Extra-articular factors of the femur and tibia affecting knee balance in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Twenty-year survivorship cohort study of total knee arthroplasty in Asian patient using a single posterior-stabilized implant performed by a single surgeon

INTRODUCTION

As life expectancy has improved, the potential number of revision candidates is also expected to increase among patients who have undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The longevity of modern posterior stabilized knee prostheses after 20 years of use has not been well documented, especially in Asian populations that require a deeper flexion range due to a floor-based lifestyle.

HYPOTHESIS

Firstly, the implant longevity regarding mechanical failures such as aseptic loosening and polyethylene (PE) wear would vary over a longer follow-up depending on the age groups; and secondly there would be unique risk factors for revision surgery in an Asian TKA cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted this age-stratified survival analysis in a consecutive series of 368 NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into four age groups (< 60 years, early 60s, late 60s, and ≥ 70 years). The implant longevity against aseptic mechanical failures was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The revision surgery risk was evaluated using postoperative factors including a deep flexion capability (> 135̊), and postoperative mechanical alignments.

RESULTS

Overall survivorship was significantly lower in the youngest groups than other groups (Log-rank test, p=0.001). The cumulative 20-year implant longevity was more than 95% in the two oldest groups, but less than 60% in the youngest group. It was notable that the post-TKA implant longevity was not apparent up to 10 years between the age groups (p=0.073∼0.458). Aseptic loosening was observed with an earlier onset (3.1 to 18.9 years) trend than PE wear (9.8∼17.9 years), with most cases arising in the youngest groups. Flexion limitation and varus alignment were significant risks to aseptic loosening and PE wear (Cox proportional hazard regression: p=0.001 and 0.045, respectively).

DISCUSSION

A younger age (< 60 years), inability of postoperative deep flexion, and varus alignment were significant risk factors for aseptic loosening and PE wear after modern PS design in this Asian cohort. The difference in postoperative longevity affected by these factors was not obvious during the first 10 years but emerged over a second decade.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III; retrospective cohort study.

Validation of a novel finite-element model for evaluating patellofemoral forces and stress during squatting after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have documented the relationship between patellofemoral pain and patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, few computer simulations have been designed to evaluate the patellofemoral joint during flexion. The aim of this study was to validate a new computational simulation, driven by forces and moments, and to analyze patellofemoral reaction forces and stress under squat loading conditions after TKA implantation.

HYPOTHESIS

This computational simulation of a squat using a model driven by forces and moments is comparable to in vitro and in silico data from the literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We developed a finite element model of the lower limb after implantation of a fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized TKA. To simulate squat loading conditions when standing on both legs, an initial load of 130N was applied to the center of the femoral head. Quadriceps force, patellofemoral contact force and Von Mises stress on the patellar implant, tibiofemoral contact forces and pressure on the tibial insert, and post-cam contact force were evaluated from 0° to 100° of knee flexion.

RESULTS

Quadriceps force increased during flexion, up to 6 times the applied load. Von Mises stress on patellar implant increased up to 16MPa at 100° flexion. Tibiofemoral contact forces increased up to 415 N medially and 339 N laterally, with 64% distributed medially on the tibial insert. Post-cam contact started slightly before 70° of flexion.

DISCUSSION

In this simulation, tibiofemoral, patellofemoral and post-cam contact forces, and pressure distribution on the tibial insert were consistent with various published studies. This agreement suggests that computational simulation driven by forces and moments can reproduce squat loading conditions during knee flexion after TKA, without experimental kinematic data used to drive the simulation.

CONCLUSION

This study represents an initial step towards validating tibiofemoral and patellofemoral mechanical behavior under squat conditions, from this computational simulation driven by forces and moments. This model will help us better understand the influence of various implantation techniques on patellofemoral forces and stress during flexion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, biomechanical computational study.

Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed no difference in range of motion, reoperation rate or functional outcomes when compared to manually balanced total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the clinical and functional knee outcomes after Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty (VA TKA), and to compare these outcomes, where possible, with those from manually balanced total knee arthroplasty (MB TKA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus from the beginning of January 2012 until the end of June 2022, to identify potentially relevant articles for this review. Selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: full text English- or German-language clinical studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, which assessed clinical and functional outcomes following VA TKA. Not original research, preprints, abstract-only papers, protocols, reviews, expert opinion papers, book chapters, surgical technique papers, and studies pertaining only to unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) or patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) were excluded. Several scores (Knee Society Score [KSS], Oxford Knee Score [OKS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-4 subscales [KOOS4] and Physical Function-Computerised Adaptive Testing [PF-CAT]), alongside postoperative measurements of range of motion [ROM], reoperation rates and the rate of manipulation under anaesthesia [MUA]) were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. The quality of included papers, except randomised control trials (RCTs), was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). For the assessment of included RCTs, the Jadad Scale was used.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 243 articles. After removing duplicates, 184 papers were included in the initial screening process. Fourteen of them met all the inclusion criteria following the selection process. Mean MINORS for non-comparative studies value was 11.5 (11-12), and for comparative studies 18.2 (13-21). Mean Jadad Scale score was 3.6 (2-5). Outcomes from a total number of 3633 patients were evaluated (mean age at surgery 68.5 years [32-88 years]). In terms of clinical outcomes, the overwhelming majority of studies observed an improvement after VA TKA, but no statistically significant difference in ROM and reoperation rate when compared to MB TKA. On the other hand, lower rates of MUA have been described in the VA TKA group. An increase in postoperative clinical and functional scores values, when compared to the preoperative ones, has been reported in both groups, although no statistically significant difference between them has been observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of Verasense pressure sensors in TKA leads to no significant improvement in ROM, reoperation rate or functional outcomes, when compared to the standard manually balancing technique. However, lower rates of MUA have been described in the VA TKA group. These findings highlight the importance of tools being able to measure ligament stresses or joint pressure for achieving an optimally balanced knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.