Matching the Patient to the Intraocular Lens: Preoperative Considerations to Optimize Surgical Outcomes

Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Functional Outcomes after Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Stable and Mild Glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to describe the visual, refractive, functional, and patients' satisfaction outcomes of the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) in patients with mild primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

This is an ambispective, multicenter, and descriptive study. Patients with mild and stable POAG for at least 6 months, as well as patients who had the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ EDOF IOL implanted were included. Humphrey Field Analyzer III (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and Triton optical coherence tomography (Topcon, Japan) were used to evaluate the inclusion criteria. In all cases, the formula used to calculate IOL power was Barrett Universal II. Refractive outcomes and visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near were evaluated from 3 months postoperatively onward. In addition, monocular and binocular defocus curve and contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000, VectorVision, Greenvile, OH, USA) were assessed. Patient satisfaction was assessed through the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT) and Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) questionnaires .

RESULTS

In total, 72 AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ lenses from 36 patients were enrolled, of which 28 were women. The mean age was 71.61 ± 7.68 years, the mean thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was 79.24 ± 14.96 µm, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 16.88 ± 3.09 mmHg, and the mean number of topical anti-glaucoma medication was 0.89 ± 0.95. Binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), binocular corrected intermediate visual acuity (CIVA), and binocular corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) were 0.00 ± 0.12, 0.16 ± 0.14, and 0.24 ± 0.11 LogMAR, respectively. Spherical equivalent was -0.27 ± 0.33 diopters (D). In addition, 86.11% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D and 95.83% were within ± 1.0 D. The binocular defocus curve shows a peak of maximum visual acuity (VA) at 0 D (0.00 ± 0.11 LogMAR) and smooth curve at intermediate (66 cm/-1.5 D) 0.11 ± 0.09 LogMAR and near distance (40 cm/-2.5 D) 0.36 ± 0.18 LogMAR. Binocular contrast sensitivity showed a decrease in high spatial frequencies compared with low spatial frequencies. The IOLSAT revealed that in bright light conditions, 88.89%, 91.67%, and 63.89% of patients "never" or "rarely" need glasses at far, arm's length, and near distances, respectively. In addition, according to the QUVID, 97.06% of patients "never" report shadow areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The new AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ EDOF IOL seems to provide good visual outcomes at distance, intermediate, and near vision, with an adequate contrast sensitivity, defocus curve, a low rate of visual disturbances and high visual satisfaction in patients with mild and stable POAG.

Dissatisfaction after implantation of EDOF intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the symptoms, etiology, and treatment of patient dissatisfaction after extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

For this study, all medical records of patients who received an EDOF IOL from July 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had reported any dissatisfaction after surgery. The main outcome parameters were reasons for dissatisfaction (subjective complaints) and the presumed etiology of the complaints.

RESULTS

Of 202 patients (354 eyes) who underwent EDOF IOL implantation, 83 eyes (22.8%) of 52 dissatisfied patients were included. Blurred vision was the predominant complaint, reported in 78 eyes (94%). Photic phenomena were reported in 21 eyes (25.3%), with 16 eyes (76.2%) experiencing coexisting blurred vision. The major etiologies for dissatisfaction in this cohort were residual ametropia (51.8%), dry eye disease (26.5%), and posterior capsular opacification (12.0%). Treatments were administered to 85.5% of the eyes, including interventions such as artificial tears, spectacles, or refractive surgery enhancement. A small number of patients (n = 12; 5.9%) remained dissatisfied despite intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this real-world data study, dissatisfaction after EDOF IOL implantation can be effectively identified and treated in most cases.

Optical properties of artificial intraocular lenses and considerations for additive manufacturing

Cataracts, a leading cause of blindness in the world, are commonly treated by replacing the ocular lens with an artificial intraocular lens (IOL). The material and structure of the IOL are major factors in their efficacy, affecting, among other characteristics, the optics of the eye. In the recent research record, two optical properties have emerged as standardized characterization methods for IOL optics: (1) optical transmittance and (2) optical scattering. This mini review describes these two methods and collates data in such a way that comparisons may be drawn across four different IOL material types (PMMA, hydrophobic acrylic, hydrophilic acrylic, and silicone) and three IOL conditions (in-vivo, cadaver explant, and inventory control). Finally, the emerging field of additive manufacturing for IOL production is considered. Such technologies hold promise for optimizing IOLs for cataract patients. Researchers in additive manufacturing for IOL production may incorporate optical transmittance and optical scattering as standard characterization methods for 3D-printed IOLs developed by the broader IOL researcher community.

Influence of Corneal Higher Order Aberrations on Visual Performance With a Multifocal Intraocular Lens

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of corneal aberrations on the visual performance of patients who received a multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) implant.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy patients who underwent cataract or refractive lens exchange and were implanted with an apodized diffractive MIOL were included in the analysis. Relationships between total higher order aberrations (HOAs), coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration (SA) measured with a Scheimpflug topographer at 4 mm versus visual acuity and contrast sensitivity areas under the defocus curves (AUC) were evaluated. Relationships between other demographic and biometric variables with total AUCs were also explored.

RESULTS

Eyes rarely showed coma and trefoil aberrations exceeding 0.2 μm, 0.1 μm for SA, and 0.3 μm for the total HOAs. The total HOAs showed correlations with age (rho = 0.32, P < .0005) and anterior chamber depth (rho = -0.21, P = .001). The mesopic pupil size, age, and chart luminance, in the following order, were mainly correlated with total AUCs. A correction by mesopic pupil was required to unmask weak correlations of AUCs with the corneal aberrations. These were found particularly for total HOAs and total and near AUCs (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Values below 0.3 μm for total HOAs, 0.2 μm for coma and trefoil, and 0.1 μm for SA at 4 mm are safe for the study IOL. Higher values are rare but still can be safe, and the 0.5 μm cut-off at 4 mm for contraindication merits further research with this and other IOLs. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(4):e291-e299.].

Prophylactic Therapy for Long-Term Ocular Discomfort After Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

The cataract surgery dissatisfaction rate is 20% to 35% due to ocular surface discomfort. We investigate the ocular surface discomfort after surgical failure as a consequence of age-related parainflammation. We also aim to prevent it by immune-modulating prophylactic management.

METHODS

Monocentric clinical trial realized in a teaching hospital. Prospective, randomized, open-label, unmasked clinical trial. One hundred patients diagnosed with cataracts underwent phacoemulsification surgery. Groups A (<65 years; n = 25) and B (>75 years; n = 25) received surgery only. Groups C and D (both >75 years and both n = 25) used cyclosporine A 0.1% cationic emulsion (CE) eye drops or CE lubricating eye drops (both twice daily), respectively, for 30 days before surgery. Patients were followed up 90 days after surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative ocular surface failure; secondary outcomes examined the influence of prophylactic cyclosporine A 0.1% CE therapy on ocular surface outcomes.

RESULTS

Group B demonstrated greater severity regarding ocular surface signs and symptoms throughout the study period, versus all other groups. Signs/symptoms were typically lower in Group A. Group C achieved significant reductions in conjunctival Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye values ( P < 0.05), conjunctival hyperemia severity ( P < 0.01), and meibomian gland dysfunction ( P < 0.001) at Day 45, versus Group B, and tear break-up time was increased ( P < 0.001). Ocular surface inflammatory marker transcription (HLADR, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM-1], and interleukin 6 [IL-6]) was significantly downregulated in Group C, versus Group B, at 90 days ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery induced ocular surface system failure with a clinically significant persistent inflammatory status (InflammAging) in patients older than 75 years. Prophylactic cyclosporine A 0.1% CE eye drops were associated with improved ocular surface homeostasis and reductions in inflammatory markers.

Effect of Pupil, Spherical Aberration, Decentration, and Tilt on the Optical Performance of Five Different Monofocal IOLs

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the effect of pupil size, spherical aberration (SA), decentration, and tilt on the optical performance of five different monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

Four aspheric IOLs (Vivinex, Hoya; SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc; ZCB00, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision; Akreos Adapt AO, Bausch & Lomb) with different SA values and one spherical IOL (SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) were tested using an OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 optical bench. The IOL diopter was measured at different apertures. The optical quality of the IOLs was evaluated using the modulation transfer function (MTF), through-focus MTF, and images of the United States Air Force Target test with different apertures and corneal SA values. The IOLs were also measured while they were decentered and tilted.

RESULTS

The smaller the aperture, the wider the through-focus MTF of all tested IOLs, and the best image quality was observed with a 3-mm aperture. The diopter of aspheric IOLs with negative SA were negatively correlated with aperture size, but the result was opposite for spherical IOLs. The IOL power difference was more than 0.50 diopters between different apertures. All aspheric IOLs had similar MTF curves with a 3-mm aperture. Aspheric IOLs had the best visual quality with the same or similar corneal SAs. Most of the tested IOLs had lower tolerances in tilt than in decentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pupil size, SA value, the degree of decentration, and tilt had different effects on the optical performance of aspheric IOLs. The results can provide guidance for surgeons in clinical practice. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(3):e220-e230.].

Effect of crystalline lens decentration and tilt on visual performance in eyes implanted with bifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To explore the potential of crystalline lens decentration and tilt as indicators for screening cataract patients for presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification with bifocal (Tecnis ZMB00) or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) (Tecnis ZXR00) IOL implantation were consecutively enrolled. The decentration and tilt of the crystalline lens and the IOL were quantified through the utilization of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Casia2). Postoperative visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), objective optical quality, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed at a 3-month follow-up. A LOWESS (LOcally WEighted Scatterplot Smoothing) curve was employed to analyze the changes in VA, CS, and objective optical quality relative to the decentration or tilt of crystalline lenses. A further comparison of visual outcomes was conducted based on the inflection points suggested by the curves.

RESULTS

Eighty‑seven patients with ZMB00 IOL and 76 patients with ZXR00 IOL were included. Multiple 6-mm internal aberrations showed a nonlinear increase with greater crystalline lens decentration. The inflection points for the steep increase were observed to be 0.28 mm for the bifocal group and 0.35 mm for the EDOF group. Beyond these points, internal aberrations such as coma increased significantly (all P < 0.01). Patient satisfaction decreased (P < 0.01). Moreover, the bifocal group exhibited a decline in spectacle-independence from 98.67% to 83.33% (P = 0.049), along with a reduction in CS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased decentration of crystalline lenses compromises specific visual quality aspects in eyes implanted with ZMB00 and ZXR00 IOLs, with cut-off values of 0.28 mm and 0.35 mm, respectively.

Monovision versus multifocality for presbyopia during primary phacoemulsification: systematic review and network meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) focuses on comparing monovision and bilateral multifocal lenses (bMFIOL) implantation methods in treating presbyopia, a common age-related condition often seen in post-cataract surgery patients. This review focuses on evaluating the efficacy, user satisfaction and limitations of these two approaches through direct or indirect comparison. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library, considering studies up to 15 July 2022, with direct or indirect comparisons between any monovision and bMFIOL implantation with bilateral cataract surgery. The study protocol has been published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42022340257). Thirty-two studies (3082 patients) were included in the NMA for the primary outcome, complete post-operative spectacle independence. NMA showed monovision to be inferior to bMFIOLs, as bMFIOL was more likely to provide complete spectacle independence (RR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.34 to 3.15, p = 0.002) compared to monovision. Monovision resulted in less glare compared to bMFIOL (RR = 0.343, 95% CI = 0.181 to 0.651, p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between monovision and bMFIOL for binocular unadjusted distance visual acuity (MD = 70.01, 95% CI = -19.88 to 4.60, p = 0.437) and binocular unadjusted near visual acuity (MD = 5.46, 95% CI = -5.24 to 10.94, p = 0.191). When compared to monovision, bMFIOL provided greater complete spectacle independence at the expense of greater glare. This study was limited by data heterogeneity, and further studies with standardized reporting would be useful.

Evaluation of Visual Outcomes, Postoperative Angle Alpha, and Angle Kappa After Implantation of Isofocal Intraocular Lenses

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of angles kappa and alpha on the visual outcomes after implantation of isofocal intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery.

Methods

This prospective study involved 66 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with Isopure IOLs. Exclusion criteria comprised irregular corneal astigmatism exceeding 1.0D, and ocular co-morbidities affecting visual outcomes post-surgery. Evaluation parameters included postoperative refraction, uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 cm. Additionally, postoperative angles alpha, kappa, and wavefront aberrations at a 3-mm pupil using ray tracing were assessed post-surgery at least 60 days later.

Results

Patients had a mean age of 64.48 ± 9.92 years. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.21 ± 0.27 D. Mean UDVA and CDVA were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.04 and 0.02 ± 0.06, respectively. Mean UIVA LogMAR 0.32 ± 0.08 while mean DCIVA was LogMAR 0.29 ± 0.08. Postoperative angles kappa and alpha were 0.39 ± 0.14 mm and 0.45 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. Mean postoperative ocular RMS higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 0.23 ± 0.08. Spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil averaged 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.03, and 0.07 ± 0.03, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between postoperative angle kappa and alpha with UDVA, CDVA, or HOAs. A non-significant weak positive correlation was noted between angle kappa and UIVA/DCIVA, while no correlation was found between angle alpha and UIVA/DCIVA.

Conclusion

No substantial correlations were found between various postoperative angles kappa and alpha values and postoperative visual acuity metrics (UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA) or higher order ocular aberrations (including, spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil with a 3.0 mm diameter) in pseudophakic eyes implanted with isofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Premium intraocular lens adoption: Insights from a national health insurance analysis

BACKGROUND

This study explores the utilization patterns of premium and nonpremium intraocular lenses (IOLs) under Taiwan's National Health Insurance, given the potential out-of-pocket expenses incurred by cataract surgery patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, population-based analysis was performed on patients who underwent IOL implantation between 2016 and 2020. IOLs were categorized into nonpremium and premium, with the latter further divided based on function. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors influencing IOL implantation, with data stratified by medical institute type, ownership, and patient demographics.

RESULTS

In total, 1,194,805 IOLs were implanted during the study period. The rate of premium IOL implantation was lower compared to non-premium IOL implantation. However, the adoption rate of premium IOLs increased more rapidly than that of non-premium IOLs. Specifically, the adoption rate for premium IOLs was 35.2% in 2016, rising to 42.6% in 2020. Patients receiving treatment in clinics were considerably more likely to use nonpremium IOLs than were those receiving treatment in medical centers (12.7% higher probability for clinics; P < 0.001). The implantation of higher-end premium IOLs was more prevalent in clinics than in other medical institutes. The prevalence of premium IOL implantation was higher in private hospitals than in public hospitals (odds ratio: 1.403; P < 0.001). Premium IOLs were more commonly implanted in younger patients with higher income levels and without relative contraindications.

CONCLUSIONS

IOL selection is associated with both personal and institutional characteristics. These factors should be considered in public policy development aimed at regulating the IOL market within a universal health insurance framework.

Functional Design Analysis of Two Current Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses

Purpose

To evaluate the differences between two extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses, the Alcon IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart and to compare them with a simple monofocal lens, the Alcon IQ, using a simulation-based approach.

Methods

A mathematical lens model was created for each lens type based on a measured surface geometry. The lens model was then used in a raytracer to calculate a refractive power map of the lens and a ray propagation image for the focal zone.

Results

The simulations confirm the enhanced depth of focus of these two lenses. There are apparent differences between the models. For the Vivity, more light is directed into the far focus in low light conditions, whereas the LuxSmart behaves more pupil independent and prioritizes intermediate vision.

Conclusions

The simulation-based approach was effective in evaluating and comparing the design aspects of these lenses. It can be positioned as a valuable third tool for lens characterization, complementing in vivo studies and in vitro measurements.

Translational Relevance

With this approach not only focusing on the resulting optical performance, but the underlying functional mechanisms, it paves the way forward for a better adaptation to the individual needs and preferences of patients.

BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Management with intraocular lenses

Cataract surgery including intraocular lens (IOL) insertion, has been refined extensively since the first such procedure by Sir Harold Ridley in 1949. The intentional creation of monovision with IOLs using monofocal IOL designs has been reported since 1984. The first reported implantation of multifocal IOLs was published in 1987. Since then, various refractive and or diffractive multifocal IOLs have been commercialised. Most are concentric, but segmented IOLs are also available. The most popular are trifocal designs (overlaying two diffractive patterns to achieve additional focal planes at intermediate and near distances) and extended depth of focus designs which leave the patient largely spectacle independent with the reduced risk of bothersome contrast reduction and glare. As well as mini-monovision, surgical strategies to minimise the impact of presbyopia with IOLs includes mixing and matching lenses between the eyes and using IOLs whose power can be adjusted post-implantation. Various IOL designs to mimic the accommodative process have been tried including hinge optics, dual optics, lateral shifts lenses with cubic-type surfaces, lens refilling and curvature changing approaches, but issues in maintaining the active mechanism with post-surgical fibrosis, without causing ocular inflammation, remain a challenge. With careful patient selection, satisfaction rates with IOLs to manage presbyopia are high and anatomical or physiological complications rates are no higher than with monofocal IOLs.

Clinical results with a multifocal intraocular lens with a novel optical design

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the optical performance and safety of a new multifocal lens with a novel optical design featuring two additional foci (or intensifiers) in patients with cataract and presbyopia.

METHODS

In this single-center, non-randomized prospective observational study, 31 patients underwent implantation of the new multifocal IOL between March 2020 and November 2021 at a tertiary clinical center in Buenos Aires and Ramos Mejia, Argentina. Postoperative examinations with emphasis on uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at distance and near and at two different intermediate distances (80 cm and 60 cm) were performed during the 3 postoperative months.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients who underwent implantation of the new IOL, 30 underwent bilateral surgery (61 eyes in total). At 3 months, all 61 eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) of at least 0.15 logMAR; 57 eyes (93%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) of 0.1 logMAR and 27 eyes (44%) had an UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR. At 80 cm, 60 eyes (98%) had an uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA) of at least 0.1 log MAR and 48 eyes (79%) had an UCIVA of 0.0 logMAR.

CONCLUSION

The new multifocal IOL with a novel optical concept (5 foci) showed a wide range of visual acuity especially at intermediate and near distances in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Uncorrected visual acuity was excellent at all tested distances, monocularly and binocularly, spectacle independence and patient satisfaction were high.

Intraocular lens selection in diabetic patients: How to increase the odds for success

The incidence of cataracts is significantly higher in diabetic individuals, particularly in younger age groups, with rates quadrupled in those under 65 and doubled in those over 65 compared to non-diabetics. Cataract surgery in diabetic patients poses many challenges: Poor epithelial healing, decreased corneal sensitivity, increased central corneal thickness, decreased endothelial cell count, variable topography, poor pupillary dilatation, anterior capsular phimosis, posterior capsular opacification (PCO), chances of progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR), zonular weakness, and vitreous prolapse and diabetic macular edema. Selection of an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) is crucial for visual rehabilitation and monitoring DR. The choice of IOL in diabetic cataract patients is a challenging scenario. Square-edge IOLs are favored for their capacity to mitigate PCO, whereas hydrophilic counterparts may incur calcification in the setting of proliferative DR. The advisability of premium IOLs for achieving spectacle independence warrants judicious evaluation, particularly in the presence of advanced retinopathy. Optimal IOL placement within the capsular bag is advocated to minimize postoperative complications. Rigorous preoperative assessment and informed patient counseling regarding IOL options are indispensable for optimizing surgical outcomes. This review article covers various aspects regarding the choice of IOLs in different case scenarios and complications in the diabetic population.

Efficacy of a new water-free topical cyclosporine 0.1% solution for optimizing the ocular surface in patients with dry eye and cataract

This is a pooled analysis from 2 phase III clinical trials investigating a water-free topical cyclosporine 0.1% for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye. The analyses included 1162 patients: 35% with cataract, 20% with pseudophakia, and 45% without cataract. Demographics or baseline characteristics were comparable across groups except for age and vision. The cyclosporine-treated patients achieved large mean improvements from baseline by day 15: -3.7 in patients without cataract, -3.2 in patients with cataract, and -3.1 in pseudophakic patients. These improvements were statistically significantly higher compared with the respective vehicle groups. In the cataract subgroup, 59% of patients treated with cyclosporine achieved ≥3 grade improvements in corneal staining score, as early as day 15. The magnitude of the effect and early onset of action make this new cyclosporine solution a promising candidate for preoperative management of ocular surface in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction

AIM

To evaluate the objective visual outcomes following implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) in individuals with varying axial lengths (AL) and targeted refraction.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised age-matched eyes that underwent implantation of the EDOF IOL. Eyes were categorized based on AL into groups: control group with AL < 26 mm; high myopia group with AL ≥ 26 mm. Each group was then subdivided based on postoperative spherical equivalent (SE). Follow-up at three months included assessment of uncorrected visual acuity at different distances, contrast sensitivity (CS), refractive outcomes, and spectacle independence.

RESULTS

Overall, this study included 100 eyes from 100 patients, comprising 50 males (50.00%) and 50 females (50.00%), with 20 eyes in each group. In the control group, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 5 and 3 m (m) in the - 1.50 to -0.75 group was inferior to that of the - 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.004). Conversely, the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 33 cm in the - 1.50 to -0.75 group was superior to that of the - 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.005). Within the high myopia group, the UDVA at 5 and 3 m in the - 2.25 to -1.50 group was worse than in the - 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.009 and 0.008, respectively). However, the UNVA at 33 cm in the - 2.25 to -1.50 group was better than in the - 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed among the groups for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P > 0.05). Additionally, in the high myopia group, the CS of the - 2.25 to -1.50 group was lower compared to that of the - 0.75 to 0.00 group (P = 0.017). Among high myopia patients, 90.00% with refraction ranging from - 1.50 to -0.75 reported achieving overall spectacle independence.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses (IOLs) yields satisfactory visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with axial myopia. Among high myopia patients, a refraction ranging from - 1.50 to -0.75 diopters achieves superior visual quality compared to other postoperative myopic diopters.

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantations of three types of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses that have undergone corneal refractive surgery

This prospective, non-randomized, comparative study aimed to compare the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantations of three presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) after myopic refractive surgery. It was conducted from January 2020 to December 2021 in Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups based on the type of IOL implanted. The visual acuity, refractive stability, high-order aberrations, objective visual quality, spectacle independence, and visual function index 14 questionnaire scores of the three groups were compared. This study included 78 eyes of 39 patients: 26 eyes with 839MP, 26 eyes with MF30, and 26 eyes with ZXR00. Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved significantly for all three groups. For a pupil diameter of 4.0 mm, the spherical aberrations of the three groups were 0.33 ± 0.16 μ, 0.50 ± 0.08 μ, and 0.39 ± 0.10 μ, respectively. The spectacle independence for distance vision was over 90% in each group; for near vision, it was only 25% for the ZXR00 group. All three types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs improved visual quality in post-LASIK or PRK patients. However, the high incidence of photic phenomena after presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation in patients who have undergone myopic LASIK should not be neglected.

Comparison of modal and zonal wavefront measurements of refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

Extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are typically evaluated using commercially available aberrometers. Given the intricate optical design of these IOLs, employing an appropriate wavefront reconstruction method with a sufficient sampling resolution of the aberrometer is crucial. A high-resolution Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor was developed by magnifying the pupil aperture by a factor of five onto a lenslet array (pitch: 133 µm) and utilizing a full-frame CMOS sensor (24 by 36 mm), resulting in a 26.6 µm sampling resolution. Zonal wavefront reconstruction was used and compared with Zernike-based modal wavefront reconstruction to retain detailed local slope irregularities. Four refractive EDoF IOLs with a power of 20D were examined, and the wavefront difference between the zonal and modal methods, expressed as the root mean squared error (RMSE), remained significant for two of the IOLs up to the 16th-order Zernike spherical aberrations (SAs). Conversely, a negligibly small RMSE was observed for the other two IOLs, as long as the Zernike SAs were higher than the 6th order. The raytracing simulation results from the zonal wavefronts exhibited a stronger correlation with the results of recent optical bench studies than those from the modal wavefronts. The study suggests that certain recent refractive EDoF IOLs possess a complex optical profile that cannot be adequately characterized by limited orders of SAs.

Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular eye procedures, with more than 40 million cases performed globally. As CRS-treated patients age and develop cataract, the number of cases that require additional preoperative considerations and management will increase around the world. Thus, we provide an up-to-date, concise overview of the considerations and outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with previous CRS, including surface ablation, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Challenges associated with accurate biometry in eyes with CRS have been mitigated recently through total keratometry, ray tracing, intraoperative aberrometry, and machine learning assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to improve prediction. Emerging studies have highlighted the superior performance of ray tracing and/or total keratometry-based formulas for IOL power calculation in eyes with previous SMILE. Dry eye remains a common side effect after cataract surgery, especially in eyes with CRS, though the risk appears to be lower after SMILE than LASIK (in the short-term). Recent presbyopia-correcting IOL designs such as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs may be suitable in carefully selected eyes with previous CRS.

SUMMARY

Ophthalmologists will increasingly face challenges associated with the surgical management of cataract in patients with prior CRS. Careful preoperative assessment of the ocular surface, appropriate use of IOL power calculation formulas, and strategies for presbyopia correction are key to achieve good clinical and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction. Recent advances in CRS techniques, such as SMILE, may pose new challenges for such eyes in the future.

The influence of personality on the quality of vision after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the possible correlation between patients' personality traits and subjective perception of quality of vision (QoV), after multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL) implantation.

METHODS

patients who had bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive X-WAVE or a trifocal lens were assessed 6 months postoperatively. Patients answered the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI-20) questionnaire ("Big Five five-factor personality model") to examine their personality. Six months following surgery, patients were asked to fill a QoV questionnaire where they graded the frequency of 10 common visual symptoms. Primary outcomes were to evaluate the correlation between personality scores and the reported frequency of visual disturbances.

RESULTS

The study comprised 20 patients submitted to bilateral cataract surgery, 10 with a non-diffractive X-WAVE lens (AcrySof® IQ Vivity) and 10 with a trifocal lens (AcrySof® IQ PanOptix). Mean age was 60.23 (7.06) years. Six months following surgery, patients with lower scores of conscientiousness and extroversion reported a higher frequency of visual disturbances (blurred vision, P  =  .015 and P  =  .009, seeing double images P  =  .018 and P  =  .006, and having difficulties focusing, P  =  .027 and P  =  .022, respectively). In addition, patients with high neuroticism scores had more difficulty focusing (P  =  .033).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, personality traits such as low conscientiousness and extroversion and high neuroticism significantly influenced QoV perception 6 months after bilateral multifocal lens implantation. Patients' personality questionnaires could be a useful preoperative assessment test to a mIOL.

Recommendation for Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Delphi Consensus Statement by the ESASO Study Group

PURPOSE

To establish consensus among experts in lens and refractive surgery to guide general ophthalmologists on issues related to presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).

DESIGN

A modified Delphi method to reach a consensus among experts.

METHODS

A steering committee formulated 105 relevant items grouped into four sections (preoperative considerations, IOL selection, intraoperative considerations, and postoperative considerations). The consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of experts agreeing with the evaluation of a statement.

RESULTS

Ten experts participated and completed all rounds of questionnaires (100% response rate). Of 68 items considered in the preoperative considerations, consensus was achieved in 48 (70.6%). There was a lack of consensus over IOL selection, the experts only agreed on the importance of the patient's habits for the optical IOL design selection. Of the 14 considerations related to intraoperative issues, the experts reached a consensus on 10 (71.4%). The postoperative considerations section reached the highest consensus in 10 items of 13 (76.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations for a diffractive multifocal IOL were a potential postoperative visual acuity > 0.5, a keratometry between 40-45 diopters, a pupil >2.8 mm under photopic conditions and <6.0 mm under scotopic conditions, a root mean square of higher order corneal aberrations <0.5 µm for 6-mm pupil size, while monofocal or non-diffractive IOLs should be considered for patients with coexisting eye disorders. A lack of agreement was found in the issues related to the IOL selection.

Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma-A Systematic Review

The incidence of both cataract and glaucoma is increasing globally. With increasing patient expectation and improved technology, premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including presbyopia-correcting and toric IOLs, are being increasingly implanted today. However, concerns remain regarding the use of premium IOLs, particularly presbyopia-correcting IOLs, in eyes with glaucoma. This systematic review evaluates the use of premium IOLs in glaucoma. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database was performed from inception until 1 June 2023. Initial search yielded 1404 records, of which 12 were included in the final review of post-operative outcomes. Studies demonstrated high spectacle independence for distance and good patient satisfaction in glaucomatous eyes, with positive outcomes also in post-operative visual acuity, residual astigmatism, and contrast sensitivity. Considerations in patient selection include anatomical and functional factors, such as the type and severity of glaucomatous visual field defects, glaucoma subtype, presence of ocular surface disease, ocular changes after glaucoma surgery, and the reliability of disease monitoring, all of which may be affected by, or influence, the outcomes of premium IOL implantation in glaucoma patients. Regular reviews on this topic are needed in order to keep up with the rapid advancements in IOL technology and glaucoma surgical treatments.

The Novel Optical Design and Clinical Classification of a Wavefront-Shaping Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical rationale of wavefront-shaping technology, describe how intraocular lenses (IOLs) using wavefront-shaping technology are differentiated from refractive or diffractive optical presbyopia-correcting designs, and describe the mode of action of this technology.

Methods

Extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs are the latest class of presbyopia-correcting IOLs addressing the growing demand of patients for reduced spectacle dependence. These use various optical technologies, including diffractive designs (eg, TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 and AT LARA 29 MP) and non-diffractive designs such as small aperture (eg, IC-8 IOL and XtraFocus Pinhole Implant), spherical aberration (eg, MINI WELL Ready and LuxSmart), and wavefront shaping (eg, AcrySof IQ Vivity DFT015 and Clareon Vivity CNWET0). Despite some improvement in visual acuity at intermediate and near distances, these technologies can still be associated with increased rate of visual disturbances or poorer distance vision compared with monofocal IOLs. One way to overcome such limitations is using a wavefront-shaping optical principle.

Results

Clinical data show that wavefront-shaping technology results in a continuous EDoF compared with a monofocal IOL while exhibiting a minimal halo, similar to an aspheric monofocal IOL. Clinically, this translates to a lens that has proven to exceed the American National Standards Institute/American Academy of Ophthalmology criteria for an EDoF IOL.

Conclusion

The novel wavefront-shaping optic technology allows patients to achieve a continuous range of vision from distance to functional near with low levels of visual disturbances comparable with aspheric monofocal IOLs.

Symptoms and Satisfaction Levels Associated with Intraocular Lens Implants in the Monofocal and Premium IOL Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Study

PURPOSE

To develop a questionnaire with standardized questions and images about visual symptoms and satisfaction administered before and after cataract surgery with monofocal and various (premium) intraocular lenses (IOLs).

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study of cataract surgery patients completing a self-administered questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively at 4 to 6 months.

PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients with plans to undergo implantation of the same IOL in both eyes on separate occasions in 20 ophthalmology practices.

METHODS

An 86-item questionnaire with standardized images assessed the following 14 symptoms: glare, blurry vision, starbursts, hazy vision, snowballs, halos, floaters, double images, rings and spider webs, light flashes with eyes closed, distortion, light flashes with eyes open, shimmering images, and dark crescent-shaped shadows.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom severity and level of symptom bother, satisfaction with vision, quality of vision, and ability to see without corrective lenses or eyeglasses.

RESULTS

Except for dark crescent-shaped shadows, the report of visual symptoms significantly decreased postoperatively. Best uncorrected binocular visual acuity improved from 0.47 (20/59 Snellen visual acuity values) ± 0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.12 (20/26 Snellen visual acuity values) ± 0.12 logMAR postoperatively. Patients' ratings of intermediate vision as good to excellent improved significantly from 12% preoperatively to 71% postoperatively, and patients' ratings of distance vision improved from 8% preoperatively to 85% postoperatively. After surgery, 84% reported that they were somewhat, very, or completely satisfied with their vision. Most patients (88%) reported that they could see pretty well, very well, or perfectly well without corrective lenses after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The Assessment of IntraOcular Lens Implant Symptoms questionnaire can be used across a wide variety of IOLs to evaluate visual symptoms and satisfaction with a growing segment of the market, premium IOLs, that target intermediate and near vision, in addition to distance vision. Compared to patients receiving monofocal IOLs, patients receiving premium IOLs appear to be more challenging to satisfy because of their requirements for distance, intermediate, and near vision, and their desire to be free of eyeglasses postoperatively. This instrument provides a structured, uniform tool for regulators, researchers, and ophthalmologists in everyday practice to gain insights into patients' experiences.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Refractive lens exchange - who is getting it, what are they getting, how are they doing?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the literature on refractive lens exchange and present a retrospective analysis of 55 patients who underwent refractive lens exchange at a single practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our study substantiates refractive lens exchange as an important option for presbyopic patients, hyperopic patients or patients with extremely high refractive error who desire spectacle independence.

SUMMARY

Our study reveals that the refractive lens exchange population is younger than the average cataract population and their primary motivations are to resolve hyperopic or myopic refractive errors, gain spectacle independence, and address near vision loss. A variety of presbyopia-addressing intraocular lens options are available and we present our experience with multifocal, extended depth-of-focus, light-adjustable, and monofocal lenses.

Factors Predictive of Refractive Error After Toric Lens Implantation

Purpose

To identify factors related to suboptimal refractive outcomes after toric intraocular lens implantation.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective case-control chart review of 446 eyes with toric lens insertion by the same surgeon at a university hospital from 2016 to 2020 was conducted. Pre-operative exam findings, biometry, and one month and three month post-operative vision and refraction were noted. Reviewed charts were considered cases if uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was worse than 20/40, spherical equivalent (SE) >1 diopter (D) off target, or cylinder >1 D off target.

Results

Overall, 93.7% (n = 343) of eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better, 92.7% (n = 306) were within 1 D of target SE, and 90.9% (n = 300) were within 1 D of target cylinder. UDVA cases had more eyes with prior LASIK (21.7% vs 7.0%, p = 0.01) and keratoconus (8.7% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001) than controls. More SE cases had prior radial keratotomy (RK) (8.3% vs 0%, p < 0.001) and keratoconus (12.5% vs 0%, p < 0.001) than controls. More cylinder cases had prior LASIK (30.0% vs 8.7%, p < 0.001) and higher mean astigmatism (2.3 vs 1.5 D, p = 0.02) than controls. More cases in all three analyses had higher toric cylinder power (T5-T9) than controls. Age, sex, eye laterality, axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens power, dry eye, anterior basement membrane dystrophy, and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy differences were not significant.

Conclusion

Prior LASIK or RK, keratoconus, and higher astigmatism may increase the chance of a suboptimal outcome.

Clinical Outcomes with Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses in Cases in Which Multifocal Lenses Are Not Primarily Recommended

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the visual and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) who were not primarily good candidates for multifocal IOL implantation.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of data from 30 eyes (23 patients) undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of one of two EDOF IOLs (follow-up: 37.9 ± 16.2 months) and prospective observational study including 106 eyes (78 patients) implanted with one of 6 different EDOF models (follow-up: 8.0 ± 7.7 months). Patients recruited had one of the following conditions: monofocal IOL implanted in the fellow eye, previous corneal refractive surgery, mild and nonprogressive maculopathy or glaucoma, age > 75 years, amblyopia, or previous vitrectomy.

Results

In the retrospective phase, significant improvements were found in uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) (p ≤ 0.013), with a nonsignificant trend to improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA). A total of 90% of patients were completely to moderately satisfied with the outcome achieved. In the prospective phase, significant improvements were found in UDVA, CDVA, UNVA, and CNVA (p ≤ 0.032), with a total of 85.5% of patients being completely to moderately satisfied (dissatisfaction 3.3%). In both phases, extreme difficulties were only reported by a limited percentage of patients for performing some near vision activities.

Conclusions

EDOF IOLs seem to be a viable option for providing an efficient visual rehabilitation with good levels of patient satisfaction and spectacle independence associated in patients that are not primarily good candidates for multifocal IOL implantation.

Patient reported outcomes after implementation of an enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens with low postoperative myopia

Background

Enhanced depth-of- focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOL) have filled the gap between monofocal and multifocal intraocular implants with optical qualities of monofocal lenses and usually minor dysphotopsias typical for multifocal lenses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new EDOF IOL in patients with requirements for perfect near and intermediate vision.

Methods

The study included 15 patients (29 eyes as one was amblyopic) with bilateral implantation of LUXSMART EDOF IOL (Bausch & Lomb) with a targeted myopia (between -0.25 and -0.50D) in both eyes. Monocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near as well as refractive outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Additionally, binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and defocus curve were measured at the final follow-up visit. At 12 months' visit patients completed a questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction, spectacle independence and presence of dysphotopsias.

Results

Binocular uncorrected visual acuities at 12 month's visit were 0.13 ​± ​0.16, 0.06 ​± ​0.08, 0.07 ​± ​0.09 and 0.15 ​± ​0.09 logMAR for far distance, 80 ​cm, 66 ​cm and 40 ​cm respectively. Corrected binocular visual acuities at 12 months were 0.00 ​± ​0.00, 0.05 ​± ​0.07, 0.05 ​± ​0.06, 0.13 ​± ​0.16 respectively for distance, 80 ​cm, 66 ​cm and 40 ​cm. Automated refraction spherical equivalent at 12 months' visit stood at -0.70 ​± ​0.48D, which was 0.46D less than calculated biometric target, however spherical equivalent of subjective refraction at 12 months equaled -0.49 ​± ​0.46D, which was closer to preoperative biometric target. Defocus curve had gentle shape without peaks typical for monofocal IOLs. Binocular contrast sensitivity results were superior to average results for that age group and equaled 1.78 ​± ​0.16 logMAR without correction and 1.81 ​± ​0.13 logMAR with correction. Spectacle independence for near and intermediate distances was achieved in all patients and for far distance in 73.3% of patients. Burdensome dysphotopsias were not reported in any case.

Conclusions

EDOF IOLs targeted bilaterally at low myopia can provide excellent near and intermediate visual acuity and independence of any optical correction in majority of cases. This approach can be used in selected patients who are focused on stationary activities.

Acuity and Quality of Vision in Eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy after Regular Pseudophakia

PURPOSE

This retrospective case-control study was conducted to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visual impairment in eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD) after regular cataract surgery.

METHODS

EBMD pseudophakic eyes were compared with matched pseudophakic eyes free from surface disorders. At least 3 weeks after surgery we evaluated uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), objective aberrometry, Point Spread Function (PSF), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and patient complaints.

RESULTS

Twenty-five EBMD eyes and 25 control eyes (13 patients per group) were included. Nine patients per group had a monofocal IOL, and four patients had a trifocal IOL. All the EBMD patients complained of postoperative blurred vision with ocular discomfort; intensive use of lubricants induced subjective improvement only in eyes with monofocal IOLs. Postoperative mean UDVA was 0.19 ± 0.16 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.11 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control group (p = 0.016). Mean CDVA was 0.18 ± 0.15 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.06 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control eyes (p = 0.001). The PSF curve width was significantly worse in the EBMD group (p < 0.001). The MTF cut-off value was lower in the EBMD group than in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After cataract removal, eyes with EBMD had significantly lower UDVA and CDVA than controls. All the aberrometric parameters were significantly worse in EBMD cases. EBMD patients complained about their postoperative visual outcome, while control patients did not.

Intraoperative aberrometry: an update on applications and outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is now a large body of experience with intraoperative aberrometry. This review aims to synthesize available data regarding intraoperative aberrometry applications and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) System utilizes Talbot-moiré interferometry and is the only commercially available intraoperative aberrometry device. There are few studies that include all-comers undergoing intraoperative aberrometry-assisted cataract surgery, as most studies examine routine patients only or atypical eyes only. In non-post-refractive cases, studies have consistently shown a small but statistically significant benefit in spherical equivalent refractive outcome for intraoperative aberrometry versus preoperative calculations. In studies examining axial length extremes, most studies have shown intraoperative aberrometry to perform similarly to preoperative calculations. Amongst post-refractive cases, post-myopic ablation cases appear to benefit the most from intraoperative aberrometry. For toric intraocular lenses (IOLs), intraoperative aberrometry may be used for refining IOL power (toricity and spherical equivalent) and alignment, and most studies show intraoperative aberrometry to achieve low postoperative residual astigmatism.

SUMMARY

Intraoperative aberrometry can be utilized as an adjunct to preoperative planning and surgeon's judgment to optimize cataract surgery refractive outcomes. Non-post-refractive cases, post-myopic ablation eyes, and toric intraocular lenses may have the greatest demonstrated benefit in intraoperative aberrometry studies to date, but other eyes may also benefit from intraoperative aberrometry use.

Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Eyes After Corneal Refractive Laser Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Purpose

To assess the efficacy, safety, and predictability of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in cataract patients with previous corneal refractive surgery.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of presbyopia-correcting IOLs implantation in cataract surgery after laser refractive surgery. Outcomes were efficacy, safety and predictability parameters.

Results

The authors identified 13 studies, involving a total of 128 patients and 445 eyes. Presbyopia-correcting IOLs were effective at improving distance, intermediate and near visual acuity aftercataract surgery. The proportion of post-laser surgery eyes with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/25 was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.90] and the pooled rates of spectacle independence at near, intermediate, and far distances were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94) respectively. The percentage of participants who suffered from halos and glare was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.25-0.64) and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.60), respectively. The predictability had a percentage of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) of eyes within ±0.5 diopters (D) and ±1.0 D from the targeted spherical equivalent.

Conclusions

Presbyopia-correcting IOLs provide satisfactory results in terms of efficacy, safety and predictability in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery, but have a higher risk of photopic side effects such as halos and glare.

Quantitative assessment of photic phenomena in the presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens

This was a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of the photic phenomena test (PPT) for quantifying glare, halo, and starburst. We compared two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs), the Symfony IOL and the PanOptix IOL, as well as the monofocal Clareon IOL in 111 IOL-implanted eyes of 111 patients who underwent the PPT 1 month postoperatively. The reproducibility of photic phenomena with the PPT was assessed in 39 multifocal IOL-implanted eyes of 20 patients and among the examiners. Patients with ocular diseases, except for refractive errors, were excluded. The mean values of the groups were evaluated. Bland–Altman plots were used to analyze statistical data (Easy R version 1.37; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The PPT reproducibility assessment revealed no fixed bias or regressive significance. Reproducibility was confirmed. The glare size did not differ significantly between the Symfony, PanOptix, and Clareon groups. The halo size was significantly larger in the Symfony group (p < 0.01) than in the PanOptix group. The halo intensity was significantly brighter in the PanOptix group (p < 0.01) than in the Symfony group. In contrast, no halos were perceived in the Clareon group. The starburst size or intensity did not differ significantly between the Symfony, PanOptix, and Clareon groups. We identified the photic phenomenon related to various IOLs.

Pupil steering holographic display for pre-operative vision screening of cataracts

Cataract is the most common cause of preventable blindness and vision loss where the only treatment is surgical replacement of the natural lens with an intraocular lens. Computer-generated holography (CGH) enables to control phase, size, and shape of the light beam entering through the eye-pupil. We developed a holographic vision simulator to assess visual acuity for patients to experience the postoperative corrected vision before going through surgery. A holographically shaped light beam is directed onto the retina using small non-cataractous regions of the lens with the help of a pupil tracker. A Snellen chart hologram is shown to subjects at desired depth with myopia and hyperopia correction. Tests with 13 patients demonstrated substantial improvements in visual acuity and the simulator results are consistent with the post-operative vision tests. Holographic simulator overperforms the existing vision simulators, which are limited to static pinhole exit pupils and incapable of correcting aberrations.

Swept-source OCT reduces the risk of axial length measurement errors in eyes with cataract and epiretinal membranes

AIMS

To compare the biometric data from partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) in patients with age-related cataract and epiretinal membrane (ERM): ERM, ERM with foveoschisis and macular pseudohole.

METHODS

49 eyes of 49 subjects including 36 ERM, 9 ERM foveoschisis and 4 macular pseudohole were analysed to evaluate the axial length (AL) measurements and the presence of AL measurement errors, defined basing on the shape of the biometric output graphs and on the concordance of AL values between instruments. Eyes with ERM were divided in four stages according to OCT features (i.e. presence/absence of the foveal pit, presence of ectopic inner foveal layers, disrupted retinal layers).

RESULTS

The devices provided similar mean AL measurements in all subgroups, with differences <0.1 mm in 41/49 cases (83.6%). AL measurement errors were observed in ERM stages 3 and 4, characterized by ectopic inner foveal layers, and were significantly more frequent with the PCI (8/17, 47%) as compared with the SS-OCT device (2/17, 12%), p = 0.02. The refractive prediction error in cases with AL measurement errors was significantly greater using the PCI compared to the SS-OCT device (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both devices provide reliable biometric data in the majority of patients and can be used in the preoperative assessment of patients with age-related cataract and ERM. In eyes with ectopic inner foveal layers, attention should be paid as AL measurement and refractive prediction errors may occur, more frequently with the PCI device.

Visual Function and Patient Satisfaction with Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Glaucoma and Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

To report visual function and self-reported satisfaction of patients with glaucoma and dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD) implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL).

Methods

Patients with glaucoma or dAMD as well as healthy individuals implanted with MIOL were invited to participate. Explorations performed were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), binocular contrast sensitivity, and defocus curves. Patients completed the Catquest-9 questionnaire and reported on the presence of dysphotopsias and the need for spectacles.

Results

38 subjects were included: 11 in the healthy/control group and 9 each in the preperimetric glaucoma, perimetric glaucoma, and dAMD groups. Controls had statistically better monocular UDVA, CDVA, and LCVA than patients with glaucoma and dAMD, as well as better binocular acuity in the defocus curves between −2.00 D and +0.50 D. Differences between controls and patients with preperimetric glaucoma were not statistically significant. Between −3.0 D and +0.5 D, all groups except dAMD achieved acuities better than 0.2 logMAR. Patients with dAMD had worse contrast sensitivity than all others for 3 cycles per degree (cpd), and patients with glaucoma had worse values than all others for 12 cpd; other differences did not reach statistical significance. Healthy subjects and patients with preperimetric glaucoma perceived halos more often than patients with glaucoma or dAMD, while suffering less from glare. Patients with glaucoma and dAMD found more difficulties when driving at night and required spectacles for near more often than the other subjects. Patients with dAMD were less satisfied with their vision.

Conclusions

MIOLs may be implanted in patients with preperimetric glaucoma with little fear of patient dissatisfaction. In glaucoma and dAMD, MIOLs might be considered with caution, after explaining the increased risk of glare and the higher need for spectacle correction for reading.