Anatomic Considerations in Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery

Endonasal endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas are slow-growing, benign intracranial tumors that can be characterized as functional (hormone-producing) or non-functional (non-hormone producing). Symptoms therefore arise from either endocrinologic abnormalities or mass effect on surrounding structures resulting in symptoms such as visual impairment and headache. In the last two decades, technical innovations have shifted surgical resection of such adenomas to endoscopic endonasal approaches. In this review, we describe the evolving approach to pituitary adenomas in the modern endoscopic era, including preoperative multidisciplinary review, relevant surgical anatomy, and a description of the technical nuances of standard and expanded approaches to the anterior skull base.

Endoscopic Anatomy of the Skull Base

Presently, endoscopic skull base surgery has undergone significant advancements since its inception over two decades ago. Nevertheless, it is imperative to underscore that the fundamental basis of all surgical procedures lies in the meticulous understanding of anatomy, with particular emphasis on the ventral anatomy. This facet has recently garnered increased attention.Following the advancements in endoscopic skull base surgery techniques, this chapter will concentrate on the pertinent anatomical considerations that serve as key foundations for successful procedures. These considerations are categorized into two planes: the sagittal plane and the coronal plane.The sagittal plane is further subdivided into five distinct approaches, namely,(1) the transcribriform approach, (2) the transplanum approach, (3) the transsellar approach, (4) the transclival approach, and (5) the transodontoid approach.On the other hand, the coronal plane is delineated into seven specific zones to facilitate comprehension and potential applications: (1) the petrous apex approach, (2) the intrapetrous approach, (3) the suprapetrous approach, (4) the cavernous sinus approach, (5) the infratemporal approach, (6) the medial condyle approach, and (7) the jugular foramen approach.By organizing the anatomical aspects in this systematic manner, the information provided becomes more accessible, fostering a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter for potential future application.

Defining the Clival Recess Surgical Corridor and Clival Classification System for Approach to Sellar Pathology

BACKGROUND

Sellar masses within the pars intermedius, bordered anteriorly by normal pituitary gland/stalk, and/or with ectatic cavernous carotid anatomy are challenging and high risk when approached through the endonasal standard direct/anterior sellar approach. This approach portends itself to a higher risk of pituitary gland/stalk injury and subtotal resection with the aforementioned anatomic variants.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the indirect clival recess corridor approach to sellar lesions. This corridor is a "silent" point of access to lesions in this region endoscopically. While skull base teams may have used this approach to some degree, it has not yet been described in the literature to our knowledge.

METHODS

We defined the clival recess surgical corridor with skull base craniometric measurements and use a case example with aberrant anatomy to illustrate the approach. We cross-sectionally reviewed 42 patients with sellar and suprasellar masses. To describe the approach's anatomy, we devised and defined the terms dorsum sella plumb line, anatomic corridor, angle of osseous, and operative corridor.

RESULTS

Created novel clival aeration grade informing surgical planning. Classified clival aeration as Grade 1 (100%-75% aeration), Grade 2 (75%-50% aeration), Grade 3 (50%-25% aeration), and Grade 4 (25%-0% aeration). This classification system determines extent of drilling of the clivus required to optimize the clival recess corridor approach and its limitations.

CONCLUSION

The clival recess surgical corridor is effective for accessing pituitary lesions within the sella. Consider the indirect approach when a standard direct/anterior sellar approach has high risk for vascular injury and/or endocrinological dysfunction.