|
1
|
Shih PK, Chen JX, Morrison SD, Lin MC, Wang TH, Wu SC. Diet Outcome in Patients With Hypopharyngeal Defects Repaired With Different Reconstruction Flaps: A Comparative Study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 171:387-394. [PMID: 38668643 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess potential risk factors influencing diet outcomes after reconstruction of subtotal hypopharyngeal defects using free patch- or tube-shaped anterolateral thigh (ALT) fasciocutaneous flaps. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING First-level referral hospital. METHODS Between January 2011 and December 2020, we studied hypopharyngeal cancer patients who underwent the reconstruction of hypopharyngeal defects using free patch- or tube-shaped ALT fasciocutaneous flaps. The choice between patch- or tube-shaped ALT flaps depended on the defect's nature, favoring patch-shaped for subtotal defects and tube-shaped for circumferential defects. A restricted diet was characterized by a history of enterostomy or endoscopic esophageal dilation treatment postreconstruction. We analyzed patients with restricted diets at 1- and 3-year follow-up visits. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients were enrolled; 39 patch-shaped flaps, and 59 tube-shaped flaps. No significances were noted in demographics, postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy, rates of free flap reoperation/salvage, or complications. However, a significant difference emerged in diet outcomes at the 1-year follow-up (P = .005). The rate of a restricted diet was 6.08 times higher in patients with tube-shaped flaps compared to patch-shaped flaps (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95-18.94). Stratifying based on postoperative RT revealed a 5.47 times higher rate of a restricted diet in tube-shaped flap recipients compared to patch-shaped flap recipients (95% CI: 1.44-20.48). No significances were observed in 5-year survival rates. CONCLUSION Concerning postoperative RT, patch-shaped flaps exhibited a lower incidence of a restricted diet compared to tube-shaped flaps. Preservation of the posterior mucosa may play a crucial role in preventing RT-induced esophageal stricture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pin-Keng Shih
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Xun Chen
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shane D Morrison
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mei-Chen Lin
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ti-Hao Wang
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chi Wu
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Escandón JM, Santamaría E, Prieto PA, Duarte-Bateman D, Ciudad P, Pencek M, Langstein HN, Chen HC, Manrique OJ. Reconstruction of Pharyngolaryngeal Defects with the Ileocolon Free Flap: A Comprehensive Review and How to Optimize Outcomes. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49:378-396. [PMID: 35832153 PMCID: PMC9142245 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Several reconstructive methods have been reported to restore the continuity of the aerodigestive tract following resection of pharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. However, high complication rates have been reported after voice prosthesis insertion. In this setting, the ileocolon free flap (ICFF) offers a tubularized flap for reconstruction of the hypopharynx while providing a natural phonation tube. Herein, we systematically reviewed the current evidence on the use of the ICFF for reconstruction of the aerodigestive tract. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE(R). Data on the technical considerations and surgical and functional outcomes were extracted. Twenty-one studies were included. The mean age and follow-up were 54.65 years and 24.72 months, respectively. An isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic standard ICFF, patch flap, or chimeric seromuscular-ICFF can be used depending on the patients' needs. The seromuscular chimeric flap is useful to augment the closure of the distal anastomotic site. The maximum phonation time, frequency, and sound pressure level (dB) were higher with ileal segments of 7 to 15 cm. The incidence of postoperative leakage ranged from 0 to 13.3%, and the majority was occurring at the coloesophageal junction. The revision rate of the microanastomosis ranged from 0 to 16.6%. The ICFF provides a reliable and versatile alternative for reconstruction of middle-size defects of the aerodigestive tract. Its three-dimensional configuration and functional anatomy encourage early speech and deglutition without a prosthetic valve and minimal donor-site morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Escandón
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Eric Santamaría
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Peter A. Prieto
- Surgery Department, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York; Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | | | - Pedro Ciudad
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru
- Department of Plastic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Megan Pencek
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Howard N. Langstein
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Hung-Chi Chen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Oscar J. Manrique
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Tsao CK, Marchi F, Kang CJ, Sampieri C, Lu YA, Huang SF, Chen YT, Giordano G, Peretti G, Parrinello G, Iandelli A, Fang TJ. Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030544. [PMID: 35158812 PMCID: PMC8833548 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Laryngopharyngectomy is still the treatment of choice in locally advanced pharyngolaryngeal tumors not eligible for organ preservation protocols. Loss of speech capacity has been reported as one of the factors that most affect the patient-reported quality of life. Thus, the reconstructive goals are restoring the pharynx and possibly the voice in such a scenario. For decades, tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) has allowed proper voice rehabilitation; however, TEP has a non-neglectable financial expenditure and complication rate. Therefore, we recently reported a novel flap design and surgical technique that shares the same principles of TEP, without the need to change any device over time, named J-flap. This study aimed to analyze both techniques’ subjective and objective vocal outcomes and their impact on overall and voice-related quality of life. Abstract Background: Tracheoesophageal puncture with a voice prosthesis is the gold standard for speech rehabilitation in patients that receive a laryngopharyngectomy. However, a novel surgical technique, using a tubularized anterolateral tight flap, named “J-flap,” has been demonstrated to produce adequate voice restoration. We aimed to compare the outcomes and the quality of life of patients who underwent voice rehabilitation with both techniques. Methods: We enrolled patients that underwent laryngopharyngectomy and voice restoration surgery. The control group received a tracheoesophageal puncture with a voice prosthesis, while the study group received J-flap reconstruction. A total of 20 patients received voice prosthesis rehabilitation, while 18 received J-flap reconstruction. Speech and vocal outcomes and quality of life metrics were collected. Results: The objective phonatory performances and the acoustic voice analysis did not outline a significant difference. Speech pathologists judged the consonant pronunciation in the J-flap group as less accurate (p < 0.001). The voice handicap index revealed a moderate impairment for the J-flap group (p < 0.001). Quality of life scores were higher for the voice prosthesis group. Conclusion: Voice prostheses and J-flaps share similar objective phonatory outcomes. Quality of life was more impaired in the J-flap group. In our view, these two techniques possess complementary characteristics in clinical practice, taking into account health care system regulations and patients’ social background.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung-Kan Tsao
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-K.T.); (F.M.); (Y.-T.C.)
- Center for Tissue Engineering, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Filippo Marchi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-K.T.); (F.M.); (Y.-T.C.)
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Chung-Jan Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-J.K.); (Y.-A.L.); (S.-F.H.)
| | - Claudio Sampieri
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Yi-An Lu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-J.K.); (Y.-A.L.); (S.-F.H.)
| | - Shiang-Fu Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-J.K.); (Y.-A.L.); (S.-F.H.)
| | - Yu-Ting Chen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-K.T.); (F.M.); (Y.-T.C.)
| | - Giorgio Giordano
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Giampiero Parrinello
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Iandelli
- Department of Otolaryngology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (C.S.); (G.G.); (G.P.); (G.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-J.K.); (Y.-A.L.); (S.-F.H.)
- Correspondence: (A.I.); (T.-J.F.)
| | - Tuan-Jen Fang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taipei 333, Taiwan; (C.-J.K.); (Y.-A.L.); (S.-F.H.)
- Correspondence: (A.I.); (T.-J.F.)
| |
Collapse
|