Oncological safety of submental island flap for reconstruction of pathologically node-negative and node-positive T1-2 oral squamous cell carcinoma-related defects: A retrospective study and comparison of outcomes

Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with pathological level I lymph node metastasis: Flap site recurrence and survival analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine flap site recurrence rate in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients who had undergone reconstruction with submental island flap, to evaluate factors affecting flap site recurrence, particularly pathological level I lymph node status, and assess survival outcomes.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who underwent surgical resection and submental island flap reconstruction between October 2012 and February 2024 were enrolled onto the study. Tumor recurrence and survival outcomes were analyzed. A Kaplan-Meier estimate of locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) was calculated. Factors affecting flap site recurrence and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Most patients (78.57 %) were in the advanced stage (stage III-IV), and 21.43 % had pathological level I lymph node metastasis. Flap site recurrence rate was observed in 5.36 % of cases, without any identifiable factors predicting the recurrence, including pathological level I lymph node metastasis. The 5-year LRRFS, DSS, and OS rates were 60.28 %, 84.55 %, and 67.38 %, respectively. Positive resection margin, perineural invasion, and extranodal extension adversely affected LRRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Submental island flap reconstruction in selected oral squamous cell carcinoma patients is oncologically safe regarding low flap site recurrence rate, satisfactory survival outcomes, and pathological level I lymph node metastasis did not affect the flap site recurrence.

Reconstruction of Complex Oral and Maxillofacial Defects After Oral Cancer Resection With Individualized Anterolateral Thigh Multiple Paddle Flaps

PURPOSE

This study aimed to use reconstructive methods for complex oral and maxillofacial defects, explore their feasibility, and evaluate the efficacy of defect reconstruction using anterolateral thigh (ALT) multiple paddle flaps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective case series of 33 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial defect reconstruction using the ALT multiple paddle flaps. The design and harvest of the flaps, methods for defects reconstruction, and reconstructive efficacy are described.

RESULTS

All 33 patients were men, with a mean age of 49.5 years. Of the flaps, triple skin paddles plus muscle paddles were included in 3 cases, triple skin paddles were included in 1 case, 2 skin paddles plus muscle paddles were included in 29 cases. The skin paddles measured 3×5 cm to 10×16 cm. Postoperatively, all flaps survived completely. Parotid salivary fistula and orocutaneous fistula occurred in 1 patient of each, thigh wound infection and effusion occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. All patients were followed up for ~2 to 93 months; most patients' oral functions and appearance were acceptable, and thigh motor dysfunction was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

With separate skin paddles for defects of different positions, individualized muscle flap for dead spaces, combination of different skin paddles for larger defects, effective reduction or avoidance of wound complications, and acceptable donor site morbidity, the ALT multiple paddle flaps are an ideal candidate for complex oral and maxillofacial defects reconstruction.

Impact of age stratification on risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas patients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to assess the association between age and lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) in T1 oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas (OTSCC) patients.

METHODS

Patients with T1 OTSCC were extracted from the SEER database between 2005 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were produced to recognize the association between age and risk factors of LNM.

RESULTS

A total of 3535 patients were analyzed. Younger patients more frequently presented with LNM compared to their older peers (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, older age was associated with a significantly lower risk of LNM. Compared to patients aged 12-39-years-old, the hazard ratios for patients aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and 80-101 years old were 0.999 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.684-1.461), 0.863 (95 % CI 0.611-1.219), 0.972 (95 % CI 0.687-1.373), 0.667 (95 % CI 0.452-0.983), and 0.395 (95 % CI 0.241-0.646), respectively. Subgroups analysis shows that the effect of older age was significantly associated with a lower risk of LNM in Caucasian female who harbored moderately differentiated disease.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that younger patients with T1 OTSCC had a higher risk of LNM than their old peers, especially for tumors with poor differentiation. More accurate assessments of LNM and prophylactic neck dissection or prophylactic adjuvant radiation therapy to neck will be imperative for reducing recurrence in younger T1 OTSCC.

Impact of tumor localization and choice of microvascular flap on posterior airway changes following ablative surgery in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: A monocentric cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of intraoral reconstructions following oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resection with a free microvascular flap on the posterior airway space (PAS) and to correlate these results with the potential risk of developing an obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Only primary OSCC cases of the tongue or floor of the mouth which were operated and reconstructed. The PAS displayed in computed tomography (CT) scans at three time points were analyzed: t0 = preoperative, t1 = first postoperative CT, and t2 = most recent situation. The following three PAS parameters were calculated: minimum cross-sectional area (minCSA), mean cross-sectional area (meanCSA), and volume.

RESULTS

MinCSA increased from t0 to t2: t0 = 86.9 cm2 (0.0 - 251.8), t1 = 106.6 cm2 (1.0 - 483.4), and t2 = 124.8 cm2 (0.5 - 395.6). MeanCSA increased from t0 to t2: t0 = 225.1 cm2 (79.0 - 500.2), t1 = 247.8 cm2 (102.8 - 674.3), and t2 = 272.2 cm2 (92.2 - 668.4). The volume increased from t0 to t2: t0 = 21.5 cm3 (8.0 - 63.2), t1 = 24.1 cm3 (9.6 - 67.3), and t2 = 26.9 cm3 (6.2 - 67.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior airway space PAS values became higher than preoperatively. In particular, flap type had a significant influence on the three PAS parameters.

Narrative Review: Submental Artery Island Pedicled Flap, Indications, Tips, and Pitfalls

Study Design

Narrative review.

Objective

To describe the advantages, challenges, and potential indications of the submental artery island flap as a local pedicled flap for head and neck reconstruction.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to describe the submental artery island flap's surgical technique, indications, and outcomes. Data sources included peer-reviewed articles, case reports, and clinical studies on using the submental flap in head and neck surgery reconstruction.

Results

The submental artery island flap, while offering advantages such as minimal donor site morbidity, and good cosmetic outcomes, presents challenges related to the pedicle dissection and patient selection. This flap is particularly suitable for defects in the oral cavity, oropharynx, parotid bed, and midface or neck skin. Simultaneous neck dissection is feasible but should be approached with caution in patients with a history of prior neck surgery.

Conclusions

The submental artery island flap is a valuable option for selected cases. When performed in the right patient with a correct technique, this flap can reconstruct defects in the oral cavity, oropharynx, parotid bed, and skin of the midface or neck with a minimally visible scar of the donor site.

Myomucosal island flaps for oropharyngeal reconstruction

The oropharynx represents one of the most challenging areas to reconstruct for the head and neck surgeon. The buccinator myomucosal island flaps pedicled on the facial artery [tunnelized facial artery myomucosal island flap (t-FAMMIF)] or the buccal artery [buccal artery myomucosal island flap (BAMMIF)] are an ideal reconstructive option for moderate size defects measuring up to 8-9cm. Two fresh specimens have been used to show the step-by-step surgical technique of both island flaps. Design and flap extension, dissection plane, identification of the vascular pedicle, flap rotation and insetting are described. Reconstructive indications and the pros and cons of each one are discussed in this article. Myomucosal island flaps represent a very useful and versatile option for the functional reconstruction of the oropharynx. A detailed knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the cheek is key to obtain a large flap while minimizing the risk of complications.

The reliability of submental flap for soft tissue reconstruction in patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity

BACKGROUND

The submental island flap (SIF) is a reliable option for reconstruction of the defects of the oral cavity following cancer resection. Advantages include reliable axial vascular pedicle, low donor site morbidity, good functional and cosmetic outcome, shorter operative time and lower cost compared to free flap reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 consecutive patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity were included in this study. All patients underwent resection and immediate reconstruction with SIF pedicled the submental vessels. Donor and recipient site morbidity, functional outcome, and locoregional recurrences are reported.

RESULTS

The study included 22 males (69%) and 10 females. The mean age was 54 years (range of 31-79 years). The most common primary tumor site was the tongue (15 patients, 47%), followed by the buccal mucosa, alveolar margin, floor of mouth, lower lip and hard palate. In 25 patients (78%) the flap survived completely. Complete flap loss occurred in one patient (3%). Six patients (19%) developed complications related to flap vascularity. 21 patients (66%) resumed normal diet, while 11 patients (34%) tolerated only soft diet. Over a median follow up was of 15 months (range of 3-62 months), 21 patients (66%) are alive and disease free, while 8 patients died, of whom 4 of locoreginal recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

SIF is reliable for reconstruction of the intraoral soft tissue defects following cancer resection. The functional and cosmetic outcomes are satisfactory and donor site morbidity is low. Careful patient selection is necessary for favorable outcome.

The contralateral-based submental artery island flap: feasibility and oncological safety in oral cancer-related defect reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Oncologic risk is a serious concern of submental artery island flaps. Here, we introduce the contralateral-based submental artery island flap (C-SAIF) and demonstrate its feasibility and long-term oncological safety in reconstructing oral cancer-related defects.

METHODS

An anatomical study was performed concentrating on the pedicle length in seven cadavers. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on C-SAIF patients operated on by a single team. The standard surgical technique of C-SAIF was conducted. Outcomes including operative time, length of hospital stay, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and scores of the Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire were compared with a similar cohort reconstructed with anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF). In addition, oncological outcomes were evaluated by the 5-year cumulative survival rate between C-SAIF and ALTF patients.

RESULTS

The pedicle length of C-SAIF was sufficient for the flap to be extended to the contralateral oral cavity. Fifty-two patients were included in the retrospective study, and nineteen of them underwent reconstruction with C-SAIF. The operative time of C-SAIF was shorter (p = 0.003), and the intraoperative blood loss was less (p = 0.004) than that of ALTF. There was no difference in MSGS scores. The results of survival analysis revealed comparable survival curves for the two groups in terms of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

C-SAIF is a feasible and reliable flap for reconstructing oral cancer-related defects. Moreover, it is an effective island flap to preserve the perforator and pedicle without compromising oncological safety.

Tongue Reconstruction with Buccinator Myomucosal Island Flaps: Technical Considerations, Oncologic Safety, Functional Outcomes and QoL Assessment-A Retrospective Observational Study

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of buccinator myomucosal island flaps for tongue reconstruction following malignant tumor resections. A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who underwent tongue reconstructions with buccinator myomucosal island flaps between 2012 and 2020. We reviewed the flap type and size, harvesting time, recipient- and donor-site complications, postoperative oncologic outcomes, functional recovery and QoL assessment. All of the flaps were transposed successfully without any total flap loss. Neither in the primary site nor in the neck were cancer relapses observed. An evaluation of the sensitivity revealed that 96.1% of patients experienced a recovery of touch, two-point and pain sensations. There were significant differences between the flap and the native mucosa in terms of the tactile (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001) and two-point (p < 0.001) thresholds. The average swallowing score recorded was 6.1 out of 7, with only minor complaints. The quality of life assessments demonstrated high scores across physical (24.5 out of 28), social (25.8 out of 28), emotional (20.3 out of 24) and functional (25 out of 28) aspects. The present study showed how buccinator myomucosal island flaps represent an effective and functional tongue reconstructive option, requiring a short operative time with a low rate of donor site morbidity, and with evidence of long-term oncologic safety and high quality of life.

Oncologic safety of the pedicled submental island flap for reconstruction in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of 101 cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the pedicle submental island flap (SIF) can be safely used in the oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) patients with pathologically node-positive (pN+) neck, especially pN+ at level I.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 101 OTSCC patients with SIF reconstruction were enrolled. Oncological outcomes included the total locoregional recurrence, the SIF related locoregional recurrence (SRLR) which referred to the local recurrence at flap and ipsilateral neck recurrence at level I, recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were pathologically node-negative (pN0) and 40 were pN+. Thirteen patients experienced locoregional recurrence, of which 5 had a SRLR. The pN+ group had a significantly higher locoregional recurrence rate, lower 5-year RFS, OS and DSS than pN0 group (P < 0.05). Patients with pN0 had a significantly higher neck RFS when compared to those with pN+ either at level I (P = 0.005) or at other levels (P < 0.001). However, the neck RFS was similar between the two subgroups of pN+ (P = 0.550). Especially, patients with pN+ at level I had a significantly higher SRLR rate (P = 0.006) compared to those with pN0 at level I. Multivariate analysis showed that pN+ was an unfavorable factor for tumor recurrence and OS.

CONCLUSION

Our data did not support the use of SIF in OTSCC patients with pN+ neck at level I due to an significantly increased SRLR rate compared to those with pN0 neck at level I.

The submental island flap - should we be worried about lymph node transfer? An anatomical and histological study

The submental island flap has been increasing in popularity for both oncological and non-oncological reconstruction of the head and neck. However, the original description of this flap left it with the unfortunate designation as a lymph node flap. There has thus been significant debate on the oncological safety of the flap. In this cadaveric study the perforator system suppling the skin island is delineated and the lymph node yield of the skeletonised flap is analysed histologically. A safe and consistent approach to raising the perforator flap modification is described and the pertinent anatomy, and an oncological discussion with regards to the submental island perforator flap histological lymph node yield discussed. Ethical approval was received from Hull York Medical School for the anatomical dissection of 15 sides of cadavers. 6 x 4cm submental island flaps were raised following a vascular infusion of a 50/50 mix of acrylic paint. The flap size mimics the T1/T2 tumour defects these flaps would usually be used to reconstruct.The submental vascular anatomy, including length, diameter, venous drainage patterns, and the skin perforator system was documented. The dissected submental flaps were then histologically examined for the presence of lymph nodes by a head and neck pathologist at Hull University Hospitals Trust department of histology. The total length of the submental island arterial system, the distance from where the facial artery branches off from the carotid to the submental artery perforator entering the anterior belly of digastric or skin, averaged 91.1mm with anaverage facial artery length of 33.1mm and submental artery of 58mm. Vessel diameter for microvascular reconstruction was 1.63mm for the submental artery and 3mm for the facial artery. The most common venous anatomy drainage pattern was the submental island venaecomitantes draining to the retromandibular system then to the internal jugular vein. Almost half the specimens had a dominant superficial submental perforator allowing the ability to raise this as a skin only system. There were generally 2-4 perforators passing through the anterior belly of digastric to supply the skin paddle.73.3% (11/15) of the skeletonised flaps contained no lymph nodes on histological examination. The perforator version of the submental island flap can be safely and consistently raised with inclusion of the anterior belly of digastric. In approximately half the cases a dominant superficial branch allows for a skin only paddle. Due to the vessel diameter, free tissue transfer is predictable.Venous anatomy is variable and care needs to be taken when raising this flap. The skeletonised version of the perforator flap is largely devoid of nodal yield and on oncological review a 16.3% recurrence rate is equivalent to current standard treatment.

Lymph Node Ratio in Head and Neck Cancer with Submental Flap Reconstruction

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the lymph node ratio (LNR) and survival results of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) reconstructed by a submental artery flap (SMAF) to limit tumor size. This study retrospectively recruited 49 patients with HNSCC who underwent both primary resection and neck dissection with SMAF reconstruction. The LNR was the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the sum number of examined lymph nodes. A LNR of 0.04 was the best cut-off value for HNSCC-specific death on receiver operating curve analysis. Patients with LNRs > 0.04 were univariately related to cancer-specific, disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and locoregional recurrence-free survival than those with LNRs ≤ 0.04 by log-rank test. In a Cox’s proportional hazards model with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) adjusting for pathological stage, extranodal extension and or surgical margins, the LNR (>0.04/≤0.04) predicted multivariate shorter cancer-specific (HR = 9.24, 95% CI = 1.49−176), disease-free (HR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.23−10.3), and distant metastasis-free (HR = 9.76, 95% CI = 1.57−187) survival. In conclusion, LNR for patients of HNSCC with SMAF reconstruction for limited tumor size was a prognostic factor for survival outcomes.

Analysis of hospitalization costs and length of stay for oral cancer patients undergoing surgery: Evidence from Hunan, China

OBJECTIVE

To provide information about hospitalization costs and length of stay (LOS) for inpatients undergoing oral cancer (OC) surgery, and to investigate the association of hospitalization costs and LOS with demographics, tumor subsite, surgery-related and hospital characteristics.

METHODS

Data extracted from Chinese National Health Statistics Network Reporting System database in Hunan, China during 2017-2019 were analyzed using quantile regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 6,420 OC patients undergoing surgery were identified. After controlling potential compounding variables, the median hospitalization cost was significantly higher in male than in female patientsby $515.70 at the median (p < 0.001). Patients aged over 60 hadsignificantly less costs by $294.85 at the meanthan did those below 60, while no differenceof LOS existed across age. OC patients with neck dissection had significantly higher costs by $1,983.33 at the median than those without (P < 0.001). Regional flaps were the most economical, with lower costs than free flaps by $3,084 (P < 0.001) and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) by $549.45 (P < 0.001) at the median.

CONCLUSION

Male is a significant driver of hospitalization costs and LOS for OC, and age over 60 is associated with lower costs, but not with LOS. Mouth primary site is associated with the highest costs and LOS, while lip primary site the lowest. Absence of neck dissection in early-stage OC can significantly reduce costs and LOS, but its oncological validity needs more evidence. Regional flaps are less expensive than free flaps and the PMMF for oral reconstruction, and are recommended in select patients.

Resurgence of regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The strain on healthcare resources in light of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many head and neck surgeons to explore reconstructive options that may decrease length of stay. Here, we review three common and versatile regional flaps used in head and neck reconstruction that are comparable alternatives to free tissue transfer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial anatomic descriptions of the facial artery musculocutaneous (FAMM) flap, the supraclavicular artery island flap and the submental artery island flap were published decades ago. Since then, many have proposed modifications to these descriptions to improve technical ease and patient outcomes. Benefits of regional flaps include ease of harvest, comparable outcomes to free tissue microvascular flaps, shorter operative time and hospital length of stay. Drawbacks to regional flaps include limitations to size and reach, partial necrosis, wound dehiscence and surgeon experience. The integrity of the vascular pedicle is also contingent upon vessel preservation during the cancer ablation.

SUMMARY

Although a resurgence of regional flaps began well before the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions began looking for alternatives to free flap reconstruction to conserve healthcare resources and minimize patient hospitalization time in the past year. There has been a revival of regional flaps such as the FAMM, supraclavicular and submental flaps that are valuable reconstructive options for many defects of the head and neck.

Oncologic safety of submental island flap reconstruction in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients: a prospective comparative study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the oncologic safety of submental island flap (SIF) reconstruction in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients. Forty-four clinically node-negative oral cancer patients with tumour size T1-T3 were divided into two groups. The Submental group consisted of 21 patients, who underwent submental island flap reconstruction whereas the control group consisted of 23 patients who underwent reconstruction with other locoregional or free flaps. The locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in these two groups were assessed and compared. The follow-up period in the two groups ranged from six to 28 months, with a median follow-up period of 15 months and 21 months, respectively. Results showed that the LRR in the control and the submental group was 21.7% and 19%, respectively (p = 0.825). Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the difference in recurrence-free survival in the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.749). Multivariate and bivariate analyses did not establish any relationship between the predictive parameters and locoregional recurrence. Thus, the Submental island flap is a reliable and versatile locoregional flap for the reconstruction of post-resection defects in oral cancer. It has no predictive influence on locoregional recurrence in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients.

Modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap: is it a reliable alternate reconstructive option for small- to mid-sized defects especially in male patients with oral/oropharyngeal cancer?

Purpose

To introduce modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap as a new and viable hairless locoregional option for reconstruction of small- to mid-sized defects after ablative surgery in oral/oropharyngeal cancer patients keeping in mind the present pandemic situation.

Methods

An observational retrospective study was conducted using modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap as a locoregional reconstructive option for both intraoral and oropharyngeal defects in early-stage oral/oropharyngeal cancer patients, from Jan 2016 to May 2020 in a tertiary care hospital. All patients in this study were male and the overall flap outcome was evaluated with post-operative follow-up.

Results

Out of 18 patients, in 4 patients modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap was used as a combination of flaps for reconstruction. Six patients (33.33%) underwent adjuvant radiation therapy/radiation chemotherapy. The long-term functions (speech and swallowing) and cosmetic outcomes were good in the majority of the patients. One patient (5.55%) had pinhole oroantral fistula. No patient had any major flap failure.

Conclusion

Modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap can be considered as a good alternative in male patients for reconstruction of small- to mid-sized oral cavity/oropharyngeal defects post-resection, especially during the prevailing pandemic crisis. It is an oncologically safe procedure with the major advantage of providing a hairless flap for oral cavity, tonsillar and BOT resection defects with lesser donor site morbidity.