Effect of transforming growth factor-beta1 antisense oligonucleotides on matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in keloid fibroblasts

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

The Keloid Disorder: Heterogeneity, Histopathology, Mechanisms and Models

Keloids constitute an abnormal fibroproliferative wound healing response in which raised scar tissue grows excessively and invasively beyond the original wound borders. This review provides a comprehensive overview of several important themes in keloid research: namely keloid histopathology, heterogeneity, pathogenesis, and model systems. Although keloidal collagen versus nodules and α-SMA-immunoreactivity have been considered pathognomonic for keloids versus hypertrophic scars, conflicting results have been reported which will be discussed together with other histopathological keloid characteristics. Importantly, histopathological keloid abnormalities are also present in the keloid epidermis. Heterogeneity between and within keloids exists which is often not considered when interpreting results and may explain discrepancies between studies. At least two distinct keloid phenotypes exist, the superficial-spreading/flat keloids and the bulging/raised keloids. Within keloids, the periphery is often seen as the actively growing margin compared to the more quiescent center, although the opposite has also been reported. Interestingly, the normal skin directly surrounding keloids also shows partial keloid characteristics. Keloids are most likely to occur after an inciting stimulus such as (minor and disproportionate) dermal injury or an inflammatory process (environmental factors) at a keloid-prone anatomical site (topological factors) in a genetically predisposed individual (patient-related factors). The specific cellular abnormalities these various patient, topological and environmental factors generate to ultimately result in keloid scar formation are discussed. Existing keloid models can largely be divided into in vivo and in vitro systems including a number of subdivisions: human/animal, explant/culture, homotypic/heterotypic culture, direct/indirect co-culture, and 3D/monolayer culture. As skin physiology, immunology and wound healing is markedly different in animals and since keloids are exclusive to humans, there is a need for relevant human in vitro models. Of these, the direct co-culture systems that generate full thickness keloid equivalents appear the most promising and will be key to further advance keloid research on its pathogenesis and thereby ultimately advance keloid treatment. Finally, the recent change in keloid nomenclature will be discussed, which has moved away from identifying keloids solely as abnormal scars with a purely cosmetic association toward understanding keloids for the fibroproliferative disorder that they are.

Pharmacological treatment for keloids

INTRODUCTION

Keloids are fibroproliferative disorders that are characterized by histological accumulation of collagens and fibroblasts, refractory clinical symptoms such as itching, topical invasiveness, and frequent postsurgical recurrence. At present, to treat or prevent keloids, new drugs are currently being designed and the pharmaceutical indications of known drugs are being expanded.

AREAS COVERED

The current pharmacological interventions for keloids are mainly described on the basis of the various hypotheses on keloid etiology and the keloid ingredients that are targeted. These interventions include angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers (based on hypertension hypothesis), selective estrogen receptor modulator (based on endocrinological hypothesis), vitamins and essential fatty acids (based on immunonutritional hypothesis), and transglutaminase inhibitor (based on metabolic hypothesis). Drugs that directly target the reduction or destruction of the major extracellular matrix or cellular constituents of keloids are also included. Besides, drugs that indirectly modulate the biochemical microenvironment are described. These include growth factors, immunomodulators, and anti-inflammation and anti-allergy drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the unclear etiology of keloids and the lack of animal models, efficient, reliable, and specific pharmaceutical interventions for keloids continue to be lacking. The reliability of current data and clinical observations must be strengthened by large-scale, randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Organ fibrosis inhibited by blocking transforming growth factor-β signaling via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists

BACKGROUND

Organ fibrosis has been viewed as one of the major medical problems, which can lead to progressive dysfunction of the liver, lung, kidney, skin, heart, and eventually death of patients. Fibrosis is initiated by a variety of pathological, physiological, biochemical, and physical factors. Regardless of their different etiologies, they all share a common pathogenetic process: excessive activation of the key profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma), a ligand-activated transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily, has received particular attention in recent years, because the activation of PPARgamma by both natural and synthetic agonists could effectively inhibit TGF-beta-induced profibrotic effects in many organs.

DATA SOURCES

The English-language medical databases, PubMed, Elsevier and SpringerLink were searched for articles on PPARgamma, TGF-beta, and fibrosis, and related topics.

RESULTS

TGF-beta is recognized as a key profibrotic cytokine. Excessive activation of TGF-beta increases synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins and decreases their degradation, associated with a gradual destruction of normal tissue architecture and function, whereas PPARgamma agonists inhibit TGF-beta signal transduction and are effective antifibrogenic agents in many organs including the liver, lung, kidney, skin and heart.

CONCLUSIONS

The main antifibrotic activity of PPARgamma agonists is to suppress the TGF-beta signaling pathway by so-called PPARgamma-dependent effect. In addition, PPARgamma agonists, especially 15d-PGJ2, also exert potentially antifibrotic activity independent of PPARgamma activation. TGF-beta1/Smads signaling not only plays many essential roles in multiple developmental processes, but also forms cross-talk networks with other signal pathways, and their inhibition by PPARgamma agonists certainly affects the cytokine networks and causes non-suspected side-effects. Anti-TGF-beta therapies with PPARgamma agonists may have to be carefully tailored to be tissue- and target gene-specific to minimize side-effects, indicating a great challenge to the medical research at present.

Extracellular matrix molecules implicated in hypertrophic and keloid scarring

Tissue regeneration repairs the fabric of the skin to maintain homeostasis after injury. The expression and proliferation of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules in the dermis, mediated by a range of growth factors and cytokines, is a fundamental element of wound repair. Previous work focused on how these complex molecular mechanisms relate to the formation of raised dermal scars, including keloid and hypertrophic scars, characterized by excessive deposition of ECM molecules. However, the mechanisms in the wound repair pathway which lead to the differential expression and organization of ECM molecules observed in different types of scar tissue are not fully understood. To summarize what is known about the expression and composition of ECM molecules in abnormal scarring, an extensive search of the literature was conducted, focusing on keywords connected to skin scarring, hypertrophic scars and keloid disease. The transcription and translation of collagen I and III, fibronectin, laminin, periostin and tenascin are all increased in raised dermal scar tissue. However, hyaluronic acid, dermatopontin and decorin are decreased, and the expression and localisation of fibrillin and elastin fibres in the dermis are altered compared with normal skin and scars. Recent whole genome profiling and proteomic studies have led to the identification of regulatory elements with different expression profiles in hypertrophic and keloid tissue. If the mechanisms of raised dermal scar formation are to be elucidated and effective therapeutic treatments developed, an integrated approach to research is required, focussing on the interactions between ECM molecules, regulatory elements and pathways.