The IBTIS score; a new prognostic score for arthroscopic biceps tenotomies

Inter- and intra-observer agreement in arthroscopic assessment of the long head of the biceps

INTRODUCTION

Long head of the biceps (LHB) pathology is frequent but can be difficult to diagnose. Arthroscopy is the current diagnostic gold-standard. The aim of the present study was to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement in arthroscopic analysis of the LHB.

HYPOTHESIS

Agreement in arthroscopic analysis of the LHB is good in the particular case of small rotator cuff tears.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 49 patients operated on between November 1 and November 30, 2017. Seven surgeons were asked to record videos of arthroscopic LHB analysis for Patte-1 small supraspinatus tendon tears. One junior and 2 senior surgeons analyzed the videos independently, studying macroscopic intrinsic and extrinsic LHB aspect. Inter-observer agreement, and intra-observer agreement for the junior surgeon, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement between the surgeons and intra-observer agreement for the junior surgeon were slight in describing the pathologic aspect of the LHB: respectively, κ=0.254, p<0.038; and κ=0.319, p<0.0019.

DISCUSSION

Isolated arthroscopic LHB assessment without clinical or paraclinical input or precise surgical exploration protocol showed slight inter-observer agreement. Analysis and interpretation of LHB aspect should in practice be based on combined clinical, paraclinical and arthroscopic data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Management of normal long head of the biceps tendon in isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tear: Research protocol for a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND

The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a common locus of pain in rotator cuff tear and of residual pain after tendon repair. Therefore, systematic LHB tenotomy, with or without tenodesis, is usually recommended. However, the recent literature suggests that long-term functional results of supraspinatus tendon repair are comparable between conservation of a normal biceps and tenotomy. The study objective is to compare functional results between sectioning and sparing a normal LHB in treating isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tendon tear. The study hypothesis is that sparing the normal LHB is clinically preferable to sectioning in the particular case of distal supraspinatus tear.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A French nationwide prospective single-blind randomized clinical study will include 194 patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of grade-1 supraspinatus tear with normal LHB. They will be randomized to 2 parallel groups: LHB sparing and sectioning. The main endpoint is Constant-Murley score, and secondary endpoints comprise ASES and SSV scores, clinical assessment of the biceps, pain on VAS, ultrasound assessment of cuff repair healing and conserved LHBs, impact on return to work and sport, pathologic assessment of sectioned LHBs, and analysis of risk factors for cuff repair failure.

ETHICAL APPROVAL AND PUBLICATION

The protocol has been approved by the data protection committee (art.L.1122-1) and meets the criteria of the Declaration of Helsinki and of the SPIRIT statement defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

not applicable.