Topography-Guided LASIK versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Long-term Refractive and Quality of Vision Outcomes

Topography-guided excimer laser ablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, the most commonly performed corneal refractive surgery is laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Customized forms of LASIK have been developed, which have allowed for improved outcomes and the enhanced correction of higher order aberrations (HOAs). This review discusses one form of custom LASIK, topography-guided LASIK, including factors involved in preoperative planning, and advantages and disadvantages compared with other forms of keratorefractive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various treatment-planning approaches addressing discrepancies between the refractive and topographic astigmatic magnitude and axis have been used successfully, although there is debate regarding a superior method in the literature.

SUMMARY

There are many forms of custom LASIK, which provide excellent outcomes. Topography-guided LASIK may be of particular use in highly aberrated corneas and may also provide outstanding outcomes in healthy eyes given its emphasis on treating the primary refractive surface of the eye.

Design and Conduct of Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Surgical Innovations in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Surgical innovations are necessary to improve patient care. After an initial exploratory phase, novel surgical technique should be compared with alternative options or standard care in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, surgical RCTs have unique methodological challenges. Our study sought to investigate key aspects of the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs of novel surgeries.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021253297). RCTs evaluating novel surgeries for cataract, vitreoretinal, glaucoma, and corneal diseases were included. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. The search period was January 1, 2016, to June 16, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 52 ophthalmic surgery RCTs were identified in the fields of glaucoma (n = 12), vitreoretinal surgery (n = 5), cataract (n = 19), and cornea (n = 16). A description defining the surgeon's experience or level of expertise was reported in 30 RCTs (57%) and was presented in both control and intervention groups in 11 (21%). Specification of the number of cases performed in the particular surgical innovation being assessed prior to the trial was reported in 10 RCTs (19%) and an evaluation of quality of the surgical intervention in 7 (13%). Prospective trial registration was recorded in 12 RCTs (23%) and retrospective registration in 13 (25%); and there was no registration record in the remaining 28 (53%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Important aspects of the study design such as the surgical learning curve, surgeon's previous experience, quality assurance, and trial registration details were often missing in novel ophthalmic surgical procedures. The Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) framework aims to improve the quality of study design.

Decision taking in corneal refractive surgery

A 27-year-old woman who wants to get rid of contact lenses and spectacles was seen at our clinic. She had strabismus surgery as a child and was patched for the right eye but now shows mild nondisturbing exophoria. Infrequently, she likes to box in the sports school. Her corrected distance visual acuity at presentation in the right eye was 20/16 with -3.75 -0.75 × 50 and in the left eye 20/16 with -3.75 -1.25 × 142. Her cycloplegic refraction in the right eye was -3.75 -0.75 × 44 and in the left eye was -3.25 -1.25 × 147. The left eye is the dominant eye. The tear break-up time was 8 seconds in both eyes, and the Schirmer tear test was 7 to 10 mm in right and left eyes, respectively. Pupil sizes under mesopic conditions were 6.62 mm and 6.68 mm. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) (measured from the epithelium) in the right eye was 3.89 mm and in the left eye was 3.87 mm. The corneal thickness was 503 μm and 493 μm of the right and left eye, respectively. Corneal endothelial cell density was on average 2700 cells/mm2 for both eyes. Slitlamp biomicroscopy showed clear corneas and a normal flat iris configuration. Supplemental Figures 1 to 4 (available at http://links.lww.com/JRS/A818, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A819, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A820, and http://links.lww.com/JRS/A821) show the corneal topography and Belin-Ambrósio deviation (BAD) maps at presentation of the right eye and left eye, respectively. Would you consider this patient a candidate for corneal refractive surgery (eg, laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy, laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK], or small-incision lenticule extraction [SMILE] procedure)? Has your opinion changed given the recent opinion of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding LASIK?1 The patient herself is slightly favoring an implantation of a phakic intraocular lens (pIOL), as she prefers something reversible. Would you implant a pIOL, and which type of IOL, for this level of myopia? What is your diagnosis or are additional diagnostic methodologies needed to establish a diagnosis? What is your treatment advice for this patient? REFERENCES 1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) lasers-patient labeling recommendations; draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff; availability. July 28, 2022, Federal Register; 87 FR 45334. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/laser-assisted-situ-keratomileusis-lasik-lasers-patient-labeling-recommendations Accessed January 25, 2023.

Comparison of Planned Versus Achieved Central Stromal Thickness Reduction in LASIK Versus SMILE: A Contralateral Eye Study

PURPOSE

To compare attempted versus achieved corneal stromal thickness reduction in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in the other eye.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study included 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), one eye randomized to have myopic LASIK and the contralateral eye to have SMILE. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. For each of the treatment groups, the achieved maximum stromal thickness reduction was compared to the planned/attempted thickness. The deviation of planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction was then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 3 months postoperatively, LASIK had a lower difference between planned versus attempted stromal thickness reduction compared to SMILE (13.72 ± 14.45 vs 24.00 ± 19.45 µm, P = .03). Graphical analysis revealed this deviation to be exaggerated in higher myopic errors, when a higher maximum stromal reduction was planned. The mean stromal reduction thickness was 83.40 ± 29.52 µm achieved versus 97.13 ± 25.69 µm mean planned ablation depth in the LASIK group (P < .001) compared to 76.45 ± 29.69 µm achieved versus 100.45 ± 26.56 µm planned ablation depth in the SMILE group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK had a significantly lower difference between planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction when compared to SMILE (P = .03). This difference was more apparent in higher myopic corrections. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(7):454-459.].

Comparison of effective corneal refractive centration to the visual axis: LASIK vs. SMILE, a contralateral eye digitized comparison of the postoperative result

PURPOSE

To define and compare the centration of the ablation effect in LASIK to the corresponding effect in SMILE, in myopic laser vision correction in order to possibly explain the refractive performance differences noted between the two procedures in a contralateral eye study.

SETTING

Private Ambulatory Eye Surgery Unit.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized contralateral eye study.

METHODS

In 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), one eye was prospectively randomized to have myopic topography-guided LASIK treatment and the contralateral eye to have SMILE; Digital image analysis of the achieved centration to the aimed corneal vertex was assessed for both procedures on the perioperative Scheimpflug tangential curvature maps, using a proprietary digitized methodology.

RESULTS

The radial displacement between the attempted centration on the corneal vertex versus the center of the effective anterior corneal curvature flattening was on average 130 ± 62 μm in the LASIK group and 313 ± 144μm in the SMILE group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this contralateral eye study, topography-guided myopic LASIK was found to achieve significantly better effective centration compared to myopic SMILE, in regards digitally measured decentration of the effective refractive change achieved in the anterior corneal curvature from the corneal vertex. This may explain the previously reported superior visual outcomes in the LASIK group eyes when compared to the contralateral SMILE group eyes.

Scheimpflug vs Scanning-Slit Corneal Tomography: Comparison of Corneal and Anterior Chamber Tomography Indices for Repeatability and Agreement in Healthy Eyes

Purpose

To evaluate and compare the repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug vs scanning-slit tomography of the cornea and the anterior chamber in terms of keratometric and tomographic indices in healthy eyes.

Methods

The 20 eyes of 10 healthy participants underwent 3 consecutive measurements using both Scheimpflug-tomography and scanning-slit tomography, diagnostic devices. Multiple corneal and anterior chamber tomographic parameters were recorded and evaluated to include corneal keratometry and its axis; corneal best-fit sphere (BFS), pachymetry mapping, angle kappa, anterior chamber depth (ACD), pupil diameter, and location. Repeatability for each device was assessed using the within each subject standard deviation of sequential exams, the coefficient variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement between the two devices was assessed using Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and correlation coefficient (r).

Results

Both devices were found to have high repeatability (ICC>0.9) both in keratometric and other tomographic measurements. Scheimpflug tomography's repeatability though appeared superior in the average keratometry values, anterior and posterior BFS, thinnest corneal pachymetry value and location (p<0.05). Agreement: Statistically significant inter-device differences were noted in the mean values of K1, K2, BFS, ACD and thinnest corneal pachymetry (p<0.05). Despite the agreement differences noted, the two devices were well correlated (r>0.8) in respective measurements with Scheimpflug delivering consistently lower values than the scanning-slit tomography device.

Conclusion

Scheimpflug-tomography repeatability was found to be superior to that of scanning-slit tomography in this specific study, in most parameters evaluated. Inter-device agreement evaluation suggests that reading from the two devices may not be used interchangeably in absolute values, yet they are well correlated with Scheimpflug delivering consistently lower values in most.

Refractive surgery

Refractive surgery has evolved beyond laser refractive techniques over the past decade. Laser refractive surgery procedures (such as laser in-situ keratomileusis), surface ablation techniques (such as laser epithelial keratomileusis), and photorefractive keratectomy have now been established as fairly safe procedures that produce excellent visual outcomes for patients with low-to-moderate amounts of ametropia. Additionally, a broader selection of options are now available to treat a wider range of refractive errors. Small incision lenticule extraction uses a femtosecond laser to shape a refractive lenticule, which is removed through a small wound. The potential advantages of this procedure include greater tectonic strength and less dry eye. In the future, intracorneal implants could be used to treat hyperopia or presbyopia. Phakic intraocular implants and refractive lens exchange might be useful options in carefully selected patients for correcting high degrees of ametropia. Thus, physicians are now able to provide patients with the appropriate refractive corrective option based on the individual's risk-benefit profile.