Pain-phenotyping in osteoarthritis: Current concepts, evidence, and considerations towards a comprehensive framework for assessment and treatment

Brain functional imaging contributions in osteoarthritis-related pain: A viewpoint

Objective

Neuroimaging investigations are critical to provide a more direct assessment of brain disturbances associated with osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain, and to better understand its pathophysiology to develop new treatment strategies. This viewpoint aims to summarize the importance of the brain in OA pain.

Method

A European working group on pain in osteoarthritis GO-PAIN (Going Inside Osteoarthritis-related Pain Phenotyping) has been created to work on a global assessment of the OA-related pain. Relevant scientific literature was evaluated, summarized and discussed to expose advances in functional brain alterations related-to OA pain.

Results

Findings of neuroimaging studies are highly heterogenous and based on small sample size, but some key brain alterations associated with OA pain can be identified across experiments. A systematic literature review conducted by Hall and colleagues (2023) found lower activity, connectivity, and grey matter volume in the right anterior insula in patients with OA than in healthy controls. Other works also pointed out that activity of specific brain regions could serve as a potential surrogate biomarker, but several limitations and confounding factors needs to be addressed.

Conclusions

Brain functional imaging provides opportunities to accurately address an OA-related pain endophenotype. To encompass limitations and fill the gaps from the previous studies, we propose a blueprint for the next 5 years and stimulate ideas for others working in the field.

Antidepressants to Manage Osteoarthritic Pain: The Value of Pain Phenotyping

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition in which pain significantly affects quality of life, often leading to reduced physical activity and disability. Globally, an estimated 595 million people are affected, with the numbers likely to increase owing to an aging population and rising obesity rates. Effective pain management is crucial, yet current treatments, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, often provide limited relief and come with risks. One reason for this limited success is the insufficient recognition of the importance of psychosocial factors and heterogeneity of patients with OA (such as anxiety and depression), which can exacerbate pain and its impacts. The variability in patient pain experiences highlights the potential value of pain phenotyping, which involves a comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics to tailor treatments to individual needs. Antidepressants, particularly serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), show promise in alleviating both psychological symptoms and OA-related pain, but their effectiveness varies among individuals. Therefore, further research into standardized pain phenotyping methods and their integration into antidepressant treatment is needed to improve efficacy and minimize side effects through more personalized approaches.

Applying Nociplastic Pain Criteria in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Vignette Study

Background/Objectives: The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recently introduced clinical criteria and a grading system to identify nociplastic pain, marking a pivotal step toward improving diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the IASP criteria using clinical vignettes, assessing their effectiveness in identifying nociplastic pain in clinical settings. Methods: A reliability and diagnostic accuracy study was conducted using 32 clinical vignettes based on the literature and pre-existing clinical data. The vignettes represented patients with and without the characteristics of nociplastic pain and were reviewed independently by two expert physiotherapists. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were evaluated with a 1-month interval between assessments. Criterion validity was analyzed by comparing the IASP criteria against the standardized vignettes as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results: The IASP criteria demonstrated moderate-to-perfect intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.71-1.00, p < 0.05) and weak-to-perfect inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.52-1.00, p < 0.05). Criterion validity was moderate (κ = 0.68), with strong specificity (89.0%) and moderate sensitivity (69.0%). Positive and negative predictive values were high at 81.8% and 81.0%, respectively, supporting the criteria's accuracy in identifying and excluding nociplastic pain. Conclusions: The IASP criteria for nociplastic pain exhibited satisfactory reliability and criterion validity in this preliminary study, particularly after initial rater familiarization. Future research should evaluate their application in real-world clinical settings, explore concurrent and prognostic validity, and involve a broader range of raters to enhance generalizability.

Transarterial Embolization for Musculoskeletal Pain Management: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Musculoskeletal embolization has emerged in recent years as a treatment of chronic joint pain, as the inflammatory cascade responsible for such pain has become better understood. Studies have shown a complex interplay between joint inflammation and synovial hypervascularity that causes growth of new unmyelinated nerve fibers responsible for pain. Embolization targets joint hypervascularity to disrupt the inflammatory cycle and provide pain relief. The standard treatment algorithm for chronic joint pain is well established and entails escalating therapeutic options that include exercise, self-management programs, analgesic medications, intraarticular injections, and finally surgical replacement or release. Genicular artery embolization (GAE), targeting abnormal vasculature around the knee joint, is the most studied musculoskeletal embolization procedure, reflecting the high worldwide prevalence and increasing incidence of knee osteoarthritis (OA). GAE is now supported by multiple prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials comparing GAE versus sham treatment. Embolization has also extended outside of the knee joint to include the shoulder (treatment of adhesive capsulitis or secondary stiff shoulder), elbow (medial or lateral epicondylitis), hip (OA, great trochanteric pain syndrome), and ankle (plantar fasciitis). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review discusses the current status of transarterial embolization for musculoskeletal pain management, focusing on treatment of knee OA and chronic shoulder pain.

Do cytokines play a role in the transition from acute to chronic musculoskeletal pain?

Musculoskeletal pain has a high prevalence of transition to chronic pain and/or persistence as chronic pain for years or even a lifetime. Possible mechanisms for the development of such pain states are often reflected in inflammatory or neuropathic processes involving, among others, cytokines and other molecules. Since biologics such as blockers of TNF or IL-6 can attenuate inflammation and pain in a subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the question arises to what extent cytokines are involved in the generation of pain in human musculoskeletal diseases. In numerous experimental non-human studies, cytokines have been shown to alter neuronal sensitivity in the peripheral and central nociceptive systems. In this review, we addressed the involvement of cytokines in postoperative pain, complex regional pain syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, temporomandibular joint disease, low back pain and fibromyalgia using PubMed searches including meta-analyses of data. There is evidence that certain pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines are regulated in all of these diseases, often in both acute and chronic disease states. However, within these data, we found a great deal of heterogeneity in the association between cytokine levels and pain. Neutralization of cytokines showed antinociceptive effects in subgroups of patients with chronic pain (e.g., in a proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis), but failed to reduce chronic pain in other diseases (e.g., osteoarthritis). More systematic studies are needed to unravel the pathogenic role of cytokines in human musculoskeletal pain, taking into account the disease process and the mechanisms of pain initiation and maintenance.

Redesigning the Care of Musculoskeletal Conditions With Lifestyle Medicine

Value-based health care has been accelerated by alternative payment models and has catalyzed the redesign of care delivery across the nation. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is one of the fastest growing medical specialties and has emerged as a high-value solution for root cause treatment of chronic disease. This review detailed a large integrated health care delivery system's value transformation efforts in the nonoperative treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by placing patient-centric, team-based, lifestyle-focused care at the foundation. With an economic and treatment imperative to reimagine care, recognizing more intervention is not always better, a collaborative approach was designed, which placed functional improvement of the patient at the center. This article described the process of implementing LM into an MSK model of care. The change management process impacted clinical, operational, and benefit plan design to facilitate an integrated care model. A new understanding of patients' co-occurring physical impairments, medical comorbidities, and behavioral health needs was necessary for clinicians to make the shift from a pathoanatomic, transactional model of care to a biopsychosocial, longitudinal model of care. The authors explored the novel intersection of the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of care using LM principles to achieve greater value for the MSK patient population.

Application of the IASP Grading System to Identify Underlying Pain Mechanisms in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to apply the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system for identifying nociplastic pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and propose criteria to fine-tune decision-making. In addition, the study aimed to characterize a "probable" versus "no or possible" nociplastic pain mechanism using biopsychosocial variables and compare both groups in their 1-year post-TKA response.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of baseline data of a longitudinal prospective study involving 197 patients with KOA awaiting total TKA in Belgium and the Netherlands was performed. Two approaches, one considering 4 and the other 3 pain locations (step 2 of the grading system), were presented. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to compare the probable and no or possible nociplastic pain mechanism groups for several preoperative biopsychosocial-related variables and 1-year postoperative pain. Also, a sensitivity analysis, comparing 3 pain mechanism groups, was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty (15.22%-approach 4 pain locations) and 46 (23.35%-approach 3 pain locations) participants were categorized under probable nociplastic pain. Irrespective of the pain location approach or sensitivity analysis, the probable nociplastic pain group included more woman, was younger, exhibited worse results on various preoperative pain-related and psychological variables, and had more pain 1-year post-TKA compared with the other group.

DISCUSSION

This study proposed additional criteria to fine-tune the grading system for nociplastic pain (except for discrete/regional/multifocal/widespread pain) and characterized a subgroup of patients with KOA with probable nociplastic pain. Future research is warranted for further validation.

Prognostic value of preoperative mechanical hyperalgesia and neuropathic pain qualities for postoperative pain after total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacement (TKR) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage chronic osteoarthritis pain, yet many patients report chronic postoperative pain after TKR. The search for preoperative predictors for chronic postoperative pain following TKR has been studied with inconsistent findings.

METHODS

This study investigates the predictive value of quantitative sensory testing (QST) and PainDETECT for postoperative pain 3, 6 and 12 months post-TKR. We assessed preoperative and postoperative (3 and 6 months) QST measures in 77 patients with knee OA (KOA) and 41 healthy controls, along with neuropathic pain scores in patients (PainDETECT). QST parameters included pressure pain pressure threshold (PPT), pain tolerance threshold (PTT), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation (TS) using cuff algometry, alongside mechanical hyperalgesia and temporal summation to repeated pinprick stimulation.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, KOA patients at baseline demonstrated hyperalgesia to pinprick stimulation at the medial knee undergoing TKR, and cuff pressure at the calf. Lower cuff algometry PTT and mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia were associated with preoperative KOA pain intensity. Moreover, preoperative pinprick pain hyperalgesia explained 25% of variance in pain intensity 12 months post-TKR and preoperative neuropathic pain scores also captured 30% and 20% of the variance in postoperative pain at 6 and 12 months respectively. A decrease in mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia from before surgery to 3 months after TKR was associated with lower postoperative pain at the 12 months post-TKR follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that preoperative pinprick hyperalgesia and neuropathic-like pain symptoms show predictive value for the development of chronic post-TKR pain.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study's findings hold significant implications for chronic pain management in knee osteoarthritis patients, particularly those undergoing total knee replacement surgery (TKR). Mechanical hyperalgesia and neuropathic pain-like characteristics predict postoperative pain 1 year after TKR, emphasizing the importance of understanding pain phenotypes in OA for selecting appropriate pain management strategies. The normalization of hyperalgesia after surgery correlates with better long-term outcomes, further highlighting the therapeutic potential of addressing abnormal pain processing mechanisms pre- and post-TKR.

Assessment of Neuropathic Pain in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis

Background/Objectives: Erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA) is an aggressive form of hand osteoarthritis (OA) and a severely disabling condition. Patients affected by OA frequently lament symptoms suggestive of neuropathic pain (NP). The aim of our study was to ascertain the presence and severity of NP in patients with EHOA and correlate its presence with EHOA clinical characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included all consecutive EHOA patients with NP symptoms who underwent upper limb electroneurography (ENoG) and nerve ultrasound. The presence of NP was screened using the ID pain neuropathic pain-screening questionnaire (ID-Pain). In addition, the following NP questionnaires were also used: Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), PainDETECT, and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Moreover, patients completed the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) and Dreiser's algofunctional finger index questionnaires assessing EHOA disease activity. The following clinical and laboratory data were collected: age, sex, BMI, disease duration, intensity of pain (VAS 0-10), painful and swollen joints, and inflammatory indices, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Results: Of the 34 patients studied, 24 (70.6%) presented NP to the ID-Pain questionnaire. According to DN4, 14 (41.2%) patients had NP, while using the PainDETECT questionnaire, 67.6% had NP. Patients with NP were statistically younger and had a higher VAS pain score compared to subjects without NP. The ENoG and median nerve ultrasound were normal in 81% of patients, while four patients had carpal tunnel syndrome. The ID-Pain questionnaire correlated with the number of painful joints (r = 0.48, p = 0.03) and with the AUSCAN questionnaire (r = 0.37, p = 0.05). The DN4 questionnaire correlated with PainDETECT (r = 0.58, p < 0.01). The PainDETECT questionnaire correlated with VAS pain (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), the DN4 questionnaire (r = 0.58, p < 0.01), and AUSCAN (r = 0.51, p = 0.02). The NPSI questionnaire correlated negatively with BMI (r = -0.53, p = 0.01) and positively with the PainDETECT questionnaire (r = 0.49, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our study revealed that 32% to 70% of EHOA patients exhibited symptoms consistent with NP, with observed variability depending on the questionnaire utilized. Despite patients frequently exhibiting symptoms compatible with NP, only 19% of patients presented alterations on ENoG and ultrasound examinations confirming CTS. This suggests a probable nociplastic component for pain in patients with EHOA, which warrants tailored treatment. In the present study, NP correlated with clinical and functional indices of EHOA.