Acoustic tumor observation and failure to follow-up

Characterization of facial nerve outcomes following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a precise and efficacious treatment modality for vestibular schwannoma (VS) with favorable cranial nerve preservation rates. This study aims to better characterize facial nerve (FN) outcomes in VS after GKRS.

METHODS

A query of six medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies exclusively reported VS managed with single-fraction GKRS and included House-Brackmann (HB) scale assessments prior to and following GKRS. Data was analyzed using random-effects modeling, and FN preservation was defined as HB I or II at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Data was analyzed from 15 articles with 3,155 patients at an mean age of 55.0 years. Mean tumor volume, radiation dose, follow-up, tumor control, and hearing preservation were 4.28 cm3, 13.3 Gy, 59.4 months, 92.7%, and 62.6%, respectively. The pooled FN preservation rate was 92.9%. Mean preoperative tumor volume > 2.5 cm3 and age > 60 years were significantly associated with worse preoperative FN function (p = 0.019, p = 0.023, respectively). Normal FN function (HB = 1) at last follow up was 95.8% for VS volume < 2.5 cm3 and 89.4% with larger volumes (p < 0.001). Doses ≤ 13 Gy were significantly associated with superior FN preservation (96.5%) compared to higher doses (p < 0.001). Tumor control and hearing preservation were not significantly associated with FN preservation.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identifies tumor volume and radiation dose as prognostic factors for FN preservation. A FN preservation rate of 93% may be expected at five years after GKRS. This study provides a unique characterization of FN outcome that should be considered in the management of VS.

Patient Characteristics Impacting Adherence to Serial Observation for Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient characteristics that impact serial observation adherence among vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

METHODS

We selected for VS patients from 201 to 2020 who elected for serial observation as initial management. Patients under 18, with previous management, bilateral or intralabyrinthine VS, and neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status were extracted. Single and multiple logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics impacting follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 507 VS patients who chose serial observation as initial management. Most were female (56.0%), white (73.0%), and married (72.8%). The mean age was 59.3 and most had private insurance (56.4%). Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.00. Mean pure tone audiometry (PTA) average was 41.7 Hz. Average tumor size was 9.04 mm. Of 507 patients, 358 (70.6%) returned for at least one follow-up. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with private insurance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.39, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.68; P = .001), racial minority background (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.35-0.83; P = .005), worse PTA averages (OR: 0.99, CI: 0.98-1.00; P = .044), and older age at diagnosis (OR: 0.97, CI: 0.95-1.00; P = .038) were less likely to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Private health insurance, racial minority background, worse PTA average, and older age were associated with decreased follow-up among adult VS patients electing serial observation. Patients with these characteristics may require additional support to ensure serial observation adherence.

[Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Natural History of Brachial Plexus, Peripheral Nerve, and Spinal Schwannomas

BACKGROUND

Management of sporadic schwannomas is often dictated by a patient's clinical presentation and the tumor's behavior. For patients who are managed nonsurgically, there are little data available about the expected natural history.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the natural history and growth patterns of extracranial schwannomas including tumors of the distal peripheral nerves, spine, and brachial plexus.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with nonsyndromic extracranial schwannomas at a single tertiary care institution diagnosed between 2002 and 2019. Patient data and tumor characteristics including volume were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven patients were identified (mean age 51 years, 42% male, average of 27.8-month follow-up). Tumor location was distal peripheral nerve in 82, brachial plexus in 36, and paraspinal in 109. At the time of diagnosis, peripheral lesions were significantly larger than spinal (59 m 3 vs 13 cm 3 ) and brachial plexus lesions (15 cm 3 ). Distinct growth patterns were seen with both distal peripheral nerve and spinal lesions; 34/82 peripheral nerve lesions had fast growth (β = 0.176%/day), and 48 had slow growth (β = 0.021%/day; P < .01). Spinal schwannomas similarly had 30 fast-growing (β = 0.229%/day), 16 moderate-growing (β = 0.071%/day), and 63 slow-growing (β = 0.022%/day; P = .03) subtypes. The brachial plexus had relatively homogeneous growth patterns (β = 0.065%/day). Females had 2.9 times greater odds of having the fast-growing subtype.

CONCLUSION

Distinct growth patterns were seen in extracranial sporadic schwannomas based on tumor location and patient demographics. Fast (>80% volume change per year) vs slow (5%-10% per year) tumor growth can often be ascertained within 2 follow-up images. Awareness of these patterns might have implications for patient counseling and therapeutic decision-making.

Wait and Scan Management of Intra-canalicular Vestibular Schwannomas: Analysis of Growth and Hearing Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To report on the results of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (ICVS) that were managed by wait and scan and to analyze the possible predictors of tumor growth and hearing deterioration throughout the observation period.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series.

SETTING

Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies.

PATIENTS

Patients with sporadic ICVS managed by wait and scan.

INTERVENTION

Serial resonance imaging (MRI) with size measurement and serial audiological evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Tumor growth defined as 2 mm increase of maximal tumor diameter, further treatment, and hearing preservation either maintain initial modified Sanna hearing class, or maintain initial serviceable hearing (class A/B).

RESULTS

339 patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 36.5±31.7 months with a median of 24 months. Tumor growth occurred in 141 patients (40.6%) either as slow growth (SG) in 26.3% of cases or fast growth (FG) in 15.3% of cases. Intervention was performed in only 64 cases (18.8%). Out of 271 patients who underwent hearing analysis, 86 patients (33.5%) showed hearing deterioration to a lower hearing class of the modified Sanna classification. Tumor growth and older age were predictors of hearing deterioration. Of the 125 cases with initial serviceable hearing (Class A/B), 91 cases (72.8%) maintained serviceable hearing at last follow-up. Tumor growth and a worse initial pure tone average (PTA) were predictors of hearing deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Wait and scan management of ICVS is a viable option and only 18.8% of patients needed further treatment. Hearing tends to deteriorate over time.

Adherence to Long-Term Follow-up in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas Managed With Serial Observation

Objectives

To examine the long-term adherence to serial imaging of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and analyze factors associated with being lost to follow-up.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review with telephone interview.

Setting

Single tertiary care center.

Methods

Patients with a sporadic vestibular schwannoma and started on observational surveillance management between January 2005 and December 2010 were included. Demographic data, tumor size, hearing and vestibular changes, and follow-up length were recorded. Patient factors were analyzed for association with being lost to follow-up.

Results

In total, 122 patients were included with a median length of follow-up of 5 months (range, 0-146). After initial surveillance, 22.1% (n = 27) of patients had a change in management to either microsurgery or radiosurgery. Of the remaining 77.9% (n = 95), nearly half (44.2%, n = 42) never returned for a second visit, and all but 3 were eventually lost to follow-up. There was no association between sex, race, age at diagnosis, initial tumor size, insurance status, household income, or driving distance to hospital and being lost to follow-up. Of 26 interviewed patients initially lost to follow-up, 11 (42.3%) sought care at another institution, 5 (19.2%) chose to no longer receive care, 1 (3.8%) had transportation difficulties, and 9 (36.4%) had poor understanding of their diagnosis or instructions.

Conclusions

The length of follow-up for patients undergoing surveillance of sporadic vestibular schwannoma varies widely, and patients are commonly lost to follow-up. Further efforts should be made to identify at-risk patients and provide adequate education to improve long-term surveillance.

Useful hearing preservation is improved in vestibular schwannoma patients who undergo stereotactic radiosurgery before further hearing deterioration ensues

INTRODUCTION

The present study evaluates whether hearing deterioration during observation reduces serviceable hearing preservation rates after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with useful hearing.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1447 VS patients who underwent SRS between 1992 and 2017. We identified 100 VS patients who had Grade I Gardner- Robertson (GR) hearing at initial diagnosis but were observed without surgery or SRS. We compared hearing after SRS in 67 patients who retained GR Grade I hearing from initial diagnosis to SRS (the hearing maintenance or HM group) to 33 patients whose hearing worsened from GR grade I to grade II (the hearing deterioration or HD group). We also investigated whether a decline in pure tone average (PTA) or speech discrimination score (SDS) before SRS affected hearing preservation after SRS.

RESULTS

The serviceable hearing (GR I and II) preservation in HM patients was 80%s, 63%, and 51% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The serviceable hearing preservation in HD patients was 40%, 33%, and 20% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, younger age (< 55 years, p = 0.045) and HM during observation (p = 0.001) improved serviceable hearing preservation rates. Patients whose PTA increased ≥ 15 dB (p = 0.024) or whose SDS declined ≥ 10% (p = 0.019) had reduced serviceable hearing preservation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing deterioration during observation before SRS reduced long term hearing preservation rate in VS patients with GR grade I hearing at initial diagnosis. SRS before hearing deterioration was recommended for hearing preservation.

EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma

The level of evidence to provide treatment recommendations for vestibular schwannoma is low compared with other intracranial neoplasms. Therefore, the vestibular schwannoma task force of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology assessed the data available in the literature and composed a set of recommendations for health care professionals. The radiological diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma is made by magnetic resonance imaging. Histological verification of the diagnosis is not always required. Current treatment options include observation, surgical resection, fractionated radiotherapy, and radiosurgery. The choice of treatment depends on clinical presentation, tumor size, and expertise of the treating center. In small tumors, observation has to be weighed against radiosurgery, in large tumors surgical decompression is mandatory, potentially followed by fractionated radiotherapy or radiosurgery. Except for bevacizumab in neurofibromatosis type 2, there is no role for pharmacotherapy.

Current strategies in management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current practitioner is more often managing intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas than in the past, as improved imaging and heightened awareness leads to earlier diagnosis of these tumors. The role of observation, microsurgery, and radiation treatment in the management of intracanalicular tumors continues to evolve. The goal of this article is to evaluate and summarize recent literature pertaining to the management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Watchful waiting is an important management option for patients with minimal symptoms. The literature on the natural history of small vestibular schwannomas continues to expand, with particular emphasis on the expected hearing outcomes. Microsurgical techniques also focus on hearing preservation. Presence of fundal fluid and good or normal hearing preoperatively are positive predictors of hearing preservation after surgery. Long-term follow-up after radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas continues to demonstrate excellent tumor control rates, although hearing preservation rates are modest.

SUMMARY

Multiple factors, including status of hearing, presence of vestibular symptoms, patient age, medical comorbidities, institutional outcomes, and patient preferences, help determine the management strategy for patients with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma.