Hip survivorship following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Factors Contributing to the Progression of Osteoarthritis after Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy: A Study of 183 Hips with a Median Follow-Up Period of 14 Years

BACKGROUND

Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) is a joint-preserving procedure that improves femoral head coverage. This procedure is expected to counteract the progression of secondary osteoarthritis of the hip (OA) in young patients who have developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, postoperative OA progression still occurs owing to multiple factors. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the factors contributing to postoperative OA progression using patient cohort data with a median follow-up period of 14 years after RAO surgery for DDH without severe OA.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent RAO for DDH who had Tönnis grades 0 and 1 were retrospectively reviewed. We calculated the survival rates by setting total hip arthroplasty (THA) and progression to Tönnis grade 2 OA as the endpoints. The associations between patient background, preoperative OA stage, postoperative acetabular coverage, and OA progression were investigated. A total of 160 patients and 183 hips (Tönnis grade 0, 112 hips; grade 1, 71 hips) were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up time was 14 years.

RESULTS

The 20-year survival rates with THA as the endpoint were similarly good at 86.4% in both Tönnis grade 0 and 1 OA groups. However, in these groups, the survival rates with progression to Tönnis grade 2 OA as the endpoint were 74.6 and 49.3%, respectively. Age at the time of RAO, preoperative OA stage, and body mass index (BMI) were predictive factors for OA progression in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, BMI was the only independent predictive factor for OA progression.

CONCLUSION

Our RAO cohort with a median follow-up period of 14 years demonstrated good survival rates in patients at the pre-osteoarthritis stage and in patients at the initial stage of DDH. In the multivariate analysis, high BMI was independently associated with OA progression after RAO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does total hip arthroplasty benefit patients with minimal radiological osteoarthritis?

Aims

The effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with no or minimal radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. In this study, we aimed to: 1) assess the outcome of such patients; 2) identify patient comorbidities and CT or MRI findings which predicted outcome; and 3) compare their outcome to the expected outcome of THA for hip OA.

Methods

Adult patients undergoing THA for hip pain, with no or minimal radiological features of OA (Tönnis grading scale ≤ 1), were identified from a consecutive series of 1,925 THAs. Exclusion criteria were: inflammatory arthritis; osteonecrosis of the femoral head; prior trauma or infection; and patients without minimum one-year follow-up and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) scale, and patient satisfaction on a validated three-point 'better', 'same', or 'worse' scale.

Results

A total of 107 patients with a median age of 41 years (IQR 18 to 73) were included, with mean follow-up of 6.0 years (SD 3.1). All patients underwent a diagnostic hip injection as a decision aid. Median postoperative OHS was 34 (IQR 28 to 42), with 36 patients (33%) achieving a patient-acceptable symptom state (OHS ≥ 42), lower than THA patients in international registries (40 to 43 points). Secondary outcomes were UCLA of 6 (4 to 8) and EQ-VAS of 73 (51 to 80); 91/102 patients (89%) felt 'better' and would 'undergo surgery again'. Patients with chronic pain syndrome or hypermobility had lower OHS than patients without comorbidities (-6 points, p < 0.006). Overall, 84 patients had a CT and 34 patients an MRI. Patients with subchondral cysts (OHS 42 (37 to 45) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.014) or joint space narrowing on CT (OHS 42 (IQR 37 to 44) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.022) had higher function.

Conclusion

Despite high satisfaction levels, patients undergoing THA with minimal or no radiological OA had lower postoperative function than typical THA patients. We recommend obtaining low-dose CT imaging and a diagnostic hip injection to aid decision-making.

Concomitant Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy and Arthroscopy Versus Isolated Arthroscopy With Capsular Plication for Borderline Dysplasia: Two Good Options

PURPOSE

To compare minimum 2-year outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with concomitant hip arthroscopy (HA) versus isolated HA with capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent surgery for femoroacetabular impingement in the setting of BHD between September 2008 and December 2021. Included patients had preoperative and minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores. Patients who underwent staged PAO and HA comprised the PAO group. Patients who underwent isolated HA with capsular plication comprised the HA group. Matching occurred at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, and Tönnis grade.

RESULTS

A total of 74 hips were included. In the HA group, the mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale score were 90.32 ± 12.39, 89.46 ± 11.57, 81.47 ± 20.54, and 1.74 ± 1.89, respectively. In the PAO group, these PRO values were 90.69 ± 13.46, 91.59 ± 10.80, 82.20 ± 21.23, and 1.49 ± 1.94, respectively. The HA group met the minimal clinically important difference for the modified Harris Hip Score (89.19%), Nonarthritic Hip Score (86.49%), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (72.97%) at similar rates to the PAO group (89.19%, 86.49%, and 78.38%, respectively). The rates of achieving the patient acceptable symptom state for these PROs were 86.49%, 72.97%, and 67.57%, respectively, in the HA group and 86.49%, 78.38%, and 70.27%, respectively, in the PAO group. The rates of achieving maximal outcome improvement for these PROs were 81.1%, 75.68%, and 70.27%, respectively, in the HA group and 75.68%, 75.68%, and 70.27%, respectively, in the PAO group. Complications occurred in 10.81% of patients in the PAO group and 5.41% of those in the HA group (P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

PAO with concomitant HA and isolated HA with capsular plication in the setting of BHD yielded favorable and comparable outcomes. A high percentage of patients in both the HA and PAO groups reached clinically relevant thresholds, with similar rates of revision and conversion to arthroplasty at minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Sexual function and pregnancy outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic review

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This systematic review investigates the impact PAO has on sexual function and pregnancy through changes in patient-reported outcomes. A literature search of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1996 to November 2023 was performed. Search terms included: 'periacetabular osteotomy', 'pelvic osteotomy', 'outcomes', 'sexual function', 'pregnancy', and 'childbirth'. Assessment of methodological quality was performed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) criteria and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system. The search returned 560 papers, with 5 meeting the inclusion criteria. Sexual function improved over both short- and longer-term follow-up periods. 48.2% of patients had improved sexual function following PAO. Female patients reported greater improvement than males, who had a higher baseline score. No complications were documented in pregnancy or delivery compared to patients who had not had a PAO. Increased rates of caesarean sections (CSs) were seen in all studies (37.4%) compared to the European average. All five papers were calculated to be of low quality according to the MINORS criteria and low certainty according to the GRADE level of evidence. Patients receiving a PAO due to symptomatic DDH had improved sexual dysfunction due to a reduction in hip pain, but almost half of these patients may not appreciate any benefit. There is an increased likelihood of CS in patients post-PAO, with no reliable evidence for its necessity. Limitations of this review included poor quality and availability of evidence, as all studies were retrospective cohort studies. Further larger powered studies are required to assess the full impact of PAO on both sexual function and pregnancy.

Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND

Understanding the implications of either nonoperative or operative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) performed before periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is critical to counseling patients and their families. There are limited studies, however, on PAO for the treatment of residual DDH after surgical intervention during childhood, and even less information about PAO after prior nonoperative treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We analyzed patients who had undergone PAO for DDH and asked: Did patients with prior childhood treatment (either operative or nonoperative) (1) improve less in modified Harris hip score (mHHS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) score, or WOMAC score; (2) demonstrate more severe preoperative deformities; and (3) receive less complete radiographic correction and have more frequent complications than did patients whose hips had not undergone prior treatment? We also asked: (4) Were there subgroup differences among patients with DDH treated nonoperatively versus operatively before PAO in these same functional and radiographic parameters?

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2020, a total of 90 PAOs were performed in 82 patients who had prior surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Of those, 3 patients (3 hips) with neuromuscular diseases were excluded, 4 patients (5 hips) were excluded for having received treatment after childhood, 7 hips that had undergone bilateral PAOs were excluded, and another 4 patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up before the minimum study period of 2 years, leaving 71 patients (71 hips) for analysis (the previous treatment group). Among these, 32 patients had a history of previous surgery (the previous surgery group), and 39 patients had prior nonsurgical treatment (such as a Pavlik harness, closed reduction, spica casting) (the previous nonoperative group). During the same period, 1109 PAOs were performed in 956 patients who had no history of previous hip treatment. Following a 1:2 ratio, 142 patients (142 hips) were selected as the control group by matching for age (within 2 years difference), year of surgery (same year), and follow-up time (within 1-year difference). The patient characteristics for both the previous treatment group and the control group exhibited comparability, with mean ± SD follow-up durations of 49 ± 23 months and 48 ± 19 months, respectively. Within the previous 5 years, 3 patients (8%) in the previous nonoperative group, 4 patients (13%) in the previous surgery group, and 15 patients (11%) in the control group had not attended follow-up visits. We compared hip function and radiographic results between the two groups and performed a subgroup analysis between the previous surgery group and the previous nonoperative group. Hip function was assessed using the mHHS questionnaire, the WOMAC, and the iHOT-12 with attention to the minimum clinically important differences of these tools. The threshold values for clinically important improvement were 9.6 points, 13 points, and 16.1 points for the mHHS, iHOT-12, and WOMAC, respectively. Radiographic measurements included the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), Tönnis angle, acetabulum-head index, and acetabular wall index. We also evaluated Tönnis osteoarthritis grade and femoral head deformity. Occurrences of adverse radiographic events such as posterior column fracture, nonunion, stress fractures, insufficient coverage or overcoverage, acetabular protrusion, and progression of osteoarthritis were recorded.

RESULTS

We found no clinically important differences in magnitude of improvement between the previous treatment group and the control group in terms of mHHS (mean ± SD 10 ± 12 versus 12 ± 12; p = 0.36), iHOT-12 (25 ± 18 versus 26 ± 19; p = 0.51), or WOMAC score (12 ± 12 versus 15 ± 19; p = 0.17). Preoperative deformity in the previous treatment group was more severe than in the control group (mean ± SD LCEA -1° ± 9° versus 5° ± 8°; ACEA -8° ± 18° versus 1° ± 14°; Tönnis angle 31° ± 7° versus 27° ± 7°; acetabulum-head index 56% ± 13% versus 61% ± 8%; all p < 0.001). In the previous treatment group, a higher percentage of patients exhibited flattening or irregularity of the femoral head compared with the control group (52% versus 9%; p < 0.001), and there was also a higher proportion of patients with Tönnis grade 1 or above (51% versus 42%; p < 0.001). Although there were still differences in LCEA, ACEA, and Tönnis angle between the two groups at the last follow-up, the differences were small, and the mean values were within the normal range. The previous treatment group had a higher risk of intraoperative posterior column fracture (14% and 5%; p = 0.02), insufficient acetabular coverage (20% and 8%; p = 0.01), and progression of osteoarthritis (17% and 8%; p = 0.04) compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed no clinically important differences in magnitude of improvement between the previous surgery group and the previous nonoperative group in terms of mHHS (10 ± 14 versus 10 ± 11; p = 0.91), iHOT-12 (22 ± 21 versus 27 ± 14; p = 0.26), or WOMAC score (12 ± 14 versus 12 ± 11; p = 0.94). Apart from a higher proportion of patients who presented with arthritis (72% versus 34%; p = 0.01) and a smaller anterior wall index (11% ± 11% versus 20% ± 12%; p = 0.01) in the previous surgery group, all other preoperative radiographic parameters were consistent between the two groups. Additionally, the previous surgery group had a higher frequency of arthritis progression (28% versus 8%; p = 0.02), while the frequencies of other complications were similar between the two groups. Specifically, the frequencies of pubic ramus nonunion (22% versus 21%; p = 0.89), intraoperative posterior column fracture (19% versus 10%; p = 0.50), and insufficient acetabular coverage (25% versus 15%; p = 0.31) were high in both groups.

CONCLUSION

We found no clinically important difference in the magnitude of improvement between patients who had childhood treatment and those who did not, but patients who had prior childhood treatment were more likely to experience serious complications, and radiographic correction in those patients was less complete. As in the case of patients who have had prior operative treatments, it is crucial not to overlook the unexpectedly severe deformity of residual DDH after previous nonoperative treatment and complications following PAO. Surgeons and patients alike should be aware of the potential for worse radiographic outcomes or an increased risk of complications when prior operative or nonoperative treatment has preceded PAO. Future studies might investigate optimal management strategies for this specific group of patients to improve outcomes and reduce complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?

BACKGROUND

Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy is performed to prevent osteoarthritis caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To achieve sufficient acetabular coverage, understanding the characteristics of acetabular coverage in DDH is necessary. However, the features of acetabular coverage in males with DDH remain unclear. We thought that the differences in acetabular coverage between females and males might be associated with the differences in pelvic morphology between the sexes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the differences in the acetabular coverage between females and males with DDH? (2) What are the differences in the rotations of the ilium and ischium between females and males with DDH? (3) What is the relationship between the rotation of the ilium and ischium and the acetabular coverage at each height in females and males with DDH?

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2023, 114 patients (138 hips) underwent eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy at our hospital. We excluded patients with Tönnis Grade 2 or higher, a lateral center-edge angle of 25º or more, and deformities of the pelvis or femur, resulting in 100 patients (122 hips) being included. For female patients (98 hips), the median (range) age was 40 years (10 to 58), and for the male patients (24 hips), it was 31 years (14 to 53). We used all patients' preoperative AP radiographs and CT data. The crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and pelvic width index were evaluated in AP radiographs. The rotation of the innominate bone in the axial plane was evaluated at two different heights, specifically at the slice passing through the anterior superior iliac spine and the slice through the pubic symphysis and ischial spine in CT data. Furthermore, we evaluated the anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles. Comparisons of variables related to innominate bone measurements and acetabular coverage measurements between females and males in each patient were performed. The correlations between pelvic morphology measurements and acetabular coverage were evaluated separately for females and males, and the results were subsequently compared to identify any sex-specific differences. For continuous variables, we used the Student t-test; for binary variables, we used the Fisher exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of AP radiographs, an indicator of acetabular retroversion-the crossover sign-showed no differences between the sexes, whereas the posterior wall sign (females 46% [45 of 98] hips versus males 75% [18 of 24] hips, OR 3.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 11.71]; p = 0.01) and pelvic width index less than 56% (females 1% [1 of 98] versus males 17% [4 of 24], OR 18.71 [95% CI 1.74 to 958.90]; p = 0.005) occurred more frequently in males than in females. There were no differences in the iliac rotation parameters, but the ischium showed more external rotation in males (females 30° ± 2° versus males 24° ± 1°; p < 0.001). Regarding acetabular coverage, no differences between females and males were observed in the anterior acetabular sector angles. In contrast, males showed smaller values than females for the posterior acetabular sector angles (85° ± 9° versus 91° ± 7°; p = 0.002). In females, a correlation was observed between iliac rotation and acetabular sector angles (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.35 [95% CI -0.05 to 0.16]; p < 0.001, posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.42 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.57]; p < 0.001). Similarly, ischial rotation showed a correlation with both acetabular sector angles (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.34 [95% CI -0.51 to -0.15]; p < 0.001 and posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.45 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.59]; p < 0.001). Thus, in females, we observed that external iliac rotation and ischial internal rotation correlated with increased anterior acetabular coverage and reduced posterior coverage. In contrast, although acetabular coverage in males showed a correlation with iliac rotation (anterior acetabular sector angles: r = -0.55 [95% CI -0.78 to -0.18]; p = 0.006 and posterior acetabular sector angles: r = 0.74 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.88]; p < 0.001), no correlation was observed with ischial rotation.

CONCLUSION

In males, acetabular retroversion occurs more commonly than in females and is attributed to their reduced posterior acetabular coverage. In females, an increase in the posterior acetabular coverage was correlated with the external rotation angle of the ischium, whereas in males, no correlation was found between ischial rotation and posterior acetabular coverage. In treating males with DDH via eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy, it is essential to adjust bone fragments to prevent inadequate posterior acetabular coverage. Future studies might need to investigate the differences in acetabular coverage between males and females in various limb positions and consider the direction of bone fragment rotation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that males with DDH exhibit acetabular retroversion more frequently than females, which is attributed to the reduced posterior acetabular coverage observed in males. The smaller posterior acetabular coverage in males might be related to differences in ischial morphology between sexes. During eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for males with DDH, adequately rotating acetabular bone fragments might be beneficial to compensate for deficient posterior acetabular coverage.

Construction of a predictive nomogram for functional recovery after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy

Background and purpose

Surgical indications for Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) are well-established. However, the extent of postoperative functional recovery varies widely, as observed in clinical follow-ups. Thus, preoperative evaluation is crucial. This study aims to identify factors that influence functional recovery post-PAO and to develop a predictive nomogram.

Patients and methods

Retrospective data were collected between December 2016 and March 2022 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. The dataset included demographic and imaging data of patients who underwent PAO. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was utilized to identify influencing factors, which were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to construct a predictive nomogram for post-PAO functional recovery.

Result

The analysis identified critical factors affecting functional recovery post-PAO, namely, the preoperative distance from the innermost surface of the femoral head to the ilioischial line, the surgical approach, preoperative acetabular depth, and the continuity of the preoperative Calve line. A nomogram was developed using these significant predictors. The model's validity was demonstrated by the receiver operating characteristic curve, with an area under the curve of 0.864. Additionally, the calibration curve confirmed the nomogram's accuracy, showing a strong correlation between observed and predicted probabilities, indicating high predictive accuracy.

Conclusion

This predictive nomogram effectively identifies patients most suitable for PAO, providing valuable guidance for selecting surgical candidates and determining the appropriate surgical approach.

A Mind-Body Intervention to Improve Physical Activity for Patients with Chronic Hip-Related Pain: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Pain and dysfunction persist for most patients following hip-related pain treatment. Additionally, individuals with hip-related pain are typically less physically active than individuals without hip pain, despite evidence that regular physical activity reduces chronic musculoskeletal pain. Poor psychological health is common in patients with hip-related pain and further reinforces low physical activity. Mind-body interventions can improve psychological health and activity levels but have yet to be integrated to provide comprehensive, psychologically informed care for patients with hip-related pain. Thus, we are using the NCCIH intervention development framework to develop Helping Improve PSychological Health (HIPS), a novel, multimodal mind-body intervention to improve physical activity for individuals with hip-related pain and poor psychological health.

METHODS

We will recruit physical therapists (N = 20) and patients with hip-related pain (N = 20) to participate in 60 min qualitative interviews (focus groups with therapists; one-on-one interviews with patients). Using these data, we will develop the initial HIPS intervention and provider training materials. One physical therapist will be trained to deliver the HIPS intervention to five participants in an open pilot trial. Participants will attend six 30 min HIPS intervention sessions. We will collect quantitative data on satisfaction, improvement, and physical activity, alongside qualitative exit interviews with participants and the physical therapist in order to refine the HIPS intervention and provider training materials.

RESULTS

This study has been approved by the MGB IRB. We aim to develop and test the initial feasibility of the HIPS intervention in an open pilot trial. The findings from this project will inform a subsequent feasibility RCT.

Incidence and clinical outcome of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury after periacetabular osteotomy

Aims

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury is a complication after periacetabular osteo-tomy (PAO) using an anterior approach, which might adversely affect the outcome. However, no prospective study has assessed the incidence and severity of this injury and its effect on the clinical outcomes over a period of time for longer than one year after PAO. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and severity of the symptoms of LFCN injury for ≥ three years after PAO and report its effect on clinical outcomes.

Methods

A total of 40 hips in 40 consecutive patients who underwent PAO between May 2016 and July 2018 were included in the study, as further follow-up of the same patients from a previous study. We prospectively evaluated the incidence, severity, and area of symptoms following LFCN injury. We also recorded the clinical scores at one year and ≥ three years postoperatively using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) scores.

Results

A total of 20 patients (50%) had symptoms of a LFCN injury at one year after PAO. At ≥ three years postoperatively, the symptoms had completely resolved in seven of these patients and 13 (33%) had persistent symptoms. The severity and area of symptoms did not significantly differ between one and ≥ three years postoperatively. The JHEQ showed significant differences in the patient satisfaction and mental scores between those with and those without sypmtoms of LFCN injury at ≥ three years postoperatively, while there was no significant difference in the mean SF-36 scores.

Conclusion

The incidence of LFCN injury after PAO using an anterior approach is high. The outcome of PAO, ≥ three years postoperatively, is poorer in patients with persistent symptoms from a perioperative LFCN injury, in that patient satisfaction and mental health scores are adversely affected.

Prevention of motor ascending branch of the rectus femoris injuries in Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: a cadaveric study

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical procedure used to treat hip dysplasia in young adults, but it carries the risk of neurological complications, including injury to the motor ascending branch of the rectus femoris (MABRF). This study aimed to describe anatomical considerations to prevent MABRF injuries during PAO. A cadaveric study was conducted on seven specimens. The original and modified PAO approaches were used, with and without disinsertion of the rectus femoris muscle origin. The femoral nerve was dissected in all specimens from the endopelvic position to the MABRF origin (T-point). The average distance from the anterosuperior iliac spine to the T-point was 10.2 ± 0.4 cm. To protect the MABRF, a safety zone was identified for the osteotome placement during the ischial cut. The osteotome was slid over the joint capsule, deflecting the iliocapsularis muscle medially and distally. This manoeuvre shields the MABRF with the iliocapsularis muscle, reducing the risk of neurological injury. Both the original and modified PAO approaches were considered safe techniques with low risk to the rectus femoris innervation. These findings offer valuable insights for surgeons performing PAO, emphasizing the significance of understanding anatomical relationships and implementing protective measures to enhance patient outcomes and minimize complications. In conclusion, implementing these anatomical considerations can help prevent MABRF injuries during PAO, contributing to safer and more successful surgical interventions for hip dysplasia in young adults.

Team Approach: Hip Preservation Surgery

The evaluation and treatment of adolescents and young adults with hip pain has seen tremendous growth over the past 20 years. Labral tears are well established as a common cause of hip pain but often occur because of underlying bony abnormalities. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia are now well-established causes of hip osteoarthritis and are increasingly treated in the prearthritic stage in hopes of improving symptoms and prolonging the longevity of the native hip. Beyond FAI and acetabular dysplasia, this patient population can present with a complex and variable group of underlying conditions that need to be taken into account. Expertise in the conservative management of this population, including physical therapy, is valuable to maximize the success. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative decision-making and care in this population is complex and evolving. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to the care of this patient population has been used for over 20 years by our institution with great success. The purpose of this article is to review the "team-based approach" necessary for successful management of the spectrum of adolescent and young adult hip disorders.

Lateral Center-edge Angle of 18° (Bone-Edge): Threshold for Hip Arthroscopy Treatment in Patients with Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

OBJECTIVE

Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze minimum 2-year outcomes of BDDH after arthroscopic surgery and explore the criteria and thresholds of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) in arthroscopic surgery for BDDH.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients aged 18-50 who underwent arthroscopic surgery for BDDH and had an LCEA 18-25° between September 2016 and June 2020. The consistency of interobserver and intraobserver measurements of bone-edge LCEA was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on LCEA (18-20°and 20-25°) and the results of arthroscopy compared between groups. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, consisting of the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the international hip outcome tool-12 (IHOT-12), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom status (PASS) were calculated.

RESULTS

In 52 patients with ≥2-year follow-up, female patients accounted for 71.2% and the mean age was 30.8 ± 8.4 years (range: 18 to 49 years). There was a high level of agreement when measuring the bone-edge LCEA definition of BDDH (Kappa = 0.921). Interobserver repeatability (ICC = 0.909, 95%CI: 0.847-0.947) and intraobserver repeatability (ICC = 0.944, 95%CI: 0.905-0.968) were excellent for bone-edge LCEA measurements. In addition to LCEA and Tönnis angle, there were no significant differences in α angle, neck stem angle, femoral anteversion angle, medial joint space, Tönnis grade of osteoarthritis, acetabular retroversion (8 sign), Cam deformity and anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) morphology between the two groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative findings and procedures showed no statistical difference between groups (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 44.4 ± 11.0 months (range: 25 to 64 months). Postoperative VAS, mHHS and IHOT-12 scores in the LCEA 18-20° group and the LCEA 20-25° group were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of MCID and PASS (mHHS and iHOT-12) between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the LCEA 18-20° group and the LCEA 20-25° group achieved favorable outcomes after arthroscopic surgery. LCEA 18° (bone-edge) should be the threshold for hip arthroscopic surgery in BDDH patients without obvious hip instability.

Periacetabular osteotomy with intraoperative computer-assisted modalities: a systematic review

The role of intraoperative computer-assisted modalities for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), as well as the perioperative and post-operative outcomes for these techniques, remains poorly defined. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the techniques and outcomes of intraoperative computer-assisted modalities for PAO. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL/EBSCOHost and Cochrane) were searched for clinical studies reporting on computer-assisted modalities for PAO. Exclusion criteria included small case series (<10 patients), non-English language and studies that did not provide a description of the computer-assisted technique. Data extraction included computer-assisted modalities utilized, surgical techniques, demographics, radiographic findings, perioperative outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications and subsequent surgeries. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 208 patients with average ages ranging from 26 to 38 years. Intraoperative navigation was utilized in seven studies, patient-specific guides in one study and both modalities in one study. Three studies reported significantly less intraoperative radiation exposure (P < 0.01) in computer-assisted versus conventional PAOs. Similar surgical times and estimated blood loss (P > 0.05) were commonly observed between the computer-assisted and conventional groups. The average post-operative lateral center edge angles in patients undergoing computer-assisted PAOs ranged from 27.8° to 37.4°, with six studies reporting similar values (P > 0.05) compared to conventional PAOs. Improved PROs were observed in all six studies that reported preoperative and post-operative values of patients undergoing computer-assisted PAOs. Computer-assisted modalities for PAO include navigated tracking of the free acetabular fragment and surgical instruments, as well as patient-specific cutting guides and rotating templates. Compared to conventional techniques, decreased intraoperative radiation exposure and similar operative lengths were observed with computer-assisted PAOs, although these results should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneous operative techniques and surgical settings.

Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated With Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain: A Revision

The Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (AOPT), formerly the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). This is an update to the 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated with Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain. The goals of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. This current CPG covers pathoanatomical features, clinical course, prognosis, diagnosis, examination, and physical therapy interventions in the management of nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(7):CPG1-CPG70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0302.

When are patients with osteoarthritis referred for surgery?

Current treatment strategies in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involve a combined approach that includes not only modification of risk factors and conservative treatment but also joint-preserving surgical therapy in the early stages, or joint replacement in late OA. With the recent development of new etiological concepts (i.e. hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement as major risk factors for hip OA), treatment alternatives for joint preservation could be extended significantly. Satisfactory results of osteotomies and other reconstructive procedures around hip and knee joints can only be expected in early OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 0-II). If patients with advanced radiographic OA grades III-IV do not respond to conservative treatment over at least 3 months and express a relevant burden of disease, joint replacement might be considered. Prior to surgery, potential contraindications must be excluded, patient expectations need to be discussed, and modifiable risk factors, which may negatively influence the outcome, should be optimized.

Periacetabular osteotomy for Tönnis grade 2 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for Tönnis grade 2 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients (51 hips) with Tönnis grade 2 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia, followed by a mean of 52.3 months (range: 24.1 to 95.2 months), were reviewed. As a control group, 51 patients (51 hips) with Tönnis grade 1 osteoarthritis were matched for age, surgery date, and follow-up period. All patients were evaluated clinically with the use of modified Harris hip score (mHHS) questionnaire, WOMAC score, and the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot-12). Radiographic measurements included the lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, and anterior centre-edge angle (ACEA). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed to predict a five year survival rate of no osteoarthritis progression.

RESULTS

All functional scores and radiographic measurements of the two groups significantly improved at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences between the two groups either in functional scores or radiographic measurements. The five year survival rate of no osteoarthritis progression was 86.2% in Tönnis grade 2 group and 93.1% in Tönnis grade 1 group, respectively. In the Tönnis grade 2 group, the osteoarthritis progressed in six hips. Of which, four hips had an ACEA of < 25°. No osteoarthritis progression was found in hips with an ACEA > 40°.

CONCLUSIONS

PAO yielded similar results for patients with Tönnis grade 2 and grade 1 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia. The majority of hips can be preserved without progression of osteoarthritis at five years postoperatively. The slight overcorrection anteriorly may be helpful in preventing osteoarthritis progression.

[Preoperative MR imaging for hip dysplasia : Assessment of associated deformities and intraarticular pathologies]

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a known reason for hip pain for adolescents and young adults. Preoperative imaging is increasingly recognized as an important factor due to the recent advances in MR imaging.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to give an overview of preoperative imaging for DDH. The acetabular version and morphology, associated femoral deformities (cam deformity, valgus and femoral antetorsion) and intraarticular pathologies (labrum and cartilage damage) and cartilage mapping are described.

METHODS

After an initial evaluation with AP radiographs, CT or MRI represent the methods of choice for the preoperative evaluation of the acetabular morphology and cam deformity, and for the measurement of femoral torsion. Different measurement techniques and normal values should be considered, especially for patients with increased femoral antetorsion because this could lead to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. MRI allows analysis of labrum hypertrophy and subtle signs for hip instability. 3D MRI for cartilage mapping allows quantification of biochemical cartilage degeneration and yields great potential for surgical decision-making. 3D-CT and, increasingly, 3D MRI of the hip to generate 3D pelvic bone models and subsequent 3D impingement simulation can help to detect posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Acetabular morphology can be divided in anterior, lateral and posterior hip dysplasia. Combined osseous deformities are common, such as hip dysplasia combined with cam deformity (86%). Valgus deformities were reported in 44%. Combined hip dysplasia and increased femoral antetorsion can occur in 52%. Posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement between the lesser trochanter and the ischial tuberosity can occur in patients with increased femoral antetorsion. Typically, labrum damage and hypertrophy, cartilage damage, subchondral cysts can occur in hip dysplasia. Hypertrophy of the muscle iliocapsularis is a sign for hip instability. Acetabular morphology and femoral deformities (cam deformity and femoral anteversion) should be evaluated before surgical therapy for patients with hip dysplasia, considering the different measurement techniques and normal values of femoral antetorsion.