Burden of complications after giant cell tumor surgery. A single-center retrospective study of 192 cases

Cisplatin-functionalized dual-functional bone substitute granules for bone defect treatment after bone tumor resection

Invasive bone tumors pose a significant healthcare challenge, often requiring systemic chemotherapy and limb salvage surgery. However, these strategies are hampered by severe side effects, complex post-resection bone defects, and high local recurrence rates. To address this, we developed dual-functional bone substitute biomaterials by functionalizing commercially available bone substitute granules (Bio-Oss® and MBCP®+) with the established anticancer agent cisplatin. Physicochemical characterization revealed that Bio-Oss® granules possess a higher surface area and lower crystallinity compared to MBCP®+ granules, which enhances their capacity for cisplatin adsorption and release. In co-cultures with metastatic breast and prostate cancer cells (MDA-MB-231 and PC3) and bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs), cisplatin-functionalized granules and their releasates exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxic effects on cancer cells while having less impact on hBMSCs. Furthermore, investigations on the mechanism of action indicated that cisplatin induced significant cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 and PC3 cells, contrasting with minimal effects on hBMSCs. In a rat femoral condyle defect model, cisplatin-functionalized granules did not evoke adverse effects on bone tissue ingrowth or new bone formation. Importantly, local application of cisplatin-functionalized granules resulted in negligible cisplatin accumulation without signs of apoptotic damage in kidneys and livers. Taken together, we here provide hard evidence that cisplatin-functionalized granules maintain a favorable balance between biosafety, anticancer efficacy, and bone regenerative capacity. Consequently, loading granular bone substitutes with cisplatin holds promise for local treatment of bone defects following bone tumor resections, presenting a safe and potentially more effective alternative to systemic cisplatin administration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Current treatments in combating malignant bone tumors are hampered by severe side effects, high local tumor recurrence, and complex bone defects after surgery. This study explores a facile manufacturing method to render two types of commercially available bone substitute granules (Bio-Oss® and MBCP®+) suitable for local delivery of cisplatin. The use of cisplatin-functionalized granules has shown promising results both in killing cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner and in aiding bone regeneration. Importantly, this local treatment strategy avoids the systemic toxicity associated with traditional chemotherapy to excretory organs. This dual-functional strategy represents a significant advancement in bone cancer treatment, offering a safe and more efficient alternative that could improve outcomes for patients following bone tumor resection.

What to improve: Results of fixed-hinge knee endoprosthesis reconstructions over 40 years in a single tumor center

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, numerous structural changes in implants, medical treatments, and surgical techniques have been made for Malignant Bone Tumors (MBT) around the knee. However, the overall care improvement is still unclear. The method is crucial when analyzing outcomes in surveys involving tumors, and a thorough assessment of the mortality is mandatory because death acts as competing event. The aims of this study were: 1) a comprehensive and longitudinal assessment of the revisions with an extensive follow-up and adequate methods; 2) a complete mortality review to consider competing risks.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that some prosthesis's structural improvements were made while the surgical toll increased as well as an improvement of mortality was also expected.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analyses were performed on 248 patients with MBT (mean follow-up was 8.7 years, surgeries between 1972 and 2017). Three prosthesis models were successively used over time: 120 Guepar (older model), 42 Tornier, and 86 Stanmore (more recent model). The primary outcome was the assessment of revisions sorted out according to Henderson: type-1 soft-tissue failures or instability, type-2 aseptic loosening, type-3 structural failures, type-4 periprosthetic infections, type-5 tumoral progression. Death and amputations were considered as competing events. An extensive assessment of mortality was performed by merging the dataset with the French register of Deaths (INSEE). Cumulative probabilities were computed at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years and compared with Gray's tests.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival was, 80% (95% CI: 73-87) for Guepar, 69% (95% CI: 56-84) for Tornier, and 71% (95% CI: 62-82) for Stanmore (p=0.4). The 5-year cumulative risks for type-1 were 5% (95% CI: 1-9), 9% (95% CI: 0-18), and 17% (95% CI: 9-25) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.01). The 15-year cumulative risks for type-2 were 22% (95% CI: 15-39), 8% (95% CI: 0-17) and 8% (95% CI: 2-14) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.10). Ten patients had an implant failure, nine Guepar, and one Tornier. The 5-year cumulative risks for type-4 were 7% (95% CI: 2-12), 19% (95% CI: 7-31), and 12% (95% CI: 5-18) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). There were 29 tumoral progressions; the 15-year risks were 16% (95% CI: 2-22), 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), and 12% (95% CI: 4-19%) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). No difference whatsoever was found between the proximal tibial and distal femur.

CONCLUSION

There were some improvements in prosthesis design (forged steel instead of cast steel) and probably also in cemented stem fixation, but not in prosthetic joint infection and local recurrence over forty years. The overall mortality did not change significantly over the last 40 years amongst this specific cohort of patients who benefited from a hinge reconstruction prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative case series with sensibility analysis.