Netarsudil’s Effect in Eyes with a History of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty

Netarsudil as a Predictor of Response for MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of netarsudil as an outcome predictor of MicroPulse transscleral laser therapy (MPTLT).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SUBJECTS

Forty-seven eyes in 33 adult patients with glaucoma with a minimum of 1 month of follow-up after netarsudil treatment and 3 months of follow-up after MPTLT were included. Eyes receiving intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures in the interim were excluded.

INTERVENTION

Ophthalmic eyedrops of netarsudil at 0.02%, followed by MPTLT treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation of success between netarsudil and MPTLT. Netarsudil success was defined as an IOP reduction ≥ 20% from baseline, whereas MPTLT success was defined as an IOP reduction ≥ 20% without additional IOP-lowering medications. Secondary outcomes included success rates, mean IOP reduction, adverse effects after each treatment, and netarsudil discontinuation rate.

RESULTS

We found a positive correlation between the netarsudil response and the subsequent MPTLT response (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-13.24; P = 0.041). Among netarsudil responders, 73.7% (14/19) of eyes subsequently responded to MPTLT, whereas among netarsudil nonresponders, 42.8% (12/28) of eyes subsequently responded to MPTLT (P = 0.037). From netarsudil, 44.4% of eyes were successful; from MPTLT, 55.3% of eyes were successful. The mean IOP reductions were 2.83 ± 5.74 mmHg from netarsudil and 3.15 ± 6.43 mmHg from MPTLT. Overall, the rate of netarsudil discontinuation was 55.3%. The most common reasons for netarsudil discontinuation were adverse effects (48.9%), followed by high cost (19.1%). The most common adverse effects to netarsudil were conjunctival hyperemia (48.9%) and blurred vision (8.5%). There were no adverse events reported after MPTLT. After MPTLT, 29.8% of eyes required additional IOP-lowering procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The netarsudil response may serve as a predictive marker of the MPTLT response, with over 70% of netarsudil responders subsequently responding favorably to MPTLT in this study.

Pragmatic adjunctive usage of netarsudil: A retrospective chart review from a tertiary care center

Purpose

This retrospective chart review of netarsudil (Rhopressa) characterizes intra-ocular pressure (IOP) reduction, drug tolerance, drug cost, and compliance in a tertiary university Midwest clinic in a variety of glaucoma diagnoses on patients prescribed netarsudil 01/2017 to 5/2020.

Methods

Patient demographics, primary diagnosis, indication for medication, prescription date, prescription fill status, duration of use, discontinuation reason, and number of IOP-lowering medications were noted. Confounding medication changes were excluded from IOP analysis. The IOP difference between the first visit after starting netarsudil and the baseline (mean before starting netarsudil on the stable medication regimen) was calculated.

Results

A total of 133 patients were prescribed netarsudil (age 69 ± 20 years, 59% females, 79% white, 86% primary glaucoma) as adjunct glaucoma medication (mean medications 3.2 ± 0.9). Indications were lowering IOP (mean baseline IOP 20.0 ± 6 mmHg) and drug regimen simplification. Prescription was not filled by 22/133 subjects because of the cost (68%) and the need for surgery (23%). No demographic factors were associated with prescription fill status. A total of 101 eyes of 76 patients were used for IOP analysis. The mean change in IOP was -0.8 ± 6.4 mmHg, (IOP decrease in 67%, increase or no change in 33% eyes). Netarsudil was discontinued in 52% (50/96) patients; the reasons include surgery for IOP control (42%), allergies (30%), cost (14%), and paradoxical rise in IOP (12%).

Conclusion

Netarsudil was used as adjunct third or fourth line medication at a glaucoma practice in Midwestern USA. 17% of prescriptions went unfilled; netarsudil was discontinued in 52% of patients. IOP response was variable in this population with severe complex glaucoma.

Effectiveness of Netarsudil as an Additional Therapy for Glaucoma in Patients Already on Maximally Tolerated Medical Therapy

Purpose

This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of netarsudil (Rhopressa) in patients with inadequately controlled IOP on otherwise maximally tolerated medical therapy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients started on netarsudil at Stanford University. Exclusion criteria included glaucoma surgery or laser within 6 months of starting netarsudil and other modifications to the baseline medication regimen within 4 weeks of starting netarsudil. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as IOP reduction meeting a predetermined target, and no further medication, laser, or surgery recommended subsequent to starting netarsudil.

Results

Sixty-two eyes were included, and 36 (58%) achieved treatment success at first follow-up. Mean baseline IOP was 19.5 ± 5.6 mmHg on a mean of 3.5 ± 0.7 ocular hypotensive medications. The mean change in IOP from baseline to first follow-up was -3.53 mmHg (-17%). In patients who achieved treatment success, mean IOP change was -5.22 mmHg (-28.0%). Of the eyes with baseline IOP ≤ 20 mmHg, 69% achieved treatment success, compared to only 17% of eyes with baseline IOP ≥ 21 mmHg (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Netarsudil is effective in lowering IOP for patients on otherwise maximally tolerated medical therapy, for which glaucoma laser or surgery would have been the only remaining therapeutic options. Treatment success was more likely in eyes with baseline IOP under 20 mmHg.

A multicenter, open-label study of netarsudil for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a real-world setting

OBJECTIVE

Assess the real-world efficacy of netarsudil, either as monotherapy or concomitant therapy, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) requiring modification of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, interventional, open-label, Phase 4 study, clinical trial registration number: NCT03808688. Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% was prescribed at the recommended once-daily dosage, with treatment regimens determined by the investigators. Netarsudil could be used alone or in combination with other IOP-lowering medications, consistent with standard clinical practice. Primary efficacy endpoint: percentage reduction from baseline IOP at week 12.

RESULTS

Among 261 enrolled patients, 242 received ≥1 netarsudil dose and had ≥1 follow-up IOP measurement (efficacy population). Mean IOP in patients who were treatment-naïve at baseline and using netarsudil as monotherapy (n = 24) decreased by 16.9%. Netarsudil monotherapy was comparable in efficacy to prior therapy across subgroups, and those who replaced prostaglandin analog (n = 57) monotherapy demonstrated reduction of 2.5% from prostaglandin analog-treated baseline values. Among patients who used netarsudil as concomitant therapy (n = 151), reductions in mean IOP (± standard deviation) to week 12 were seen across subgroups who added netarsudil to a single agent (4.3 ± 2.88 mmHg; 20.5%) or ≥2 classes of concomitant therapy (4.5 ± 4.08 mmHg; 20.9%) and who used netarsudil to replace ≥1 other drug classes (0.4 ± 2.47 mmHg; 1.7%). Of 260 netarsudil-treated patients, 41 (15.8%) discontinued, including 29 (11.2%) due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world treatment of patients with OAG or OHT, netarsudil consistently maintained IOP control when it replaced previous IOP-lowering therapies and provided additional IOP-lowering efficacy when added to other treatments.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Netarsudil in Combination with Other Ocular Hypotensive Agents

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of netarsudil in combination with other ocular hypotensive agents in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients with OAG or OHT with netarsudil added to a regimen of at least 1 other ocular hypotensive agent between March 2018 and March 2019.

METHODS

Subjects with at least 2 baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements on the same medication regimen before initiation of netarsudil were included. Subjects were excluded if they experienced other changes in their ocular hypotensive medication regimen.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in IOP after initiation of netarsudil was assessed using linear mixed-effect models. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the time to discontinuation of netarsudil for any reason.

RESULTS

Netarsudil was prescribed for 191 eyes of 138 patients. All of these subjects were included in the analysis of adverse effects. Twelve subjects discontinued netarsudil before the first follow-up visit because of adverse effects, leaving 175 eyes of 126 patients with at least 1 follow-up visit while using netarsudil included in the effectiveness analysis. The mean baseline IOP ± standard deviation was 17.1 ± 5.2 mmHg on a median of 2 ocular hypotensive medications. Including all observations on the same medication regimen after the addition of netarsudil, the mean IOP was 15.0 ± 4.5 mmHg, with a mean reduction of 2.2 mmHg (P < 0.001). A reduction in IOP was observed in eyes on 1 (2.0 mmHg, P < 0.001), 2 (1.0 mmHg, P = 0.12), 3 (3.0 mmHg, P < 0.001), and 4 (2.9 mmHg, P = 0.002) medications at baseline. A sustained ≥ 20% IOP reduction was observed in 16.2% of 123 eyes with at least 2 observations on treatment with netarsudil. Of the 138 subjects who were treated with netarsudil, 26.8% discontinued it because of adverse effects. The median time to discontinuation of netarsudil for any reason was 88 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a modest reduction in IOP is achievable with netarsudil in patients with OAG or OHT who are taking as many as 4 ocular hypotensive medications. The incidence of discontinuation due to adverse effects or inadequate efficacy was high. Supplemental material available atwww.aaojournal.org.