Quality of life in glaucoma patients and normal subjects related to the severity of damage in each eye

Impact of binocular integrated visual field defects on healthy related quality of life in glaucoma

To investigate the impact of different types of binocular integrated visual field defects on the quality of life in glaucoma.Ninety-six patients with primary glaucoma were divided into 5 groups with 25, 24, 11, 15, and 21 patients according to types of the binocular integrated visual field (BVF) defects. The criteria for BVF grouping included mild visual field defect in binocular eyes, mild visual field defect in 1 eye and moderate or advanced defect in the other, moderate and non-overlapping visual field defect in both eyes, overlapping and moderate visual field defect in binocular eyes, and severe defect in both eyes, respectively. The visual field (VF) evaluation was based on H-P-A visual field grading system. Visual acuity, visual field tests and Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire (GQL-15) were performed for enrolled patients, and binocular visual field results were integrated. The changes and correlations of the Visual field index values and quality of life scores were compared among the 5 groups. The main factors affecting the quality of life in glaucoma were analyzed by multiple regression analysis.The best binocular integrated visual field index (BVFI) and optimal quality of life were observed in group A. The BVFI of group B was better than that of group C or group D, but the peripheral vision glare and dark adaptation were worse. No significant difference was noted between group C and group D in terms of BVFI. However, the glare and dark adaptation in group C were better than that in group D. The BVFI was the lowest and the quality of life was the worst in group E. In all, BVFI and decibels (dB) values were negatively correlated with GQL-15 scores and positively correlated with patients' quality of life.Binocular integrated visual field accurately reflects the visual function in glaucoma. Higher binocular integrated visual field indices represent a better quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Mild to moderate synchronous or complementary binocular VF defects had a slight effect on the quality of life, while severe and non-compensated VF loss significantly impacts on quality of life in glaucoma patients.

Agreement amongst consultant ophthalmologists on levels of visual disability required for eligibility for certificate of sight impairment : Sight impairment registration using binocular composite visual fields

BACKGROUND

Registration as sight impaired allows access to services important for patients. The rates of sight impairment due to visual field loss are underestimated. Previous work has shown that evaluation of visual field defects in both eyes produces poor agreement among ophthalmologists for categorisation of patients as eligible for sight impairment registration.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of binocular summation of both eye glaucomatous visual field defects on agreement for sight impairment registration.

METHODS

Thirty consultant ophthalmologists (Graders), graded 50 glaucomatous visual field sets. Each consisted of both monocular fields and summated binocular plots. Graders classified the visual field sets as sight impaired (SI), severely sight impaired (SSI) or neither. Trichotomous, (SI, SSI or no sight impairment) and dichotomous (any sight impairment versus no sight impairment) concordance values were estimated for the group of graders as a whole and for glaucoma and non-glaucoma experts.

RESULTS

For trichotomous analysis the overall kappa agreement rate was 0.29; for dichotomous analysis it was 0.40. There was no material difference between glaucoma experts and non-experts.

CONCLUSION

Overall agreement was modest. Grading for SI showed the poorest levels of agreement. Using binocular fields does not appear to improve concordance for sight impairment registration. Moreover, there is no difference in agreement between glaucoma and non-glaucoma experts. An overall score for visual disability using mean deviation may be a more pragmatic approach.