Unstable odontoid fracture: surgical strategy in a 22-case series, and literature review

Age-Based Incidence of Dens Fracture Has Unimodal Distribution Rather Than Commonly Claimed Bimodal Distribution

Background

Type-II dens fractures have long been described in the literature as occurring in a bimodal distribution, peaking in young adulthood as well as in older adulthood; however, the origin of this claim is unclear. The primary goal of this study was to examine the incidence of type-II dens fractures and assess for bimodality.

Methods

This is a retrospective cross-sectional review of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) records on traumatic type-II dens fractures between October 2015 and December 2016. Rates were obtained from the NTDB, and the incidence per 100,000 was ascertained by utilizing U.S. Census data from 2016. Subgroupings by gender and Black or White race were also examined.

Results

Dens fractures occur unimodally, peaking around 89 years of age overall, skewed left by high rates in older White adults. The Black subgroup demonstrated trimodality, with the fracture incidence peaking at 25, 62, and 82 years of age. Rates among Black and White patients were similar until age 65, after which dens fractures occurred disproportionately in White patients. Fractures prior to age 75 occurred predominantly in men.

Conclusions

The evidence derived in this study challenges the common belief that type-II dens fractures occur bimodally across the entire population. However, there remains utility in considering younger and older patients as distinct groups for the purposes of management.

Does the Surgical Approach Matter in Treating Odontoid Fractures? A Comparison of Mechanical Complication Rates Between Anterior Versus Posterior Surgical Approaches: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

Odontoid fractures are treated surgically through the anterior or posterior approach. Each surgical approach has its advantages and disadvantages, so the preferred approach remains debatable. There are few meta-analyses or systemic reviews on the mechanical complications of surgical treatment for odontoid fractures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the operation-related morbidity, including mechanical complications, and mortality of patients with odontoid fractures, treated via the anterior or posterior approach.

Methods

A systematic search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for the studies up to October 2023 on the complication rate of the surgical treatment of odontoid fractures, related to the surgical approach. The risk ratios (RR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to assess the mechanical complication rates, other complications, revision surgery, and mortality, depending on the surgical approach.

Results

A total of 1,519 studies were retrieved using the search strategy, and 782 patients from 15 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Mechanical complications were significantly more frequent in the anterior surgical group with low heterogeneity. The incidences of fracture nonunion and revision surgery were also higher in the anterior surgery group. However, there was no significant difference in systemic complications and mortality rates between the two groups.

Conclusion

The posterior approach was more advantageous than the anterior approach in terms of mechanical complications, fusion rates, and incidence of revision surgery. However, further studies, should be performed to strengthen these results.

Incidence of vertebral artery injury in patients undergoing cervical spine trauma surgery in correlation with surgical approach: A review

Spinal cord injuries at the cervical spine level represent the most consequential of the related injuries at all levels of the spine. They can trigger permanent unilateral or bilateral damage with conspicuous disability. Regarding unstable injuries, the gold standard approach is open reduction and osteosynthesis, which can select between anterior and posterior surgical access. Each of the aforementioned approaches demonstrates both advantages and disadvantages; thus, it is up to the surgeon to determine the optimal option concerning the patient's safety. Diligent intraoperative control of anatomical reduction is pivotal to obtaining the best feasible postoperative outcomes. Literature data delineate copious complications following surgical intervention in the cervical spine. Indubitably, the most crucial intraoperative complication accounts for vascular injuries, with the most preponderant being the corrosion of the vertebral artery, as it is potentially life-threatening. This paper aims to provide a succinct and compendious review of the existing literature regarding cervical spinal cord injuries and to deduce many inferences concerning the incidence of iatrogenic vertebral artery injuries in relation to the surgical approach for fracture reduction.

Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches in Treating odontoid fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Odontoid fractures account for 15%-20% of cervical injuries. Although the operation methods vary in different types, the superiority of overall outcomes of the anterior approach (AA) and posterior approach (PA) in treating odontoid fractures still remains controversial. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed comparing AA and PA for these fractures.

Methods

The relevant studies were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine (CBM), and Wanfang Database from the onset of conception to June 2022. Prospective or retrospective comparative studies on AA and PA for odontoid fractures were screened, referring to fusion rates (primary outcomes), complications, and postoperative mortality rates. A meta-analysis of the primary outcomes and a systematic review of other outcomes were performed; the procedure was conducted with Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Twelve articles comrising 452 patients were included, and all publications were retrospective cohort studies. The average postoperative fusion rate was 77.5 ± 17.9% and 91.4 ± 13.5% in AA and PA, respectively, with statistical significance [OR = 0.42 (0.22, 0.80), P = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis showed a difference in fusion rates between AA and PA in the elderly group [OR = 0.16 (0.05, 0.49), P = 0.001]. Five articles referred to postoperative mortality, and the mortality rates of AA (5.0%) and PA (2.3%) showed no statistical difference (P = 0.148). Nine studies referred to complications, with a rate of 9.7%. The incidence of complications in AA and PA groups was comparable (P = 0.338), and the incidence of nonfusion and complications was irrelevant. The prevalent cause of death was myocardial infarction. The time and segmental movement retention of AA were possibly superior to those of PA.

Conclusion

AA may be superior in regard to operation time and motion retention. There was no difference in complications and mortality rates between the two approaches. The posterior approach would be preferred in consideration of the fusion rate.

Odontoid fracture complicating ankylosing spondylitis presenting with cervical canal stenosis and quadriparesis: A case report with 5-year follow-up and review of the literature

Introduction and importance

Spinal fractures, especially cervical fractures, are more common in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in comparison with unaffected patients. However, odontoid fractures are relatively rare in these patients. Also, neurological symptoms are not common in odontoid fractures due to the larger diameter of the spinal canal at this level.

Case presentation

Here, we presented a 41 year-old man known case of ankylosing spondylitis who develop odontoid fracture and severe cervical stenosis after falling trauma. Quadriparesis and positive Hoffman sign as well as significant thoracolumbar kyphosis were diagnosed in further investigation. Laminectomy and posterior fixation were executed primary and pedicular subtraction osteotomy was performed two years later to manage the kyphosis and sagittal imbalance. On the follow-up period of five years the patient was fully functional.

Clinical discussion

There are a few cases of odontoid fractures complicating ankylosing spondylitis in the literature. Neurological symptoms are relatively uncommon in odontoid fractures; however, cases with AS can present with neck pain, weakness, and hyperreflexia when having unstable fractures.

Conclusion

Although there is not any gold standard for the treatment of the odontoid fracture in AS, surgical intervention is preferred.

•

The occurrence of the odontoid fracture is rare in patients with AS.

•

Neurological deficits are more common in posterior subluxation of the odontoid process compared to anterior subluxation.

•

The optimal treatment approach for odontoid fracture in cases with AS is unknown; however, surgical management is preferred.

Unstable odontoid fractures: technical appraisal of anterior extrapharyangeal open reduction internal fixation for irreducible unstable odontoid fractures. Patient series

BACKGROUND

Displaced odontoid fractures that are irreducible with traction and have cervicomedullary compression by the displaced distal fracture fragment or deformity caused by facetal malalignment require early realignment and stabilization. Realignment with ultimate solid fracture fusion and atlantoaxial joint fusion, in some situations, are the aims of surgery. Fifteen such patients were treated with direct anterior extrapharyngeal open reduction and realignment of displaced fracture fragments with realignment of the atlantoaxial facets, followed by a variable screw placement (VSP) plate in compression mode across the fracture or anterior atlantoaxial fixation (transarticular screws or atlantoaxial plate screw construct) or both.

OBSERVATIONS

Anatomical realignment with rigid fixation was achieved in all patients. Fracture fusion without implant failure was observed in 100% of the patients at 6 months, with 1 unrelated mortality. Minimum follow-up has been 6 months in 14 patients and a maximum of 3 years in 4 patients, with 1 unrelated mortality.

LESSONS

Most irreducible unstable odontoid fractures can be anatomically realigned by anterior extrapharyngeal approach by facet joint manipulation. Plate (VSP) and screws permit rigid fixation in compression mode with 100% fusion. Any associated atlantoaxial instability can be treated from the same exposure.

Risk Factors Associated with 90-day Readmissions Following Odontoid Fractures: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Study

STUDY DESIGN

Nationwide Readmissions Database Study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate readmission rates and factors related to readmission after surgical and nonsurgical management of odontoid fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Management of odontoid fractures, which are the most common isolated spine fracture in the elderly, continues to be debated. The choice between surgical or nonsurgical treatment has been reported to impact mortality and might influence readmission rates. Hospital readmissions represent a large financial burden upon our healthcare system. Factors surrounding hospital readmissions would benefit from a better understanding of their associated causes to lower health care costs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed using the 2016 Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD). Demographic information and factors associated with readmission were collected. Readmission rates, complications, length of hospital stay were collected. Patients treated operatively, nonoperatively, and patients who were readmitted or not readmitted were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using open source software SciPy (Python v1.3.0) for all analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 2921 patients who presented with Type II dens fractures from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016, 555 of which underwent surgical intervention. The readmission rate in patients who underwent surgery was 16.4% (91/555) and 29.4% (696/2366) in the nonoperative group. Hospital costs for readmitted and nonreadmitted patients were $353,704 and $174,922, and $197,099 and $80,715 for nonoperatively managed patients, respectively. Medicaid and Medicare patients had the highest readmission rate in both groups. Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices were significantly higher in patients who were readmitted (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We report an overall 90-day readmission rate of 16.4% and 29.4%, in operative and nonoperative management of type II odontoid fractures, respectively. In the face of a rising incidence of this fracture in the elderly population, an understanding of the comorbidities and age-related demographics associated with 90-day readmissions following both surgical and nonsurgical treatment are critical.Level of Evidence: 3.

Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation for Pediatric and Adolescent Odontoid Fractures: Single-Center Experience Over a Decade

OBJECTIVE

Management of pediatric odontoid fractures is tricky and controversial. This study will enrich world literature with intricacies of anterior odontoid screw (OS) fixation in the pediatric population learned over the last decade.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients with pediatric odontoid fracture who underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation from January 2010 to December 2019 were included and evaluated for surgical outcome.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included in this study (mean age, 15 years; range, 6-18 years; male/female, 11:2; type II, 10; type IIA, 1; type III, 2). Common causes of injury were motor vehicle accidents (61.5%) followed by fall from height (38.5%) and all were acute fractures (2-30 days). Five patients had neurologic deficits. Accurate placement of screw was achieved in 92.3% of patients, including all 9 patients who used intraoperative O-arm. K wire migration during bicortical drilling resulted in neurovascular injury, with 1 mortality (7.7%). The remaining 12 patients were available for follow-up (mean, 36 months; range, 20-72 months) and all had preservation of neck movements. Successful OS fixation was achieved in 84.6% of patients, including 1 patient (7.7%) who had a fibrous union. One patient (8.3%) had nonunion because of migration of the screw head in the C2 body.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior odontoid screw fixation in the pediatric population provides good functional outcomes with instant fixation by direct osteosynthesis. However, the surgeon should be meticulous in the surgical approach and should achieve a lag effect. The surgeon should stop after engaging the outer cortex of the odontoid peg with K wire to avoid cranial migration. Intraoperative O-arm guidance is useful.

Clinical and radiological outcome after minimally invasive surgical approach for type II unstable odontoid fractures

INTRODUCTION

Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a valid surgical option for unstable odontoid fractures, as type II Anderson D'Alonzo fractures. Grauer further divided type II fractures in subtypes according to the fracture line, providing recommendations for implementation of screw fixation techniques.

OBJECTIVE

Primary endpoint of our study is to evaluate the postoperative results of minimally invasive odontoid screw insertion in terms of outcome, fusion rate and stability of cranio-cervical junction. Secondary endpoint was to investigate the influence of age or fractures' features on outcome and fusion rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report the clinical and radiological features of 32 patients harbouring unstable type II fractures operated by a minimally invasive odontoid screw insertion technique. All patients underwent a high resolution multiplanar CT in order to assess fracture features according to Grauer's classification; the integrity of ligaments was investigated by MRI. In addition, a preoperative neurological performance (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) was evaluated for patients either directly or interviewing their families. Follow-up at one, three and six months and 1 year have been performed (averaging 13.5 months) by cervical CT (fusion rate and stability) and mRS update. In order to investigate the influence of age on postoperative neurological performance, two groups (≤50 yrs, 9 pts/>50 yrs, 23 pts) were separately considered and analysed. Overall, we observed no surgery related complications. We also analysed the fusion rate and its correlation with patient age and Grauer's subtype of fracture.

RESULTS

At last available clinical follow-up, the preoperative performance was preserved (mRS 0/1: 24, 75%; mRS 2-4: 9, 15%) although with slight reduction of intact patients (mRS 0: 22 vs. 19; 71.8 vs. 59.3%). Younger patients (≤50 yrs) fared significantly better than older ones, achieving a good clinical outcome (mRS 0/1) in 100% vs. 69.5% (9/9 vs. 16/23 pts). Statistical analysis showed a fair correlation between age and outcome. Other factors such as sex and Grauer's type did not influence significantly the clinical outcome. Nine patients did not complete a full radiological follow-up and were therefore excluded from analysis of radiological outcome. Among the remaining 23 patients, only 25% of those who were followed three months or less showed fusion; conversely, all patients who have been examined from 6 to 48 months fused. Among the non-union patients, two underwent a second surgery by posterior approach.

CONCLUSIONS

In our recent experience, the minimally invasive AOSF proved safe and effective in treating odontoid peg fractures. Selection based on Grauer's type is mandatory to achieve best results. While in the elderly, an anterior approach is well accepted as the first choice treatment, we recommend that this option should be offered as a suitable alternative to Halo or orthosis also in younger patients since it provides prompt, excellent clinical outcome and high fusion rate especially in this age group.

Traumatic Atlantoaxial Dislocation with an Odontoid Fracture: A Rare and Potentially Fatal Injury

Traumatic dislocation of the atlanto-axial joint in combination with an odontoid fracture remains a rare entity. Beaucause of its instability, it's alsoo a seriuous injury. A fatal outcome is feared especially in elderly. We report a case of 74-year-old man who presented with neck pain Confusion and spastic tetraparesia after a low energy trauma. Radiographs and computed tomography demonstrated a C1C2 dislocation with odontoid fracture. After an unsuccessful attempt at closed reduction with halo traction, a surgical stabilisation was performed using a posterior approach. Death was occured in early postoperative due to respiratory distress.

Type II Odontoid Fracture: a case series highlighting the treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

A type II odontoid fracture, if unstable, can cause spinal cord damage. In this case, it is essential to choose the correct treatment-but the issues of what the correct treatment is and which of the different surgical options is best are quite controversial. In this paper we present strategies for treatment of type II odontoid fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive cases of type II odontoid fracture were treated at the Division of Neurosurgery at Villa Sofia Hospital in Palermo (23 cases) and at the Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital of Palermo (seven cases), from January 2011 to August 2016. Four patients were treated with external immobilization. Twenty-six patients underwent a surgical procedure.

RESULTS

There was no mortality related to the surgical procedure. One patient had a pre- and postoperative neurological deficit, and remained tetraparetic. Follow-up radiological studies in the surgically treated group showed bone union in 21 patients and stable fibrous union in one.

CONCLUSION

In our and other authors' experience, when the direction of the fracture line is down and forward, external immobilization can be sufficient for healing. Anterior odontoid screw fixation can be considered the treatment of choice for unstable odontoid fractures (with a horizontal, down and back, or comminuted fracture line) without dislocation or with dislocation less than 7 mm.When the odontoid fracture is associated with a Jefferson fracture or dislocation greater than 7 mm, stabilization of C1-C2 may be necessary. In this case, placement of screws in the dens and in the joints through a single approach represents the most valid technique.In the case of an inveterate fracture of the dens with severe C1-C2 dislocation, the surgical operation that offers the best prospects is posterior stabilization, utilizing the Guo technique.

Treatment of Odontoid Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To establish recommendations for the treatment of odontoid fractures based on current literature and the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

METHODS

Narrative review of the literature. Analyzing treatment algorithms of German trauma and spine centers as members of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

RESULTS

There are many influencing factors leading to appropriate treatment of odontoid fractures such as age, bone quality, arthrosis, classification, and type of the fracture. Conservative nonoperative treatment is appropriate for stable undislocated displaced odontoid fractures. Anterior osteosynthesis with 1 or 2 screws leads to good results in the classical unstable type II odontoid fracture in patients with good bone quality. However, modifiers have been identified by the working group leading to higher complication and failure rates. For these cases, more stable constructs and/or posterior approaches are indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Operation seems to be standard treatment for odontoid fractures. However, in the aged population, conservative treatment should be considered as morbidity and mortality rise significantly in the group of >75 years. Conservative treatment may also be started within stable nondislocated fractures, but then regular controls have to be performed. If operation is indicated, many influencing factors have to be considered for appropriate approach and technique. The classification of Anderson and D'Alonzo is still standard. To create an adequate treatment algorithm, dislocation displacement and instability have to be identified. Stable odontoid fractures are treated conservatively non-operatively, but if so regular controls have to be performed. Unstable and/or dislocated displaced odontoid fractures are treated by anterior osteosynthesis with 1 or 2 screws. The technique is demanding and leads to elevated complication and failure rates if modifiers are apparent. In these cases, posterior instrumentation or fusion of C1 and C2 is favorable. In the aged population (>80 years), operative therapy is critical as postoperative morbidity complication and mortality rates rise significantly. As there is still some bias in the treatment algorithms, the working group recommends establishment of a prospective study to result in more objective statements.

Type II Fractures in Older Adults: Can They Be Treated Conservatively?: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures are the most common acute cervical spinal fractures in the geriatric population. Their rate is increasing along with the rising age of the elderly population. Whereas conservative management with external immobilization is reported as the treatment of choice for type I and III odontoid fractures, there are no clear indications concerning the best treatment for type II fractures. In younger patients surgical management is considered the best choice, but in older adults the rate of good outcomes worsens and operative risk because of comorbidities increases.

METHODS

We report our retrospective single-center experience with conservative treatment of type II odontoid fractures in an elderly population, focusing on both radiologic and functional outcomes to compare our results with the recent literature.

RESULTS

Among the 21 selected subjects with a minimum follow-up of 18 months, 19 (90.5%) showed a satisfactory clinical outcome, with an adequate bony healing in 10 cases and nonsymptomatic pseudarthrosis in 9 patients. All these patients were satisfied with the conservative results and could stop use of the collar. Two patients (9.5%) did not show any improvement and had to keep the collar indefinitely.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was limited because it was a retrospective review, with a limited number of patients. Nevertheless, the clinical and radiologic outcomes of our patients differ from the results of other studies, suggesting that conservative management of these fractures in this population does not necessarily lead to a bad clinical outcome or delayed surgery.

Treatment of type II odontoid fracture with a novel technique: Titanium cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation

Surgical methods for type II odontoid fracture can be classified into 2 main groups: anterior or posterior approach. A more effective way to achieve bone fusion with the lowest possible surgical risk is needed. Therefore, the aim of our study was to describe and evaluate a novel technique, cable-dragged reduction/cantilever beam internal fixation for the treatment of type II odontoid fracture.This was a retrospective study enrolled 34 patients underwent posterior cable-dragged reduction/cantilever-beam internal fixation surgery. Medical records, rates of reduction, the location of the instrumentation and fracture healing during follow-up were analyzed. Once fracture healing was obtained, instrumentation was removed. Neck pain (scored using a visual analog scale [VAS]), neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and neck disability index (NDI) were recorded before and after removing the instrumentation during follow-up.The mean duration of follow up was 22.8 ± 5.3 months. There was no iatrogenic damage to nerves or blood vessels. Radiographic evaluation showed complete reduction in the 20 patients with fracture displacement and satisfactory fracture healing in all 34 cases. Titanium cable breakage was observed in 4 patients after fracture healing. After removal of instrumentation, significant improvements were seen in neck-pain VAS score, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and NDI (all P < .01).Posterior cable-dragged reduction/cantilever-beam internal fixation was an optimal salvage maneuver to conventional surgical methods such as anterior screw fixation and C1-C2 screw-rod system. The operative difficulty and incidence of nerve and vascular injury were reduced. Its major disadvantage is the exposure and screw-setting at C3, which is left intact in traditional surgery, and it is suitable only for patients with intact C1 posterior arches.

"Direct vision" operation of posterior atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation for unstable atlantoaxial fractures: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The posterior screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass, also called C1 "pedicle" screw, combined with C2 pedicle screw fixiation has shown better biomechanical stability in unstable atlantoaxial fractures. However, its popularization has to fulfill the limitation imposed by anatomical characteristics. The aim of this study was to explore the manipulation, effect, and safety of the atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation under "direct vision" for the treatment of unstable atlantoaxial fracture.

METHODS

All the patients diagnosed with unstable atlantoaxial fracture, who received surgery treatment of C1,C2 internal fixation from January 2012 to December 2014 were reviewed. Only these patients that were diagnosed with atlantoaxial unstability secondary to trauma and were treated with atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation under "direct vision" and iliac autograft were included. The safety of transpedicular screw placement, postoperative outcome, atlantoaxial stability, autograft fusion, and complications was observed and analyzed retrospectively. The pain visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were used as surgical curative effect evaluation standards.

RESULTS

We reviewed a total of 92 patients diagnosed with unstable atlantoaxial fracture, who received surgery treatment of C1,C2 internal fixation from January 2012 to December 2014, and 87 patients were treated with atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation under "direct vision" and were included this analysis. A total of 306 transpedicular screws in atlas and axis were placed successfully. All cases were followed-up >12 months. The overall breach rate was 11.36%. None of the breaches resulted in new-onset neurological sequela. The neurological status in cases with bilateral upper extremities numbness and lower extremities weakness had improved after surgery. At the latest follow-up, the neck VAS and JOA scores were significantly improved (P < .01) than those preoperatively. No cases demonstrated implantation failure and bone graft absorption on the postoperative x-ray films and CT scans.

CONCLUSION

Atlantoaxial transpedicular screw fixation under "direct vision" and iliac autograft for the treatment of unstable atlantoaxial fracture has shown simple manipulation and efficient performance. Thus, the technique of C1-C2 fixation is feasible in treating unstable atlantoaxial fracture.

Anterior retropharyngeal plate screw fixation with bilateral anterior transarticular screws for odontoid fractures ... a new comprehensive technique

INTRODUCTION

A certain group of odontoid fractures (Anderson and D' Alonzo Type-2) are usually offered surgical treatment. Common surgical option is an anterior odontoid screw. Some of the fractures are not suitable for anterior odontoid screw (anterior oblique, displaced distal fragments and those with atlantoaxial instability) and these are usually offered posterior transarticular screws (Magerl's) or posterior atlantoaxial screw rod/plate fixation (Goel-Harms technique). Posterior surgery involves atlantoaxial fixation with an indirect attempt to reduce and fuse the fracture . Posterior surgery has a risk of injury to the vertebral arteries, hemorrhage from the paravertebral venous plexus and the C2 root ganglion.

METHODS

A direct anterior submandibular retropharyangeal approach with open reduction and fixation (ORIF) using a customized variable screw placement (VSP) plate was used to realign and fix the fracture fragments in compression mode under direct vision. Twenty patients of type-II odontoid fractures (unsuitable for anterior odontoid screw) underwent an anterior retropharyngeal approach with anterior variable screw position (VSP) plate and screw fixation and eight amongst them, who had associated atlantoaxial instability underwent additional bilateral anterior transarticular screws.

RESULTS

All patients treated by this technique had 100% fracture site bone union without any implant failure. Longest follow-up has been for 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Anterior retropharyangeal approach allows direct fracture fragment realignment under vision with an opportunity to fix in compression mode using the VSP plate, which ensures early fusion across the type-II odontoid fracture. Any associated instability can be treated by additional bilateral anterior transarticular screws. The approach is simple and safe without any risk to the vertebral arteries and biomechanically appealing.

Patient-reported outcome following nonsurgical management of type II odontoid process fractures in adults

Background:

Transverse (type II) odontoid process fracture is among the most commonly encountered cervical spine fractures. Nonsurgical management through external immobilization is occasionally preferred to surgical management but is criticized for its higher rates of failure and lower patient satisfaction. Our aim is to analyze patient-reported outcomes in patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for type II odontoid fractures.

Methods:

We identified patients >18-year-old who underwent external immobilization as a treatment for isolated type II odontoid fracture between 2007 and 2012. We collected demographic parameters, clinical presentation, mode of injury, imaging studies and modality and duration of treatment (soft collar, halo-vest, or both). Patients were contacted by telephone to participate in a 15-min survey addressing their recovery including their subjective rate of return to preinjury level of functioning.

Results:

Fifteen patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and participated in our survey. Patients were followed up for an average of 19 months after injury. Overall mean age was 61 years. Injury followed a mechanical fall or a road traffic accident in 11 and 4 cases, respectively. External immobilization was achieved by halo vest only in nine patients, soft collar only in two patients (13%), and through a sequential combination in the remaining 4 (27%). This was deployed for a mean of 7.8 months. Radiological studies at the last follow-up showed bony healing (27%), fibrous nonunion (60%), and persistent instability (13%). Patients reported gradual recovery of function throughout the 1^st year after injury with levels above 70% of preinjury functioning achieved by 13% of patients at 6 months, 33% at 9 months, and 47% at 12 months. Overall satisfaction with nonsurgical management was 68%.

Conclusion:

In selected patients with type II odontoid fractures, external immobilization represents a good option with acceptable course of recovery.

A Systematic Review of the Treatment of Geriatric Type II Odontoid Fractures

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fracture in the geriatric population; however, the treatment of type II odontoid fractures in this age group is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term (<3 months) mortality, long-term (≥12 months) mortality, and complication rates of patients >60 years of age with a type II odontoid fracture managed either operatively or nonoperatively.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of literature published between January 1, 2000, and February 1, 2015, related to the treatment of type II odontoid fractures in patients >60 years of age. An analysis of short-term mortality, long-term mortality, and the occurrence of complications was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 452 articles were identified, of which 21 articles with 1233 patients met the inclusion criteria. Short-term mortality (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63) and long-term mortality (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.64) were lower in patients who underwent surgical treatment than in those who had nonsurgical treatment, and there were no significant differences in the rate of complications (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.63). Surgical approach (posterior vs anterior) showed no significant difference in mortality or complication rate. Similarly, no difference in mortality or complication rate was identified with hard collar or a halo orthosis immobilization.

CONCLUSION

The current literature suggests that well-selected patients >60 years of age undergoing surgical treatment for a type II odontoid fracture have a decreased risk of short-term and long-term mortality without an increase in the risk of complications.

A Novel Anterior Odontoid Screw Plate for C1-C3 Internal Fixation: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical in vitro study was performed using a standardized experimental protocol in a biomechanical spine testing apparatus.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the biomechanical stability afforded by 4 cervical fixation techniques: anterior cervical plate+odontoid screw+cage (ACP+OS+cage), anterior odontoid screw plate+bone graft (AOSP+bone graft), posterior C2-3 fixation+odontoid screw (C2PS+C3LMS+OS), and posterior C1-3 fixation (C1PS+C2PS+C3LMS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Unstable axis injuries with multiple fracture lines are uncommon injuries, and their management is still challenging for surgeons who aim to achieve primary stability, early mobilization, preserved cervical range of motion (ROM), and favorable outcome. We designed a novel AOSP to assist in this challenging clinical scenario.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric spine specimens (C1-C3) were subjected to stepwise destabilization of the C1-3 complex, with serial replication of a type II Hangman fracture, a type II odontoid fracture, and a C2 to C3 disc injury. Intact specimens, destabilized specimens, and destabilized specimens with various stabilization techniques including anterior and posterior techniques, some using our AOSP, were each tested for stability. Each spine was subjected to flexion, and extension testing, left and right lateral bending, and left and right rotation.

RESULTS

After AOSP+bone graft fixation, the ROMC2-C3 during all loading modes were reduced to values that were significantly less than normal. During all loading modes, AOSP+bone graft fixation significantly outperformed the ACP+OS+cage fixation in limiting ROMC2-C3. During flexion and extension, AOSP+bone graft fixation significantly outperformed the C1PS+C2PS+C3LMS fixation and C2PS+C3LMS+OS fixation in limiting ROMC2-C3.

CONCLUSION

The AOSP has excellent biomechanical performance when dealing with type I Hangman fractures, type II odontoid fractures, and C2-3 disc injuries. The AOSP+one graft fixation can preserve the function of atlanto-axial joint, which may be a valuable stabilization strategy for these unique injuries.

Pooled analysis of non-union, re-operation, infection, and approach related complications after anterior odontoid screw fixation

Background

Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been one of the most popular treatments for odontoid fractures. However, the true efficacy of AOSF remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to provide the pooled rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures.

Methods

We searched studies that discussed complications after AOSF for type II or type III odontoid fractures. A proportion meta-analysis was done and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis.

Results

Of 972 references initially identified, 63 were eligible for inclusion. 54 studies provided data regarding non-union. The pooled non-union rate was 10% (95% CI: 7%–3%). 48 citations provided re-operation information with a pooled proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3%–7%). Infection was described in 20 studies with an overall rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0%–1.2%). The main approach related complication is postoperative dysphagia with a pooled rate of 10% (95% CI: 4%–17%). Proportions for the other approach related complications such as postoperative hoarseness (1.2%, 95% CI: 0%–3.7%), esophageal/retropharyngeal injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–1.1%), wound hematomas (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%–1.8%), and spinal cord injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–0.2%) were very low. Significant heterogeneities were detected when we combined the rates of non-union, re-operation, and dysphagia. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that old age was significantly predictive of non-union. Subgroup comparisons showed significant higher non-union rates in age ≥70 than that in age ≤40 and in age 40 to <50. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any examined variables influencing the re-operation rate. Meta-regression analysis showed age had a significant effect on the dysphagia rate.

Conclusions/Significances

This study summarized the rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid factures. Elderly patients were more likely to experience non-union and dysphagia.

Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly

Odontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d'Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in the elderly with regard to survival, nonunion, and complications. After a systematic literature research 38 publications were included. A cumulative analysis of 1284 published cases found greater survival if elderly patients with odontoid fractures type II received surgical treatment (RR = 0.64). With regard to nonunion in 669 published cases primary posterior fusion had the best fusion results. The systematic literature review came to the following conclusions. (1) Surgical stabilisation of odontoid fractures type II improves survival in patients between 65 and 85 years of age compared to nonsurgical treatment. (2) Posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid fractures type II in the elderly has the greatest bony union rate. (3) Odontoid nonunion is not associated with worse clinical or functional results in the elderly. (4) The complication rate of nonsurgical treatment is similar to the complication rate of surgical treatment of odontoid fractures type II in the elderly.