Reconstruction plates for midshaft clavicular fractures: A retrospective cohort study

Usefulness of double plate fixation after failed ORIF for clavicle shaft fracture

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of double plate fixation for failed clavicle shaft fracture surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 14 patients who underwent double plate fixation due to plate failure after clavicle shaft fracture surgery from March 2016 to March 2021. The study used 3.5 mm locking compression plates for superior clavicle and anterior reconstruction in all patients. In addition, moldable allograft bone was used to fill the bone defect. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed immediately, at 2 and 4 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The visual analog scale (VAS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and range of motion of the shoulder were evaluated as clinical results. For radiological evaluation, anteroposterior, caudal, and cephalad views of both clavicles were used. Successful bone union was defined as complete adjoining of the fracture site through callus formation.

RESULTS

Successful bone union was achieved in all patients, and the mean time to bone union was 16.7 ± 1.2 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). Statistically significant improvement in forward flexion and external and internal rotation was observed from 135.5° ± 6.3, 45.2° ± 5.3, and 13° ± 2.3 preoperatively to 157.0° ± 9.3, 68.7° ± 6.3, and 9.8° ± 3.1 at the final follow-up, respectively. The VAS score improved from an average of 6.2 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.7 at the final follow-up, which was statistically significant (P = 0.018). In addition, the ASES score significantly increased from a mean of 52.1 ± 6.3 points preoperatively to 83.6 ± 7.8 points at the final follow-up (P = 0.001). The average UCLA shoulder score was 16.7 ± 1.4 and 31.4 ± 2.2 points preoperatively and at the final follow-up, respectively, which was statistically significant (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Double plate fixation has shown good results after failed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for clavicle shaft fractures. Therefore, in complicated situations after ORIF, double plate fixation is considered a surgical treatment option.

Immediate Weight-bearing Through Walker or Crutches After Surgical Fixation of Clavicle Fractures in Patients With Lower Extremity Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of immediate upper extremity weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) rehabilitation protocol after clavicle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Three Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients older than 18 years who had ORIF of mid-shaft clavicle fractures and lower extremity fractures who were allowed immediate WBAT on their affected upper extremity through use of a walker or crutches were included. All clavicles were fixed with either precontoured clavicular plates or locking compression plates. Included patients were those who had clinical/radiographic follow-up until fracture union, nonunion, or construct failure.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

WBAT patients were matched in a one-to-one fashion to a cohort with isolated clavicle fractures who were treated non-weight-bearing (NWB) postoperatively on their affected upper extremity. Matching was done based on age, sex, and temporality of fixation. After matching, treatment and control groups were compared to determine differences in possible confounding variables that could influence the primary outcome, including patient demographics, fracture classification, cortices of fixation, and construct type. All patients were assessed to verify conformity with weight-bearing recommendation. Primary outcome was early hardware failure (HWF) with or without revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative infections and union of fracture.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in the WBAT cohort; there were no significant differences with the matched NWB cohort based on patient demographics. Both the WBAT and the NWB cohorts had 2.5% chance of acute HWF that required surgical intervention ( P = 1.0). Additionally, there was no difference in overall HWF ( P = 0.49). All patients despite weight-bearing status including those who required revision ORIF for acute HWF had union of their fracture ( P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data would support that immediate weight-bearing after clavicle fracture fixation in patients with concomitant lower extremity trauma does not lead to an increase in HWF or impact ultimate union. This challenges the dogma of prolonged postoperative weight-bearing restrictions and allow for earlier rehabilitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Do multiple fractures affect risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fracture? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures is associated with quick recovery and low risk of non-union. However, fixation failure may occur in case of severe comminution fractures. Moreover, clinical outcomes may be affected when clavicle fractures occur in combination with other injuries, particularly those involving the lower extremities, as the use of crutches or walkers may hinder the process of rehabilitation by adding strain on the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, resulting in possible fixation failure. This study aims to identify risk factors for fixation failure of midshaft clavicle fractures and elucidate the role of combined fractures in treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study included patients diagnosed with midshaft clavicle fractures who underwent initial surgery between January 2012 and November 2021 at a designated regional trauma center hospital. Retrospective evaluation of fixation failure was carried out in 352 patients with midshaft clavicle fractures using standard clinical evaluation protocols and conventional radiographs. The prevalence of fixation failure and the effects of several demographic variables on the risk of fixation failure and non-union were examined. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for fixation failure.

RESULTS

Fixation failure occurred in 40 patients (11.4%). Multivariate analysis identified comminution [odds ratio (OR) 3.532, p value = 0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-8.05)] and fewer number of screws (OR 0.223, p value = 0.022, 95% CI 0.06-0.80) as risk factors for fixation failure. Surgical techniques using wire cerclage reduced the chances of fixation failure in comminuted fractures (OR 0.63, p value = 0.033, 95% CI 0.05-0.80). Combined fractures that required rehabilitation using walkers or crutches increased the risk of non-union (OR 19.043, p value = 0.032, 95% CI 1.28-282.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional fixation of comminuted fractures using cerclage can reduce the risk of treatment failure, while multiple fractures or rehabilitation for ambulation increases the risk of the same.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Precontoured dynamic compression plate using patient-specific 3D-printed models in minimally invasive surgical technique for midshaft clavicle fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study introduced a novel approach for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures, utilizing patient-specific 3D-printed models for accurate preoperative contouring of dynamic compression plates (DCPs) and an alternative minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique with precontoured DCPs through small vertical separated incisions.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Mirror image 3D clavicular models were reproduced from 40 patients with acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures who underwent MIPO using precontoured DCPs inserted through small, vertical separated incisions. Exclusion criteria included patients with open fractures, pathological fractures, ipsilateral limb injury, skeletal immature patients, and those who had previous clavicle fractures or surgery. Postoperative evaluation was conducted using clinical and radiographic review. The Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scores were used for clinical evaluations, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was used to assess surgical scars.

RESULTS

The average time to union of all fractures was 12.88 weeks (range, 8-15) without loss of reduction. The patient-specific precontoured DCPs fitted well in all cases, with fracture consolidation and minimal three cortical sides connecting the fracture fragment. No hardware prominence and skin complications occurred, and clinical evaluation showed no existing difference compared with the contralateral sides. The average Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scores were 96.33 ± 3.66 and 93.26 ± 5.15, respectively. Two patients requested their implant removal, and scar qualities were satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the use of a patient-specific precontoured DCP, in combination with 3D printing technology, provides accurate preoperative planning, effective fracture reduction, and improved postoperative outcomes in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The MIPO with a patient-specific precontoured DCP through separated vertical incisions along the Langer's lines appears to be a promising option, regarding appearance, avoiding associated complications, and obviating the need for reoperation. These results suggest that this technique has merit and can be a viable option for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.

Single-plate versus double-plate comparison in the surgical treatment of comminuted clavicle fractures: Is the secondary plate reliable?

The objective of this study is to retrospectively assess the use of single-plate (SP) and double-plate (DP) fixation in the open reduction and internal fixation of comminuted clavicle fractures, focusing on fracture union and complications. We retrospectively evaluated comminuted diaphyseal clavicle fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type 15.B1-3) treated with open reduction and internal fixation and having a minimum 1-year follow-up. Two patient cohorts were identified: DP (utilizing a superiorly located clavicle-specific plate and an anteriorly located tubular plate) and SP (utilizing a superiorly located clavicle-specific plate). These groups were compared in terms of union time, peri-incisional numbness, implant irritation, return to work time, union rates, re-operation rates, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. The study included 27 SP and 23 DP patients meeting the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in terms of union time, peri-incisional numbness, implant irritation, return to work time, union rates, re-operation rates, DASH, and ASES scores at the end of the first year (P = .889, P = 1.00, P = .122, P = 1.00, P = 1.00, P = .493, P = .736, P = .762, P = .937 respectively). However, it was observed that the DP group showed a significantly earlier return to work time and better DASH scores at 3rd and 6th months, whereas the SP group exhibited significantly better ASES scores at 3rd and 6th months (P = .034, P = .016, P = .032, P = .036, P = .021, respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of union and complications in acute clavicle fractures treated with SP and DP fixation. The DP group demonstrated an earlier return to work and superior early functional scores compared to the SP group. Our findings suggest that a secondary plate can be reliably used, particularly in situations where clavicle fracture fixation is insufficient or in cases of comminuted clavicle fractures.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: An indirect reduction using joystick technique

BACKGROUND

A minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique has become increasingly popular in long bone fracture fixation as it could eliminate postoperative complications. However, the most challenging aspect of employing the MIPO for midshaft clavicle fractures among general orthopedic surgeons is the technically demanding that indirect reduction is typically a closed maneuver.

METHODS

We present a consecutive series of patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures undergoing clavicular fixation using the MIPO technique between January 2017 and October 2019. The joystick technique was used to obtain anatomical reduction. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley and the American shoulder and elbow surgeons shoulder scores.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a mean age of 42.44 years were included. The functional shoulder scores showed no disabilities compared with those of a healthy population. No major complications requiring re-operation were noted, and all fractures were completely healed with an average time of 12.53 weeks.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that facilitating the MIPO for midshaft clavicle fractures using simple operative devices and techniques was possible. The joystick technique with the use of an external fixator for temporary stabilization is a safe and effective method that can be added to achieve anatomical alignment with the fracture site unexposed. This technique could be performed either in a fresh fracture or a delayed case with failed conservative treatment.

Indications for the removal of implants after fracture healing: A comparison between human and veterinary medicine

Indications for implant removal after fracture healing are still under debate in both human and veterinary medicine. Although hardware removal is a common procedure, it should not be undertaken lightly. Intra and post-operative complications are common and a thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits should be performed. This review aimed to collect and summarise published data on the indications for implant removal in small animals, compare the collected data with human and equine medicine, and investigate the existence of guidelines for this purpose. There is no international consensual agreement for implant removal after fracture healing, neither in small animals nor in human orthopaedics. Decision-making processes are still controversial in some scenarios, thus clear evidence-based protocols for implant removal are needed.

Locking versus nonlocking superior plate fixations for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: A prospective randomized trial comparing clinical and radiografic results

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether locking or nonlocking superior plate fixation is better for managing displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking and nonlocking superior plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (2B1 and 2B2 in Robinson classification) participated in this randomized controlled trial; 12 patients were excluded. Surgeries were performed using a 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) between 2007 and 2015. Patients were treated either with a locking plate (group L, n = 45) or a nonlocking plate (group N, n = 45). In both groups, the plates were fixed to the proximal and distal clavicle with two and/or three screws, respectively. The main outcome measures were complication rates, time to bone union, and Constant score.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients in group L (mean age, 45.9 years) and 41 in group N (mean age, 43.6 years) were followed. The overall complication rates in groups L and N were 7.2% (three peri-implant fractures) and 7.3% (non-union, deformed plate, and peri-implant fracture), respectively (p = .98). The average time to union significantly differed between groups (L vs. N: 13.0 ± 4.1 vs. 17.5 ± 6.3 weeks; p < .01). However, the Constant score at the final follow-up was not significantly different between groups (L vs. N: 87.0 ± 12.3 vs. 89.8 ± 9.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar complication rates and clinical results were found for locking and nonlocking superior plate fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the time to bone union was shorter with the locking plate. This study suggests that both plating systems are effective for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level I.

Peri-implant distal clavicle fracture: Case report (overlaying plate fixation: Solution for peri-implant clavicle fractures)

Introduction and importance

Surgical treatment for clavicle injuries is indicated for displaced and shortened fractures. Osteosyntheses with plate fixation may present with complications in 6.3% to 8.5% of patients. Peri-implant clavicle fractures (PIF) are rare, and we have not found any previous cases in our literature search.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old male with previously (six years earlier) surgically treated clavicle fracture presented with a peri-implant clavicle fracture requiring surgical treatment. The management involved overlaying an implant to fix the lateral clavicle fracture without removing the previous plate. Complete bone healing was observed without any further complication.

Clinical discussion

Despite the low rate of implant failure in clavicle fractures, this complication occurs mainly in elderly patients with poor bone quality. No PIF have been described in the literature prior to this. This case report demonstrates a young patient with good bone quality and previous fracture fixation presenting with PIF which has now shown complete bone healing.

Conclusion

In this case, overlying an additional plate on the lateral clavicle portion without removing the previous plate increased the stability of the fracture. It demonstrates the value of overlaying plate osteosyntheses for patients with clavicle PIF.

•

Peri-implant clavicle fracture is a rare situation.

•

The management of peri-implant fracture is challenging.

•

Overlaying plate fixation can be the solution for peri-implant clavicle fractures.

Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures : a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Aims

The aims of this network meta-analysis (NMA) were to examine nonunion rates and functional outcomes following various operative and nonoperative treatments for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

Initial search strategy incorporated MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four treatment arms were created: nonoperative (NO); intramedullary nailing (IMN); reconstruction plating (RP); and compression/pre-contoured plating (CP). A Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare all treatment options for outcomes of nonunion, malunion, and function using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome scores.

Results

In all, 19 RCTs consisting of 1,783 clavicle fractures were included in the NMA. All surgical options demonstrated a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of nonunion in comparison to nonoperative management: CP versus NO (OR 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.17); IMN versus NO (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19); RP versus NO (OR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.24). Compression plating was the only treatment to demonstrate significantly lower DASH scores relative to NO at six weeks (mean difference -10.97; 95% CI -20.69 to 1.47).

Conclusion

Surgical fixation demonstrated a lower risk of nonunion compared to nonoperative management. Compression plating resulted in significantly less disability early after surgery compared to nonoperative management. These results demonstrate possible early improved functional outcomes with compression plating compared to nonoperative treatment. Surgical fixation of mid-shaft clavicle fractures with compression plating may result in quicker return to activity by rendering patients less disabled early after surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):646–654.

A multicentric study on the newly developed reconstruction locking plate for midshaft clavicular fracture

Objectives: To examine the efficacy and clinical and radiological outcomes of the use of a streamlined clavicle plate^® (MEIRA, Aichi, Japan) for midshaft clavicular fractures. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 155 patients with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated using a streamlined clavicle plate between 2015 and 2019 in 18 hospitals across Japan. A questionnaire regarding bone union and postoperative complications was used, and 136 cases were followed up for one year or until bone union. Plate fitting was evaluated retrospectively using surgical records, radiographic findings, and surgeon's opinion. Results: During surgery, plate bending was needed in 19 cases (12.3%), poor fitting was observed in 8 cases (5.2%), and bone union was achieved in 133 cases (97.8%). Total implantation failure, including plate breakage and screw loosening, occurred in 10 cases (6.5%) from the intraoperative to postoperative period. Subjective complications were observed in 26 cases (16.8%): incongruity around the surgical scar or in the anterior chest in 23, and contracture of the shoulder in three. Plate removal was performed in 66 cases (48.5%) per patient's request. Conclusion: The use of a streamlined clavicle plate is effective for midshaft fractures of the clavicle, and the success rates of bone union and implantation using this approach are comparable to those of other existing plates.

Risk factors for hardware removal following operative treatment of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hardware removal (HWR) after operative fixation of clavicular fractures varies widely. Risk factors related to HWR remain incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for HWR after plate fixation of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures. We hypothesized that (1) the total HWR incidence would be <20%, (2) the HWR incidence of operatively treated distal- and middle-third clavicular fractures would not be statistically different, and (3) symptomatic implants would be the most common HWR indication.

METHODS

We performed a multi-hospital retrospective study of skeletally mature patients who underwent plate fixation of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures from November 2008 to November 2018. Data included patient demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, operative records, hardware-related symptoms, subsequent HWR, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (aged 16-75 years, 76.7% male patients) were included. Of the patients, 87 (84.5%) underwent plate fixation for midshaft clavicular fractures and 16 (15.5%) underwent plate fixation for distal-third clavicular fractures. HWR was performed in 13 patients (12.6%). A significantly higher percentage of HWR procedures were performed for distal clavicular fractures (50%) than for middle-third clavicular fractures (4.9%, P < .0001). An initial high-energy mechanism of injury was associated with HWR (P = .0025). The most common indication for HWR was symptomatic hardware (69.2%). The overall complication rate was 14.5%.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of clavicular HWR was 12.6%. A distal fracture location was associated with a significantly higher incidence of HWR. An initial high-energy mechanism of injury was a significant risk factor for HWR. The primary indication for HWR was symptomatic hardware.

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes, complications, and implant removals in anatomically pre-contoured clavicle plates versus reconstruction plates - a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study of 106 patients

Background

Plate fixation is frequently used to treat displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, however the ideal plate choice remains subject to discussion; reconstruction locking compression plates (RLCPs) are cheaper and can be easily contoured, whereas anatomically pre-contoured locking compression plates (ALCPs) are thought to provide better stability and therefore lower rates of mechanical failure.

To compare the incidence of mechanical failures, functional and radiological outcomes in patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with ALCPs versus RLCPs.

Methods

A propensity score matched retrospective cohort study was conducted across two centers. One hundred and six consecutively recruited patients with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, who were treated with plate fixation and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were matched on gender, age, fracture grading, energy of injury, and fracture location. The resulting groups included 53 ALCP-treated fractures and 53 matched controls treated with RLCPs.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 20.5 months, there were no implant deformities in the ALCP group whereas the RLCP group had 6 patients (11.3%, p = 0.012) with implant deformities (5 occurrences of plate bending with fracture union, and 1 plate breakage with nonunion). Despite the higher rate of plate deformities in the RLCP group, there were no statistically significant differences in number of patients recovering full shoulder range of motion (ALCP 90.6%, RLCP 88.7%, p = 0.751), incidence of rest pain (ALCP 13.2%, RLCP 9.4%, p = 0.542), or implant removals (ALCP 49.1%, RLCP 56.6%, p = 0.439).

Conclusion

ALCPs may be superior to RLCPs in terms of implant stability but appear to produce similar clinical results.

Clavicle nonunion and plate breakage after locking compression plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

Open reduction and plate fixation have been widely used for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCF). The nonunion rate after plate fixation of DMCF has been reported to be between 0.1 and 15% and the construct failure rate is approximately 5%. Few studies have discussed the risk factors of construct failure. The aim of the present study was to identify possible risk factors of construct failure in plate fixation of DMCF and discuss the subsequent treatment strategies. Six patients who experienced plate breakage and clavicle nonunion between 2015 and 2017 were evaluated. All these patients were treated with open reduction and plate fixation of DMCF using a 3.5-mm locking compression plate. The plate breakage occurred 3-6 months after the initial injury. After the diagnosis of plate breakage, four patients underwent surgical management and two patients underwent nonoperative treatment. Potential risk factors for construct failure and efficacy of the subsequent treatment strategies were analyzed. We found that a risk factor for plate breakage was the increased stress in free hole area around the fracture zone. A second surgery for plate renewal and bone grafting may be necessary in a large percentage of these individuals. Based on the results of this study, our recommendation is that monocortical screws or simple obturators for the holes around the fracture zone should be used to protect the comminuted fragment for further damage and enhance plate strength. If a clavicle nonunion and plate breakage does occur, surgical repair and bone grafting provide high union rates and should be a necessary remedy.

Surgical treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures by minimally invasive internal fixation facilitated by intra-operative external fixation: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Mid-shaft clavicle fractures are common and may require surgery. The objective of this study in adults with high-risk mid-shaft clavicle fractures was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a minimally invasive surgical technique involving a minimally invasive approach, fracture reduction, temporary intra-operative external fixation, and locking plate internal fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

This minimally invasive surgical technique for mid-shaft clavicle fractures ensures satisfactory radiographic fracture healing and medium-term functional outcomes, with a short immobilisation, rapid return to sports, and low complication rate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective review was performed of patients managed using our minimally invasive surgical technique between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. The primary outcome measure was the 3-month radiographic healing rate. The secondary outcome measures were duration of post-operative immobilisation, 3- and 6-month QuickDASH scores, and post-operative complications.

RESULT

A total of 19 patients were included, 18 males and 1 female with a mean age of 37 years. Radiographic healing was consistently achieved within 3 months. Immobilisation duration was 3 weeks. The mean QuickDASH score was 23.75 after 3 months and 7.5 after 6 months. Return to sports occurred after 3 months. The only complication was transient paraesthesia in the distribution of the C8 nerve root in 1 patient.

DISCUSSION

The management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. The high complication rates associated with conventional surgical techniques make treatment decisions difficult. A surgical technique characterised by temporary intra-operative external fixation to facilitate minimally invasive internal fixation may have a lower complication rate and shorter immobilisation requirements compared to conventional surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational study.

Comparison of implant failure rates of different plates for midshaft clavicular fractures based on fracture classifications

Backgrounds

The aim of our study was to investigate failure rates of reconstruction plate and non-reconstruction plate, and find the best strategy for implant selection for different fracture types for midshaft clavicular fractures.

Patients and methods

Two hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with midshaft clavicular fractures who received open reduction and plate fixation during Jan 2012 to July 2017 were reviewed. The correlations between implant failure rates and risk factors including demographic data, fracture classifications, and implant types were analyzed.

Results

AO/OTA fracture classification and plate types are the most important factors affecting implant failure for midshaft clavicular fractures. Reconstruction plate had a significantly higher failure rate (53%) than that of non-reconstruction plates (3%) in comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures (P value < 0.01). However, the difference was not significant in AO/OTA 15-2A and 2B classifications.

Conclusion

Patients with comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures treated with reconstruction plates had very high implant failure rates compared to non-reconstruction plates. We suggested that patients with comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures treated with reconstruction plates need more protection and more frequent follow-up in the postoperative period.

Mechanical failure of plate breakage after open reduction and plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture - a possible new risk factor: a case report

Background

Plate breakage is one form of construct failure after a clavicle fracture treated with an open reduction and plate fixation. A recent study evaluated construct failure after an open reduction and plate fixation and reported a construct failure rate of 6.9% of which 1.9% were related to broken plates. Plate breakage is rare, thus, there are insufficient data regarding risk factors, pathogenesis, or how to avoid it.

Case presentation

This case report presents an unusual case of a 35-year-old Caucasian man, 7 weeks after open reduction and internal plate fixation of a fracture in the middle third of his clavicle, who developed breakage of the implant. Surgery was advised, the implant was retrieved, the fracture was reduced, and a new bridging locking plate was implanted.

Conclusions

In the current case it seems that the use of a bridging plate, the fundamental anatomical structure of the clavicle and the forces that are applied on it, the lack of discipline in complying with the postoperative functional restrictions, and an unclear “patient expectation” process were the main reasons for the failure. These aspects should be carefully considered and addressed in clavicle fractures.

Clavicle fractures in adults; current concepts

BACKGROUND

For decades, clavicle fractures have been treated conservatively. In the last 20 years, however, non-union rates after conservative treatment appear higher than previously reported and more evidence regarding operative treatment has become available. This has led to a paradigm shift towards an increase in operative treatment. The aim of this review is to present the current concepts and available evidence regarding clavicle fracture treatment.

METHODS

Conservative and operative treatment options together with their indications for medial, shaft and lateral clavicle fractures are discussed. For all three anatomical locations, a treatment algorithm is proposed.

CONCLUSION

In general, non-displaced fractures are treated conservatively. Operative treatment has to be discussed with patients with displaced clavicle fractures, especially in the young and active patient.

The first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate for clavicular midshaft fractures

BACKGROUND

Pre-contoured locking plates were recently introduced in the management of clavicular midshaft fractures. These plates may offer advantages such as no necessity for intraoperative bending and reduced plate irritation. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical and radiographical outcome of the first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, 100 consecutive patients (16 female, 84 male) with a median age of 40 years (range 15-82) who underwent surgery for clavicular midshaft fractures with a VariAx locking plate (Stryker Corporation Kalmazoo, MI, USA) between March 2012 and January 2016 were included. Postoperative follow-up was performed until union was clinically and radiographically achieved. Fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative need for contouring the plate, further surgery such as revision or hardware removal and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

One-hundred patients with a dislocated midshaft clavicular fracture with a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (standard deviation 13.2) were included. Ninety-three patients reported normal shoulder function at latest follow-up. Median surgical time was 75.5 min (range, 35-179). In three patients, intraoperative bending of the plate was necessary. In two patients, plates designed for the other side were implanted. Five patients needed revision surgery: One patient with wound healing problems, one patient with a re-fracture after early (13 months) hardware removal and minor trauma, one patient with postoperative shoulder stiffness and two patients with failed osteosynthesis because of surgical implantation fault. One asymptomatic nonunion without further treatment was observed. In 30 patients, the plate was removed after a mean of 17.5 months (SD 4.2) because of subjective plate discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

With this new pre-contoured locking plate, good to excellent intraoperative fit to the anatomical shape of the clavicle can be achieved. The implant seems to be reliable regarding handling and complications. Clinical and radiological results are comparable to results reported in the literature. Hardware removal rate is comparable to other studies with a pre-contoured plate and lower compared to non-pre-contoured.

Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts

Clavicle fractures are common fractures and the optimal treatment strategy remains debatable. The present paper reviews the available literature and current concepts in the management of displaced and/or shortened midshaft clavicle fractures.

Operative treatment leads to improved short-term functional outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, an earlier return to sports and lower rates of non-union compared with conservative treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, operative treatment also seems to be advantageous.

However, operative treatment is associated with an increased risk of complications and re-operations, while long-term shoulder functional outcomes are similar.

The optimal treatment strategy should be one tailor-made to the patient and his/her specific needs and expectations by utilizing a shared decision-making model.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:374-380. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170033

Rehabilitation after plate fixation of upper and lower extremity fractures

Post-operative rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocols are important to fracture fixation outcomes, yet there is a dearth in the literature concerning universal treatment guidelines following plate fixation of extremity fractures. There are controversies regarding time to allow weight-bearing and range of motion for most fractures of the upper and lower extremity. This lack of a consensus has led to varying practice guidelines and differing anecdotal protocols between treating surgeons. This review attempts to establish consensus guidelines for the post-operative rehabilitation required for patients following plate fixation of common upper and lower extremity fractures.

Comparison of conventional reconstruction plate versus direct metal laser sintering plate: an in vitro mechanical characteristics study

BACKGROUND

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology has helped to achieve several advances in the medical field, particularly as far as fabrication of implants is concerned. But the application of direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) bone plate is quite limited due to the indeterminate mechanical property. The purposes of this study were to characterize the biomechanical properties of the polished DMLS reconstruction plate and to compare these with the properties of commonly applied implants and to find whether the mechanical performance of DMLS plate meets the requirements for clinical application.

METHODS

In this study, we fabricated two groups of plates by DMLS and computer numerical control (CNC) techniques. After that, we polished all samples and investigated their roughness, components, hardness, static bending, and torsional performance. Moreover, cyclic bending tests and fractographic analysis were conducted. Statistical comparisons of the group by means of monotonic test data were made, and a qualitative comparison was performed to assess failures in fatigue.

RESULTS

We found no differences in surface roughness or components after polishing, but the DMLS plate hardness is 7.42% (p < 0.01) greater than that of the CNC plates. Compared with the CNC plates, the DMLS plate static bending and torsional performance were significantly greater. In a dynamic test, the DMLS plates survived 106, 106, 32,731, and 33,264 cycles under 0.6, 0.8, 0.9, and 1 kN cyclic loads, respectively, while the CNC plates survived 106, 106, 106, and 283,714 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the mechanical performances of the DMLS plate are stronger, and the strength under fatigue tests is sufficient. DMLS implant has great potential and may become a better choice for clinical use in the future. However, direct application of these AM instruments in the operating room requires further validation including animal and clinical experiment.

Construct failure after open reduction and plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, implants mostly used for fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCF) are the easily to bend reconstruction plate and the stiffer small fragment locking compression plate. Construct failure rates after plate fixation of DMCF are reported around 5 percent. Possible risk factors for construct failure are implant type and fracture type. However, little is known about the influence of fracture fixation method on construct failure. The aim of this study was to assess construct failure in plate fixation of DMCF and to identify possible risk factors.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated in a level 1 trauma centre with open reduction and fixation of DMCF using a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate or 3.5-mm small fragment locking compression plate between 2007 and 2015 were evaluated. Potential risk factors for construct failure were analysed using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were analysed. Fifty DMCF (19%) were fixated with a reconstruction plate and 209 (81%) with a small fragment locking compression plate. Construct failure was seen in 18 patients (6.9%), including 5 broken plates and 13 with screw loosening. Eight percent of all reconstruction plates broke in contrast to 0.5 percent of all small fragment locking compression plates (p=0.001). All broken implants were used as a bridging plate. Loosening of screws was seen in older patients and when the plate was fixated with less than three bicortical screws on one side of the fracture (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall construct failure after open reduction and plate fixation of DMCF occurred in 6.9 percent. Risk factors for plate breakage were the use of a reconstruction plate and a bridging method for fracture fixation. Risk factors for screw loosening were an increasing patient age and plate fixation with less than three bicortical screws on one side of the fracture.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of this study our recommendation is to use a small fragment locking compression plate for open reduction and internal fixation of DMCF. The surgeon should always strive to fixate the plate on both sides of the fracture with at least three bicortical screws.