Comparison between ilioinguinal approach and modified Stoppa approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Transformation of transverse fractures of the acetabulum in T-shaped fractures and sequential approaches

Transverse acetabular fractures are difficult to reduce and generally associated with poorer clinical outcomes than other types of acetabular fractures. For these fractures affecting both columns, the surgical strategy is subject to controversy and there is currently no optimal method of management. The transformation of these transverse fractures in to a T-shaped fracture makes it possible to make the anterior and posterior components of the fracture independent and to reduce them sequentially. This technique has made it possible to obtain a satisfactory reduction of the fracture in certain cases and gives hope for good long-term functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Efficacy and safety of pararectus approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pararectus (PR) approach combines the advantages of the second window of the ilioinguinal approach and the medial view of the modified Stoppa approach. However, it is unclear whether the PR approach is more effective or safer than the other approaches, as few clinical studies have compared the PR approach with the other approaches. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the PR approach with the other approaches for the treatment of acetabular fractures and to answer the following question: Are the results of the PR approach superior to those of the other approaches in terms of reduction quality, operative time, operative blood loss, complications, and clinical outcomes for treatment of acetabular fractures?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using relevant original studies from various databases. Pooling of data was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A p-value<0.05 was considered to be significant. We calculated the mean differences for continuous data and odds ratio for dichotomous data with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on I2 using the standard χ2 test.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings demonstrated that operative blood loss was significantly lower in the PR approach than in the other approaches (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of anatomical reduction, the operative time, the rate of complications, and the rate of excellent or good clinical score between the PR approach and the other approaches.

DISCUSSION

The PR approach provided lower operative blood loss, although there was no significant difference in reduction quality, operative time, complications, and excellent or good clinical score between the PR approach and the other approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effects of Different Surgical Procedures on the Therapeutic Effects, Prognosis, and Major Complications of Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly of China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. Different surgical approaches were systematically evaluated to provide an evidence-based medical rationale for the application and promotion of acetabular fractures in the elderly of China. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of different surgical methods in the treatment of elderly acetabular fractures were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network Database (CNKI), China VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). The search time threshold was set from the time the database was created to the current time. Investigators obtained data independently, and the bias risk of each included writing was reviewed using the Cochrane Manual 5.1.0 criterion. The meta data was analyzed using RevMan 5.4 statistical package. Results. 6 RCT articles were included in the end. A total of 445 samples were analyzed by meta. All the six RCT literatures included in this meta-analysis reported the baseline status of patients, only 3 RCT mentioned “random assignment” without any explanation, and the rest did not mention “random” information. The five studies included all gave detailed intervention measures. The number and reasons of blind method and lost follow-up or withdrawal were not described in detail in 6 RCT articles. Through the meta-analysis excellent and good rate between the experimental group and the control group through 6 RCT studies, the heterogeneity test results were $\text{ch}{\text{i}}^2=6.11$ , $\text{df}=4$ , $\text{P}=0.19>0.05$ , and ${\text{I}}^2=35\%$ , without obvious heterogeneity at $Z=2.68$ and $P=0.007$ . These results suggested that the total hip arthroplasty application has the same excellent rate as other surgical treatment methods, indicating that total hip arthroplasty has a significant effect on the treatment of elderly acetabular fractures. Through the meta-analysis hip-joint function score, the heterogeneity test results were $\text{ch}{\text{i}}^2=56.16$ , $\text{df}=4$ , $P<0.00001$ , and $I^2=93\%$ , with obvious heterogeneity. The great difference was discovered in hip function score between total hip arthroplasty and other surgical methods, showing that total hip arthroplasty can greatly improve hip-joint function. Then, the incidence of hip complications between the experimental cases and the control cases was calculated by meta. The heterogeneity test results were $\text{ch}{\text{i}}^2=3.17$ , $\text{df}=4$ , $P=0.53>0.05$ , and $I^2=0\%$ , without remarkable heterogeneity at $Z=3.05$ and $P=0.002$ . This demonstrated that a significant difference was observed in the complication incidence, indicating that total hip arthroplasty displayed a lower incidence of hip-joint functional complications. Conclusion. Total hip arthroplasty has a good prognosis and a low complication rate in the treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly. However, more studies and longer follow-ups are needed to further validate the findings of this study.