Nasal Obstruction Considerations in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty

Functional Outcomes After Feminizing Rhinoplasty

Feminizing rhinoplasty, as part of facial feminization surgery (FFS), aims to align nasal appearance with gender identity. While nasal obstruction is a known complication of rhinoplasty, its impact on feminizing rhinoplasty is unclear.This study investigates if feminizing rhinoplasty causes nasal obstruction secondary to structural modifications.Prospective cohort study.IRB-approved study included males and females undergoing cosmetic rhinoplasty and transgender females undergoing feminizing rhinoplasty at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Nasal obstruction was assessed using the nasal obstruction and symptom evaluation (NOSE) survey preoperatively and 3-, 6-, and 12-months postoperatively, analyzed with a t-test.NOSE scores significantly decreased in all groups, with transgender females showing a 78, 84, and 77% reduction at 3-, 6-, and 12-months. No significant difference was found between cosmetic rhinoplasty and FFS groups postoperatively.Decreases in average NOSE scores across groups suggest that feminizing rhinoplasty does not worsen nasal obstruction and may improve functional outcomes.

Gender Considerations in Rhinoplasty

SUMMARY

Precise nasofacial analysis ahead of rhinoplasty is imperative. Features common to the White masculine nose are reviewed in a stepwise fashion and contrasted with those of the White feminine nose. A solid understanding of the cisgender male, masculine nose enables the plastic surgeon to determine the changes required for a successful facial feminizing rhinoplasty as a part of facial gender confirmation surgery.

Understanding Nasal Valve Compromise in Nasal Airway Obstruction: A New Classification System

OBJECTIVES

A key aspect of rhinoplasty is integrity of nasal valves area because of its fundamental role in patent nasal airway. furthermore, nasal obstruction is a dominant feature in patient with nasal valves dysfunction (NVD) which can be devastating outcome after rhinoplasty.

METHODS

Nonetheless, NVD has been widely investigated regarding their etiologies and management. However, it has been assumed that the anatomical complexity and interplay between its structures causing a confusion for a beginner surgeon to diagnose and treat NVD. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea (2022-11-005).

RESULTS

To date, the lack of consensus on nasal valve pathologies and corrective procedures has led to its underestimations during analysis and management. As result, we proposed a classification system based on its affected anatomical part, location, and their management. Thus, implementing a classification system for NVD will help guide the practice of rhinoplasty and introduce a more structured approach.

CONCLUSION

This approach will prove useful in expanding our understanding of how important to locate the pathology of NVD and apply the most relevant management options, particularly for a beginner surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Airflow Considerations and the Effect of Webster's Triangle in Reduction Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Reduction rhinoplasties, regardless of the methods used (structural or preservation), can cause a reduction in the internal nasal volume, which may lead to breathing problems. In 1977, Webster proposed preserving a little triangle in the beginning of the lower lateral osteotomy line to prevent breathing problem. However, its importance is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

and methods: This prospective randomized controlled study (level of evidence 1) included 46 patients without nasal breathing problem. High-to-low (Webster's triangle preservation) osteotomy (control group, n = 23) and low-to-low osteotomy (study group, n = 23) were performed. All operations were performed according to the proposed volumetric rhinoplasty steps (examination/measurement, prevention and treatment). Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) test, visual analog scale, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and three-dimensional measurements were performed in all patients. Breathing tests were repeated before and 6 months after surgery with and without xylometazoline administration.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in NOSE and visual analog scale scores was found between the two groups. Acoustic rhinometry, PNIF, and rhinomanometry findings showed no statistically significant breathing difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In reduction rhinoplasties, a decrease in the internal volume may be expected as directly proportional with the reduction amount. The decrease in the internal volume may create nasal breathing problems. To prevent it, nasal airflow should be adjusted according to new anatomy. In this study, we discussed "volumetric rhinoplasty" steps to prevent breathing problems in reduction rhinoplasty. Following these steps, not preserving Webster's triangle (low-to-low osteotomy) has no effect on the nasal airway.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Factors Involved in the Decision of Iranian Men to Undergo Rhinoplasty: A Grounded Theory Study

Undergoing a rhinoplasty can affect an individual's mental health either positively or negatively, depending upon how he or she perceives the results. Because of the impact that rhinoplasty may have on an individual's mental health and the cost of this surgery, it is important to understand the reasons that men decide to undergo rhinoplasty and the challenges they face when making the decision to have a rhinoplasty. Using a grounded theory method, we collected data by conducting interviews with 20 participants. We analyzed the data and initially obtained 684 initial codes. After we removed duplicate codes and carefully analyzed participants' interviews, a total of 497 codes remained. We developed these codes into 10 main categories and 32 subcategories. We found that the causal factors affecting the decision of Iranian men to undergo rhinoplasty included the following 5 categories: a lack of confidence; a desire to improve their appearance; a desire for attention from others; a need to keep up with the Joneses (i.e., a desire to show that one is as good as other people by getting what others have and doing what others do); and persuasion by others. Intervening factors affecting the decision of Iranian men to undergo rhinoplasty included the following 4 categories: family challenge; social atmosphere; financial problems; and unwanted consequences. Iranian men make the decision to undergo rhinoplasty by overcoming and ignoring these intervening factors. The primary variable in participants' decision to undergo rhinoplasty was the desire to improve their appearance.

Imaging of adult nasal obstruction

The commonest causes of nasal obstruction are rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis, which affect up to 30% and 14% of the adult population, respectively. The global financial burden is huge, estimated at $5 billion for rhinitis and $8.6 billion for chronic rhinosinusitis per annum in the USA. On referral for imaging, computed tomography (CT) is indicated initially when there is a suboptimal response to medical treatment of these mucosal diseases or there are "red flags," such as persistent unilateral obstruction, epistaxis, pain, and orbital or neurological symptoms. A mass visible at rhinoscopy or endoscopy in the nose or nasopharynx and lymphadenopathy are further indications. The anterior (cartilaginous) nose plays a key role in the aetiology of nasal obstruction as it accounts for 50-75% of the total resistance to airflow in the upper airway. It has been ignored in the imaging literature, but extensively evaluated by clinicians using a range of methods, including CT. Oblique reconstructions perpendicular to the parabolic curve of lamellar airflow provide accurate assessment of the anterior nose. A thorough and systematic approach to assessing the nose addresses the discrepancy between imaging and clinical evaluation of structural causes of nasal obstruction, especially septal deviation, reported in the surgical literature. Nasal tumours are a very uncommon cause of nasal obstruction; magnetic resonance imaging is commonly performed to assess their full extent and improve the specificity of diagnosis.