Management of recent unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. An update conference supported by the Club Bassin Cotyle. (Pelvis-Acetabulum Club)

Assessing the utility of routine postoperative radiographs in pelvic and acetabular trauma Surgery

PURPOSE

Early postoperative x-rays are frequently ordered after fracture fixation surgery without clear indication. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of early formal x-rays compared to intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients undergoing surgical fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing surgical fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center were identified. Early postoperative x-rays were defined as x-rays ordered within 48 h of surgery without clear indication. Two blinded orthopedic surgeons assessed x-rays and fluoroscopic imaging for reduction quality (within 2 mm of anatomic) and accuracy of implant placement. Accuracy of implant placement was categorized as safe, suspicious, or definite implant malposition.

RESULTS

Patients received early postoperative x-rays in 117 cases (53.9%) and fluoroscopy only in 100 cases (46.1%). Among patients undergoing postoperative x-ray, 100% of reductions deemed to have imperfect reduction quality were also deemed to be imperfect on intraoperative fluoroscopy. Similarly, 100% of implants deemed to be of inconclusive safety on postoperative x-ray were also deemed inconclusive on intraoperative fluoroscopy. Considering all patients, 4/117 (3.4%) in the postoperative x-ray group experienced an unplanned change of care within 1 week of surgery vs. 1/100 (1.0%) in the fluoroscopy only group (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

The acquisition of early postoperative x-rays and implant placement accuracy are not reliable predictors of change in care among patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures. Early postoperative x-rays may be unnecessary and should only be ordered with clear clinical indications to improve cost-effectiveness and reduce radiation exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 Retrospective cohort study; III.

Dynamic trapezoid external fixation: Enhancing temporary stability in unstable pelvic ring fractures

BACKGROUND

Unstable pelvic fractures often require emergency temporary external fixation before definitive management by internal fixation. The objective of this study was to improve the stability of the posterior arc of the pelvic ring during the placement of a temporary external fixator.

HYPOTHESIS

Did a temporary pelvic external fixator with dual bars (compression and distraction) enhances posterior pelvic stability by increasing posterior compression?

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Four supracetabular fixation setups, including a "dynamic trapezoid external fixator" (a supra-acetabular external fixation construct featuring two connecting rods, one in compression and the other in distraction), were tested on foam pelvis models with simulated sacroiliac disjunction. Each configuration was also tested with a supra-acetabular pin partially or fully inserted into the SA corridor. Stability was assessed using a biomechanical model through reproducible cranial and lateral traction force applied to the iliac tuberosity under a 20N load to identify the most effective temporary pelvic ring stabilization method. Each measurement was repeated 10 times per configuration. Student's t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different models.

RESULTS

Sacroiliac displacement under vertical and lateral forces was measured for each configuration. Fully inserted supra-acetabular pins significantly reduced displacement compared to half insertion (p < 0.001). The "dynamic" construct exhibited the lowest displacement across all configurations (mean 2.9 ± 0.9 mm under lateral force; 1.8 ± 0.3 mm under vertical force). Compared to other constructs, it was significantly associated with superior stability (p < 0.005). ANOVA confirmed the effects of construct type (p < 0.0001) and SA pin length (p < 0.0001) on displacement, with the "dynamic" construct and full pin insertion yielding the best outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that a dynamic trapezoidal supra-acetabular external fixator, with rods in compression and distraction, enhances resistance to vertical and horizontal displacement of SI joint compared to other construct. Though not fully replicating in vivo conditions, this model supports a streamlined approach to temporary pelvic stabilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V; In Vitro Research.

Minimally invasive transiliac anatomical locking plate for posterior pelvic ring injury: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters for the gull wing plate

Background

Posterior pelvic ring injuries are challenging for surgeons to treat adequately due to difficulties with reduction and stabilization. Surgical intervention is a beneficial option to protect neurological structures and provide sufficient stability for early mobilization. The gull wing plate (GWP) is a pre-contoured anatomical locking plate with six screws, and its design is unique among posterior transiliac tension-band plates. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical results of the GWP.

Methods

Patients who had an unstable posterior pelvic ring injury and underwent internal fixation with GWP were retrospectively analyzed at a trauma center. Demographic data, fracture type, perioperative data, and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) were collected. Clinical outcomes were graded using the functional independence measure (FIM) and Majeed outcome score.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled (mean age, 54 years), and the mean follow-up period was 23 months. The mean Injury Severity Score was 24 points, and internal fixation was performed 6.6 days post-trauma. CT evaluation showed the lateral surface angle of the uninjured ilium was approximately 68°. The GWP pre-contoured anatomical design closely matched this angle. The mean FIM and Majeed score were 119 and 76 points, respectively, which were graded as excellent (n = 14), good (n = 9), or fair (n = 3).

Conclusions

With the retrospective single-center data available, the GWP seems to be a minimally-invasive alternative, provides reliable stability of the posterior pelvic ring and allows for rehabilitation within normal ranges.

Surgical Interventions for Lumbosacral Plexus Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background:

Nerve reconstruction techniques for lumbosacral plexus (LSP) injuries vary. There are no clear treatment guidelines available, and summative evaluations of the literature discussing these surgeries are lacking. For these reasons, this investigation aimed to systematically review and consolidate all available literature discussing surgical interventions for LSP injuries and cohesively present patient-reported and objective postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

The authors conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (via Proquest.com), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. After title and abstract screening, identified articles were read in full and selected for inclusion based on prespecified criteria.

Results:

Our literature search identified 8683 potential citations, and after duplicate removal, abstract screening, and full-text review, 62 studies remained meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes were extracted according to the location of injury and type of surgical repair. Injuries were classified into isolated femoral nerve injuries, isolated obturator nerve injuries, isolated sciatic nerve injuries, and multilevel LSP injuries. Surgical treatment was further classified into exploration with neurolysis, direct repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer surgery.

Conclusions:

Although results vary based on the location of the injury and the surgical technique used, nerve grafts and transfers demonstrated reasonable success in improving functional and pain outcomes. Overall, isolated femoral and obturator nerve injuries had the best outcomes reported with surgical treatment. Furthermore, incomplete sciatic nerve and multilevel LSP injuries had more reported surgical options and better outcomes than complete sciatic nerve injuries.

Management of Complex Pelvic Ring and Acetabular Fracture Associated With Open Tibia Fracture in Severe Polytrauma Patient: Case Report

With the increase of high energy injuries, acetabular and pelvic ring fractures tend to be a more common part of polytrauma patients. Despite growing incidence, management of these injuries remains one of the most difficult challenges in orthopedic surgery. As these patients are usually multiply injured, it is not only life-threatening trauma in acute settings but also crippling in long time.

We present a case of a 40-year-old male who suffered from a dreadful traffic accident following the fractures of pelvic ring and both acetabulum, open fracture of tibia, urinary bladder rupture, and crush syndrome. We discuss the factors which dictated the timing of definitive management of pelvic and associated injuries and compare it with this study. Furthermore, we present patients' final outcomes and management of long-term complications.

Minimally invasive triangular lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries with vertical instability: Technical note

To date, no strong consensus exists on the best way to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries when there is no neurological deficit. Various fixation methods have been described; more recently, constructs that combine lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation have been introduced. This type of fixation is mainly indicated in cases of spinopelvic dissociation with large displacement of fracture fragments in the sagittal plane. However, these techniques are associated with postoperative complications, particularly infections and severe skin complications. This led us to propose a minimally invasive lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation technique for posterior pelvic ring injuries. The procedure is done with the patient prone. It consists of pedicle screw insertion into L4 or L5 and screw fixation of the ilium with fluoroscopy guidance; intraoperative distraction can be done depending on the amount of displacement. An iliosacral screw is then inserted percutaneously to allow reduction in the transverse plane and yield a triangular construct. In the five patients that we have operated using this technique, the mean preoperative vertical displacement was 11.9±6.9mm (SD) (min 1.3, max 19.7) versus 3.7±3.2mm (min 0.3, max 6.7) postoperatively and the mean preoperative frontal displacement was 7.5±3.7mm (min 4.2, max 12.4) versus 2.5±2.0mm (min 0.3, max 4.3) postoperatively. Minimally invasive iliosacral and lumboiliac fixation is an option for treating posterior pelvic ring fractures free of neurological deficit and especially spinopelvic dissociation.

INFIX-safe and effective surgical option for complex fracture patterns of the anterior pelvic ring: A prospective single center study

Background

Complex fracture patterns of anterior pelvic ring are a challenge and usually needs extensive surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate INFIX as a minimally invasive procedure for such injuries in terms of feasibility, outcomes and complications in the Indian population.

Methods

Patients with complex fracture patterns of anterior pelvic ring were selected for anterior INFIX application along with standard posterior stabilization. Outcomes were assessed radiographically by Matta's criteria and amount of displacement. Post-operative CT scan for relation of implant to vital structures and Doppler at varying hip flexion for possible vascular occlusion was used. Functional outcomes included both disease specific scores (Majeed score, IOWA pelvic score) and quality of life scores (SMFA, SF-12). Complications were also noted.

Results

12 cases out of 112 patients had complex fracture pattern of the anterior ring. Most common injury pattern were LC-3 and VS (n = 6 and 3) Young and Burgess type. The average follow up was 6 months. Fracture reduction as per Matta's criteria was excellent in 10 (83.3%) cases and good in 2 (16.6%) cases with functional outcomes excellent in 11 cases, and a mean Majeed score of 92.67 ± 5.8. The average SMFA score was 51 ± 4.39 and mean SF-12 scores for physical and mental health were 48.493 ± 6.74 and 56.370 ± 4.04 respectively. Complications noted were lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (1/24 nerves), skin dehiscence (n = 2), infection (n = 2) and sacral nonunion (n = 1).

Conclusion

INFIX is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for addressing complexfracture patterns involving the anterior half of pelvic ring with excellent fracture reduction, radiological and functional outcomes and predictable fracture healing.

Prospective validation of a new protocol with preperitoneal pelvic packing as the mainstay for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma: a 5-year experience

PURPOSES

Hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma has been a significant challenge even in most experienced Trauma Centres. In 2011 preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) was introduced in our Hospital as the first manoeuvre. This study aims to review overall mortality at 24 h from arrival in the emergency department.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospective database was performed considering patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or with the need for more than 2 Units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) on admission in the emergency department, (ED) and a pelvic fracture. Values were expressed as a median and interquartile range. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Between September 2011 and December 2016, we treated 30 patients. Median age was 51 years (40-65) and Injury Severity Score 36 (34-42). SBP in the ED was 90 (67-99), heart rate was 115 (90-130), Base Excess - 8 (- 11.5/- 4.8), pH 7.23 (7.20-7.28). Median PRBC requirements during the first 24 h (from admission) were 13 Units (8-18.8). Time to emergency treatment was 63 min (51-113). 17 patients (56.6%) underwent angiography after PPP. Overall 24 h mortality was 30%. A comparison between survivors and non-survivors showed no statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, PPP resulted to be quick to perform and effective. No death occurred from direct pelvic bleeding.

Early management of severe pelvic injury (first 24 hours)

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic fractures represent 5% of all traumatic fractures and 30% are isolated pelvic fractures. Pelvic fractures are found in 10 to 20% of severe trauma patients and their presence is highly correlated to increasing trauma severity scores. The high mortality of pelvic trauma, about 8 to 15%, is related to actively bleeding pelvic injuries and/or associated injuries to the head, abdomen or chest. Regardless of the severity of pelvic trauma, diagnosis and treatment must proceed according to a strategy that does not delay the management of the most severely injured patients. To date, in France, there are no guidelines issued by healthcare authorities or professional societies that address this subject.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 22 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation; SFAR) and the French Society of Emergency Medicine (Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence; SFMU) in collaboration with the French Society of Radiology (Société Française de Radiologie; SFR), French Defence Health Service (Service de Santé des Armées; SSA), French Society of Urology (Association Française d'Urologie; AFU), the French Society of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique; SOCFCOT), and the French Society of Digestive Surgery (Société Française de Chirurgie digestive; SFCD) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently from any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

METHODS

Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. The analysis of the literature and the recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE^® methodology.

RESULTS

The SFAR Guideline panel provided 22 statements on prehospital and hospital management of the unstable patient with pelvic fracture. After three rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached for 100% of recommendations. Of these recommendations, 11 have a high level of evidence (Grade 1 ± ), 11 have a low level of evidence (Grade 2 ± ).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement exists among experts regarding many strong recommendations for management of the unstable patient with pelvic fracture.

Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of posterior pelvic ring fractures can be achieved by either open or closed methods. They all provide a comparable biomechanical stability. The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical results of both techniques for treating posterior pelvic ring injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy patients operated for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions were retrospectively reviewed. We compared 35 patients treated by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF group) versus 35 patients stabilized by using closed reduction and percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation (CRIF group) under fluoroscopic guidance.

RESULTS

According to pelvic outcome scoring system of Pohlemann et al., 28 patients out of the ORIF group obtained good or excellent results (20 excellent and 8 good), five fair and two poor. In the CRIF group, 30 patients obtained good or excellent results (25 excellent and 5 good), four fair and one poor (P=0.64). The average intraoperative blood loss in the ORIF group was 500cc with average blood transfusion of 2units (1000cc) compared to blood loss 150cc in the CRIF group, with average blood transfusion of 1unit (500cc) (P=0.002). No intraoperative complications were reported in the ORIF group while operative guide wires were broken in two cases in the CRIF group (P=0.16). There were no neurological complications observed in the ORIF group, but one radiculopathy (L5 root palsy) occurred in the CRIF group (P=0.317). In the ORIF group, three patients had superficial wound infection and one patient had deep infection while in the CRIF group, we noted only one case of deep infection (P=0.083).

CONCLUSION

No difference was noticed between ORIF and CRIF. The technical decision is variable according to time of surgery, fracture types, patient general condition, skin condition, presence of ipsilateral fractures of the acetabulum and feasibility of the closed reduction. More studies are needed to identify prognostic factors related to quality of the reduction. We need for creation of decisional algorithm for ORIF versus CRIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Osteosynthesis in sacral fracture and lumbosacral dislocation

Sacral fracture and lumbosacral hinge trauma are rare but serious lesions. Neurologic disorder is frequently associated, and nerve release may be required, with reduction and stabilization of the fracture. Management requires knowing the fracture lines and reduction maneuvers and the fixation techniques that may need to be associated. Three classifications allow these fractures to be well understood: the Roy-Camille classification identifies high transverse fractures and their displacement; the Denis classification identifies vertical fracture line location within the sacrum, which correlates with neurologic risk; and the Tile classification analyzes pelvic ring trauma when associated with the sacral fracture. Treatment, when surgical, requires careful patient positioning, sometimes on an orthopedic table. Reduction maneuvers are founded on the fracture classification. Isolated U-shaped fracture of the sacrum is to be distinguished from sacral fracture associated with pelvic ring lesion. Osteosynthesis may be lumbopelvic or restricted to the pelvic ring (sacroiliac or iliosacral). Open osteosynthesis allows reduction to be finalized by intraoperative maneuvers on the implant, while closed osteosynthesis requires perfect preoperative reduction. Complications are frequent and neurologic recovery is uncertain. Fatigue and osteoporotic fractures show little displacement and are good indications for cementoplasty, either isolated or associated to iliosacral screwing. In lumbosacral hinge trauma, and dislocation in particular, reduction surgery with fixation (usually 360°) is indicated. The present study details the analysis and classification of these fractures, the technical pitfalls of reduction and fixation, and treatment indications.

Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors-a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with a poor quality of reduction and their relationships.

METHODS

Data from medical charts for all patients admitted with acetabular fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from 2005 to 2014 were extracted. A total of 156 patients with a mean age of 40.3 years were included. All patients were reviewed at six months of follow-up. The prognostic factors analyzed were clinical and radiological factors. A new radiological parameter was also studied: the scanographic roof-arc angle. Specific statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Using a multivariate analysis logistic regression model: roof impaction (p = 0.001; OR = 6.59; CI 95% [2.01-20.97]), transverse + posterior wall (p = 0.03, OR = 2.52; CI 95% [1.46-13.65]) and surgeons in training (p = 0.02; OR = 1.24; CI 95% [1.07-3.32]) were three independent prognostic factors. Lower values of medial and posterior scanographic roof-arc angle were associated with unsatisfactory reduction. A significant association between unsatisfactory reduction and posterior roof arc angle < 61° was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Three independent prognostic factors associated with a risk of unsatisfactory reduction in ORIF for acetabular fractures were identified: roof impaction, transverse + posterior wall fracture and surgeons in training. Scanographic roof-arc angle seems to be a new prognostic factor. Level of Evidence Level 4 retrospective study.

Damage-control orthopedics versus early total care in the treatment of borderline high-energy pelvic fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of damage-control orthopedics (DCO) vs early total care (ETC) in the treatment of borderline high-energy pelvic fractures. Seventy-two patients with borderline high-energy pelvic fractures were retrospectively reviewed; 39 received DCO and 33 received ETC. Demographic data and initial injury severities were comparable between groups, except for Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head scores and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence rates of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome and the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were significantly lower in the DCO group compared with the ETC group. Similar results were also observed in subgroups stratified by age (younger than 40 years and 40 years and older). Regarding patients with Tile B fractures, there was no significant difference between groups in incidence rates of overall postoperative complications. However, in patients with Tile C fractures, especially in those 40 years and older, the DCO group had a lower incidence rate of ALI and had lower APACHE II scores than did the ETC group. This study's findings indicate that DCO is the most suitable therapeutic option for patients with Tile C fractures, especially for those 40 years and older, whereas ETC is preferred for patients with Tile B fractures, provided that it is possible to avoid a second operation as well as any delays in patient mobilization.

[The initial management in intensive care of pelvic ring injury patients]

Pelvic trauma care is complex since it is frequently associated with multiple injuries and may lead to dramatic and uncontrollable haemorrhage. After pelvic trauma, the mortality, around 8 to 10%, is mainly related to severe pelvic hemorrhage but also to extrapelvic injuries (thoracic, abdominal or brain injuries). It is therefore crucial to manage pelvic trauma in specialized trauma center. The initial trauma assessment aims to determine the role of the pelvic injury in hemorrhage to define the therapeutic strategy of pelvic trauma care (arterial embolisation/pelvic ring stabilisation). This review was performed with a systematic review of the literature; it describes the pelvic fracture pathophysiology, and the efficacy and safety of haemostatic procedures and with their respective indications. A decision making algorithm is proposed for the treatment of trauma patients with pelvic fracture.

Sacro-iliac joint arthroscopy for arthrodesis after traumatic dislocation. Cadaver and clinical feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Sacro-iliac arthrodesis usually requires an extended posterior approach, which is associated with a number of dreaded complications. Here, we assessed the feasibility of arthroscopic exploration of the dislocated sacro-iliac joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the first step of our study, we used ligament section to induce loss of sacro-iliac joint coaptation in a cadaver. We then studied 5 patients with Tile C pelvic ring injuries. Arthroscopy was used to clear the joint of fibrous tissue and to roughen the bone to subchondral level in order to induce sacro-iliac arthrodesis. In addition, posterior fixation was performed using a hinge system or an ilio-sacral screw.

RESULTS

The cadaver study confirmed the feasibility of sacro-iliac arthroscopy after disruption of the strong posterior inter-osseous ligament. In the clinical part of the study in 5 patients with Tile C pelvic ring injuries, arthroscopy allowed direct visualisation extending to the anterior part of the joint space. A power burr and synovial knife were introduced to remove the interposed fibrous tissue and to roughen the bone to subchondral level in order to induce joint fusion. In addition, percutaneous or open posterior fixation was performed in all 5 patients. No infectious complications were recorded.

DISCUSSION

An arthroscope cannot be introduced into the normal sacro-iliac joint. In contrast, after traumatic sacro-iliac dislocation, arthroscopy can be used to evaluate the intra-articular injuries and to roughen the bone to subchondral level.