression of muscle atrophy, weakness of limb muscles, and difficulties with climbing stairs. Based on histopathology and transmission electron microscopy examination, inflammatory infiltrations consisting of mononuclear cells, severe atrophy and focal necrosis of myofibers, splitting of myofilaments, myelinoid bodies and rimmed vacuoles were observed. Primary antibodies directed against CD3, CD8, CD68, cN1A, beta-amyloid, Tau protein and apolipoprotein B made it possible to identify types of cells within infiltrations as well as the protein deposits within myofibers. Using a combination of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy methods, we were able to establish the correct final diagnosis and to implement a specific treatment to inhibit disease progression.

Myopathies featuring non-caseating granulomas: Sarcoidosis, inclusion body myositis and an unfolding overlap

Granulomatous myopathies are etiologically heterogeneous myopathies, pathologically characterized by the presence of intramuscular granulomas. Treatment outcomes are variable. We aimed to identify prognostic factors of treatment outcomes in myopathies featuring non-caseating granulomas. Sixteen patients were identified (9 sarcoid myopathy, 6 inclusion body myositis, and 1 granulomatous myopathy of indeterminate cause) over a 21-year period. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years in sarcoid myopathy group, and 64 years in inclusion body myositis group. Three inclusion body myositis patients were initially diagnosed with sarcoid myopathy based on the presence of systemic features of sarcoidosis and findings on muscle biopsies, but subsequent biopsies performed because of treatment refractoriness, showed all canonical pathologic features of inclusion body myositis. We identified sarcoplasmic congophilic inclusions in 6 sarcoid myopathy patients without associated rimmed vacuoles or typical weakness pattern of inclusion body myositis. Four inclusion body myositis and 4 of 5 sarcoid myopathy patients with congophilic inclusions were refractory to immunotherapy. Our study portrays the overlapping clinical and pathological features of sarcoid myopathy and inclusion body myositis. The presence of sarcoplasmic congophilic inclusions in sarcoid myopathy may predict an unfavorable outcome of immunosuppressive therapy, but a larger prospective study is required to further validate this observation.

Granuloma formation in a patient with GNE myopathy: A case report

We report a patient with GNE myopathy with a homozygous mutation (c.1505-4G>A) in GNE gene. The patient recognized progressive weakness of extremities at age 60. Neurological examination at age 65 revealed severe weakness and atrophy in the tibialis anterior muscles and distal predominant moderate weakness in the extremities. Muscle biopsy performed at age 65 showed myopathic changes with rimmed vacuoles, and the noteworthy finding was non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma formation surrounded by numerous inflammatory cells. Granuloma formation has never been reported in patients with GNE myopathy. We presume that aggregation of abnormal proteins and autophagy dysregulation in the myocytes of GNE myopathy could induce granuloma formation.