Comparison of Intradermal Dilutional Testing with the Multi-Test II Applicator in Testing for Mold Allergy

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR.

CONCLUSION

This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.

Modulation of Immune Mediators with MQT-based Immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE: Assess immune and clinical changes with immunotherapy based on modified quantitative testing (MQT).

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy promotes immunomodulation that occurs over several years. Quantitative testing offers the advantage of initiating immunotherapy with robust antigen concentrations. This study assessed whether changes in immune mediators and allergy symptoms occur rapidly using quantitative techniques.

METHODS: Sixteen allergic adults were tested using MQT. Subjects had serum drawn for immunoglobulins E and G4 (IgE, IgG4) to 3 antigens, Der p1, Der f1, and Fel d1, and for interleukins IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-13, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA). Subjects also completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), the Allergy Outcome Scale (AOS), and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI). They underwent MQT-based immunotherapy and completed outcome measures again at 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS: Nine subjects completed the study. Analysis demonstrated significant increases in IgG4 levels to all antigens, significant decreases in serum levels of IL-1β and IL-5, and significant increases in levels of IL-1RA. Improvement was also noted in AOS and RSDI subscales.

CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy based on MQT demonstrates significant changes in immunoglobulin and cytokine levels by 12 weeks following initiation. In addition, improvement in symptom and quality-of-life measures occurs by 12 weeks. These findings support the rapid onset of clinical effects with MQT-based treatment of inhalant allergy.

EBM rating: C-4

Diagnostic Evaluation of Inhalant Allergies: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of modified quantitative testing (MQT), intradermal dilutional testing (IDT), and in vitro allergy testing as diagnostic methods used in the management of patients with suspected IgE-mediated inhalant allergies.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to determine key statistics for analysis, such as prevalence of disease, and sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic modality. Costs were calculated based on charges from distribution companies to providers. A deterministic cost-effectiveness analysis then was conducted using a decision tree model to evaluate the various diagnostic strategies. After identifying results at baseline, we performed a sensitivity and threshold analysis to assess the strength of recommendations.

Results

At an allergic rhinitis prevalence of 20%, MQT dominated IDT and in vitro testing, with 85 people correctly diagnosed at a baseline total cost of $6630 for the 100 patients tested. Although in vitro testing had the highest effectiveness, it had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3185. The results were sensitive to changes in the prevalence, costs, and sensitivities and specificities of the different modalities.

Conclusion

The prevalence of allergic rhinitis is high and rising according to many studies, leading to a growing population of patients requiring allergy testing. Not only does today's medical community want effective health interventions, but also there is pressure to make health care cost efficient. This study looks at the cost-effectiveness of various diagnostic allergy tests. In our model, we found MQT to be the most cost-effective method of diagnosing allergic disease.

Comparison of intradermal dilutional testing, skin prick testing, and modified quantitative testing for common allergens

OBJECTIVES

To compare and correlate wheal size using the Multi-Test II applicator with the endpoint obtained by intradermal dilutional testing (IDT) for 5 common allergens. To examine the safety of modified quantitative testing (MQT) for determining immunotherapy starting doses.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective comparative clinical study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 134 subjects were simultaneously skin tested for immediate hypersensitivity using the Multi-Test II device and IDT.

RESULTS

There was a 77% concordance between results from IDT and results from MQT. When there was a difference, MQT predicted a safer endpoint for starting immunotherapy in all but 2 cases.

CONCLUSION

Wheal size by SPT is predictive of endpoint by IDT. MQT is nearly as effective as formal IDT in determining endpoint.

SIGNIFICANCE

Modified quantitative testing appears to be a safe alternative to IDT for determining starting doses for immunotherapy.

Intradermal positivity after negative prick testing for inhalants

OBJECTIVE

Examine the incidence of positive intradermal tests after a negative skin prick test for 24 inhalant antigens.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study. Charts from patients who underwent modified quantitative testing (MQT) over a 3-year period were reviewed. Patients were initially tested with Multi-Test II. Subjects with negative wheals to a specific allergen were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of that allergen.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three patients underwent MQT for 24 antigens. Allergens with the highest incidence of positive intradermal wheals after negative prick testing were Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae at 26.67%. Allergens with elevated incidence of positive intradermals included fusarium, cockroach, cocklebur, rough marsh elder, and ragweed, all with incidences of 16% to 19%.

CONCLUSION

Positive intradermal responses after negative prick testing occur commonly. Future study is needed to determine the generalizability and clinical significance of these findings.

EBM RATING

C-4.