Percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: current concepts

Cost Difference Between Open Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Spinal vertebral fractures pose a significant healthcare burden due to their frequency and impact on quality of life, resulting in substantial social costs. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers advantages over traditional open surgery (OS), such as reduced tissue damage, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays, although it involves higher implant costs. Research comparing the overall direct costs of these interventions is limited. This study aims to compare the direct hospital-care costs associated with OS and MIS for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Spain.

METHODS

We conducted an ambispective analysis of patients treated for thoracolumbar unstable fractures at our hospital from January 2004 to July 2022. Patients were categorized into OS and MIS groups. We performed analyses on the entire cohort, patients with minor trauma, and applied propensity score matching. Direct hospital costs were documented and adjusted for inflation.

RESULTS

Out of 218 patients, 75 underwent OS and 143 received MIS. Cost analysis indicated that MIS patients had shorter hospital stays and lower admission costs, though total costs did not differ significantly. Multivariate analysis showed OS was slightly more expensive but not significantly so. Propensity score matching confirmed similar findings. For patients with minor trauma, MIS again showed shorter stays and lower costs, with no significant difference in total costs. All cohorts exhibited significantly lower blood expenditure with MIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that MIS is not inferior to OS in terms of costs, with some advantages like reduced blood bank expenses. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with economic evaluations are needed for more definitive conclusions.

Posterior segmental fixation for thoraco-lumbar and lumbar fractures: a comparative outcome study between open and percutaneous techniques

PURPOSE

Showing results of open and percutaneous surgical management of traumatic AO type A3, A4 and B2 thoracic and lumbar fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative analysis of traditional open fusion versus percutaneous navigated fixation of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Minimum 24 months follow-up to collect ODI and VAS outcome scores for comparative analysis was required.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with a mean age of 39 years met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six patients were in the open group (Group O) and 31 in the percutaneous group (Group P). The majority of fractures were either type A3 or A4; there were three type B chance fractures in Group O and one in Group P. VAS and ODI scores followed comparable trends in the two groups until the final follow-up. The main statistically significant result between the two groups was blood loss, which was lower in Group P (110 versus 270 ml in Group O on average), although this did not reflect into different clinical outcomes. Similar peri-operative measures of operating time and length of stay were found between the two groups. A significantly higher degree of loss of reduction was noted at follow-up in Group P (8° versus 5° in Group O on average).

CONCLUSIONS

Open and percutaneous posterior fixation techniques of thoracic and lumbar fractures in this cohort were associated with different perioperative blood losses as well as radiological measurements, but not with clinically meaningful differences in patient reported outcome measures at 24 months' follow-up.

Hidden blood loss in minimally invasive surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine prevents the collapse of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) with lower complication and bleeding rates than open surgery. However, the possibility of hidden blood loss (HBL) has been recently described, referring to the loss of blood diffused into tissues and lost through hemolysis. This study aimed to estimate the postoperative impact of HBL in patients undergoing MIS for OVF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of a series of patients who had MIS for OVF. A descriptive analysis of recorded variables was performed, and total blood volume (TBV), total bleeding (TB), HBL, and Hb drop were calculated. This was followed by a comparative analysis between HBL (<500mL vs. ≥500mL) and the variables of hospital stay and postoperative evolution. Binary logistic regression models were performed to rule out confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included, 8 men and 32 women, with a mean age of 76.6 years. The mean HBL was 682.5mL. An HBL greater than 500mL is found to be an independent risk factor for torpid postoperative evolution (p=0.035), while it does not predict a longer hospital stay (p=0.116). In addition, a higher HBL was observed in surgeries of greater technical complexity and longer surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MIS techniques have shown less intraoperative bleeding than open surgery, HBL should be diagnosed because it is associated with a torpid evolution. The use of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm may help minimize its impact.

Hidden blood loss in minimally invasive surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine prevents the collapse of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) with lower complication and bleeding rates than open surgery. However, the possibility of hidden blood loss (HBL) has been recently described, referring to the loss of blood diffused into tissues and lost through hemolysis. This study aimed to estimate the postoperative impact of HBL in patients undergoing MIS for OVF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of a series of patients who had MIS for OVF. A descriptive analysis of recorded variables was performed, and total blood volume, total bleeding, HBL, and hemoglobine drop were calculated. This was followed by a comparative analysis between HBL (<500ml vs. ≥500ml) and the variables of hospital stay and postoperative evolution. Binary logistic regression models were performed to rule out confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included, 8 men and 32 women, with a mean age of 76.6 years. The mean HBL was 682.5ml. An HBL greater than 500ml is found to be an independent risk factor for torpid postoperative evolution (P=0.035), while it does not predict a longer hospital stay (P=0.116). In addition, a higher HBL was observed in surgeries of greater technical complexity and longer surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MIS techniques have shown less intraoperative bleeding than open surgery, HBL should be diagnosed because it is associated with a torpid evolution. The use of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm may help minimize its impact.

Outcomes of Dorsolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis Treated by Minimally Invasive and Open Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study

Purpose of Study

To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive and open techniques in the surgical management of dorsolumbar and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (STB).

Methods

Skeletally mature patients with active STB involving thoracolumbar and lumbar region confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. Healed and mechanically stable STB, patients having severe hepatic and renal impairment, coexisting spinal conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and patients unwilling to participate were excluded from the study. The patients were divided in to two groups, group A consisted of patients treated by MIS techniques and group B consisted of patients treated by open techniques. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. MIS techniques were used in 18 patients and open techniques were used in 24 patients. On comparison between the two groups, blood loss (234 ml vs 742 ml), and immediate post-operative VAS score (5.26 vs 7.08) were significantly better in group A, whereas kyphotic correction (16° vs 33.25°) was significantly better in group B. Rest of the parameters such as duration of surgery, VAS score, ODI score and number of instrumented levels did not show significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

MIS stabilization when compared to open techniques is associated with significant improvement in immediate post-operative VAS scores. The MIS approaches at 2-year follow-up have functional results similar to open techniques. MIS is inferior to open techniques in kyphosis correction and may be associated with complications.

Percutaneous Pedicle Screw for Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Long-term Follow-up

Objective:  This is a retrospective cohort study to analyze the long-term outcomes of thoracolumbar spine fracture patients who underwent minimally invasive percutaneous fixation. Methods:  The cases of 17 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures who had percutaneous fixation between 2009 and 2011 were the subject of a retrospective analysis. Clinical and radiographic variables were collected. For the clinical evaluation the questionnaires SF-36 and Oswestry were used. Radiographic parameters were evaluated using fracture's classification based on Magerls's criteria, the fractured vertebra's wedging angle, and the affected segment's segmental Cobb angle. The measures were made at different stages: before surgery, immediately after surgery, one year later, and at a late follow-up (5 years later). Trauma associated injuries, post-surgical and implant related complications were among the additional information taken into account. Results:  The SF-36 questionnaire showed averages above 63,5% in all domains in the late postoperative data (from 5 years after the surgery). Oswestry questionnaire answers showed minimal or no physical limitations in 80% of the patients with a mean score of 10,8%±10,5. The average preoperative Cobb angle value was 5,53° ± 13,80° of kyphosis, the immediate postoperative 2,18° ± 13,38° of kyphosis, one year postoperative 5,26 ± 13,95° of kyphosis, and the late follow-up 8,78° ± 15,06° of kyphosis. The mean correction was 3,35°, and mean loss of correction was 6,6°. There were no complications observed, no case of neurological deficit, infection or implant failure occurred. Conclusion:  Thoracolumbar vertebrae fractures can be surgically treated with positive late clinical and radiological outcomes and low complication rates using a minimally invasive percutaneous method.

Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A systematic review

Introduction

The treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures remains controversial. To date no consensus exists on the correct choice of surgical approach and technique.

Research question

to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the available different surgical methods and their quantified outcomes.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched between 2001 and 2020 using the term 'spinal fractures'. Inclusion criteria were: adults, ≥10 cases, ≥12 months follow-up, thoracic or lumbar fractures, and surgery <3 weeks of trauma. Studies were categorized per surgical technique: Posterior open (PO), posterior percutaneous (PP), stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (SA), anterior scopic (AS), anterior open (AO), posterior percutaneous and anterior open (PPAO), posterior percutaneous and anterior scopic (PPAS), posterior open and anterior open (POAO) and posterior open and anterior scopic (POAS). The PO group was used as a reference group.

Results

After duplicate removal 6042 articles were identified. A total of 102 articles were Included, in which 137 separate surgical technique cohorts were described: PO (n = 75), PP, (n = 39), SA (n = 12), AO (n = 5), PPAO (n = 1), PPAS (n = 1), POAO (n = 2) and POAS (n = 2).

Discussion and conclusion

For type A3/A4 burst fractures, without severe neurological deficit, posterior percutaneous (PP) technique seems the safest and most feasible option in the past two decades. If needed, PP can be combined with anterior augmentation to prevent secondary kyphosis. Furthermore, posterior open (PO) technique is feasible in almost all types of fractures. Also, this technique can provide for an additional posterior decompression or fusion. Overall, no neurologic deterioration was reported following surgical intervention.

Improvement of vertebral body fracture reduction utilizing a posterior reduction tool: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Extensive research regarding instabilities and prevention of kyphotic malalignment in the thoracolumbar spine exists. Keystones of this treatment are posterior instrumentation and anterior vertebral height restoration. Anterior column reduction via a single-stage procedure seems to be advantageous regarding complication, blood loss, and OR-time. Mechanical elevation of the anterior cortex of the vertebra may prevent the necessity of additional anterior stabilization or vertebral body replacement. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) if increased bony reduction in the anterior vertebral cortex could be achieved by utilization of an additional reduction tool, (2) if postoperative loss of vertebral height could be reduced, and (3) if anterior column reduction is related to clinical outcome.

METHODS

From one level I trauma center, 173 patients underwent posterior stabilization for fractures of the thoracolumbar region between 2015 and 2020. Reduction in the vertebral body was performed via intraoperative lordotic positioning or by utilization of an additional reduction tool (Nforce, Medtronic). The reduction tool was mounted onto the pedicle screws and removed after tightening of the locking screws. To assess bony reduction, the sagittal index (SI) and vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA) were measured on X-rays and CT images at different time points ((1) preoperative, (2) postoperative, (3) ≥ 3 months postoperative). Clinical outcome was assessed utilizing the Ostwestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

Bisegmental stabilization of AO/OTA type A3/A4 vertebral fractures was performed in 77 patients. Thereof, reduction was performed in 44 patients (females 34%) via intraoperative positioning alone (control group), whereas 33 patients (females 33%) underwent additional reduction utilizing a mechanical reduction tool (instrumentation group). Mean age was 41 ± 13 years in the instrumentation group (IG) and 52 ± 12 years in the control group (CG) (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of gender and comorbidities were found between the two groups. Preoperatively, the sagittal index (SI) was 0.69 in IG compared to 0.74 in CG (p = 0.039), resulting in a vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA) of 15.0° vs. 11.7° (p = 0.004). Intraoperatively, a significantly greater correction of the kyphotic deformity was achieved in the IG (p < 0.001), resulting in a compensation of the initially more severe kyphotic malalignment. The SI was corrected by 0.20-0.88 postoperatively, resulting in an improvement of the VKA by 8.7°-6.3°. In the CG, the SI could be corrected by 0.12-0.86 and the VKA by 5.1°-6.6°. The amount of correction was influenced by the initial deformity (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, both groups showed a loss of correction, resulting in a gain of 0.08 for the SI and 4.1° in IG and 0.03 and 2.0°, respectively. The best results were observed in younger patients with initially severe kyphotic deformity. Considering various influencing factors, clinical outcome determined by the ODI showed no significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of the investigated reduction tool during posterior stabilization of vertebral body fractures in a suitable collective of young patients with good bone quality and severe fracture deformity may lead to better reduction in the ventral column of the fractured vertebral body and angle correction. Therefore, additional anterior stabilization or vertebral body replacement may be prevented.

Surgical management of thoracolumbar junction fractures: An evidence-based algorithm

Background

The management of thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) fractures, involving the restoring anatomical stability and biomechanics properties, still remains a challenge for neurosurgeons.Despite the high frequency of these injuries, specific treatment guidelines, set on biomechanical properties, have not yet been assumed. The present study is meant to propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm. The primary aim for the protocol validation was the assessment of postoperative neurological recovery. The secondary objectives concerned the evaluation of residual deformity and rate of hardware failure. Technical nuances of surgical approaches and drawbacks were further discussed.

Methods

Clinical and biomechanical data of patients harboring a single TLJ fracture, surgically managed between 2015 and 2020, were collected. Patients' cohorts were ranked into 4 groups according to Magerl's Type, McCormack Score, Vaccaro PLC point, Canal encroachment, and Farcy Sagittal Index. The outcome measures were the early/late Benzel-Larson Grade and postoperative kyphosis degree to estimate neurological status and residual deformity, respectively.

Results

32 patients were retrieved, 7, 9, 8, and 8 included within group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall neurological outcomes significantly improved for all patients at every follow-up stage (p ​< ​0.0001). Surgeries gained a complete restoration of post-traumatic kyphosis in the entire cohort (p ​< ​0.0001), except for group 4 which experienced a later worsening of residual deformity.

Conclusions

The choice of the most appropriate surgical approach for TLJ fractures is dictated by morphological and biomechanical characteristics of fracture and the grade of neurological involvement. The proposed surgical management protocol was reliable and effective, although further validations are needed.

Percutaneous Cement-Augmented Screws Short Fixation for the treatment of Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures

OBJECTIVE (BACKGROUND)

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic reliability of posterior percutaneous cement-augmented screws short fixation(PASF) in patients with severe osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures(OVBFs).

METHODS

Single-level OVBFs with an anterior vertebral body height(VBH) reduction equal or superior to 60% were included. A frailty index was employed for preoperative frailty assessment. Back pain and related disability were assessed through the VAS scale and Oswestry low-back pain disability index(ODI), being administered at injury time, preoperative, postoperative, twelfth-month and last patient follow-up evaluations. The main radiological outcomes were represented by Cobb angle(CA) and anterior vertebral body compression percentage(AVBC%), being measured at injury time, preoperative, postoperative and twelfth-month examinations. Among the others, the incidence of cement leakages and hardware failures was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients resulted frail(76%) or semi-frail(24%). Significant VBH restoration and segmental kyphosis improvement after PASF was documented (AVBC%:-40(-43;-37) VS -67(-70;-65), P = 0.0001; CA: 10(8-12) VS 24(23-26), P = 0.0001). The mean VAS and ODI scores documented optimal and long-enduring pain relief and related disability reduction after PASF (VAS: 2(2-3) VS 8(7-8), P = 0.0001; ODI: 22(17-26) VS 64(60-69), P = 0.0001). Only one cement leakage (3%), asymptomatic, occurred. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, no early/late hardware failures were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiological results of this study suggest that PASF could be a safe and effective treatment option for severe OVBFs when conservative treatments failed.

Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Importance and Surgical Implications

The soft tissues surrounding the spine play a primordial role in its stability, the most important of which are located posteriorly and are deemed the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC). Injuries to the PLC in the setting of thoracolumbar trauma are often dreaded and little attention has been given to them in the management protocols of thoracolumbar trauma. This review aims to summarize and contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries of the thoracolumbar spine with the aim to provide a clear guide for clinical management. Injuries to the PLC may be suspected on the clinical exam but are often missed, leading to serious complications, including instability and neurological compromise. The diagnosis is often made indirectly by spinal radiographs and CT-scanning or by direct visualization of soft tissues via magnetic resonance imaging. The latter remains the standard imaging modality and is mandatory for patients with a high suspicion of PLC injury. PLC injuries are associated with vertebral fractures and follow a progressive pattern of severity, depending on the mechanism of injury and extent of trauma. Surgical management is warranted, as PLC damage renders the spine unstable. Although fusion was once the standard of care and remains applicable for certain patients, recent endeavors of temporary spinal fixation without fusion are increasingly gaining traction in patients with PLC injuries. In conclusion, PLC injuries are challenging as they are often missed, poorly understood, and are not easily managed. Proper diagnosis and management are crucial to avoid long-standing complications such as spinal instability. Considering the paucity of available data on such an important topic in thoracolumbar trauma, this review article aims to contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries in order to demystify this sparsely covered subject.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for the Treatment of Types B and C Thoracolumbar Injuries: A PRISMA Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries may require surgical management, particularly AO Spine types B and C injuries. Open reduction and fixation using pedicle screws, with or without fusion and/or decompression, is the gold standard surgical treatment for unstable injuries. Recent advances in instrumentation design have resulted in less-invasive surgeries. However, the literature is sparse about the effectiveness of these procedures for types B and C injuries. The objective is to compare the outcomes of conventional open surgery versus minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) for the treatment of AO Spine types B and C thoracolumbar injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed to identify studies comparing outcomes achieved with open versus minimally invasive surgery in AO Spine types B and C thoracolumbar injury patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used.

RESULTS

Five retrospective case-control studies and 3 prospective studies met selection criteria. In general, most of the studies demonstrated that minimally invasive spine surgery is feasible for types B and C injuries, and associated with potential advantages like reduced blood loss, postoperative pain, and muscle injury, and shorter hospital stays. However, no differences were detected in major outcomes, like neurological status or disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature currently suggests that minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid alternative for treating types B and C thoracolumbar injuries. However, further comparative prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish the superiority of one approach over the other.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screws and instrumentational maneuvers: Technical strategy and radiological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common condition without a clear consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) techniques are widely used in practice, while its ability to correct fracture deformity is relatively weak, especially for the central area of the endplate. In this study, we reported a novel technique to reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

The new reduction technique uses six percutaneous pedicle screws for the fractured vertebra and its adjacent vertebrae. Pedicle screws implanted in the two adjacent vertebrae were parallel to the superior vertebral endplate, as routinely required. Two monoaxial pedicle screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were placed toward the anteroinferior portion of the fractured vertebral body. After routine instrumentation and ligamentotaxis reduction, the bolt heads of the four screws implanted in the adjacent vertebrae were first tightened, and then the bolt heads of the screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were gradually tighten to elevate the collapsed endplate. A fundamental principle of this technique is to implant the pedicle screw in the fractured vertebra towards the anteroinferior portion of the vertebra in such a way that the angle between the pedicle screw and the rod is oblique on lateral fluoroscopy. As such, when the bolt heads were tightened, the pedicle screws can be swung up to reduce the endplate fragments.

RESULTS

The novel technique was performed in 24 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar AO type A3 fractures. The middle vertebral height ratio was significantly improved from 69.7%±7.6% after routine reduction to 85.1%±4.5% postoperatively (p<0.01). No complication was noticed for this new reduction technique. At 6-month follow-up, no significant correction loss of the middle and posterior vertebral height ratios, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle was observed, while 5.8% of correction loss was observed for the anterior vertebral height ratio.

CONCLUSION

The described reduction technique is simple, safe, and effective in reducing the collapsed central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Such a practical reduction strategy does not need additional medical costs.

Candidates for Percutaneous Screw Fixation Without Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Identifying candidates for isolated percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) in thoracolumbar fractures based on Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score.

METHODS

Patients underwent PSF were split into 3 TLICS-score categories, then matched with groups having similar scores managed either non-operatively or via open screw fixation (OSF). Each category was assessed for corrective power and loss of correction by comparing initial and 1-year Cobb angles as well as Oswestry Disability Index and rates of fracture healing at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (40 females) with age range 19 to 51 years, were admitted 1 to 25 hours following trauma. Each of TLISC categories consisted of matched treatment groups for comparison. In TLICS-3 fractures (2 treatment groups, n = 12 each), PSF showed similar outcomes but longer time to ambulation and length of stay (LOS) compared with nonoperative management. In TLICS-4 fractures (3 treatment groups, n = 18 each), PSF showed comparable corrective power and outcomes as OSF but was better in terms of operative time, blood loss, time to ambulation, LOS, and cosmesis. Despite higher LOS when compared with nonoperative cases, PSF showed superior radiologic and functional outcomes. In TLICS-5 fractures (2 treatment groups, n = 12 each), PSF showed shorter admissions and time to ambulation but lower corrective power, functional recovery, and tendency to lower healing rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated PSF is a valid choice in managing TLICS-4 thoracolumbar fractures; however, it did not surpass conventional methods in TLICS-3 or TLICS-5 fracture types. Further studies are needed before the generalization of findings.

[Minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine after traumatic injuries]

Injuries of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common fractures of the spine due to their anatomical position and load. Common classification systems differentiate between stable and unstable injuries and thus also between operative and conservative therapy. The majority of injuries can be treated conservatively; however, unstable injuries require surgical treatment for a variety of reasons. In the grey area between stable and unstable injuries, a clinical decision based on clinical experience is necessary in order to select the best treatment. A wide variety of parameters must be included and a change in strategy from conservative to operative may also be necessary. Posterior instrumentation is the most common procedure; purely anterior stabilization is rarely used. The length of the instrumentation/spondylodesis depends on bone quality, age of the patient, and fracture. The decision as to whether anterior operative treatment should be performed depends on fracture morphology, success of reduction, and the resulting stability. The open surgical procedure is increasingly being replaced by minimally invasive procedures in posterior and anterior techniques but can be an advantage in complex injuries (B and C injuries according to AO). Hybrid procedures are also possible. This also applies to the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, since a clear assignment between traumatic and osteoporotic cause is not always easy and possible. This article describes the principles, the possible indications, and limitations of minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization.

Accuracy of augmented reality surgical navigation for minimally invasive pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a new tracking device

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly used in spine surgery. The purpose of navigation systems is to guide the surgeon and to reduce intraoperative x-ray exposure.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and clinical accuracy of a navigation technology based on augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation compared with standard fluoroscopy-guided minimally invasive technique.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cadaveric laboratory study.

METHODS

ARSN was installed in a hybrid operating room, consisting of a flat panel detector c-arm with two dimensional/three dimensional imaging capabilities and four integrated cameras in its frame. The surface-referenced navigation device does not require a bony reference but uses video cameras and optical markers applied to the patient's skin for tracking. In four cadavers, a total of 136 pedicle screws were inserted in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The accuracy was assessed by three independent raters in postoperative conventional computed tomography.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of ARSN was 94% compared with an accuracy of 88% for fluoroscopy. The difference was not statistically significant. In the thoracic region, accuracy with ARSN was 92% compared with 83% with fluoroscopy. With fluoroscopy, unsafe screws were observed in three normal cadavers and one with scoliosis. Using ARSN, unsafe screws were only observed in the scoliotic spine. No significant difference in the median of time for K-wire placement was recorded. As no intraoperative fluoroscopy was necessary in ARSN, the performing surgeon was not exposed to radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this limited cadaveric study minimally invasive screw placement using ARSN was demonstrated to be feasible and as accurate as fluoroscopy. It did not require any additional navigation time or use of any intraoperative x-ray imaging, thereby potentially permitting surgery in a protective lead garment-free environment. A well-powered clinical study is needed to demonstrate a significant difference in the accuracy between the two methods.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

ARSN offers real-time imaging of planned insertion paths, instrument tracking, and overlay of three dimensional bony anatomy and surface topography. The referencing procedure, by optical recognition of several skin markers is easy and does not require a solid bony reference as necessary for conventional navigation which saves time. Additionally, ARSN may foster the reduction of intraoperative x-ray exposure to spinal surgeons.

A minimally invasive, 3D-fluoroscopy-navigation-guided, 3D-controlled pedicle approach in spine surgery: first reliable results and impact on patient safety

PURPOSE

Safe pedicle screw placement is a daily challenge to every spine surgeon. Introduction of minimally invasive approaches in spinal surgery led to an impaired facility of inspection of the surgical field increasing the importance of intraoperative imaging and navigation. During the past years, we established a minimally invasive, navigated approach in our clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of pedicle approaches in patients treated due to traumatic or osteoporotic fractures, spondylitis/discitis, and tumoral lesions. Guide wires for pedicle screws or kyphoplasty cannulas were inserted in a 3D-navigation-guided, minimally invasive technique. Positioning of the guide wires was verified via 3D-scan, and pedicle screws/kyphoplasty cannulas were then visualized via a.p./lateral radiographs. Accuracy data were compared to a standard navigated open approach control group with indications similar to the MIS-group.

RESULTS

23 MIS patients were included in this study (25-84 years, mean 70 years) with a total of 154 placed guide wires. Handling of the navigated Jamshidi needle was easy and secure. The guide wires showed correct placement in 151/154 cases. Three wires (1.9%) needed correction of placement after control scan. There were no vascular or neurologic complications due to wire misplacement. In the open-surgery control group, 7/181 screws (3.9%) needed intraoperative correction presenting no significant difference compared to the correction rate of the MIS-group (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the feasibility and reliability of a navigation-guided, minimally invasive pedicle approach in the clinical setting. Therefore, reduced morbidity due to minimized approaches can be combined with higher accuracy of navigated pedicle screw/kyphoplasty cannula placement improving patient safety.

Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Printed Guide and a Polyoxymethylene Thermoplastic Regulator for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Patients with Thoracolumbar Fracture

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a porous polyoxymethylene thermoplastic regulator combined with a three-dimensional (3D) printed template to guide pedicle needle insertion in patients undergoing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) for thoracolumbar fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty patients were randomly divided into group A, treated using a porous polyoxymethylene thermoplastic regulator combined with a 3D printed template, and group B, who underwent conventional PPSF. Data recorded included the number of pedicle screws successfully inserted on the first attempt, the number of attempts, the time to successful needle insertion, the total time of fluoroscopy, and the duration of surgery. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores one day before surgery, and at day 1, day 7, month 1, and month 3 after surgery were recorded. The postoperative vertebral posterior kyphotic angle (KA) and the rate of change of KA were recorded. RESULTS Group A had a significantly increased total number of successful first insertions compared with group BV (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS and ODI scores of patients in both groups were significantly lower than before surgery (P<0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups at postoperative month 1 and month 3 (P>0.05). The postoperative vertebral posterior KA decreased significantly in both groups after surgery, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The use of a porous polyoxymethylene thermoplastic regulator combined with a 3D printed template may improve the success of pedicle insertion in patients undergoing PPSF.

A comparative study between the Universal Spinal System® (USS) and the CD Horizon® Legacy™ (CDH) in the management of thoracolumbar fractures

Introduction: For the treatment of unstable non-osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures, the clinical and radiological outcome of short-segment fixation with the USS™ – Universal Spine System (DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) and the CD HORIZON^® LEGACY™ 5.5 Spinal System, (Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) were compared.

Methods: From March 2015 to January 2016, 40 consecutive patients with unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures who met our inclusion criteria were treated with either the USS system or CDH Legacy system. Segmental kyphosis angle (SKA) and anterior body height (ABH) of fractured vertebrae, and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) were evaluated. Radiological fusion was confirmed with plain X-rays and when indicated with computerized tomography (CT).

Results: The mean immediate kyphotic angle correction was 16.6° for the Schanz and 6.4 for the Legacy system, and the immediate mean anterior vertebral body height correction was 0.92 cm for the Schanz and 0.51 cm for the Legacy system. Our study shows a significant statistical difference between Schanz and Legacy systems regarding post-operative segmental kyphosis and height correction immediately postoperatively, at 6 months and at one-year follow-up (p-value < 0.005). The degree of pain reduction and neurological improvement was not influenced by the screw system.

Conclusion: Usage of USS in thoracolumbar fracture as a short-segment fixation led to a near anatomical reduction when compared to the Legacy system. However, there was no advantage regarding pain reduction and neurological outcome.

Surgical management of spine injuries in severe polytrauma patients: a retrospective study

Background: Optimal surgical management of spinal injuries as part of life-threatening multiple traumas remains challenging. We provide insights into the surgical management of spinal injuries in polytrauma patients. Methods: All patients from our polytrauma care network who both met at least one positive Vittel criteria and an injury severity score (ISS) >15 at admission and who underwent surgery for a spinal injury were included retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical data demonstrating the severity of the trauma and imaging defining the spinal and extraspinal number and types of injuries were collected.Results: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 302 (22.2%) patients suffered from spinal injury (143 total injuries) and 83 (6.1%) met the inclusion criteria. Mean ISS was 36.2 (16-75). Only 48 (33.6%) injuries led to neurological impairment involving the thoracic (n = 23, 16.1%) and lower cervical (n = 15, 10.5%) spine. The most frequent association of injuries involved the thoracic spine (n = 42). 106 spinal surgeries were performed. The 3-month mortality rate was 2.4%.Conclusions: We present data collected on admission and in the early postoperative period referring to injury severity, the priority of injuries, and development of multi-organ failure. We revealed trends to guide the surgical support of spinal lesions in polytrauma patients.

Comparison of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open posterior spine surgery for fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: A retrospective matched cohort analysis

Introduction

Percutaneous minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is a treatment option for thoracolumbar fractures and we aim to evaluate its outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study of all patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated with MISS or open posterior approach.

Results

We included 100 MISS and 155 open patients. After controlling for patient characteristics, our results statistically favor MISS in mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and number of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusions within 48 h.

Conclusions

Advantages of using MISS for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures are decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and fewer patients requiring transfusions.

Minimally invasive spine surgeries for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures of spine: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Many minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been developed for instrumentation of spine. These MIS techniques restore stability, alignment while achieving return to function quite early as compared to open spine surgeries. The main aim of this review was to evaluate role, indications and complications of these MIS techniques in Thoracolumbar and Lumbar fractures.

METHODS

Pubmed search using key words such as"Percutaneous pedicle screw for Thoracolumbar fractures" and "Video Assisted Thoracoscopy, Thoracoscopic, VATS for thoracolumbar, Lumbar and Spine fractures" were used till July 2016 while doing literature search. Authors analyzed all the articles, which came after search; the articles relevant to the topic were selected and used for the study. Both prospective and retrospective case control studies and randomized control trials (RCT's) were included in this review. Case reports and reviews were excluded. Studies demonstrating use of MIS in cases other than spine trauma and studies with lack of clinical follow up were excluded from this review. Variables such as number of patients, operative time and complications were evaluated in each study.

RESULTS

After pubmed search, we found total 68 studies till July 2016 out of which eight studies were relevant for analysis of Video Assisted Thoracoscopy for thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures. Total 72 articles for Percutaneous pedicle screws in thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures were retrieved out of which percutaneous pedicle screws were analyzed in eleven studies and twelve studies involved comparison of percutaneous pedicle screws and conventional open techniques.

CONCLUSION

Role and Indications of the MIS techniques in spinal trauma are expanding quite rapidly. MIS techniques restore stability, alignment while achieving early return to function and lower infection rates as compared to open spine surgeries. In long term, they provide good kyphosis correction and stable fixation and fusion of spine. They are associated with long learning curve and technical challenges but with careful patient selection and in expert hands, MIS techniques may produce better results than open trauma spine surgeries.

The use of minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma: a review of concepts

Traumatic injuries to the spine can be common in the setting of blunt trauma and delayed diagnosis can have a deleterious effect on patients' health. The goals of treatment in managing spine trauma are prevention of neurological injury, providing stability to the spine, and correcting post-traumatic deformity. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques are an alternative to open spine surgery for treatment of spine fractures. MISS is also a viable treatment in the setting of damage control orthopedics, when patients with multiple traumatic injuries may be unable to tolerate a traditional open approach. MISS techniques have been used in the treatment of unstable fractures with or without spinal cord injury, flexion and extension-distraction injuries, and unstable sacral fractures. Traditional open surgeries have been associated with increased blood loss, longer operative times, and a higher risk for surgical site infection (SSI). MISS techniques have the potential to reduce open approach-associated morbidity, and improve postoperative care and rehabilitation. MISS techniques for spine trauma are an indispensable option in the treatment armamentarium of spine surgeons.

Radiological Evaluation Does Not Reflect the Clinical Outcome After Surgery in Unstable Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Type A Fractures Without Neurological Symptoms: A Comparative Study of 2 Cohorts Treated by Open or Percutaneous Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective study of 2 cohorts.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of 2 cohorts of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures treated by open posterior fixation (OPF) with bone graft or by percutaneous fixation (PCF) without grafting.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In recent years, PCF is the most common treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. To date, no studies have analyzed clinical outcomes in terms of return to work.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two cohorts of patients with unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures fractures (type A2, A3, and A4) without neurological symptoms underwent OPF (n=91) or PCF (n=54) between 2010 and 2015. A conventional radiologic study was performed in the preoperative, immediate postoperative period, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The period to return to work and the type of work were also recorded.

RESULTS

The percentages of correction were significantly higher in cases operated by OPF: fracture angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), vertebral compression (P<0.001), and displacement (P<0.001). Cases operated by PCF experienced greater loss of correction at 2-year follow-up, especially in fracture displacement (P<0.001), deformity angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), and in the sagittal index (P<0.001). Besides this greater loss of correction, PCF cases showed better Visual Analog Scale (P<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P<0.001) at final follow-up. The percentage of patients returning to the same heavy work position was higher in the PCF group (P<0.001) and in a shorter period of time (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater loss of correction of patients undergoing PCF does not reflect the clinical outcomes that were significantly better as compared to patients undergoing open fixation with grafting. It would be useful to further evaluate if the radiological changes could have a long-term clinical significance.

Percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

Surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture without neurological deficit is still controversial.

Management of vertebral fracture with percutaneous fixation was first reported in 2004.

Advantages of percutaneous fixation are: less tissue dissection; decreased post-operative pain; decreased bleeding and operative time (depending on the steep learning curve); better screw positioning with fluoroscopy compared with an open freehand technique; and a decreased infection rate.

The limitations of percutaneous fixation of vertebral fractures include increased radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon, together with the steep learning curve for this technique.

Adding a screw at the level of the fractured vertebra has the advantages of incorporating fewer motion segments with less operative time and bleeding. This also increases the axial, sagittal and torsional stiffness of the construct.

Percutaneous fixation alone without grafting is sufficient for treating type A and B1 (AO classification) thoracolumbar fractures with satisfactory results concerning kyphosis reduction when compared with open instrumentation and fusion and with open fixation.

Type C and B2 fractures (ligamentous injuries) should undergo fusion since the ligamentous healing is mechanically weak, increasing the risk of instability.

This review offers a detailed description of percutaneous screw insertion and discusses the advantages and disadvantages.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:604-613. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170026.

Fish-Mouth Thoracic Fracture Fixation with Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Reduction: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of thoracic spine fractures is recommended for unstable patterns, yet much debate exists regarding the best approach for reduction. The aim of this article was to report the outcome of a novel method for stabilization of a fish-mouth thoracic spine fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective patient chart review was conducted. Data collected included blood loss, operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, neurologic deficits, and secondary procedures. The patient underwent percutaneous reduction of a hyperextension injury to the thoracic spine. Sufficient reduction was achieved through a percutaneous approach, followed by sequential distraction of 1 rod with sequential locking of the contralateral rod to maintain deformity correction. Electrophysiologic monitoring was used during the procedure.

RESULTS

Sufficient fracture reduction was achieved and evaluated on postoperative computed tomography. Operative time was 145 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 120 mL. There were no cerebrospinal fluid leaks, iatrogenic neurologic deficits, implant failures, other systemic events or revisions during the 8-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This article describes the feasibility of using a novel model for reduction and stabilization of fish-mouth thoracic spine fracture with minimal soft tissue violation.

The pedicle instrumentation and percutaneous elevation (Pi.Pe): a new cementless surgical technique in type A post-traumatic vertebral fractures

PURPOSE

To investigate if bone substitutes are strictly necessary to restore the vertebral body height and improve the clinical outcome, in patients with thoracolumbar or lumbar AO type A post-traumatic vertebral fractures, managed with balloon kyphoplasty combined with posterior screw and rod system.

METHODS

105 patients with post-traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture were recruited. At baseline, the patients underwent a CT and an MRI of the spine. Clinical evaluation was performed, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), at baseline, 48 h after surgery, at 3-month follow-up (FU), 6-month FU, 48 h after the instrumentation removal and at 24-month FU. At each FU, VK, regional kyphosis (RK), central wall (MH/PH) and anterior wall (AH/PH) heights were assessed on lateral spine X-rays. At 6-month FU, a CT scan of the spine was performed to investigate the fracture healing. The posterior instrumentation was removed 7 months after surgery (range 6-10 months).

RESULTS

A significant reduction of mean VAS (p < 0.05) and ODI (p < 0.05) was observed after surgery; no impairment of these scores was observed after the instrumentation removal. A significant correction of VK, RK, AH/PH and MH/PH was recorded after surgery; no significant changes of these values were noticed at subsequent FU. After the instrumentation removal, only an RK impairment was recorded, but it was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

PMMA or bone substitutes are not necessary to keep the reduction of the endplate obtained with the balloon tamp, when BK is performed in the association with posterior percutaneous pedicle screws instrumentation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

A Comparison of the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures

Background

The thoracolumbar AO type A3 fracture is an incomplete burst fracture, which affects one vertebral body endplate. The objective of this study was to determine which of two minimal invasive techniques was more suitable for A3 fractures based on clinical and radiographic results.

Material/Methods

We studied 112 patients with A3 subtype fractures without neurological deficits. A total of 63 patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and 49 patients were treated using mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (MWPSF). The clinical outcomes, surgery-related results, and the pre-operative and post-operative radiological findings were compared between the two groups.

Results

The length of incision, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement were compared between the PPSF and MWPSF groups, with no significant differences found (p>0.05). However, the vertebral body angle (VBA) and Cobb’s angle in the MWPSF group was much better than in the PPSF group (p<0.05). The operating time and C-arm exposure time of the MWPSF group were significantly lower than the PPSF group (p<0.05). The operative and post-operative costs of the PPSF group were significantly higher than the MWPSF group (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Our study found no significant differences in some clinical outcomes between the two groups. Both treatments were safe and effective for A3 subtype fractures. Nevertheless, given the radiation exposure, reduction of kyphosis, special equipment required, learning curve and hospitalization costs associated with PPSF, we concluded that MWPSF was a better choice for A3 subtype fractures.

A retrospective study comparing percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures with spinal injuries

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar fractures with spinal injuries.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with thoracolumbar fractures and spinal injuries were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) group with 56 patients, who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and an open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) group with 49 patients, who underwent open pedicle screw fixation in accordance with the treatment project. Relative operation indexes, radiologic, and effectiveness parameters were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical features including age, body mass index, gender, fracture level, fracture classification, and Frankel grade in both groups were not significantly different (all P >.05). The PPSF group exhibits significantly lower operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and hospital stay on average compared with the OPSF group (all P < .05). Besides, the average postoperative radiologic parameters, including Cobb angle (CA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), vertebral front height percentage (VFHP), and sagittal index (SI), in both the groups were not significantly different (all P > .05). Nevertheless, both visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) after surgery decreased more substantially in the PPSF group than in the OPSF group (all P < .05) while no significant difference in VAS scores or ODI during the last follow-up period was demonstrated in both the groups (both P > .05). Frankel classifications were stimulated in both the groups during the last follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

PPSF has a smaller incision, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter recovery time, higher safety measures on average compared with OPSF with respect to managing thoracolumbar fractures with spinal injuries.

Open versus percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures: magnetic resonance imaging comparison of paravertebral muscles after implant removal

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures is intended to decrease paravertebral muscle damage by avoiding dissection. The aim of this study was to compare muscles at instrumented levels in patients who were treated by open or percutaneous surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients underwent open instrumentation, and 65 were treated percutaneously. A standardized MRI protocol using axial T1-weighted sequences was performed at a minimum 1-year follow-up after implant removal. Two independent observers measured cross-sectional areas (CSAs, in cm2) and region of interest (ROI) signal intensity (in pixels) of paravertebral muscles by using OsiriX at the fracture level, and at cranial and caudal instrumented pedicle levels. An interobserver comparison was made using the Bland-Altman method. Reference ROI muscle was assessed in the psoas and ROI fat subcutaneously. The ratio ROI-CSA/ROI-fat was compared for patients treated with open versus percutaneous procedures by using a linear mixed model. A linear regression analyzed additional factors: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Pfirrmann grade of adjacent discs, and duration of instrumentation in situ.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement was good for all CSAs. The average CSA for the entire spine was 15.7 cm2 in the open surgery group and 18.5 cm2 in the percutaneous group (p = 0.0234). The average ROI-fat and ROI-muscle signal intensities were comparable: 497.1 versus 483.9 pixels for ROI-fat and 120.4 versus 111.7 pixels for ROI-muscle in open versus percutaneous groups. The ROI-CSA varied between 154 and 226 for open, and between 154 and 195 for percutaneous procedures, depending on instrumented levels. A significant difference of the ROI-CSA/ROI-fat ratio (0.4 vs 0.3) was present at fracture levels T12–L1 (p = 0.0329) and at adjacent cranial (p = 0.0139) and caudal (p = 0.0100) instrumented levels. Differences were not significant at thoracic levels. When adjusting based on age, BMI, and Pfirrmann grade, a significant difference between open and percutaneous procedures regarding the ROI-CSA/ROI-fat ratio was present in the lumbar spine (p < 0.01). Sex and duration of instrumentation had no significant influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous instrumentation decreased muscle atrophy compared with open surgery. The MRI signal differences for T-12 and L-1 fractures indicated less fat infiltration within CSAs in patients who received percutaneous treatment. Differences were not evidenced at thoracic levels, where CSAs were smaller. Fat infiltration was not significantly different at lumbar levels with either procedure in elderly patients with associated discopathy and higher BMI. In younger patients, there was less fat infiltration of lumbar paravertebral muscles with percutaneous procedures.

Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: A review of diagnosis and treatment

An appropriate protocol and unified management of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment has not been well defined.

This review attempts to elucidate some controversies regarding diagnostic tools, the ability to define the most appropriate treatment of classification systems and the evidence for conservative and surgical methods based on the recent literature.

Cite this article: Vilà-Canet G, García de Frutos A, Covaro A, Ubierna MT, Caceres E. Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: a review of diagnosis and treatment. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:332-338. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000029

Temporary Percutaneous Instrumentation and Selective Anterior Fusion for Thoracolumbar Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial in thoracolumbar trauma with 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimal invasive surgery, and the rational of circumferential fracture treatment with regard to age, degenerative changes, bone mineral density, and global sagittal balance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Non-neurologic fractures with anterior column defect can be treated by posterior percutaneous instrumentation and selective anterior fusion. After consolidation, instrumentation can be removed at 1 year to provide mobility in non-fused segments.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients, 47 (18-75) years, were operated for A2, A3, or B-type fractures. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed. Radiographic measurements were: sagittal index, regional kyphosis, T4-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and T9 tilt. Anterior fusion and facet joints were analyzed on computed tomography (CT) at 1 year.

RESULTS

The ODI was 8.8 before accident, 35.4 at 3 months, 17.8 at 2 years, 14.4 at 5 years. The VAS was 2.0 at 3 months and 1.0 at 5 years. The sagittal index was 18.0° preoperatively and 1.0° at 3 months (P < 0.0001). A loss of reduction of 1.1° occurred after implant removal (P = 0.009). Global sagittal balance remained unchanged. Ten patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis had a worse ODI: 24.7 versus 11.9 (P = 0.016), and a greater loss of correction: 4.9° versus 1.3° (P = 0.007). Cages filled with cancellous bone from the fractured vertebra fused regularly. Spontaneous facet joint fusions were observed in two patients at the fracture level in B-type injuries.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous instrumentation and selective anterior fusion using autologous bone and mesh cages lead to high fusion rates, which provided good long-term clinical results in younger patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Sagittal alignment was maintained after instrumentation removal without damaging paravertebral muscles. Outcomes were worse in elderly patients presenting osteopenia or osteoporosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Percutaneous Instrumentation Without Arthrodesis for Thoracolumbar Flexion-Distraction Injuries: A Review of the Literature

Background

Flexion-distraction injuries (FDI) represent 5% to 15% of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Treatment depends on the extent of ligamentous involvement: osseous/Magerl type B2 injuries can be managed conservatively, while ligamentous/Magerl type B1 injuries undergo stabilization with arthrodesis. Minimally invasive surgery without arthrodesis can achieve similar outcomes to open procedures. This has been studied for burst fractures; however, its role in FDI is unclear.

Objective

To conduct a systematic review of the literature that examined minimally invasive surgery instrumentation without arthrodesis for traumatic FDI of the thoracolumbar spine.

Methods

Four electronic databases were searched, and articles were screened using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines for patients with traumatic FDI of the thoracolumbar spine treated with percutaneous techniques without arthrodesis and had postoperative follow-up.

Results

Seven studies with 44 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 19 patients with osseous FDI and 25 with ligamentous FDI. When reported, patients (n = 39) were neurologically intact preoperatively and at follow-up. Osseous FDI patients underwent instrumentation at 2 levels, while ligamentous injuries at approximately 4 levels. Complication rate was 2.3%. All patients had at least 6 mo of follow-up and demonstrated healing on follow-up imaging.

Conclusion

Percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis represents a low-risk intermediate between conservative management and open instrumented fusion. This “internal bracing” can be used in osseous and ligamentous FDIs. Neurologically intact patients who do not require decompression and those that may not tolerate or fail conservative management may be candidates. The current level of evidence cannot provide official recommendations and future studies are required to investigate long-term safety and efficacy.

Polytrauma Patients With Associated Spine Fractures: An Assessment of Surgical Intervention on Patient Outcome

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine perioperative characteristics among polytraumatized patients with operative, unstable spine fractures with and without concomitant operative long bone injuries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Treatment of polytrauma patients has delicate and time-sensitive protocols to ensure successful recovery. The literature defines standards for vertebral injury and surgical intervention.

DATA

Severely polytraumatized patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15 were divided according to those with operative spine fractures with operative long bone fractures (OSFLBF) and those with operative spine fractures alone (OSFA).

METHODS

Patients were compared by sex, age, mechanism of injury (MOI), ISS, location of injuries, time spent inpatient before procedure(s), total time in the operating room, type of procedure(s) performed, estimated operative blood loss, complications, length of stay (LOS), and time to discharge.

RESULTS

In a 12-year period, >600 patients were admitted to our level I trauma center with polytrauma and unstable spine fracture. Twelve had sustained operative unstable spine injuries and 21 had unstable spine injuries with a long bone injury requiring operative stabilization. Significant differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury, or total operating room time between the 2 groups were not observed. Differences were seen concerning average blood loss during surgery and time spent inpatient before entering the operating room. OSFLBF patients were discharged at a faster rate after 20 days compared with OSFSA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury or vertebral procedure, or total operating room time were observed. Blood loss was more substantial in the OSFLBF group, but it spent fewer days in the hospital preoperatively. Despite a nonstatistical difference in LOS, a larger proportion of OSFA patients remained in the hospital after being inpatient for >20 days, reducing the risk for iatrogenic complication in that group compared with OSFA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative.

History of Retractor Technologies for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Systems

Minimally invasive techniques aimed at minimizing surgery-associated risk and morbidity of spinal surgery have increased in popularity in recent years. Their potential advantages include reduced length of hospital stay, blood loss, and requirement for post-operative analgesia and earlier return to work. One such minimally invasive technique is the use of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, which is paramount for promoting rigid and stable constructs and fusion in the context of trauma, tumors, deformity and degenerative disease. Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion can be an intimidating prospect for surgeons who have only been trained in open techniques. One of the ongoing challenges of this percutaneous system is to provide the surgeon with adequate access to the pedicle entry anatomy and adequate tactile or visual feedback concerning the position and anatomy of the rod and set-screw construct. This review article discusses the history and evolution of percutaneous pedicle screw retractor technologies and outlines the advances over the last decade in the rapidly expanding field of minimal access surgery for posterior pedicle screw based spinal stabilization. As indications for percutaneous pedicle screw techniques expand, the nuances of the minimally invasive surgery techniques and associated technologies will also multiply. It is important that experienced surgeons have access to tools that can improve access with a greater degree of ease, simplicity and safety. We here discuss the technical challenges of percutaneous pedicle screw retractor technologies and a variety of systems with a focus on the pros and cons of various retractor systems.

Management of Spine Tuberculosis With Chemotherapy and Percutaneous Pedicle Screws in Adjacent Vertebrae: A Retrospective Study of 34 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebra in the treatment of spine tuberculosis (TB).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the increased treatment concepts and surgical methods, the management of TB, which is increasing in prevalence, remains challenging. Considerable complications existing in the conventional debridement surgery with TB spondylitis requires more attention.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation containing 34 cases of spinal TB (17 males, 17 females; average age 59 years; 14 thoracic TB, 11 thoracolumbar TB, nine lumbar TB) between April 2007 and August 2014 was conducted. All patients were treated with local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebrae. The ASIA grade, the Cobb angle, and complications were investigated.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed with an average of 18 (range, 12-52) months and were successfully treated without radiculopathy or neurological complications, with 27 excellent and seven fair outcomes at the final follow-up. One case that developed serious abscess in the primary focus underwent anterior focus debridement and bone graft fusion and recovered to the grade of fine at the final following up. As for kyphotic deformity, there was no Cobb angle loss. No other obvious complications were observed in all the patients.

CONCLUSION

Local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebrae seems an effective method to treat spine TB, with some advantages including smaller trauma, fine neurologic recovery, few complications, and no Cobb angle loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Effect of the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the fractured vertebra on the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the fractured vertebra in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. All patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and they were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either the placement of pedicle screws into the fractured vertebra (fractured group) or not (control group). The operation time and intra-operative blood loss were recorded. Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) as clinical assessments were quantified. Radiographic follow-up was defined by the vertebral body index (VBI), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), and Cobb angle (CA).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the operation time and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. Clinical results (VAS and ODI scores) showed no significant difference during all the follow-up periods. In the fractured group, there were better correction and less loss of AVBH and VBI compared with the control group. However, post-operative correction of the CA immediately after surgery and the correction loss at the final follow-up showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous screw fixation combined with intermediate screws at the fractured vertebra could more effectively restore and maintain fractured vertebral height, and is an acceptable, minimally invasive surgical choice for patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Fixation Techniques for Thoracolumbar Trauma: A Meta-Analysis

Study Design Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies published in English. Objective This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between percutaneous and open pedicle screws for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. The variables of interest included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, kyphosis angle, and vertebral body height, as well as intraoperative blood loss and operative time. The results were pooled by calculating the effect size based on the standardized difference in means. The studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within- and between-study error. Confidence intervals were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I (2). Results After two-reviewer assessment, 38 studies were eliminated. Six studies were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The combined effect size was found to be in favor of percutaneous fixation for blood loss and operative time (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences in vertebral body height (VBH), kyphosis angle, or VAS scores between open and percutaneous fixation. All of the studies demonstrated relative homogeneity, with I (2) < 25. Conclusions Patients with thoracolumbar fractures can be effectively managed with percutaneous or open pedicle screw placement. There are no differences in VBH, kyphosis angle, or VAS between the two groups. Blood loss and operative time were decreased in the percutaneous group, which may represent a potential benefit, particularly in the polytraumatized patient. All variables in this study demonstrated near-perfect homogeneity, and the effect is likely close to the true effect.

Integrity of Damage Control Posterior Spinal Fusion Constructs for Patients With Polytrauma: A Biomechanical Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate spinal stability achieved with different levels of posterior percutaneous fixation (postPerc) for thoracolumbar fractures in cadavers subjected to ICU activities.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

"Spine damage control" involves postPerc performed within 24 hours of injury and staged, elective, definitive stabilization. Amount of instrumentation needed to initially achieve adequate spinal stability, minimize morbidity, and accommodate ICU care needs between stages are not defined.

METHODS

In full-unembalmed cadavers motion-tracking sensors were placed at T11 and L1. A T12 corpectomy with PLC injury was stabilized with 1, 2, and 3 levels of PostPerc above/below the injury. Motions between T11 and L1 were measured during Log-Roll and Sit-Up on an ICU bed. After in situ testing, anatomic spinal motion ranges were determined under pure moment loads.

RESULTS

5 cadavers were evaluated. For Log-Roll, 2 and 3 levels above/below restored stability to intact, whereas 1 level above/below did not for axial rotation. For translation, all instrumentation restored stability to intact. During Sit-Up, a linear increase in flexion was observed. At 45° Sit-Up, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar to intact for flexion; 1 level above/below had significantly more flexion. All instrumentations restored translation to intact for Sit-Up; significantly more axial collapse occurred for instrumentation compared with intact. During ex situ testing, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar; 1 level above/below had significantly greater laxity in flexion, extension, and axial rotation.

CONCLUSION

Posterior instrumentation 2 or 3 levels above/below a severe thoracolumbar fracture model can restore spinal stability back to its intact condition. 2 levels of fixation above/below this "worst-case scenario" is minimum fixation sufficient to provide absolute spinal stability in the ICU setting as a "Damage Control" technique in patients with polytrauma. In less severe injury models, 1 level of fixation above/below may provide adequate spinal stability; although this should be confirmed in future investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

[Minimal invasive circumferential fusion in the management of kyphotic thoracolumbar lesions: Technical note]

INTRODUCTION

Management of spinal kyphotic deformities remains challenging in order to achieve a complete correction of the deformity, stabilize the spine and restore a satisfactory sagittal alignment. The aim of this study was to report the results of a technique combining, during the same operative session: a percutaneous osteosynthesis (with or without decompression) and a minimal invasive corpectomy using an anterior approach.

METHODS

Twelve patients (mean age 54 years old) were included in this single center retrospective study. Kyphotic deformity was related to a trauma in 9 cases, to a tumor in 2 cases and was infectious in the last case. The level involved was L1 in 7 cases, T12 in 3 cases, T10 and L4 in 1 case each. First step of the surgical strategy was a routine posterior percutaneous osteosynthesis. In 5 cases, a complementary minimal invasive decompression was performed using tubular retractors. During the second step, an anterior corpectomy was performed and the vertebral reconstruction was done using telescopic vertebral body prosthesis. Once the last correction was achieved, final locking of the posterior instrumentation was performed.

RESULTS

In the entire series, a short construct was done in 2 cases and a long construct was decided for the 10 other cases depending on the lesion. Mean surgical time was 246 min [173-375] and postoperative blood transfusion was not necessary. Patients were discharged from the hospital on average at day 8 [4-25] according to associated lesions. Based on radiographic analyses, a significant restoration of the vertebral kyphosis (average 17°, P<0.001) and vertebral body height (27% on average, P<0.001) were obtained.

CONCLUSION

Combination of these two minimal invasive techniques allows a circumferential spinal fixation with a low rate of complications and a satisfactory restoration of local sagittal deformity. This strategy is, in our experience, a valuable alternative to conventional techniques. Further studies with a longer follow-up will therefore needed in order to confirm these results.

Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

The main aims of managing thoracolumbar fractures involve stabilization of traumatized regions, to promote vertebral healing or segmental fusion. Recently, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation has evolved as an alternative approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, aiming to minimize soft tissue injury and perioperative morbidity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare outcomes of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified from six electronic databases from their inception to December 2014.

RESULTS

From 12 relevant studies identified, 279 patients undergoing percutaneous fixation were compared with 340 open fixation procedures. Operative duration was significantly shorter in the percutaneous group by 19 min (P = 0.0002). The percutaneous approach was also associated with shorter hospital stay by 5.7 days (P = 0.0007). Whilst there was no difference in screw malpositioning (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.33, 1.83; P = 0.56), the percutaneous approach had lower rates of infections (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13, 1.00; P = 0.05), and superior visual analogue scale clinical outcomes (P = 0.001). No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative Cobb angle (P = 0.22), postoperative body angle (P = 0.66), and postoperative anterior body height (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous approach was associated with shorter operative duration and hospital stay, reduced intraoperative blood loss and reduced infection rates. Given the lack of robust clinical evidence, these findings warrant verification in large prospective registries and randomized trials.

Minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine trauma

Thoracolumbar and lumbar trauma account for the majority of traumatic spinal injuries. The mainstay of current treatments is still nonoperative therapy with bracing. Classic treatment algorithms reserved absolute surgical intervention for spinal trauma patients with neurological compromise or instability. Relative indications included incapacitating pain and obesity/body habitus making brace therapy ineffective. In the past decade, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques for spine surgery have been increasingly used for degenerative conditions. These same minimally invasive techniques have seen increased use in trauma patients. The goal of minimally invasive surgery is to decrease surgical morbidity through decreased soft-tissue dissection while providing the same structural stability afforded by classic open techniques. These minimally invasive techniques involve percutaneous posterior pedicle fixation, vertebral body augmentation, and utilization of endoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques. While MIS techniques are somewhat in their infancy, an increasing number of studies are reporting good clinical and radiographic outcomes with these MIS techniques. However, the literature is still lacking high-quality evidence comparing these newer techniques to classic open treatments. This article reviews the relevant literature regarding minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar trauma.

Surgical outcomes of mini-open Wiltse approach and conventional open approach in patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury

This study aimed to introduce a novel mini-open pedicle screw fixation technique via Wiltse approach, and compared it with the traditional posterior open method. A total of 72 cases of single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury underwent pedicle screw fixation via two different approaches. Among them, 37 patients were treated using posterior open surgery, and 35 patients received mini-open operation via Wiltse approach. Crew placement accuracy rate, operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization time, radiation exposure time, postoperative improvement in R value, Cobb's angle and visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the two methods were compared. There were no significant differences in the accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, radiation exposure and postoperative R value and Cobb's angle improvement between the two groups. However, the mini-open method had obvious advantages over the conventional open method in operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative improvement in VAS. The mini-open pedicle screw technique could be applied in treatment of single-segment thoracolumbar fracture without neurologic injury and had advantages of less tissue trauma, short operative and rehabilitative time on the premise of guaranteed accuracy rate and no increased radiation exposure.