Outcomes of surgical fixation of greater tuberosity fractures: A systematic review

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic reduction and double row-suture bridge for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus

PURPOSE

Currently, there is limited information on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for these fractures, hypothesizing that arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment for large greater tuberosity fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed patients with large greater tuberosity fractures (fracture fragment ≥30 mm in diameter) who underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation and had a follow-up period exceeding 2 years. The anatomic reduction was confirmed by assessing the step-off on radiographs immediately after surgery, and the radiologic union time was recorded. At the final follow-up, range of motion and functional outcome scores were evaluated. Additionally, any surgery-related complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with a mean follow-up of 57.7 ± 23.1 months were included in the study. The mean fracture fragment size was 32.5 ± 2.4 mm, with a mean displacement of 5.1 ± 1.6 mm. Immediately postsurgery, 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) had a fracture step-off of <3 mm, with an average union time of 3 months. At the final follow-up, patients demonstrated excellent outcomes, with an average forward flexion of 167 ± 9.7° and external rotation of 70 ± 16.3. Functional outcome scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001). No major surgery-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures is safe and shows good fracture reduction and excellent clinical outcomes. Therefore, this surgical method can be considered an alternative to open reduction for large greater tuberosity fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Evaluation of a Novel Suture-Button Technique for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Isolated Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity of the Humerus: A Retrospective Study

The purpose of the study is to present a novel technique for the open reduction and fixation of isolated displaced greater tuberosity (GT) fractures, utilizing a suture-button system, along with an evaluation of its efficacy. We conducted a retrospective study, including 18 patients with isolated tuberosity fractures displaced by more than 5 mm. All patients underwent surgical treatment using open reduction and internal fixation with a suture-button system (Zip Tight), reinforced with high-resistance sutures. The "Constant score," the "ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score," and range of motion (ROM) were assessed postoperatively, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Postoperative X-rays were obtained in the anteroposterior (AP) view with the humerus in a neutral position, as well as in internal and external rotation and axial views. The "Constant score," the "ASES score," and ROM increased significantly, reaching their highest levels at the six-month follow-up and remaining stable up to the 12- and 18-month follow-ups. Postoperatively, the mean anterior flexion reached 145° (range: 100°-170°), and the mean abduction was 142° (range: 95°-170°). At 12 months, no patients exhibited significant problems with internal rotation, with the average reaching the T12 level (range: T7 to the posterior iliac crest). External rotation results were also very satisfactory, with a mean range of 75° (range: 60°-90°). Conclusively, this novel technique could provide a safe and effective surgical solution for the treatment of isolated GT fractures, with minimal complications and positive functional and radiological outcomes.

Influence of reestablishing greater tuberosity angle on patient outcomes following greater tuberosity fractures

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess whether higher values of GTA after osteosynthesis of isolated greater tuberosity fractures were associated with worse functional and symptomatic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2012 to 2024, including all patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis at a single institution. GTA measurements before and after osteosynthesis were recorded, along with the latest QuickDash score and constant shoulder score.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were recruited, with 25 undergoing osteosynthesis with cannulated screws and eight with anchors. Twenty-two patients self-administered the QuickDash score and completed the constant shoulder score. The average GTA before surgery was 84.2°, reducing to 62.2° post-surgery. The average constant score was 86.8, and the mean QuickDash score was 7.65. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Additionally, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score (r = - 0.65, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis experience a change in GTA after surgery. However, they achieved satisfactory symptomatic and functional scores post-surgery. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence the GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Furthermore, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score.

Management of greater tuberosity fracture dislocations of the shoulder

Background

Despite extensive literature dedicated to determining the optimal treatment of isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures, there have been few studies to guide the management of GT fracture dislocations. The purpose of this review was to highlight the relevant literature pertaining to all aspects of GT fracture dislocation evaluation and treatment.

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was performed.

Results

During glenohumeral reduction, an iatrogenic humeral neck fracture may occur due to the presence of an occult neck fracture or forceful reduction attempts with inadequate muscle relaxation. Minimally displaced GT fragments after shoulder reduction can be successfully treated nonoperatively, but close follow-up is needed to monitor for secondary displacement of the fracture. Surgery is indicated for fractures with >5 mm displacement to minimize the risk of subacromial impingement and altered rotator cuff biomechanics. Multiple surgical techniques have been described and include both open and arthroscopic approaches. Strategies for repair include the use of transosseous sutures, suture anchors, tension bands, screws, and plates. Good-to-excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes can be achieved with appropriate treatment.

Conclusions

GT fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus represent a separate entity from their isolated fracture counterparts in their evaluation and treatment. The decision to employ a certain strategy should depend on fracture morphology and comminution, bone quality, and displacement.

F, Meisterhans M, Borbas P, Wieser K, Grubhofer F. Anterior shoulder dislocation with avulsion fracture of the greater tuberosity results in reliable good outcomes after closed reduction

Background

Avulsion of the greater tuberosity (GT) due to traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is a commonly observed fracture pattern. After closed reduction of the dislocated humerus, the GT typically reduces itself into its anatomic position enabling the patient to undergo conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review a consecutive series of patients with conservatively treated GT avulsion fractures after closed reduction of an ASD and analyze radiographic outcome, shoulder function and glenohumeral stability and the conversion rate to surgical treatment.

Methods

All patients who underwent closed reduction of a GT avulsion fracture after ASD with the primary intention of conservative treatment between 2017 and 2022 were included. Complications (i.e. conversion to surgical treatment), shoulder function assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and subjective shoulder value, instability assessed with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score, radiological impingement (greater tuberosity index = GTI and impingement index = II) and GT fracture pattern were assessed as outcome measurements.

Results

A total of 29 patients (mean age 44 years, 27% female) with a mean follow-up of 32.6 (range, 8-96) months were enrolled. Seven patients (24%) underwent surgery due to secondary displacement (n = 4, 14%) or impingement symptoms (n = 3, 10%). All patients who underwent secondary surgery showed a multifragmentary fracture pattern of the GT. Shoulder stiffness (n = 7) and neuropraxia of the axillary nerve (n = 3) were observed temporarily and resolved during the follow-up period. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and subjective shoulder value of the conservatively treated patients at the last follow-up was 89.2 ± 19.1 respectively 86 ± 18.2%. No recurrent glenohumeral dislocation was documented. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score at last follow-up was 8(0-71). The mean GTI decreased from 1.2 ± 0.1 after ASD to 1.1 ± 0.1 at the last follow-up (P = .002). The mean II decreased from 0.6 ± 0.5 after ASD to 0.4 ± 0.3 at the last follow-up (P = .110).

Conclusion

The GT avulsion fragment reduces typically into a close to anatomic position after closed reduction and the GTI even improves with further conservative treatment over time. Close radiological follow-up is necessary to rule out secondary displacement which occurs typically in a multifragmentary fracture pattern. Patients without the need for surgery showed good clinical outcomes without recurrence of glenohumeral instability.

Fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE) sequence for shoulder joint in normal dogs

Shoulder disease is a common cause of forelimb lameness in dogs. Determining the precise underlying cause of shoulder lameness can be challenging, especially in veterinary practice. Computerized tomography (CT) is often the preferred imaging modality for bone evaluation; however, it uses ionizing radiation and provides limited soft tissue contrast. Conversely, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent soft tissue contrast but has limitations in bone imaging. This study aimed to introduce a new technical innovation that enhances cortical and trabecular bone contrast on MRI, which we refer to as Fast Field Echo Resembling a CT Using Restricted Echo-Spacing (FRACTURE). In this prospective pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the use of FRACTURE, CT, and conventional MRI sequences in assessing the normal canine shoulder using a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner. Five research beagle dogs were included, and the following pulse sequences were acquired for each dog (1): three-dimensional (3D) FRACTURE, (2) T2-weighted (T2W) images using 3D turbo spin echo (TSE), (3) T1-weighted (T1W) images using 3D TSE, (4) PD-weighted (PDW) images using 3D TSE, and (5) CT. Various parameters, including the delineation of cortical bone (intertubercular groove, greater tubercle, and lesser tubercle), conspicuity of the trabecular bone, shoulder joint visualization, and image quality, were measured for each dog and sequence. In all sequences, the shoulder joint was successfully visualized in all planes with mild motion artifacts. The intertubercular groove was best visualized on CT and FRACTURE. Both the greater and lesser tubercles were easily identified on the CT, FRACTURE, and PDW images. The trabecular pattern scored significantly higher in the CT and FRACTURE images compared to the T1W, T2W, and PDW images. Overall, the visualization of the shoulder joint was excellent in all sequences except for T1W. The use of FRACTURE in combination with conventional MRI sequences holds promise for facilitating not only soft tissue evaluation but also cortical and trabecular bone assessment. The findings from this study in normal dogs can serve as a foundation for further FRACTURE studies in dogs with shoulder diseases.

Fact or fiction: the "5 mm Rule" in greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were 1) to assess the outcome of nonoperative management of GT fractures with > 5 mm of displacement and 2) to assess whether there is a correlation between degree of displacement and outcome.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of consecutive low-energy GT fractures from 2011 to 2020. Radiographs from all visits were reviewed. The direction of maximal displacement was assessed. Subjects were stratified based on the amount of maximal displacement: Group 1: 0-5 mm, Group 2: 5-10 mm, Group 3: > 10 mm. Range of motion (ROM) at the time of final follow-up was assessed. The presence of persistent shoulder pain after healing was noted, as well as whether supplemental subacromial corticosteroid injection was provided as part of long-term treatment.

RESULTS

A cohort of 93 fractures comprised the study group. Mean age was 62 years. Mean follow-up was 20 months. All fractures went on to union. Mean displacement was 6.2 mm. There were 43 patients in Group 1, 43 in Group 2, and 7 in Group 3. Maximal displacement was most commonly inferolateral or lateral, accounting for a combined 77% of all patients. There was no difference in final ROM between displacement groups, with at least 155 degrees of forward elevation and 45 degrees of ER in all three groups. There was no difference between Group 1 and Groups 2/3 in frequency of persistent pain or likelihood of receiving a steroid injection.

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support a discrete 5 mm displacement threshold for surgical repair of isolated greater tuberosity fractures.

Inferior subluxation of humeral head after osteosynthesis for greater tuberosity fracture

Background

Inferior subluxation of the humeral head is frequently observed immediately after surgery for proximal humerus fractures; however, the incidence and risk factors of inferior subluxation after osteosynthesis for isolated greater tuberosity fractures remain unsolved. Additionally, the postoperative course of inferior subluxation has not been elucidated. The purpose of the present study is to identify the predictors for the occurrence of postoperative inferior subluxation by multivariate analysis and investigate the postoperative shift of inferior subluxation and its effect on surgical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 68 patients who underwent surgery for isolated greater tuberosity fractures. The dependent variable was the inferior subluxation at 1 week postoperatively. The explanatory variables were age, sex, affected side of the shoulder, body mass index, history of smoking, local osteoporosis, time period to surgery, axillary nerve injury, inferior subluxation before surgery, fracture dislocation, surgical approach, surgical method, operative time, amount of blood loss, and postoperative drainage. Baseline variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analyses were included in the logistic regression analysis. The patients were further categorized into two groups according to the presence of inferior shoulder subluxation exhibited 1 week postoperatively: patients with inferior subluxation (+ IS group) and patients without inferior subluxation (− IS group). We compared the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

Results

Of 68 patients, 17 (25.0%) had inferior shoulder subluxation observed 1 week postoperatively. Multivariate analysis showed that long operative time was a risk factor for postoperative subluxation (odds ratio = 1.03; P = 0.030). In all cases, inferior subluxation disappeared within 3 months of surgery. No significant difference in complication rate was observed between the + IS and − IS groups.

Conclusions

The present study provides novel information regarding postoperative inferior subluxation of fractures of the greater tuberosity. Inferior subluxation occurred in 25% of patients immediately after surgery. Long operative time contributes to the onset of postoperative inferior subluxation; however, this was temporary in all cases and had no significant effect on the surgical outcomes.

Level of Evidence: Level III.

Open Fixation of Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures Yields Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes to Acute Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair at 2 Years: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fracture fixation versus acute rotator cuff repair (RCR) at a minimum of 2 years.

Methods

Patients who underwent isolated GT fracture fixation were compared in a 1-to-3 fashion with patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR for an acute rotator cuff tear by a single surgeon from January 2006 and to July 2018. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. PROs were compared pre- and postoperatively as well as between groups (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], General Health Short Form-12 Physical Component [SF-12 PCS], Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation [SANE], Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH], and satisfaction). Reoperation rates were analyzed.

Results

A total of 57 patients (14 with isolated GT fracture fixation, mean age 45.7 years; and 43 who underwent ARCR for acute tears, mean age 56.6 years) were evaluated (P = .050). ASES scores significantly improved from 39.7 to 94.1 (P = .018) in the isolated GT fracture fixation group and from 51.0 to 95.2 (P < .001) in acute RCR group. At final follow-up, mean QuickDASH scores were 8.9 and 7.9 (P = .677) and SANE scores were 91.1 and 87.3 (P = .616) for the GT and acute RCR groups, respectively. The median satisfaction was 10/10 for the GT group and 10/10 for the RCR group. Additional comparison of patients who underwent double-row repair for an acute rotator cuff tear or isolated GT fracture revealed no significant difference in outcomes (P > .404).

Conclusion

Minimum 2-year PROs after fixation of isolated GT fractures show relatively high outcome scores whether treated by open reduction and internal fixation or arthroscopic fixation using a double-row bridging technique. The improvements in PROs are similar to those achieved with acute rotator cuff tears that were fixed arthroscopically with RCR. Further analysis of these results suggest that the functional outcomes of tendon-to-bone healing with linked, double-row rotator cuff repairs are similar to those of bone-to-bone healing as seen with GT fractures.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

Fracture Avulsion of the Greater Tuberosity: Arthroscopic Transosseous Augmented Technique

The fracture avulsion of the greater tuberosity (GT) represents 2% of all humerus fractures, but the true incidence is likely to be higher, being challenging the initial diagnosis on radiograph. The fracture avulsion of the GT could have different treatments: nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures are treated conservatively, whereas for displaced or comminuted fractures surgical treatment is preferred. The most important finding of this study is the employment of an all-arthroscopic transosseous augmented technique for the treatment of a displaced humeral GT fracture avulsion. This technique shows all the advantages of the transosseous fixation and arthroscopic approach.