A systematic review of preoperative determinants of patient-reported pain and physical function up to 2 years following primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus a Hospital-Based Center

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and same-day discharge (SDD) from hospital-based centers (HBCs) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase. There remains a paucity of literature directly comparing patient-reported outcomes by surgery site. We sought to compare outcomes between patients undergoing THA at an ASC versus HBC while controlling for medical comorbidities.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA with SDD (postoperative day 0) from a single HBC (1,015 patients) or stand-alone ASC (170 patients) from December 2020 to 2021 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications were collected. Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS JR), VR-12, and procedural satisfaction scores were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were matched by age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables, and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Linear regression models were conducted considering age, sex, and presence of comorbidities.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THA at an ASC had markedly higher VR-12 Physical Component Scores at all time points and improved VR-12 Mental Component Scores at preoperative visit and 6 months. These patients had increased procedural satisfaction at 3 months, although there was no difference at 1 year. No notable difference was observed in 90-day complication rates between groups. After matching by age and ASA, each group had 170 patients. In the matched analysis, preoperative HOOS JR scores were markedly lower in the HBC group. However, there was no notable difference in HOOS JR scores, change in HOOS JR scores, and procedural satisfaction, at any postoperative time point.

CONCLUSIONS

No notable difference was observed in patient-reported outcomes at any time point for SDD after THA performed at an ASC or an HBC when controlling for age and comorbidities. This study suggests noninferiority of stand-alone ASCs for outpatient THA, regarding patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes.

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Chronic Pain after Knee or Hip Replacement in Patients with Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis: An Umbrella Review

Knee and hip osteoarthritis are highly prevalent in the older population. Management of osteoarthritis-related pain includes conservative or surgical treatment. Although knee or hip joint replacement is associated with positive outcomes, up to 30% of patients report postoperative pain in the first two years. This study aimed to synthesize current evidence on prognostic factors for predicting postoperative pain after knee or hip replacement. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to summarize the magnitude and quality of the evidence for prognostic preoperative factors predictive of postoperative chronic pain (>6 months after surgery) in patients who had received knee or hip replacement. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, PEDro, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception up to 5 August 2022 for reviews published in the English language. A narrative synthesis, a risk of bias assessment, and an evaluation of the evidence confidence were performed. Eighteen reviews (nine on knee surgery, four on hip replacement, and seven on both hip/knee replacement) were included. From 44 potential preoperative prognostic factors, just 20 were judged as having high or moderate confidence for robust findings. Race, opioid use, preoperative function, neuropathic pain symptoms, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, other pain sites, fear of movement, social support, preoperative pain, mental health, coping strategies, central sensitization-associated symptoms, and depression had high/moderate confidence for an association with postoperative chronic pain. Some comorbidities such as heart disease, stroke, lung disease, nervous system disorders, and poor circulation had high/moderate confidence for no association with postoperative chronic pain. This review has identified multiple preoperative factors (i.e., sociodemographic, clinical, psychological, cognitive) associated with postoperative chronic pain after knee or hip replacement. These factors may be used for identifying individuals at a risk of developing postoperative chronic pain. Further research can investigate the impact of using such prognostic data on treatment decisions and patient outcomes.

Exploring appropriateness criteria for informing the total knee arthroplasty decision-making process: An interpretive descriptive study

RATIONAL

The Hawker appropriateness criteria for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are: osteoarthritis symptoms impacting quality of life, evidence of osteoarthritis, trial of conservative treatments, patient's realistic expectations, patient/surgeon agree benefits outweigh risks, and readiness for surgery. Little is known about the barriers and facilitators of using the Hawker et al. appropriateness criteria for TKA in clinical practice.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Explore the barriers and facilitators to using appropriateness criteria for TKA in making decisions for adults with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Interpretive descriptive qualitative study at an academic hospital. Purposive sampling aimed to recruit: (1) healthcare team members at all levels influencing care delivery, and (2) adults with TKA assessed at the hospital clinic. Semi-structured interviews asked about the barriers/facilitators to using the Hawker appropriateness criteria. Data analysis consisted of inductive thematic analysis with themes mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains.

RESULTS

Nine healthcare professionals and 14 adults with TKA participated and identified common barriers to using the Hawker appropriateness criteria: (a) intervention characteristics domain: difficulty to assess criteria, patients expecting healthcare professionals to decide, limited accessibility to conservative treatments; (b) individuals characteristics domain: no need to change current TKA process, clinical judgement limited to OA severity/age, implicit assessment of subjective criteria; (c) inner setting domain: TKA information received after decision made; and (d) outer setting domain: no timely access to TKA. A facilitator of use was evidence/buy-in fosters programme changes.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to using the criteria relevant to clinical practice and the healthcare system were identified while only one facilitator was revealed. Interventions tailored to these barriers are needed to support the use of the Hawker appropriateness criteria in TKA decision-making.

When are patients with osteoarthritis referred for surgery?

Current treatment strategies in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involve a combined approach that includes not only modification of risk factors and conservative treatment but also joint-preserving surgical therapy in the early stages, or joint replacement in late OA. With the recent development of new etiological concepts (i.e. hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement as major risk factors for hip OA), treatment alternatives for joint preservation could be extended significantly. Satisfactory results of osteotomies and other reconstructive procedures around hip and knee joints can only be expected in early OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 0-II). If patients with advanced radiographic OA grades III-IV do not respond to conservative treatment over at least 3 months and express a relevant burden of disease, joint replacement might be considered. Prior to surgery, potential contraindications must be excluded, patient expectations need to be discussed, and modifiable risk factors, which may negatively influence the outcome, should be optimized.

Influence of health system and patient characteristics on expectations and outcome in total hip arthroplasty patients in the Dutch-German border region: protocol for a mixed-methods prospective observational comparative study (hip across)

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip. Management of THA differs between countries, and it is hypothesised that this can influence patients' expectations and self-efficacy. Using Chen's intervening mechanism evaluation approach, this study aims to explore how structure of care influences expectations and self-efficacy of patients undergoing THA, and how expectations and self-efficacy in turn influence outcome in terms of perceived physical function and satisfaction.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed-methods study will be conducted in two German and two Dutch hospitals near the Dutch-German border. In the quantitative part, patients will complete questionnaires at three timepoints: preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Data analysis will include multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. In the qualitative part, interviews will be held with patients (preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively) and healthcare providers. Analysis will be performed using structured qualitative content analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg (2021-167) and University Medical Center Groningen (METc 2021/562 and METc 2021/601). The results will be disseminated in the international scientific community via publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS: DRKS00026744).

Function and employment after total hip replacement in older adults: A narrative review

The burden of osteoarthritis (OA) has increased steadily due to an aging population, increasing life expectancy, obesity and lifestyle factors. Total hip replacement has become one of the most prevalent and successful operations globally and it is projected that demand will continue to grow as the incidence of OA continues to increase. Patients undergoing the operation expect much-improved function and pain relief but also increasingly need to return to work postoperatively, especially given the growing demand for the procedure and the encouragement of older people to continue working by most governments in the developed world. This review provides an overview of function and employment outcomes after hip arthroplasty. Despite the generally good success rate, some patients do not attain good functional outcomes and it is important that we develop ways to identify these patients preoperatively. We describe the effect of demographic, clinical and other factors on functional outcomes, as well as trajectories of physical function and pain recovery beyond the first few weeks after total hip replacement. Regarding employment outcomes, many people in work preoperatively are likely to resume to work after recovery; however, patients feel that they lack guidance from clinicians about returning to work postoperatively. Our review encompasses factors associated with return to work, timing of return to work, and potential temporary or permanent limitations that people might experience at work depending on type of employment.

Recovery and the use of postoperative physical therapy after total hip or knee replacement

Background

Total hip or knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA) show favorable long-term effects, yet the recovery process may take weeks to months. Physical therapy (PT) following discharge from hospital is an effective intervention to enhance this recovery process. To investigate the relation between recovery and postoperative PT usage, including the presence of comorbidities, 6 months after THA/TKA.

Methods

Multicenter, observational study in primary THA/TKA patients who completed preoperative and 6 months postoperative assessments. The assessments included questions on PT use (yes/no and duration; long term use defined as ≥ 12 weeks), comorbidities (musculoskeletal, non-musculoskeletal, sensory comorbidities and frequency of comorbidities). Recovery was assessed with the HOOS/KOOS on all 5 subdomains. Logistic regression with long term PT as outcome was performed adjusted for confounding including an interaction term (comorbidity*HOOS/KOOS-subdomain).

Results

In total, 1289 THA and 1333 TKA patients were included, of whom 95% received postoperative PT, 56% and 67% received postoperative PT ≥ 12 weeks respectively. In both THA and TKA group, less improvement on all HOOS/KOOS domain scores was associated with ≥ 12 weeks of postoperative PT (range Odds Ratios 0.97–0.99). In the THA group the impact of recovery was smaller in patient with comorbidities as non- musculoskeletal comorbidities modified all associations between recovery and postoperative PT duration (Odds Ratios range 1.01–1.05). Musculoskeletal comorbidities modified the associations between Function-in-Daily-Living-and Sport-and-recreation recovery and postoperative PT. Sensory comorbidities only had an effect on Sport-and-recreation recovery and postoperative PT. Also the frequency of comorbidities modified the relation between Function-in-Daily-Living, pain and symptoms recovery and postoperative PT. In the TKA group comorbidity did not modify the associations.

Conclusion

Worse recovery was associated with longer duration of postoperative PT suggesting that PT provision is in line with patients’ needs. The impact of physical recovery on the use of long-term postoperative PT was smaller in THA patients with comorbidities.

Trial registration

Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry on March 13, 2012. TRIAL ID NTR3348; registration number: P12.047. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3197.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05429-z.

Patient-reported outcome of 95% of young patients improves after primary total hip arthroplasty: identification of 3 recovery trajectories in 3,207 patients younger than 55 years from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little is known about the outcome after receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA), specifically in young patients. We identified different recovery trajectories in young patients using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). We also explored whether risk factors commonly associated with functional outcome were associated with recovery trajectory.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used HOOS-PS score data up to 1 year postoperatively from the LROI from all patients younger than 55 years who received a primary THA between 2014 and 2019. To investigate whether different recovery trajectories could be distinguished, we performed latent class growth analysis (LCGA). Subsequently, we used multinomial logistic regression analyses to explore factors associated with class membership.

RESULTS

3,207 patients were included. LCGA identified 3 groups of patients: optimal responders (75%), good responders (21%), and poor responders (4.7%). Female sex (RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1-1.1), ASA II (RR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.1), ASA III-IV (RR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.2), smoking (RR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.1), cemented fixation (RR 1.2; CI 1.1-1.2), and a 22-28 mm head diameter (RR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.2) were associated with "good responder" class membership. ASA II (RR 1.1; 1.0-1.2), ASA III-IV (RR 1.2; 1.1-1.3), smoking (RR 1.2; CI 1.1-1.2), and hybrid fixation (RR 1.2; CI 1.0-1.2) were associated with "poor responder" class membership.

INTERPRETATION

3 recovery trajectories could be identified. Female sex, higher ASA classifications, smoking, cemented or hybrid fixation, and small head diameter were associated with a suboptimal result after primary THA in young patients. These findings can aid in the process to determine which patients are at risk of a suboptimal outcome.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Total Hip Replacement for Osteoarthritis–Evidence-Based and Patient-Oriented Indications

BACKGROUND

Total Hip Replacement (THR) belongs to the most common inpatient operations in Germany, with over 240 000 procedures performed per year. 90% of the artificial joints are still functional at 15 years, and up to 60% at 20 years after surgery. It is essential that the indications for such procedures should be uniform, appropriate, and patient-oriented.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a systematic literature search for national and international guidelines and systematic reviews on the topic of hip osteoarthritis and THR.

RESULTS

THR should be performed solely with radiologically demonstrated advanced osteoarthritis of the hip (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3 or 4), after at least three months of conservative treatment, and in the presence of high subjective distress due to symptoms arising from the affected hip joint. Contraindications include refractory infection, acute or chronic accompanying illnesses, and BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Patients should stop smoking at least one month before surgery. In patients with diabetes mellitus, preoperative glycemic control to an HbA1c value below 8% is advisable. It is recommended that patients should lower their weight below a BMI of 30 kg/m2.

CONCLUSION

The decision to perform THR should be taken together by both the physician and the patient when the expected treatment benefit outweighs the risks. Evidence suggests that a worse preoperative condition is associated with a poorer surgical outcome.

Is the Preoperative Use of Antidepressants and Benzodiazepines Associated with Opioid and Other Analgesic Use After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Mental health disorders can occur in patients with pain conditions, and there have been reports of an increased risk of persistent pain after THA and TKA among patients who have psychological distress. Persistent pain may result in the prolonged consumption of opioids and other analgesics, which may expose patients to adverse drug events and narcotic habituation or addiction. However, the degree to which preoperative use of antidepressants or benzodiazepines is associated with prolonged analgesic use after surgery is not well quantified.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

(1) Is the preoperative use of antidepressants or benzodiazepine medications associated with a greater postoperative use of opioids, NSAIDs, or acetaminophen? (2) Is the proportion of patients still using opioid analgesics 1 year after arthroplasty higher among patients who were taking antidepressants or benzodiazepine medications before surgery, after controlling for relevant confounding variables? (3) Does analgesic drug use decrease after surgery in patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use? (4) Does the proportion of patients using antidepressants or benzodiazepines change after joint arthroplasty compared with before?

METHODS

Of the 10,138 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and the 9930 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty at Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland, between 2002 and 2013, those who had primary joint arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis (64% [6502 of 10,138] of patients with hip surgery and 82% [8099 of 9930] who had knee surgery) were considered potentially eligible. After exclusion of another 8% (845 of 10,138) and 13% (1308 of 9930) of patients because they had revision or another joint arthroplasty within 2 years of the index surgery, 56% (5657 of 10,138) of patients with hip arthroplasty and 68% (6791 of 9930) of patients with knee arthroplasty were included in this retrospective registry study. Patients who filled prescriptions for antidepressants or benzodiazepines were identified from a nationwide drug prescription register, and information on the filled prescriptions for opioids (mild and strong), NSAIDs, and acetaminophen were extracted from the same database. For the analyses, subgroups were created according to the status of benzodiazepine and antidepressant use during the 6 months before surgery. First, the proportions of patients who used opioids and any analgesics (that is, opioids, NSAIDs, or acetaminophen) were calculated. Then, multivariable logistic regression adjusted with age, gender, joint, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, laterality (unilateral/same-day bilateral), and preoperative analgesic use was performed to calculate odds ratios for any analgesic use and opioid use 1 year postoperatively. Additionally, the proportion of patients who used antidepressants and benzodiazepines was calculated for 2 years before and 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use were more likely to fill prescriptions for any analgesics than were patients without a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use (adjusted odds ratios 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.2]; p < 0.001 and 1.8 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.0]; p < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use were more likely to fill prescriptions for opioids than patients without a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use (adjusted ORs 2.1 [95% CI 1.7 to 2.7]; p < 0.001 and 2.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.4]; p < 0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who filled any analgesic prescription was smaller 1 year after surgery than preoperatively in patients with a history of antidepressant (42% [439 of 1038] versus 55% [568 of 1038]; p < 0.001) and/or benzodiazepine use (40% [801 of 2008] versus 55% [1098 of 2008]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who used antidepressants and/or benzodiazepines was essentially stable during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of prolonged opioid and other analgesic use after surgery among patients who were on preoperative antidepressant and/or benzodiazepine therapy, and they should have candid discussions with patients referred for elective joint arthroplasty about this possibility. Further studies are needed to identify the most effective methods to reduce prolonged postoperative opioid use among these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Uniform criteria for total hip replacement surgery in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a decision tool to guide treatment decisions

Background

Uniform criteria for performing hip replacement surgery in hip osteoarthritis patients are currently lacking. As a result, variation in surgery and inappropriateness of care may occur. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based decision tool to support the decision-making process for hip replacement surgery.

Methods

Patients with a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis were included. Consensus rounds with orthopedic surgeons were organized to blindly reassess medical files and to decide whether surgery is indicated or not, based on all available pre-treatment information. We compared the outcomes obtained from the blind reassessment by the consensus group with the actual treatment. Furthermore, prediction models were fitted on the reassessment outcome to identify which set of clinical parameters would be most predictive and uniformly shared in the decision to operate.

Two prediction models were fitted, one model without radiologic outcomes and one model where radiologic outcomes were included.

Results

In total, 364 medical files of osteoarthritis patients were included and reassessed in the analyses. Key predictors in the prediction model without radiology were age, flexion, internal rotation and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–quality of life. The discriminative power was high (Area Under Receiver Operating Curve (AUC) = 0.86). Key predictors in the prediction model with radiology were age, internal rotation and Kellgren and Lawrence severity score (AUC = 0.94).

Conclusion

The study yielded a decision tool with uniform criteria for hip replacement surgery in osteoarthritis patients. The tool will guide the clinical decision-making process of physicians on whether to perform hip surgery and should be used together with information about patient preferences and social context.

Are patient-reported outcomes the same following second-side surgery in primary hip and knee arthroplasty?

Aims

Up to one in five patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) require contralateral surgery. This is frequently performed as a staged procedure. This study aimed to determine if outcomes, as determined by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Knee Score (OKS) differed following second-side surgery.

Methods

Over a five-year period all patients who underwent staged bilateral primary THA or TKA utilizing the same type of implants were studied. Eligible patients had both preoperative and one year Oxford scores and had their second procedure completed within a mean (2 SDs) of the primary surgery. Patient demographics, radiographs, and OHS and OKS were analyzed.

Results

A total of 236 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 122 were THAs and 114 TKAs. The mean age was 66.5 years (SD 9.4), with a 2:1 female:male ratio. THAs showed similar significant improvements in outcomes following first- and second-side surgery, regardless of sex. In contrast for TKAs, although male patients demonstrated the same pattern as the THAs, female TKAs displayed significantly less improvement in both OKS and its pain component following second-side surgery.

Conclusion

Female patients undergoing second-side TKA showed less improvement in Oxford and pain scores compared to the first-side. This difference in outcome following second-side surgery did not apply to male patients undergoing TKA, or to either sex undergoing THA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(4):243–254.

[Decision for total hip arthroplasty-the surgeons' view]

BACKGROUND

The decision for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is based on pain, loss of function, radiological changes and failed conservative therapy. These criteria are rarely based on systematic research and have not been integrated in generally accepted treatment guidelines. Aim of our study was, therefore, to analyse which decision criteria German orthopaedic and trauma surgeons use in order to recommend THA for patients with hip osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 10/2019 to 07/2020 we conducted a nation-wide survey among 218 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons about their criteria for and against THA surgery, as well as their treatment objectives.

RESULTS

147 fully completed questionnaires were analysed. Pain (99%), limitation of movement (99%), as well as impairment of walking distance (97%), and the subjective burden (97%) were the most frequent criteria. 97% and 96% of surgeons consider prescription of analgesics and physical therapy, as well as a lack of their effectiveness, as criteria for THA. 87% see radiological changes grade Kellgren & Lawrence III as threshold. A recommendation against surgery is triggered by obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) in 48% and by the presence of an active infection in 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

Current surgeons' practice criteria of recommendations for THA in Germany seem to reflect widely nationally and internationally discussed recommendations. Particular attention is given to patient factors like pain, loss of function and subjective burden, as well as previous conservative treatment and contraindications, like poorly controlled diabetes or an active infection, whereas morbid obesity is not seen as contraindication by all surgeons.

Symptomatic leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty is associated with new onset of lower back pain

BACKGROUND

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is common after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a plethora of clinical consequences. The associations between symptomatic (sLLD; disturbing perception of anatomical leg length discrepancy), anatomical (aLLD; side difference in leg length between the center of rotation of the hip and the center of the ankle joint) and intraarticular (iLLD; side difference between the tear drop figure and the most prominent point of the trochanter minor) LLD and lower back have not yet been reported in the literature. We performed a retrospective study to answer if postoperative (1) symptomatic LLD, (2) anatomic LLD, and (3) a change in intraarticular leg length are associated with lower back pain in patients undergoing THA. Further, we aimed to answer (4) whether symptomatic LLD is associated with the magnitude of anatomical LLD and the change in intraarticular leg length.

HYPOTHESIS

LLD after THA is associated with lower back pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of aLLD and iLLD using EOS™ and X-rays, and were interviewed for the presence of sLLD and lower back pain using a questionnaire 5 years after primary THA.

RESULTS

Postoperative new onset of lower back pain was reported by 9 (11%) patients. Twenty (25%) patients reported sLLD. Anatomical LLD>5mm was present in 44 (56%) (median 8.0 (IQR -3.0 to 12.0; range -22 to 22) mm) and>10mm in 17 (22%) (median 12.0 (IQR 11.0 to 16.5; range -22 to 22) mm) patients. iLLD changed>5mm in 44 (56%) (median 8.5 (IQR 7.0 to 10.0; range -8 to 18) mm) and>10mm in 10 (13%) (median 14.0 (IQR 12.5 to 14.5; range 11 to 18) mm). New onset lower back pain was associated with sLLD (p=0.002) but not with aLLD or iLLD. Patients without preoperative lower back pain had a statistically significant association between presence of sLLD and an aLLD of >10mm (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic LLD after primary THA is associated with postoperative new onset of lower back pain irrespective of the magnitude of LLD. In patients without lower back pain prior to THA, symptomatic LLD is associated with anatomical LLD of more than 10mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Self-efficacy as a prognostic factor and treatment moderator in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients attending pain management programmes: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Evidence on the effectiveness of pain management programmes (PMPs) for chronic pain patients is mixed. Self-efficacy may be associated with outcome of PMPs. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the role of self-efficacy as a (i) prognostic factor and (ii) moderator of treatment, in chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) patients attending a PMP.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature and qualitative synthesis was carried out. Six electronic databases were searched (1989-2020). Studies that measured pain self-efficacy as a prognostic factor or treatment moderator in patients with CMP, who participated in a multidisciplinary PMP were included. Study quality was appraised using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Six studies investigating self-efficacy as a prognostic factor were included with a total of 1881 participants. No studies were found assessing self-efficacy as a treatment moderator. Self-efficacy was a prognostic factor for physical functioning in two studies. There was weak evidence for self-efficacy as a prognostic factor for disability, health-related quality of life and pain outcomes and no evidence for psychological variables, disease severity and tender point index following PMPs. Quality of evidence was very low using the GRADE system for each outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

Baseline self-efficacy may play a role in physical function outcomes in CMP patients attending a PMP. Higher quality evidence is needed to determine the influence of self-efficacy on outcomes in this setting.

Preoperative medications is one of the factor affecting patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty

Although the reported clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip osteoarthritis are satisfactory, not all patients are completely satisfied. Thus, there is interest in predicting postoperative satisfaction before surgery. The influence of comorbidities and preoperative medications on the incidence of complications and duration of hospitalization following THA has become apparent. However, studies about the associations of preoperative medication with clinical outcomes of THA are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between preoperative medications and postoperative patient-reported outcomes. This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study enrolled post-THA patients (79 patients, 90 hips) who were examined from February to March 2019 in eight general hospitals. Outcome measures included patient-reported outcome as Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) score. Preoperative medications were investigated from medical records. Medications were categorized, and analgesics were categorized into non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, pregabalin, duloxetine, neurotropin (an extract from inflammatory rabbit skin inoculated by vaccinia virus), and opioid. To identify the factors associated with JHEQ score, the patients were divided into lower (<55 score) and higher (≥55) JHEQ score groups. Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) showed significant difference between the total number of preoperative medications and postoperative JHEQ movement subscale (r = -0.37, p < 0.01), mental subscale (r = -0.29, p < 0.01), and JHEQ (r = -0.30, p < 0.01) scores. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, only the total number of preoperative medications was identified as a risk factor for lower JHEQ score (p < 0.01). This study clarified an inverse correlation between the total preoperative medication count and postoperative outcomes and found that larger total count of preoperative medications is a risk factor of poor postoperative patient-reported outcomes of THA.

Sex-Modified Effects of Depression, Low Back Pain, and Comorbidities on Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The influence of sex on post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes has been variable in the literature. Though sex is often reported as an averaged effect, we undertook this study to investigate whether sex modified the influence of presurgery characteristics on post-TKA knee pain.

METHODS

This was a prospective study with data derived from 477 TKA osteoarthritis patients (279 women, 198 men). Questionnaires were completed presurgery and at 3 months postsurgery. The association between 3-month post-TKA knee pain and presurgery covariates (body mass index, comorbidity count, symptomatic joint count, low back pain, knee pain, and depressive symptoms) was assessed by linear regression. Sex-specific effects were evaluated using interactions.

RESULTS

Women had significantly worse presurgery knee pain, joint count, and depressive symptoms, and worse postsurgery knee pain, than men. With simple covariate adjustment, no sex effect on pain was found. However, sex was found to moderate the effects of comorbidities (worse for women [P = 0.013]), presence of low back pain (worse for men [P = 0.003]), and depressive symptoms (worse for men [P < 0.001]) on postsurgery pain. Worse presurgery pain was associated with worse postsurgery pain similarly for women and men.

CONCLUSION

The influence of some patient factors on early post-TKA pain cannot be assumed to be the same for women and men; average effects may mask underlying associations. Results suggest a need to consider sex differences in understanding TKA outcomes, which may have important implications for prognostic tool development in TKA.

Predictors of the use of analgesic drugs 1 year after joint replacement: a single-center analysis of 13,000 hip and knee replacements

Background

Pain persists in a moderate number of patients following hip or knee replacement surgery. Persistent pain may subsequently lead to the prolonged consumption of analgesics after surgery and expose patients to the adverse drug events of opioids and NSAIDs, especially in older patients and patients with comorbidities. This study aimed to identify risk factors for the increased use of opioids and other analgesics 1 year after surgery and focused on comorbidities and surgery-related factors.

Methods

All patients who underwent a primary hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis from 2002 to 2013 were identified. Redeemed prescriptions for acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids (mild and strong) were collected from a nationwide Drug Prescription Register. The user rates of analgesics and the adjusted risks ratios for analgesic use 1 year after joint replacement were calculated.

Results

Of the 6238 hip replacement and 7501 knee replacement recipients, 3591 (26.1%) were still using analgesics 1 year after surgery. Significant predictors of overall analgesic use (acetaminophen, NSAID, or opioid) were (risk ratio (95% CI)) age 65–74.9 years (reference < 65), 1.1 (1.03–1.2); age > 75 years, 1.2 (1.1–1.3); female gender, 1.2 (1.1–1.3); BMI 30–34.9 kg/m² (reference < 25 kg/m²), 1.1 (1.04–1.2); BMI > 35 kg/m², 1.4 (1.3–1.6); and a higher number of comorbidities (according to the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score), 1.2 (1.1–1.4). Diabetes and other comorbidities were not significant independent predictors. Of the other clinical factors, the preoperative use of analgesics, 2.6 (2.5–2.8), and knee surgery, 1.2 (1.1–1.3), predicted the use of analgesics, whereas simultaneous bilateral knee replacement (compared to unilateral procedure) was a protective factor, 0.86 (0.77–0.96). Opioid use was associated with obesity, higher CCI score, epilepsy, knee vs hip surgery, unilateral vs bilateral knee operation, total vs unicompartmental knee replacement, and the preoperative use of analgesics/opioids.

Conclusions

Obesity (especially BMI > 35 kg/m²) and the preoperative use of analgesics were the strongest predictors of an increased postoperative use of analgesics. It is remarkable that also older age and higher number of comorbidities predicted analgesic use despite these patients being the most vulnerable to adverse drug events.

Fast Starters, Slow Starters, and Late Dippers: Trajectories of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results from a Dutch Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore whether subgroups of patients with different functional recovery trajectories after total hip arthroplasty can be discerned, as well as their predictors, using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten [LROI]).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) up to 1 year postoperatively for patients who had undergone a primary total hip arthroplasty. Latent class growth modeling was used to classify subgroups of patients according to the trajectory of functional recovery represented by the patients' OHS. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with class membership.

RESULTS

A total of 6,030 patients were analyzed. Latent class growth modeling identified fast starters (fast initial improvement, high 12-month scores; 87.7%), slow starters (no initial change and subsequent improvement; 4.6%), and late dippers (initial improvement and subsequent deterioration; 7.7%). Factors associated with slow starters were female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14 to 2.33]) and smoking (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.26 to 3.03]); an anterior approach (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.78]) had a protective effect against a less favorable response. Factors associated with late dippers were age of >75 years (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.15]), smoking (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.42]), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of III or IV (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.91]), obesity (OR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.69]), poorer EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.82] for "some problems" and OR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.39 to 6.03] for "unable"), poorer EQ-5D Anxiety/Depression (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.71] for "moderately" and OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.06 to 3.24] for "extremely"), poorer EQ-5D visual analog scale (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.97] per 10 points), direct lateral approach (OR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.58 to 3.02]), and hybrid fixation with a cemented acetabular implant (OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.00 to 3.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

We discerned fast starters, slow starters, and late dippers after total hip arthroplasty. Female sex, older age, obesity, higher ASA grades, and worse EQ-5D scores were associated with a less favorable response to total hip arthroplasty, as well as hybrid fixation (cemented acetabular implant) and direct lateral approach. Anterior approach had a protective effect against a less favorable response. However, all subgroups experienced functional improvement following total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessment of functional recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty: An observational study of 95 patients

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients experience functional limitations following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate prospectively the patient-reported and objectively assessed functional recovery following THA and TKA.

METHODS

Patients were recruited at a regional Danish hospital, using a prospective, observational hypothesis-generating cohort design. Primary outcome measures were performance-based function (30-s chair-stand test) and self-reported physical function measured by the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) for those who had undergone THA, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for those who had undergone TKA. In addition, patient expectations, the "forgotten joint" scale and pain catastrophizing were measured. Outcome measures were collected at baseline (preoperatively) and at follow-up (4 months postoperatively).

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients (59 who had undergone THA and 36 who had undergone TKA) were recruited. Performance-based function improved only slightly, with a mean difference of 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 4.0) for THAs and 1.6 (95% CI 0.4, 2.8) for TKAs. Self-reported physical function improved significantly, with a mean difference of 37.9 (95% CI 31.5, 44.3) for THAs and 28.6 (95% CI 22.7, 34.4) for TKAs. However, dividing the cohort into "improved" and "non-improved" groups based on changes in performance-based function, no clinically relevant predictors for poor performance-based outcome could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported outcome measures improved significantly following THA and TKA, whereas performance-based function improved only slightly by the 4-month follow-up. The subgroup that did not improve in performance-based function still reported significant improvements in self-reported outcome measures, demonstrating the difficulty in predicting optimal rehabilitation strategies after THA and TKA.

Age-Related Decline in Patient-Reported Outcomes 2 and 5 Years Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) help assess therapeutic effectiveness. This study assessed the effect of advanced age on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients underwent primary THA at our institution between May 2007 and December 2011. Exposure was age at the time of surgery and outcomes were HOOS and LEAS scores 2 and 5 years postsurgery. We used a multivariable longitudinal generalized estimating equation to elucidate the effect of age on PROM scores.

RESULTS

Our analysis of 3700 THA patients (mean age, 66 years; 56.4% female) demonstrated a decline in scores by age for the LEAS, HOOS Activities of Daily Living, and HOOS Sport and Recreation domains. There was also association between age and HOOS Symptoms and HOOS Quality of Life domains, but not between age and the HOOS Pain domain. Critical ages at which the relationship between age and outcome changed was 63 years for the HOOS Pain, Symptom, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life domains, and 72 years for the HOOS Sport and Recreation domain and the LEAS.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA at older ages reported lower activity and sports and recreation scores than younger patients, but similar pain, symptoms, and quality of life scores. This knowledge can help physicians guide patients' expectations before THA. Our findings also indicate that PROM scores should be age adjusted when used for quality or value comparisons between hospitals or physicians.

Patient education in physiotherapy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) - The perspective of physiotherapists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is limited knowledge about patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions of patient education in physiotherapy in hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to describe physiotherapists' conceptions of the patient education in physiotherapy needed by patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The data for this qualitative study were collected using group and individual semi-structured interviews. Seven physiotherapists were interviewed. The research data were analyzed using a phenomenographic method.

RESULTS

Three categories of patient education in physiotherapy in hip arthroplasty were produced and the categories formed a hierarchy. The narrowest descriptive category was Schematic physiotherapy complying with the protocol. Identifying individual rehabilitation needs was the second category, and the third, widest category was Coaching home rehabilitation. The differences between the categories were described in four themes: 1) Moving; 2) Exercising; 3) Interaction in relation to patient; and 4) Health care system.

CONCLUSION

According to the results, patient education in physiotherapy optimally aims to identify patients' individual rehabilitation needs, advice on coping at home and especially helping patients to be prepared for and capable of long rehabilitation for which they are themselves responsible. These findings resulting from descriptive categories can be utilized in developing education methods and physiotherapists' competence in patient education.

Early Clinically Relevant Improvement in Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes 1 Year Postsurgery in Patients with Knee and Hip Joint Arthroplasties

Objective To measure and identify the determinants of the outcomes after hip/knee arthroplasty (HA/KA) in patients with osteoarthritis during the first postsurgical year. Design In this prospective observational study, we evaluated the preoperative and postoperative (3, 6, and 12 months) outcomes of 626 patients who underwent HA (346 with median age 65 years, 59% female) or KA (280 with median age 66.5 years, 54% female) between 2008 and 2013. Generic and specific tools were used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and utility. Good outcome was defined as an improvement in WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) greater than or equal to the minimal important difference (MID). Regressions were performed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative measures and evolution of WOMAC/good outcome. Results We observed an almost systematic improvement of all parameters for up to 12 months, but especially at the 3-month follow-up. The low number of comorbidities and the absence of postoperative complications were the common determinants of improvement of WOMAC total score after 12 months. Other parameters (background of the joint, preoperative function and length of hospital stay in KA group; place of discharge in HA group) affected the evolution of WOMAC scores. 87.09% of HA and 73.06% of KA patients experienced a good outcome. A small number of comorbidities, a worse preoperative function, a shortened hospital stay (KA only), and an absence of early postoperative complications (HA only) significantly predicted a good outcome. Conclusions Intermediate HRQoL following HA or KA improved quickly from preoperative levels for all instruments. More than 70% of patients achieved a good outcome defined as improved pain, stiffness and disability and the predictors are slightly close.

The first 6 weeks of recovery after primary total hip arthroplasty with fast track

Background and purpose - Fast-track protocols have been introduced worldwide to improve the recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). These protocols have reduced the length of hospital stay (LOS), and THA in an outpatient setting is also feasible. However, less is known regarding the first weeks after THA with fast track. We examined patients' experiences of the first 6 weeks after hospital discharge following inpatient and outpatient THA with fast track. Patients and methods - In a prospective cohort study, 100 consecutive patients who underwent THA surgery in a fast-track setting between February 2015 and October 2015 received a diary for 6 weeks. This diary contained various internationally validated questionnaires including HOOS-PS, OHS, EQ-5D, SF-12, and ICOAP. In addition, there were general questions regarding pain, the wound, physiotherapy, and thrombosis prophylaxis injections. Results - 94 patients completed the diary, 42 of whom were operated in an outpatient setting. Pain and use of pain medication had gradually decreased during the 6 weeks. Function and quality of life gradually improved. After 6 weeks, 91% of all patients reported better functioning and less pain than preoperatively. Interpretation - Fast track improves early functional outcome, and the PROMs reported during the first 6 weeks in this study showed continued improvement. They can be used as a baseline for future studies. The PROMs reported could also serve as a guide for staff and patients alike to modify expectations and therefore possibly improve patient satisfaction.