Correct determination of glycemia in the diagnosis and management of diabetes: Recommendations for the optimization of the pre-analytical phase

Association between hemoglobin glycation index and subclinical myocardial injury in the general population free from cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The relationship between hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) and the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been verified by previous studies. However, it remains unknown whether HGI has a predictive effect on subclinical myocardial injury (SC-MI). The purpose of the present study was to explore the relationship between HGI and SC-MI in the general population free from CVD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study included 6009 participants free of CVD from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to tested the association between HGI and SC-MI. As results, the HGI was significantly higher in participants with SC-MI compared with those without, and the HGI was positively correlated with SC-MI and other metabolic disorder parameters. Each 1-unit increase of HGI and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was independently associated with higher risk of SC-MI (P < 0.05), while fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was no longer a predictive indicator of SC-MI with the increase of confounding factors [OR (95% CI): 1.001 (0.999-1.003), P = 0.305]. And in the subgroup analysis, HGI, only in participants without diabetes, was independently associated with higher risk of SC-MI, while HbA1c and FPG had no independent predictive role in both diabetic and non-diabetic participants.

CONCLUSIONS

HGI was a significant predictor of SC-MI in the general population free from CVD.

The analytical performance of laboratory plasma glucose and HbA1c measurements are largely acceptable

AIMS

Poor comparability between laboratory results may have a strong impact on clinical decisions. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of glucose and HbA_1c measurements in a large cohort of laboratories in various countries, in order to evaluate whether the current state of these very basic laboratory examinations can be considered to be adequate with respect to the clinical needs in the management of glucose control in diabetic patients.

METHODS

External quality assessment schemes and proficiency testing surveys performed in 2017 in several European and American laboratories were analyzed in order to estimate the percentage of laboratories reaching the desired quality criteria based on the allowable total error in accordance with various international recommendations.

RESULTS

In 2017 more than 95% of laboratories met the allowable total error for measuring HbA_1c, and 92-94% of the studied laboratories met the target for glucose measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

The analytical quality for measuring glycated hemoglobin and glucose at laboratory level is generally acceptable, and accreditation to the ISO 15189:2012 standard is a robust guarantee that the laboratory meets the required criteria of acceptability. Several pre-analytical factors which may explain the discrepancies between the measured HbA_1c and that estimated from other indicators of glucose control have to be taken into account, by focusing more on the pre-analytical than the analytical phase. In the case of glucose, special attention should be paid to the use of the correct anticoagulant, in order to avoid false negative results.

Glucose meters: What’s the laboratory reference glucose?

Background

The accuracy of glucose meters is evaluated by comparing their results with those from a reference laboratory glucose analyser. The main scientific societies recommend the use of a prompt glycolysis inhibitor such as citrate for an accurate glucose determination. In the present preliminary study, we discuss the bias between capillary and plasma glucose measured concentrations, determined in two Italian clinical laboratories, using tubes containing an NaF and citrate mixture in liquid and granular form.

Methods

139 volunteers in whom 75 g OGTT was requested were recruited. Basal capillary glucose was determined using Abbott FreeStyle Precision Neo in Brescia (n=63), while clinical laboratory reference P-glucose was determined using tubes containing NaF/K3EDTA and liquid NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate. Basal capillary glucose was determined using a Roche Cobas Accu-Chek Inform II in Vicenza (n=76), while P-glucose was determined using tubes containing NaF/K2Ox and NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate in granulated form. Reference P-glucose was determined with a hexokinase method on Dimension Vista systems. Differences between capillary and reference P-glucose were evaluated according to ADA/ISO 15197:2013 specifications.

Results

96.82% and 97.37% of capillary determinations were within specifications when liquid and granular citrate mixture tubes were used, respectively. Conversely, only 73.02% and 80.26% of determinations were within criteria using NaF.

Conclusions

It’s important to know what is the laboratory reference glucose in evaluating glucose meters’ accuracy. The evaluation of glucometers’ accuracy with respect to a reference laboratory may be wrong if tubes containing only NaF are used due to in vitro glycolysis. Only tubes containing citrate mixture permit the correct evaluation of glucose meters’ accuracy.

Clinical impact of citrate-containing tubes on the detection of glucose abnormalities by the oral glucose tolerance test

Background

Plasma glucose levels provide the cornerstone of diabetes evaluation, and so it is crucial that clinical laboratories provide accurate and reliable plasma glucose results. To prevent in vitro glycolysis, citrate is used. Here, we present the first study on the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) using the currently available new citrate-containing tubes in liquid and granular forms and the previous sodium fluoride (NaF) for the diagnosis of carbohydrate metabolism disorders and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines.

Methods

The 75-g OGTT was performed in 147 volunteers, 83 of whom were pregnant women. Blood was collected in NaF/K3 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate in liquid form in tubes in Brescia and in NaF/K2Ox and NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate in granular form in Vicenza. Glucose was measured within 3–4 h from the OGTT. The mean biases were calculated and compared with the desirable bias (<± 2.1%).

Results

OGTT glucose concentrations were higher in citrate tubes when compared to NaF-containing tubes. When citrate tubes were used, GDM increased to 12.5 and 11.7% in Brescia and Vicenza, respectively. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) increased to 36.7, 6.7 and 3.4%, respectively, in Brescia. In Vicenza, an increase of 47 and 1.9% in IFG and IGT, respectively, was found.

Conclusions

OGTT glucose measurement in citrate-containing tubes was shown to be more effective than those containing only NaF in diagnosing carbohydrate disorders. This new glycolysis inhibitor seems to be a necessary preanalytical tool for accurate and reliable plasma glucose results.