Slonimsky G, Hawng G, Goldenberg D, Gagnon E, Slonimsky E. Terminology, Definitions, and Classification in the Imaging of Laryngoceles.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020;
50:384-388. [PMID:
32680631 DOI:
10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
We aim to better define the anatomy, criteria, and classification of laryngoceles, and to raise the awareness to potential mimickers and anatomical variants leading to misdiagnosis.
METHODS
A retrospective review of all computed tomography studies, performed over a decade, with the diagnosis of "laryngocele" in the radiological report in a tertiary medical center. All relevant studies were reviewed by two independent readers for the presence of true laryngoceles.
RESULTS
One hundred and twelve patients were included; average age was 54 (±18). Re-read of scans with 3D reconstructions resulted in detecting 58 (52%) true laryngoceles, with 19.5% bilateral laryngoceles. Anatomical variants and laryngocele mimickers formerly misdiagnosed as laryngoceles included 26/54 (48%) prominent ventricles, 19/54 (35%) saccules not meeting criteria for laryngocele, 8/54 (15%) prominent pyriform sinuses and one tracheal diverticulum.
CONCLUSIONS
Intimate knowledge of the laryngeal anatomy, the criteria for a laryngocele and anatomical variants as well mimickers, is the key to avoid radiological misdiagnosis.
Collapse