Is pronator quadratus repair necessary to improve outcomes after volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contribution of fracture healing in paediatric DMP zone fracture patients using the pry lever technique

Background

This study describes the efficacy of applying the prying lever technique to distal radial metaphyseal symphysis diaphysis joining region (DMP) fractures in children, and reports that the technique has an ameliorative effect on the phenomenon of delayed healing and non-union that occurs after surgery for fractures in the DMP region.

Methods

The medical records of 72 children with fractures in the DMP region, treated between December 2017 and December 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly assigned to either the cut-and-displace group (n = 36) or the pry-and-lever group (n = 36). Both groups were monitored for time to fracture healing, incidence of delayed or non-union, radiologic outcomes, complications, and functional assessments using the EQ-5D, DASH, and VAS scales.

Results

The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 5 years, with a mean of 26.5 months. After 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of delayed/non-union of fractures was 2.7% and 16.6% in the study and control groups, respectively, and the incidence of delayed healing was significant (P < 0.05) in both groups. Additional manipulations or complications caused by delayed healing or non-union were also significantly less in the study group than in the control group. The EQ-5D scale was used to compare the level of surgical satisfaction between the two groups, and the study group had a higher level of satisfaction. Carpal function was significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period, scored using the DASH scale (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain level was scored using VAS (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prying lever technique has the advantages of low impact on periosteal blood supply, simple operation, and fast recovery, which makes it a worthwhile attempt of minimally invasive reduction of fractures in the DMP region in children.

Impact of Pronator Quadratus Muscle Tear in Distal Radius Fractures on Patient Outcomes: Analyses of 55 Patients in a Volar Locking Plate Arm of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background The advantage of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair following internal fixation via the volar approach in distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery remains unconfirmed in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and functional results between patients with an intact PQ and those with a ruptured PQ before undergoing surgery with a volar locking plate for dorsally displaced unstable extra-articular DRFs. Methods A total of 120 patients aged 55 years and older were included in a randomized controlled trial comparing a volar locking plate with a dorsal nail plate. Of the 60 patients randomized to the volar plate group, the integrity of the PQ muscle was recorded during surgery for 55 patients, who were included in this study. The outcomes measured were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Measure (QuickDASH) score, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, the EQ-5D index, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, and range of motion (ROM). Results The median age was 67 years (range 55 to 88), and the one-year follow-up rate was 98%. Patients with an identified intact PQ (28/55) before surgical release had better QuickDASH scores after one year (2.5 vs 8.0, mean difference 5.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 9.8, p=0.028). Patients in the intact group also had better EQ-5D Index scores after one year (0.94 vs 0.85, mean difference 0.089, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.174, p=0.031), and demonstrated better grip strength throughout the trial; after one year: 24 kg vs 20 kg (mean difference 3.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.6, p=0.016). After one year, the intact group had regained 96% of their grip strength and the nonintact group had regained 93% of their grip strength compared to the uninjured side. The observed differences may be of questionable clinical importance, as they were lower than those of previously proposed minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Conclusions Patients with a DRF and a ruptured PQ prior to surgery exhibited higher QuickDASH scores and lower EQ-5D index scores after one year. The integrity of the PQ should be reported in future studies.

The Outcome of under 10 mm Single-Incision Surgery Using a Non-Specialized Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The distal radius fracture is a common orthopedic injury. We aimed to share the surgical steps and investigate the outcomes of treating distal radius fractures with wounds ≤10 mm using a globally accessible locking plate.

METHODS

We collected 46 patients who underwent surgery via a <10 mm wound, with a control group consisting of 40 patients who underwent conventional procedures. Both groups were treated using the same volar plate. We compared the radiographic reduction quality, including volar tilt angle, radial inclination angle, and ulna variance. Additionally, clinical outcomes, such as pain assessed using VAS, Q-Dash score, and PRWE, were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the wound was also analyzed. The follow-up time for the clinical outcomes was 24.2 ± 13.47 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the quality of reduction in parameters such as the volar tilt angle (p = 0.762), radial inclination angle (p = 0.986), and ulna variance (p = 0.166). Both groups exhibited comparable results in pain VAS (p = 0.684), Q-Dash score (p = 0.08), and PRWE (p = 0.134). The ≤10 mm incision group displayed an increase in satisfaction with the wound (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating distal radius fractures with a <10 mm wound using a non-specialized locking plate is a feasible approach. It does not compromise the quality of fracture reduction or functional scores and improves wound satisfaction.

A New Repair Technique in Pronator Quadratus in Management of Distal Radius Fracture: Comparison with Primary Repair and Unrepaired Techniques

Objective  We aimed to compare the functional and clinical results between our new repair technique in the groups with and without pronator quadratus (PQ) repair in distal radius fractures treated with plate fixation using the volar approach. Methods  The medical records of patients who underwent open reduction and volar plate fixation due to distal radius fracture between 2018 and 2020 were studied. In group A, PQ cannot be sutured or tension may occur, the intact radial fascia of the deep anterior fascia (DAF) was placed under the flexors toward the PQ and it was sutured with a 3-0 slow-absorbable monofilament suture to DAF. In group B, no repair was performed. In group C, PQ was sutured with traditional method. Range of motion (ROM) of wrist and handgrip strengths were measured at final examination. Pain was assessed with Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and functional status was evaluated with Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Complications which included tendinopathy, neuritis, tendon rupture due to plate irritation, implant failure, and malunion were also compared. Results  Seventy-seven patients (group A, 21, group B, 24, group C, 32 patients) were included in the final follow-up examination who met our inclusion criteria. Among the clinical, functional, and radiological results such as ROM, VAS, DASH, grip strength, and complications in the all group at a mean postoperative of 16.6 months no significant difference was observed. Conclusion  Although there was no significant difference between the groups in this study, we think that covering the plate may prevent long-term complications.

Does the pronator-sparing approach improve functional outcome, compared to a standard volar approach, in volar plating of distal radius fractures? A prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare functional outcomes of a volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures (DRF) performed with either a standard volar approach (SVA), which required detachment of the pronator quadratus muscle, or a pronator-sparing approach (PqSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled study included 106 patients scheduled for volar plate osteosyntheses. Patients were allocated to either the SVA group (n = 53) or the PqSA group (n = 53). Patients were blinded to treatment until completion of the study. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcome parameters were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Follow-up examinations were performed at 8 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Overall, 91 patients were included in the final analysis: 48 in the SVA group and 43 in the PqSA group. The two cohorts were not significantly different in demographic characteristics, including age, sex, injuries on the dominant side, type of injury, and fracture classification. We found significant differences between groups at 6 months in the mean PRWE (SVA: 12.3 ± 10.4, PqSA: 18.9 ± 14.11 points) and in the mean DASH score (SVA: 12.3 ± 11.9, PqSA: 19.3 ± 16.7 points), which favoured the SVA. We found no significant differences between groups in the MMWS or in the PRWE and DASH scores at any other time points.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized comparative clinical trial failed to demonstrate that a volar plate osteosynthesis performed with a PqSA could improve the outcome, compared to the SVA, in patients with DRF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II Trial registration Comparison of Two Volar Plating Systems for Distal Radius Fractures, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03474445), registered 22 March 2018, retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03474445?cond=radius&cntry=AT&draw=2&rank=1.

Does access through the pronator quadratus influence pronation strength in palmar plate fixation of distal radius fractures in elderly patients?

INTRODUCTION

Palmar plate fixation of the distal radius fracture involves dissecting the pronator quadratus (PQ). This is regardless of whether the approach is radial or ulnar to the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon. It is not yet clear whether and to what extent this dissection leads to a functional loss of pronation or pronation strength. The aim of this study was to investigate the functional recovery of pronation and pronation strength after dissection of the PQ without suturing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2010 to November 2011, patients aged over 65 with fracture were prospectively enrolled in this study. Fracture stabilisation was performed via the FCR approach without suturing the PQ. Follow-up examinations took place 8 weeks and 12 months postoperatively, and pronation and supination strength were analysed by means of an especially developed measuring device.

RESULTS

212 patients were initially screened and 107 were enrolled. The range of motion compared to the healthy opposite side was Ext/Flex 75/66% 8 weeks postoperatively. Pronation was 97% with a pronation strength of 59%. After 1 year, the scores improved to Ext/Flex 83/80%. Pronation recovered to 99% and pronation strength to 78%.

CONCLUSION

The present study can show a recovery of pronation as well as pronation strength in a large patient population. At the same time, the pronation strength is still significantly lower 1 year after the operation than on the opposing healthy side. As the pronation strength recovers as the grip strength and is at all times on a par with the supination strength, we believe that we can continue to refrain from re-fixating the pronator quadratus.

Does pronator quadratus repair affect functional outcome following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair versus no repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, CNKI, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. All randomized controlled trials comparing PQ repair with no repair in distal radius fractures before January 2023 were included. Two investigators independently screened eligible articles, assessed the study quality, and extracted data from included studies. Continuous variables used standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval as efficacy statistics. The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 430 patients in 7 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 218 underwent PQ repair, while 212 patients underwent no repair. The results of the meta-analysis displayed statistically significant differences in grip strength (short-term), pronation angle (short-term), and pronation strength (short- and long-term) between the two groups. No significant difference in other outcomes was found between the two treatment arms.

Discussion

The repair of PQ may further increase grip strength and pronation function in the short-term and enhance long-term pronator muscle strength compared to no repair. However, due to the small number of articles included in the study, the above conclusions need to be verified by a larger sample and multi-center clinical study.

Role of Pronator Quadratus Repair in Volar Locking Plate Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are the most common type of upper extremity fractures, and their incidence is increasing. There has been a rise in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures, primarily with volar locking plate fixation. Although this procedure is commonly done among orthopaedic surgeons, the role of pronator quadratus repair after fixation remains controversial. The pronator quadratus serves as a secondary forearm pronator and a dynamic stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint. Aside from a functional role, repair of the pronator quadratus has been proposed to serve as a biologic barrier between the volar locking plate and the flexor tendons to minimize tendon irritation. In this narrative review, we discuss the current treatment trends, the surgical approach for volar locking plate treatment of distal radius fractures, and the anatomy and function of the pronator quadratus. We discuss the case for and against the repair of the pronator quadratus, both for function and prevention of flexor tendon irritation and rupture. The preponderance of high-level evidence demonstrates no benefit to pronator quadratus repair for pain relief or function. The current evidence does not conclusively support or refute pronator quadratus repair as a biologic barrier from the flexor tendons.

Evaluation of sparing the pronator quadratus for volar plating of distal radius fractures: a retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

The most commonly used approach for distal radius fractures is the traditional Henry approach. However, it requires an intraoperative incision of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle, which results in a series of complications if the repair of the PQ fails.

AIM

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of sparing the pronator quadratus for volar plating of the distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients who suffered from distal radius fractures of types 23-B, 23-C1, and 23-C2 as per the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification were treated with volar locking plate fixation using either the PQ muscle incision and repair (group A, n = 39) or the PQ muscle preservation approach (group B, n = 37). Intraoperative index, postoperative efficacy and complications of patients were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for more than one year after surgery. All fractures achieved union. There were significant differences in mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and mean fracture healing time between the two groups. Still, there were no significant differences in limb function scores between the two groups at the 12-month postoperative follow-up. Outcomes assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery demonstrated significant differences in the mean range of motion and pain-related visual analog scale (VAS) between the two groups. As the range of motion and grip strength increased, the VAS scores decreased, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. Although tendon irritation and delayed carpal tunnel syndrome were more common in group A than in group B (7.6% vs. 0% and 5.1% vs. 0%, respectively), the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The modified Henry approach with sparing pronator quadratus muscle has no significant advantage in the range of wrist motion and upper limb function in the late stage. Nevertheless, the intraoperative placement of the plate under the pronator quadratus muscle can shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, reduce early postoperative pain, promote early activity, and improve the patient's quality of life. It is recommended that the pronator be preserved at the time of surgery.