Induction of cell death in ovarian cancer cells by doxorubicin and oncolytic vaccinia virus is associated with CREB3L1 activation

Immune-related adverse events of antibody-based biological medicines in cancer therapy

Recombinant antibodies (Abs) are an integral modality for the treatment of multiple tumour malignancies. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of rituximab as the first monoclonal antibody (mAb) for cancer treatment, several mAbs and antibody (Ab)-based therapies have been approved for the treatment of solid tumour malignancies and other cancers. These Abs function by either blocking oncogenic pathways or angiogenesis, modulating immune response, or by delivering a conjugated drug. The use of Ab-based therapy in cancer patients who could benefit from the treatment, however, is still limited by associated toxicity profiles which may stem from biological features and processes related to target binding, alongside biochemical and/or biophysical characteristics of the therapeutic Ab. A significant immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with Ab-based therapies is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), characterized by the development of fever, rash and even marked, life-threatening hypotension, and acute inflammation with secondary to systemic uncontrolled increase in a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Here, we review irAEs associated with specific classes of approved, Ab-based novel cancer immunotherapeutics, namely immune checkpoint (IC)-targeting Abs, bispecific Abs (BsAbs) and Ab-drug-conjugates (ADCs), highlighting the significance of harmonization in preclinical assay development for safety assessment of Ab-based biotherapeutics as an approach to support and refine clinical translation.

Oncolytic viruses-modulated immunogenic cell death, apoptosis and autophagy linking to virotherapy and cancer immune response

Recent reports have revealed that oncolytic viruses (OVs) play a significant role in cancer therapy. The infection of OVs such as oncolytic vaccinia virus (OVV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), parvovirus, mammalian reovirus (MRV), human adenovirus, Newcastle disease virus (NDV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), avian reovirus (ARV), Orf virus (ORFV), inactivated Sendai virus (ISV), enterovirus, and coxsackievirus offer unique opportunities in immunotherapy through diverse and dynamic pathways. This mini-review focuses on the mechanisms of OVs-mediated virotherapy and their effects on immunogenic cell death (ICD), apoptosis, autophagy and regulation of the immune system.

The role of interferons in ovarian cancer progression: Hinderer or promoter?

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a common gynecologic malignancy with poor prognosis and high mortality. Changes in the OC microenvironment are closely related to the genesis, invasion, metastasis, recurrence, and drug-resistance. The OC microenvironment is regulated by Interferons (IFNs) known as a type of important cytokines. IFNs have a bidirectional regulation for OC cells growth and survival. Meanwhile, IFNs positively regulate the recruitment, differentiation and activation of immune cells. This review summarizes the secretion and the role of IFNs. In particular, we mainly elucidate the actions played by IFNs in various types of therapy. IFNs assist radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and biotherapy for OC, except for some IFN pathways that may cause chemo-resistance. In addition, we present some advances in OC treatment with the help of IFN pathways. IFNs have the ability to powerfully modulate the tumor microenvironment and can potentially provide new combination strategies for OC treatment.

Pan-cancer analysis of CREB3L1 as biomarker in the prediction of prognosis and immunotherapeutic efficacy

Background: CAMP response element binding protein 3-like 1 (CREB3L1) has been indicated as a critical biomarker and can modulate multifaced behaviors of tumor cells in diverse cancers. However, a systematic assessment of CREB3L1 in pan-cancer is of absence, and the predictive value of CREB3L1 in cancer prognosis, the tumor immune microenvironment and the efficacy of immunotherapy remains unexplored.

Methods: CREB3L1 expression in 33 different cancer types was investigated using RNAseq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The characteristics of CREB3L1 alternations were illustrated in cBioPortal database. The prognostic and clinicopathological value of CREB3L1 was analyzed through clinical data downloaded from the TCGA database. The potential role of CREB3L1 in the tumor immune microenvironment was illustrated by utilizing CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms, and TISIDB online database. The associations between CREB3L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were assessed by spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Furthermore, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was conducted to explore the potential biological functions and downstream pathways of CREB3L1 in different human cancers. The correlations of CREB3L1 expression with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors efficacy and drug sensitivity were also investigated.

Results: The expression of CREB3L1 was abnormally high or low in several different cancer types, and was also strictly associated with the prognosis of cancer patients. CREB3L1 expression levels have a strong relationship with infiltrating immune cells, including regulatory T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, B naïve cells, dendritic cells and mast cells. CREB3L1 expression was also correlated with the expression of multiple immune-related biomolecules, TMB, and MSI in several cancers. Moreover, CREB3L1 had promising applications in predicting the immunotherapeutic benefits and drug sensitivity in cancer management.

Conclusions: Our results highlight the value of CREB3L1 as a predictive biomarker for the prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in multiple cancers, and CREB3L1 seems to play key roles in the tumor immune microenvironment, suggesting the role of CREB3L1 as a promising biomarker for predicting the prognosis and immune-related signatures in diverse cancers.

Oncolytic viral vectors in the era of diversified cancer therapy: from preclinical to clinical

With the in-depth research and wide application of immunotherapy recently, new therapies based on oncolytic viruses are expected to create new prospects for cancer treatment via eliminating the suppression of the immune system by tumors. Currently, an increasing number of viruses are developed and engineered, and various virus vectors based on effectively stimulating human immune system to kill tumor cells have been approved for clinical treatment. Although the virus can retard the proliferation of tumor cells, the choice of oncolytic viruses in biological cancer therapy is equally critical given their therapeutic efficacy, safety and adverse effects. Moreover, previously known oncolytic viruses have not been systematically classified. Therefore, in this review, we summarized and distinguished the characteristics of several common types of oncolytic viruses: herpes simplex virus, adenovirus, measles virus, Newcastle disease virus, reovirus and respiratory syncytial virus. Subsequently, we outlined that these oncolytic viral vectors have been transformed from preclinical studies in combination with immunotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and nanoparticles into clinical therapeutic strategies for various advanced solid malignancies or circulatory system cancers.

Combining Oncolytic Viruses and Small Molecule Therapeutics: Mutual Benefits

The focus of treating cancer with oncolytic viruses (OVs) has increasingly shifted towards achieving efficacy through the induction and augmentation of an antitumor immune response. However, innate antiviral responses can limit the activity of many OVs within the tumor and several immunosuppressive factors can hamper any subsequent antitumor immune responses. In recent decades, numerous small molecule compounds that either inhibit the immunosuppressive features of tumor cells or antagonize antiviral immunity have been developed and tested for. Here we comprehensively review small molecule compounds that can achieve therapeutic synergy with OVs. We also elaborate on the mechanisms by which these treatments elicit anti-tumor effects as monotherapies and how these complement OV treatment.