C5/C6 brachial plexus palsy reconstruction using nerve surgery: long-term functional outcomes

Neurotization of the axillary nerve using a motor branch of the triceps brachii: Outcomes after a 3-to-15-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Axillary nerve neurotization using a motor branch of the triceps brachii has become a therapeutic option in the management of deltoid paralysis. The purpose of this study was to report the medium to long-term outcomes of this procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with a median age of 31 years (interquartile range - IQR, 29-53) were included in a single-operator retrospective study. A clinical evaluation was conducted, including the assessment of deltoid muscle strength using the British Medical Research Council grading system and a dynamometer with comparisons made between preoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 6 years (IQR, 5-11). At last follow-up, the median active abduction was 160° (IQR 60-160), and 85% of patients recovered at least M3 abduction force. No donor site deficits were identified.

DISCUSSION

The medium to long-term outcomes of the neurotization of a triceps brachii motor branch on the axillary nerve are comparable to the short-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Repair methods in peripheral nerves after traumatic injuries: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

To identify and describe the most used surgical repair methods for traumatic injuries to peripheral nerves, as well as highlight the causes of trauma to peripheral nerves and the most prevalent traumatized nerves.

METHODS

This is a systematic literature review using the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The searches were carried out in PubMED, in the time window from January 2018 to December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 3,687 articles were collected, of which, after applying the inclusion and exclusion filters and analyzing the risk of bias, 34 articles remained. It was observed that the age of the injury and type of nerve repair strongly influence the recovery of patients. The most identified trauma repair procedures were neurolysis, direct suturing, grafting, and nerve transfer. Among these four procedures, direct suturing is currently preferred.

CONCLUSION

Several repair methods can be used in peripheral nerve injuries, with emphasis on direct suturing. However, nerve transfer proves to be a differential in those cases in which repair is delayed or the first treatment options have failed, which shows that each method will be used according to the indication for each case.

Morbidity of long head of the triceps motor branch neurotization to the axillary nerve: Retrospective subjective and objective assessment of triceps brachii strength after transfer

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity is considered to be negligible in Leechavengvongs transfer (LT) of the long head of the triceps onto the axillary nerve, but the assessment methods used may lack reproducibility. We assessed triceps strength after LT objectively by the isokinetic technique, addressing the following questions: Is strength lowered after LT compared to the healthy limb? And 2) is there a good correlation between isokinetic dynamometry and subjective assessment?

HYPOTHESIS

Isokinetic measurement shows a decrease in triceps strength at peak torque after LT compared to the healthy limb, and this morbidity is underestimated on subjective assessment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing LT for axillary nerve trunk palsy between 2008 and 2020, with M5 triceps preoperatively on the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale. Twenty patients, with a mean age of 25±9years (range, 15-48years) were assessed at a mean 58±47months (range, 6-174months). Elbow extension strength was assessed on a standardized questionnaire, BMRC isometric test and isokinetic test on an angular course of 90° at 60°/sec and 180°/sec concentrically and 30°/sec excentrically.

RESULTS

Strength at 60°/sec and 180°/sec concentrically and 30°/sec excentrically was significantly lower than in the healthy limb: respectively, -17Nm, -15Nm, and -16Nm, (p<0.001) for a mean -23%. Loss of strength was mainly severe on isokinetic testing and mild on isometric testing. Seven patients reported contracture (35%), 12 fatigue (60%), and 3 weakness (15%). Satisfaction with extension strength was excellent or good for respectively 12 (60%) and 8 patients (40%). Triceps strength was graded BMRC M4 in 9 triceps (11%) and M5 in 11 (55%).

DISCUSSION

After LT, isokinetic measurement found generally severe loss of triceps strength, but without subjective impact on everyday life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Ballistic peripheral nerve injuries: basic concepts, controversies, and proposal for a management strategy

Ballistic injuries to peripheral nerves are devastating injuries frequently encountered in modern conflicts and civilian trauma centers. Such injuries often produce lifelong morbidity, mainly in the form of function loss and chronic pain. However, their surgical management still poses significant challenges concerning indication, timing, and type of repair, particularly when they are part of high-energy multi-tissue injuries. To help trauma surgeons, this article first presents basic ballistic concepts explaining different types of missile nerve lesions, described using the Sunderland classification, as well as their usual associated injuries. Current controversies regarding their surgical management are then described, including nerve exploration timing and neurolysis's relevance as a treatment option. Finally, based on anecdotal evidence and a literature review, a standardized management strategy for ballistic nerve injuries is proposed. This article emphasizes the importance of early nerve exploration and provides a detailed method for making a diagnosis in both acute and sub-acute periods. Direct suturing with joint flexion is strongly recommended for sciatic nerve defects and any nerve defect of limited size. Conversely, large defects require conventional nerve grafting, and proximal injuries may require nerve transfers, especially at the brachial plexus level. Additionally, combined or early secondary tendon transfers are helpful in certain injuries. Finally, ideal timing for nerve repair is proposed, based on the defect length, associated injuries, and risk of infection, which correlate intimately to the projectile velocity.

Possible donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstruction in dual neurotization for restoring shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Restoring shoulder abduction is one of the main priorities in the surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Double nerve transfer to the axillary nerve and suprascapular nerve is widely used and considered the best option. The most common donor nerve for the suprascapular nerve is the spinal accessory nerve. However, donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstructions vary and it is still unclear which donor nerve has the best outcome. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on reconstructions of suprascapular and axillary nerves and to perform a meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of different donor nerves on axillary nerve reconstructions. We conducted a systematic search of English literature from March 2001 to December 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Two outcomes were assessed, abduction strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-two studies describing the use of donor nerves met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Donor nerves investigated included the radial nerve, intercostal nerves, medial pectoral nerve, ulnar nerve fascicle, median nerve fascicle and the lower subscapular nerve. Fifteen studies that investigated the radial and intercostal nerves met the inclusion criteria for a meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between either of these nerves in the abduction strength according to MRC score (radial nerve 3.66 ± 1.02 vs intercostal nerves 3.48 ± 0.64, p = 0.086). However, the difference in ROM was statistically significant (radial nerve 106.33 ± 39.01 vs. intercostal nerve 80.42 ± 24.9, p < 0.001). Our findings support using a branch of the radial nerve for the triceps muscle as a donor for axillary nerve reconstruction when possible. Intercostal nerves can be used in cases of total brachial plexus injury or involvement of the C7 root or posterior fascicle. Other promising methods need to be studied more thoroughly in order to validate and compare their results with the more commonly used methods.

The 2020 Yearbook of Neurorestoratology

COVID-19 has been an emerging and rapidly evolving risk to people of the world in 2020. Facing this dangerous situation, many colleagues in Neurorestoratology did their best to avoid infection if themselves and their patients, and continued their work in the research areas described in the 2020 Yearbook of Neurorestoratology. Neurorestorative achievements and progress during 2020 includes recent findings on the pathogenesis of neurological diseases, neurorestorative mechanisms and clinical therapeutic achievements. Therapeutic progress during this year included advances in cell therapies, neurostimulation/neuromodulation, brain-computer interface (BCI), and pharmaceutical neurorestorative therapies, which improved neurological functions and quality of life for patients. Four clinical guidelines or standards of Neurorestoratology were published in 2020. Milestone examples include: 1) a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of olfactory ensheathing cell treatment of chronic stroke showed functional improvements; 2) patients after transhumeral amputation experienced increased sensory acuity and had improved effectiveness in work and other activities of daily life using a prosthesis; 3) a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis used a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCI to achieve accurate and speedy computer input; 4) a patient with complete chronic spinal cord injury recovered both motor function and touch sensation with a BCI and restored ability to detect objects by touch and several sensorimotor functions. We hope these achievements motivate and encourage other scientists and physicians to increase neurorestorative research and its therapeutic applications.