Inverse Kinematic Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparative study of a single design of total knee arthroplasty inserted with or without a robotic system based on control of ligament balance: Accuracy and functional outcome at 1 year

INTRODUCTION

Robotic systems are helping to improve surgical precision with the aim of improving the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKAs). The OMNIBotics system is a semi-autonomous robotic system combining a dynamic ligament tensor and a robotic cutting guide for personalized ligament balancing. To our knowledge, there is no single-operator comparative series evaluating the contribution of this system. A retrospective comparative study was therefore carried out to compare, for the same prosthesis and operator: 1) the precision of the OMNIBotics system versus conventional ancillary equipment, 2) the functional results at 1 year postoperative for each groups.

HYPOTHESIS

The OMNIBotics system would be more accurate than the mechanical ancillary for performing planned alignments by reducing the number of outliers and would allow a significant improvement in functional scores at 1 year postoperative.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 106 patients were retrospectively included between October 2017 and December 2021; 53 patients (34 women, 19 men) underwent TKA using the OMNIBotics system (OMNI group) and 53 patients (41 women, 12 men) underwent TKA using conventional mechanical ancillary (Non OMNI group). The two groups were comparable (gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, deformity, preoperative Oxford score) except for age. All patients underwent a full length X-ray of the lower limbs at 3 months post-operatively to calculate the postoperative Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle. This was compared with the planned HKA angle, which was different for the two groups (defined by the software for the OMNI group, equal to 180 ° for the Non OMNI group). All patients responded to an Oxford score preoperatively and then to an Oxford score and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 1 year postoperative.

RESULTS

The number of patients with a difference ≤1 ° between measured and planned HKA angle was significantly higher (p = 0.032) in the OMNI group (60%, n = 32) than in the non-OMNI group (40%, n = 21). The OMNI group also had significantly fewer outliers (measured HKA angle >3° of the planned HKA angle) than the non-OMNI group (94%, n = 50 versus 81%, n = 43, p = 0.038). Postoperative Oxford and Forgotten Knee scores were significantly better in the OMNI group with a mean value of 38.4 ± 6.7 [range, 24 to 48] and 70.7 ± 22.5 [range 9 to 100] for Oxford and FJS scores in the OMNI group versus 33.5 ± 10.1 [range 8 to 45] and 56.9 ± 22.7 [range 8 to 100] for the Non OMNI group (p = 0.004 and 0.002 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The OMNIBotics is a non-imaging robotic assistance system which, after analysis of the ligament balance, enables accurate reproduction of the planning carried out, improving the patient's functional result at one year compared to a conventional ancillary system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective comparative study.

A systematic review of geographic differences in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification

BACKGROUND

The extent of geographic variation in knee phenotypes remains insufficiently documented. This systematic review intends to elucidate the regional disparities in the distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types across different geographic areas.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the distribution of knee phenotypes, as classified by the CPAK system, in both healthy and arthritic populations, were included in the analysis. Based on the methods in the literature, the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. To compare geographical differences in CPAK types among patients with arthritis, as well as healthy people.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies (28 retrospective and 1 prospective) were included in this review, encompassing 27,660 knees in 22,342 subjects. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality was good. Among the healthy knees (n = 4,082), CPAK type II was predominant in Europe (41.7%) and Asia (36.7%). In contrast, among arthritic knees (n = 21,632), CPAK type I was most common in Asia (51.3%), North America (32.8%), and Europe (32.8%), while CPAK type II was prevalent in Australia (29.3%) and Africa (25.5%). Notably, the proportions of CPAK type I (P < 0.001) and II (P = 0.002) knees varied significantly across different geographic regions among arthritic knees, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees (P = 0.48, P = 0.305).

CONCLUSION

Significant variations in CPAK distributions among arthritic knees were observed across countries, while no significant differences were observed among healthy knees. Surgeons in different regions need to make individual surgical plans according to the CPAK types of patients. Video Abstract.

Navigated versus conventionally instrumented total knee arthroplasty techniques: No difference in functional alignment or balance

PURPOSE

Much debate exists about the superiority of navigated versus conventional instrumentation for achieving optimal balance and alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent registry data indicate no long-term survivorship benefit for TKAs performed using technology assistance, despite the added resource and financial costs. However, outcome comparisons are confounded by varying surgeon techniques and targets for ideal balance and alignment. This study aimed to investigate alignment or balance outcome differences between navigated and conventionally instrumented TKAs performed using an identical operative sequence and alignment strategy.

METHODS

Fifty navigated and 50 conventionally instrumented primary TKAs, using an identical inverse kinematic alignment strategy, were included. Navigation equipment was used intraoperatively to 'post-cut' record the conventionally instrumented TKAs. Intraoperative balance, range, and alignment; and post-operative radiographic accuracy for restoration of constitutional alignment were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-nine navigated and 49 conventionally instrumented TKAs were compared (n = 2 excluded due to inadequate radiographs). No preoperative demographic or deformity severity differences existed. No intraoperative balance, range or alignment difference existed. Neither technique was more accurate for restoration of constitutional alignment.

CONCLUSION

Whilst large registry data may be confounded by uncaptured variables such as surgeon balancing techniques or surgeon alignment strategy preferences, this study found no alignment or balance differences between navigated versus conventionally instrumented TKA techniques for a surgeon and technique-controlled study. Although the increased resources necessary for technology assistance are not justified by this study, further studies may identify significance using larger samples or comparison of alternative outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Reproducibility of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) using tibia-first restricted inverse kinematic alignment

INTRODUCTION

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification categorizes knee phenotypes based on constitutional limb alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO). Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment (RIKA) is a surgical philosophy that incorporates calculated perioperative parameters to achieve patient-specific alignment. This study investigated the reproducibility of restoring preoperative CPAK phenotypes via the tibia-first RIKA concept in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This prospective study assessed 129 patients who underwent RIKA TKA using an imageless navigation robotic-assisted arm with a single implant design for primary osteoarthritis between January 2022 and December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative angles for the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured from full-length standing anteroposterior X-ray imaging. Arithmetic HKA (aHKA) was defined as MPTA - LDFA, and JLO was outlined as MPTA + LDFA to classify each knee into one of nine CPAK phenotypes. CPAK boundaries for neutral aHKA and JLO were 0° ± 2° and 180° ± 3°, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean pre- and postoperative aHKA were - 2.73° (SD ± 4.9°) vs. -2.83° (SD ± 3.0°), respectively. The most common preoperative CPAK phenotypes were I (n = 74, 42.5%) and II (n = 40, 23.0%). Among patients with preoperative type I phenotype, 39.2% (29/74) preserved their composition postoperatively, while 48.6% (36/74) converted to type IV. Of 40 Type II knees, 65.0% (26/40) preserved alignment, with 25.0% (10/40) shifting to type V. In preoperative types IV and V, 75% (12/16) and 88.5% (23/26) preserved their phenotypes, respectively. Valgus categories (III, VI, IX) were neutralized into types II and V. CPAK types VII, VIII, and IV were rare throughout.

CONCLUSION

The use of tibia-first RIKA achieved adequate preservation of the native coronal alignment postoperatively. These findings suggest that balancing a knee using tibia-first approach with the use of imageless navigation robotic-assisted systems is a valid tool for surgeons who seek contemplating RIKA TKA.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Functionally and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of Parallelism to the Ground and Weight-Bearing Position of the Knee Using Hip-to-Calcaneus Radiographs

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing mechanically aligned conventional total knee arthroplasty (MA-CTKA) and functionally aligned robotic-arm-assisted TKA (FA-RTKA). Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis between June 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups-MA-CTKA (n = 50) and FA-RTKA (n = 50)-based on the introduction of a robotic-arm-assisted system during the study period. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line orientation angle (JLOA) relative to the floor, and weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio were evaluated using full-length standing hip-to-calcaneus radiographs to compare the conventional mechanical axis (MA) and the ground mechanical axis (GA) passing through the knee joint between the groups. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the postoperative HKA angle between the groups, due to discrepancies in the targeted alignment strategies (FA-RTKA: 2.0° vs. MA-CTKA: 0.5°; p = 0.001). The postoperative JLOA in the FA-RTKA group was more parallel to the floor, whereas the MA-CTKA group showed a downward angulation toward the lateral side (0.6° vs. -2.7°; p < 0.001). In the FA-RTKA group, the GA passed through a neutral position when accounting for the calcaneus, while the MA-CTKA group showed a more lateral GA position (48.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.001). No significant differences in clinical outcomes were shown between the FA-RTKA and MA-CTKA groups, with the FA-RTKA group demonstrating higher Forgotten Joint Scores and a greater range of motion (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Functionally aligned TKA demonstrated improved joint line parallelism to the floor and more neutral weight-bearing alignment in the GA compared to mechanically aligned TKA. These findings indicate a more balanced load distribution across the knee, which may contribute to the superior clinical outcomes observed in the functionally aligned group.

Robotic functional alignment in knee arthroplasty minimizes impact on ankle alignment: Role of MPTA and LDFA preservation

PURPOSE

Alignment strategies in knee arthroplasty have a profound influence not only on knee biomechanics but also on the biomechanics of adjacent joints, particularly the ankle. Functional alignment (FA) represents a flexible alignment strategy aimed at achieving patient-specific balance. However, predefined boundaries are often applied to ensure mechanical stability, leading to adjustments in the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) while still respecting the patient's native alignment as much as possible. FA is a patient-specific strategy that seeks to respect the patient's preoperative phenotype or constitutional alignment while achieving a balanced and stable knee. The hypothesis is that FA strategies can protect the ankle from excessive biomechanical stress.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 300 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Preoperative and 6-month post-operative radiographic evaluations measured key ankle parameters, tibial plafond inclination (TPI), talar inclination (TI) and Talar Tilt (TT). Statistical analyses evaluated the influence of alignment strategies on these parameters, with particular focus on whether MPTA and LDFA crossed the 90° threshold, indicating a shift from varus to valgus or vice versa.

RESULTS

FA demonstrated smaller changes in ankle parameters compared to mechanical alignment (MA). In the FA group, mean changes were 1.8° for KTPA (standard deviation [SD] = 1.1°, p = 0.03), 2.4° for TPI (SD = 1.0°, p = 0.04), 2.1° for TI (SD = 1.3°, p = 0.05) and 1.7° for TT (SD = 0.9°, p = 0.04). The MA group showed greater deviations: 3.9° for KTPA (SD = 1.5°, p = 0.01), 5.2° for TPI (SD = 1.2°, p = 0.02), 4.8° for TI (SD = 1.4°, p = 0.03) and 3.6° for TT (SD = 1.1°, p = 0.04). Alterations in LDFA and MPTA exceeding 2° were significantly associated with worsening ankle alignment. Furthermore, FA, with its goal of maintaining Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification, was associated with minimal modifications to ankle angles, suggesting potential biomechanical benefits as reported in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

FA was associated with smaller changes in ankle alignment parameters, indicating its ability to better preserve native joint positioning. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to confirm these benefits and further establish the FA strategy as a standard in knee arthroplasty, particularly its capacity to maintain CPAK classification alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

While restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide a similar survivorship rate to mechanical alignment (MA) in the short term, no studies have reported on the long-term survivorship and function.

METHODS

One hundred four consecutive cemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted using computer navigation and following the rKA principles proposed by Vendittoli were reviewed at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Implant revisions, reoperations and clinical outcomes were assessed using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), forgotten joint score (FJS), patients' satisfaction and joint perception questionnaires. Radiographs were analyzed to identify signs of osteolysis and implant loosening.

RESULTS

Implant survivorship was 99.0% at a mean follow-up of 11.3 years (range: 10.3-12.9) with one early revision for instability. Patients perceived their TKA as natural or artificial without limitation in 50.0% of cases, and 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied with their TKA. The mean FJS was 67.6 (range: 0-100). The mean KOOS were as follows: pain 84.7 (range: 38-100), symptoms 85.5 (range: 46-100), function in daily activities 82.6 (range: 40-100), function in sport and recreation 35.2 (range: 0-100) and quality of life 79.1 (range: 0-100). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.

CONCLUSION

Cemented TKA implanted with the rKA alignment protocol demonstrated excellent long-term implant survivorship and is a safe alternative to MA to improve patient function and satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, continuous case series with no comparison group.

What does the patients' perception of alignment tell us about alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Knee alignment significantly impacts the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Understanding patient perceptions of their knee alignment in relation to objective measurements is essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and to meet patients' expectations. This study reports patients' perception of pre- and postoperative knee alignment in relation to radiographic alignment measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 141 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee (mean age: 65.4 years, BMI: 30.8). Patients categorized their knee alignment before and after surgery using a picture-based rating scale: very bow-legged (> 10° varus), bow-legged (2.1-10° varus), straight (2° varus to 2° valgus), knock-kneed (2.1-10° valgus), and very knock-kneed (> 10° valgus). Hip-to-ankle films were performed to compared actual knee alignment with patients' assessments retrospectively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 15.1% of patients with severe varus, 55.6% with varus, and 86.7% with neutral alignment perceived their knees as straight. None of the patients with valgus or severe valgus alignment considered their knees as straight. Overall, 40.2% of patients with radiographic varus alignment classified their knees as straight, while nobody with valgus alignment did. Postoperatively patients with preoperative varus considered their knees as straight with an average of 1.8 ± 1.7 deg. mechanical varus alignment, while patients with preoperative valgus alignment considered their knees straight with an average of 0.4 ± 0.9 deg. mechanical valgus alignment.

CONCLUSION

Patients predominantly desire a straight knee postoperatively, however, most patients tend to perceive some varus alignment as straight. This is most common in patients with up to 5 degrees of varus deformity and suggests that a restricted or inverse kinematic alignment with up to 5 degrees of varus can meet the expectations of most patients. In contrast, patients with valgus deformity are sensitive to any remaining valgus deformity and leaving the knees in more than 2 deg. of valgus will unlikely satisfy the patients' overall desire for a straight knee after surgery.

Functional alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformity achieves safe coronal alignment and excellent short-term outcomes

PURPOSE

Functional alignment (FA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prioritizes soft tissue balancing and anatomical restoration without systematic correction to neutral alignment. Most studies have focused on varus deformity, with little evidence available about FA in valgus deformity. The hypothesis of the present study was that FA in robotic-assisted TKA for valgus deformity would demonstrate correction of the coronal alignment and yield satisfactory short-term outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 patients with valgus coronal alignment (hip-knee-angle [HKA] ≥ 183°) who underwent robotic-assisted TKA using the FA technique with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed through the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and radiographic measurements of alignment and phenotypes. Complication and revision rates were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 39 females and 19 males with a median age of 70. Post-operatively, 86.2% of cases achieved coronal alignment within the safe zone (HKA 177-183°). Significant improvements were observed in KSS (part 1: 69.5-95, part 2: 65-94, p < 0.001), while OKS and FJS exhibited optimal outcomes. Two complications were recorded: one aseptic loosening (1.7%) and one early infection (1.7%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated favourable implant survivorship at a median follow-up of 18 months.

CONCLUSION

FA in image-based robotic TKA is a safe and effective approach for patients with valgus deformity. This procedure resulted in a modest correction of the coronal alignment, where no soft tissue releases were needed. The majority of the cases fell within the target coronal alignment boundaries by only accommodating the individual laxities, suggesting the aim of FA to restore each knee's pre-pathological alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Inverse kinematic total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation restores constitutional coronal alignment

PURPOSE

Restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) is a contemporary alignment strategy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), commonly performed with robotic assistance. While superior clinical results are reported for kinematic-type alignment strategies, registry data indicate no survivorship benefit for navigation or robotic assistance. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an instrumented, restricted iKA technique for achieving patient-specific alignment.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients undergoing 84 TKAs (five bilateral procedures) using an iKA technique were included for preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignment analysis. The mean age was 66.5 (range: 43-82) with 33 male and 51 female patients. Artificial intelligence was employed for radiographic measurements. Alignment profiles were classified using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) system. Preoperative and postoperative alignment profiles were compared with subanalyses for preoperative valgus, neutral and varus profiles.

RESULTS

The mean joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) reduced from 2.5° to -0.1° postoperatively. The mean lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) remained unchanged postoperatively, while the mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) increased by 2.5° (p = 0.001). By preservation of the LDFA and restoration of the MPTA, the mean hip knee ankle angle (HKA) moved through 3.5° varus to 1.2° valgus. The CPAK system was used to visually depict changes in alignment profiles for preoperative valgus, neutral and varus knees; with 63% of patients observing an interval change in classification.

CONCLUSION

Encouraged by the latest evidence supporting both conventional instrumentation and kinematic-type TKA strategies, this study describes how a restricted, conventionally instrumented iKA technique may be utilised to restore constitutional lower limb alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

INTRODUCTION

With a satisfaction rate of 80%, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has seen significant improvements in recent decades. The 20% of poor results may be explained by the alignment technique used for implant placement, which can influence patellofemoral kinematics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the use of inverse kinematic alignment makes it possible to obtain satisfactory clinical and radiological patellar scores in robotic TKA.

HYPOTHESIS

The inverse kinematic alignment technique coupled with robotic surgery makes it possible to restore the native kinematics of the patella.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study including 100 TKAs with a primary TKA performed using the Stryker Mako™ robotic surgery system, and the inverse kinematic alignment technique. Patients who underwent patella resurfacing were excluded. Clinical and radiological scores were recorded preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

At one year, the specific patellar clinical scores were excellent with an average Kujala score of 85.69 and an average HSS Patellar score 88.15. The average patellar lateralization index was 0.15 and the average patellar tilt was 5.1°, showing no significant difference compared to preoperation (p=0.45 and p=0.18). The average external rotation of the femoral implant was 0.47±0.6° [-1.9; 2.1].

DISCUSSION

The patellofemoral clinical results were excellent. The use of the robotic arm coupled with this alignment technique makes it possible to obtain a controlled external rotation of the femoral implant as well as an optimized orientation of the tibial component, favoring good restitution of the alignment of the extensor apparatus. This study did not demonstrate any radiological correction of patellar tilt and lateralization.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of robotic surgery with the inverse kinematic alignment technique seems effective on specific clinical results of the patellofemoral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; prospective cohort.

The Distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in a Sample of Spanish Southeast Osteoarthritic Population: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification is a pragmatic distribution of nine phenotypes for coronal knee alignment that can be used on healthy and arthritic knees. Our study aimed to describe the CPAK distributions in a Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population and compare them to other populations' published alignment distributions. Method and Materials: Full-leg standing X-rays of the lower limb from 528 cases originating from the so-called Vega Alta del Segura (southeast of the Iberian Peninsula) were retrospectively analysed. We measured the mechanical hip-knee-ankle, lateral distal femoral, and medial proximal tibial angles. We calculated the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and the joint line obliquity to classify each case according to the criteria of the CPAK classification. Results: Based on the aHKA result, 59.1% of the cases were varus (less than -2°), 32.7% were neutral (0° ± 2°), and 8.2% were valgus (greater than +2°). Based on the JLO result, 56.7% of the cases had a distal apex (less than 177°), 39.9% had a neutral apex (180° ± 3°), and 3.4% had a proximal apex (greater than 183°). The most common CPAK distribution in our Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population was type I (30.7%), followed by type IV (25.9%), type II (21%), type V (11.2%), type III (5%), type VI (2.8%), type VII (2.4%), type VIII (0.6%), and type IX (0.4%). Conclusions: We described the distribution according to the CPAK classification in a sample of the osteoarthritic population from southeastern Spain. In our sample, more than 75% of the patients were classified as type I, II, and IV.

A Restriction Boundary-Based Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) Classification for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification was proposed as a means of understanding the knee phenotype in leg alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO). However, when it is adapted to restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA), the boundaries of CPAK and those of rKA-TKA phenotype are different. We therefore reappraise the boundary between the CPAK classification and restriction protocol and propose a restriction boundary-based CPAK (Rb-CPAK). Methods Between May 2020 and March 2022, 143 knees in 95 patients underwent rKA at our institution and were included in this study. In Rb-CPAK, we set the following ranges: 6° varus to 3° valgus for arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), 0° to 6° varus for the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), 0° to 5° valgus for the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and 169° to 180° for JLO. The pre- and postoperative alignments were classified using the original CPAK and Rb-CPAK. Results There were significant differences in pre- and postoperative distributions between original CPAK and Rb-CPAK (p < 0.0001). Postoperative Rb-CPAK primarily led to neutral aHKA (116 of 143 knees), and decreased MPTA varus (pre: 83.9 ± 3.4, post: 87.0 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001) and stable LDFA values (pre: 88.7 ± 3.1, post: 88.5 ± 2.7, p = 0.4) were observed. Among cases with neutral JLO, 78 knees required MPTA or LDFA corrections. Postoperatively, 67 (64%) out of 119 knees categorized as neutral JLO fell within MPTA and LDFA ranges. Conclusion The Rb-CPAK modification more effectively outlined knees that required restriction, and the restriction was properly performed compared with the original CPAK. However, JLO does not effectively indicate if a knee requires restriction or not, and thus individual evaluation of LDFA and MPTA might be necessary.

Alignment Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where do We Stand Today?

Achieving optimal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a critical factor in ensuring optimal outcomes and long-term implant survival. Traditionally, mechanical alignment has been favored to achieve neutral post-operative joint alignment. However, contemporary approaches, such as kinematic alignments and hybrid techniques including adjusted mechanical, restricted kinematic, inverse kinematic, and functional alignments, are gaining attention for their ability to restore native joint kinematics and anatomical alignment, potentially leading to enhanced functional outcomes and greater patient satisfaction. The ongoing debate on optimal alignment strategies considers the following factors: long-term implant durability, functional improvement, and resolution of individual anatomical variations. Furthermore, advancements of computer-navigated and robotic-assisted surgery have augmented the precision in implant positioning and objective measurements of soft tissue balance. Despite ongoing debates on balancing implant longevity and functional outcomes, there is an increasing advocacy for personalized alignment strategies that are tailored to individual anatomical variations. This review evaluates the spectrum of various alignment techniques in TKA, including mechanical alignment, patient-specific kinematic approaches, and emerging hybrid methods. Each technique is scrutinized based on its fundamental principles, procedural techniques, inherent advantages, and potential limitations, while identifying significant clinical gaps that underscore the need for further investigation.

Better restoration of joint line obliquity in tibia first restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment TKA

INTRODUCTION

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), suboptimal restoration of joint line obliquity (JLO) and joint line height (JLH) may lead to diminished implant longevity, increased risk of complications, and reduced patient reported outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) leads to improved restoration of JLO and JLH compared to mechanical alignment (MA) in TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assessed patients who underwent single implant design TKA for primary osteoarthritis, either MA with manual instrumentation or rKA assisted with imageless navigation robotic arm TKA. Pre- and post-operative long standing AP X-ray imaging were used to measure JLO formed between the proximal tibial joint line and the floor. JLH was measured as the distance from the femoral articular surface to the adductor tubercle.

RESULTS

Overall, 200 patients (100 patients in each group) were included. Demographics between the two groups including age, sex, ASA, laterality, and BMI did not significantly differ. Distribution of KL osteoarthritis classification was similar between the groups. For the MA group, pre- to post-operative JLO significantly changed (2.94° vs. 2.31°, p = 0.004). No significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLH (40.6 mm vs. 40.6 mm, p = 0.89). For the rKA group, no significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLO (2.43° vs. 2.30°, p = 0.57). Additionally, no significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLH (41.2 mm vs. 42.4 mm, p = 0.17). Pre- to post-operative JLO alteration was five times higher in the MA group compared to the rKA group, although this comparison between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

rKA-TKA results in high restoration accuracy of JLO and JLH, and demonstrates less pre- and post-operative JLO alteration compared to MA-TKA. With risen interest in joint line restoration accuracy with kinematic alignment, these findings suggest potential advantages compared to MA. Future investigation is needed to correlate between joint line restoration accuracy achieved by rKA and enhanced implant longevity, reduced risk of post-operative complications, and heightened patient satisfaction.

Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Purpose

For primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an increasing trend towards patient-specific alignment strategies such as kinematic alignment (KA) and inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), which by restoring native joint mechanics may yield higher patient satisfaction rates. Second, the most recent Australian joint registry report describes favourable revision rates for conventionally instrumented TKA compared to technology-assisted techniques such as those using navigation, robotics or custom-cutting blocks. The aim of this technique article is to describe in detail a surgical technique for TKA that: (1) utilises the principles of iKA and (2) uses conventionally instrumented guided resections thereby avoiding the use of navigation, robotics or custom blocks.

Methods

A TKA technique is described, whereby inverse kinematic principles are utilised and patient-specific alignment is achieved. Additionally, the patellofemoral compartment of the knee is restored to the native patellofemoral joint line. The sequenced technical note provided may be utilised for cemented or cementless components; cruciate retaining or sacrificing designs and for fixed or rotating platforms.

Results

An uncomplicated, robust and reproducible technique for TKA is described.

Discussion

Knee arthroplasty surgeons may wish to harness the emerging benefits of both a conventionally instrumented technique and a patient-specific alignment strategy.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in a great majority of varus and straight knees and normalises valgus and severe varus deformities

PURPOSE

The present study focuses on testing the capability of a restricted tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment technique (PSA) to restore bony morphology and phenotypes.

METHODS

Three-hundred and sixty-seven patients were treated with navigated total knee arthroplasty and tibia-first gap-balanced PSA technique. Boundaries for medial proximal tibial angle were 86°-92°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle 86°-92°, and hip-knee-ankle angle 175°-183°. Knees were classified by coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK), with subsequent analyses comparing pre- and postoperative distributions. Phenotype classification within CPAK groups assessed pre- and postoperative distributions.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the largest CPAK group was type II (30.8%), followed by type I (20.5%) and type V (17.8%). Postoperatively, type II remained the largest group (39%), followed by type V (30%). All groups with varus/valgus deformities (I, III, IV and VI) became smaller. While in straight legs (II, IV), the CPAK was restored in more than 70%-75%, in varus groups (I, IV) in 40%-50% and in valgus (III and VI) in 5%-18%. The joint line obliquity remained the same in the majority of knees (straight >75%; varus 63%-80%; valgus VI 95%), with the exception of CPAK III (40%). The phenotype analysis showed for straight legs a phenotype restoration of 85%, for varus 94% and for valgus 37%. Joint line convergence angle was reduced significantly in all groups from 1.8°-4.3° preoperatively to 0.6°-1.2° postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

PSA restores bony phenotypes and joint line obliquity in the majority of straight and varus knees, while most of the valgus and extreme varus knees are normalised.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Widening of tibial resection boundaries increases the rate of femoral component valgus and internal rotation in functionally aligned TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of increasing the tibial boundaries in functional alignment on femoral component orientation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a database of robotic-assisted TKAs using a digital joint tensioning device was performed (BalanceBot®; Corin). A total of 692 TKAs with correctable deformity were included. Functional alignment with a tibia-first balancing technique was simulated by performing an anatomic tibial resection to recreate the native medial proximal tibial angle within certain boundaries (A, 87-90°; B, 86-90°; C, 84-92°), while accounting for wear. After balancing the knee, the resulting amount of femoral component outliers in the coronal and axial plane was calculated for each group and correlated to the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.

RESULTS

The proportion of knees with high femoral component varus (>96°) or valgus (<87°) alignment increased from 24.5% (n = 170) in group A to 26.5% (n = 183) in group B and 34.2% (n = 237) in group C (p < 0.05). Similarly, more knees with high femoral component external rotation (>6°) or internal rotation (>3°) were identified in group C (33.4%, n = 231) than in group B (23.7%, n = 164) and A (18.4%, n = 127) (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant (p < 0.01) overall increase in knees with both femoral component valgus <87° and internal rotation >3° from group A (4.0%, n = 28) to B (7.7%, n = 53) and C (15.8%, n = 109), with CPAK type I and II showing a 12.9- and 2.9-fold increase, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Extending the tibial boundaries when using functional alignment with a tibia-first balancing technique in TKA leads to a statistically significant higher percentage of knees with a valgus lateral distal femoral angle < 87° and >3° internal rotation of the femoral component, especially in CPAK type I and II.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs

BACKGROUND

The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification was first developed using long leg radiographs (LLR) and has since been reported using image-based and imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems. However, the correspondence between imageless robotics and LLR-derived CPAK parameters has yet to be investigated. This study therefore examined the differences in CPAK parameters determined with LLR and imageless robotic navigation using either generic or optimized cartilage wear assumptions.

METHODS

Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined from the intraoperative registration data of 61 imageless robotic TKAs using either a generic 2 mm literature-based wear assumption (Navlit) or an optimized wear assumption (Navopt) found using an error minimization algorithm. MPTA and LDFA were also measured from preoperative LLR by two observers and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. MPTA, LDFA, joint line obliquity (JLO), and arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were compared between the robotic and the average LLR measurements over the two observers.

RESULTS

ICCs between observers for LLR were over 0.95 for MPTA, LDFA, JLO, and aHKA, indicating excellent agreement. Mean CPAK differences were not significant between LLR and Navlit (all differences within 0.6°, P > 0.1) or Navopt (all within 0.1°, P > 0.83). Mean absolute errors (MAE) between LLR and Navlit were: LDFA = 1.4°, MPTA = 2.0°, JLO = 2.1°, and aHKA = 2.7°. Compared to LLR, the generic wear classified 88% and the optimized wear classified 94% of knees within one CPAK group. Bland-Altman comparisons reported good agreement for LLR vs. Navlit and Navopt, with > 95% and > 91.8% of measurements within the limits of agreement across all CPAK parameters, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Imageless robotic navigation data can be used to calculate CPAK parameters for arthritic knees undergoing TKA with good agreement to LLR. Generic wear assumptions determined MPTA and LDFA with MAE within 2° and optimizing wear assumptions showed negligible improvement.

Why Kinematic Alignment Makes Little Sense in Valgus Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Narrative Review

There is a debate about the best alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment (MA) targets in combination with necessary soft tissue releases are the gold standard for TKA in end-stage valgus osteoarthritis. Some authors propagate kinematic alignment (KA) with the aim of restoring the patient's native alignment and minimizing the need for soft tissue releases. Our previous studies showed that MA with standardized soft tissue release produces reproducible results, and that the preoperative phenotype does not influence the results of patients with valgus osteoarthritis. These data suggest that there is no functional advantage to preserving valgus alignment in patients with valgus osteoarthritis. Many patients with valgus osteoarthritis present with a compromised medial collateral ligament and leaving the knee in valgus could increase the risk of secondary instability. The current literature supports MA TKA with soft tissue release as the gold standard. While using more sophisticated enabling technologies like robotic surgery might allow for aiming for very slight (1-2°) valgus alignment on the femoral side, any valgus alignment outside this range should be avoided. This review paper summarizes our current knowledge on the surgical techniques of TKA in patients with valgus osteoarthritis.

Finite element analysis in the optimization of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) is associated with high rates of satisfaction and functional recovery. This is notably attributed to implant optimization in terms of design, choice of materials, positioning and understanding of biomechanics. Finite elements analysis (FEA) is an assessment technique that contributed to this optimization by ensuring mechanical results based on numerical simulation. By close teamwork between surgeons, researchers and engineers, FEA enabled testing of certain clinical impressions. However, the methodological features of the technique led to wide variations in the presentation and interpretation of results, requiring a certain understanding of numerical and biomechanical fields by the orthopedic community. The present study provides an up-to-date review, aiming to address the following questions: what are the principles of FEA? What is the role of FEA in studying PS design in TKA? What are the key elements in the literature for understanding the role of FEA in PS-TKA? What is the contribution of FEA for understanding of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral biomechanical behavior? What are the limitations and perspectives of digital simulation and FEA in routine practice, with a particular emphasis on the "digital twin" concept? LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment technique achieves well-balanced gaps in 90% of cases by rebuilding bony anatomy within boundaries

PURPOSE

Patient-specific alignment (PSA) technique tries to achieve balanced gaps and simultaneously rebuild the individual bony phenotype. The hypothesis was: PSA technique achieves balanced knees in a high percentage with more anatomical resections than adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA).

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-seven patients underwent navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tibia-first gap-balanced PSA technique. Resection boundaries for medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) of 86-92°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) of 86-92°, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) of 175-185° were defined. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters of HKA, MPTA, mLDFA, and gap widths were recorded. Depending on the coronal deformity, the patients were divided into three groups: varus HKA < 178°; straight 178-182° and valgus HKA > 182°. The stability was analysed by assessing the difference between medial and lateral extension and flexion gaps as well as between flexion and extension gaps. All PSA measurements were compared with data from a previously published AMA series.

RESULTS

PSA achieved balanced gaps in extension, flexion and between flexion/extension in over 90% of cases, being similar to AMA. In PSA, MPTA and mLDFA were restored within 1°, except in extreme varus (MPTA difference 2°) and valgus knees (mLDFA difference 3°). This was caused by the defined boundaries of the alignment technique. This individualised reconstruction led to significantly more anatomical resections of all tibia and femur resections.

CONCLUSION

A tibia-first, gap-balanced PSA technique achieves balanced joints in more than 90% of cases. By maintaining preoperative MPTA and mLDFA to a high extent, far more anatomical resections, compared to AMA were performed. Future studies need to be conducted to investigate whether those promising intraoperative results correlate with postoperative patient outcomes and whether patients outside the 5° corridor have higher failure rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Intraoperative Challenges of the Kinematic Knee

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for managing end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Among the various TKA techniques, kinematic alignment has gained increasing popularity as it can potentially restore a more natural joint function. However, despite its theoretical advantages, kinematic total knee replacement presents several operative challenges that necessitate a thorough understanding and analysis of patient-specific anatomy during surgical planning and execution. This review article aims to critically evaluate the operative challenges associated with kinematic TKA and explore potential strategies to optimize surgical outcomes. The challenges encompass multiple aspects including patient selection, preoperative planning, bone cuts, soft tissue balancing, and component positioning.

Twenty-year survivorship cohort study of total knee arthroplasty in Asian patient using a single posterior-stabilized implant performed by a single surgeon

INTRODUCTION

As life expectancy has improved, the potential number of revision candidates is also expected to increase among patients who have undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The longevity of modern posterior stabilized knee prostheses after 20 years of use has not been well documented, especially in Asian populations that require a deeper flexion range due to a floor-based lifestyle.

HYPOTHESIS

Firstly, the implant longevity regarding mechanical failures such as aseptic loosening and polyethylene (PE) wear would vary over a longer follow-up depending on the age groups; and secondly there would be unique risk factors for revision surgery in an Asian TKA cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted this age-stratified survival analysis in a consecutive series of 368 NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into four age groups (< 60 years, early 60s, late 60s, and ≥ 70 years). The implant longevity against aseptic mechanical failures was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The revision surgery risk was evaluated using postoperative factors including a deep flexion capability (> 135̊), and postoperative mechanical alignments.

RESULTS

Overall survivorship was significantly lower in the youngest groups than other groups (Log-rank test, p=0.001). The cumulative 20-year implant longevity was more than 95% in the two oldest groups, but less than 60% in the youngest group. It was notable that the post-TKA implant longevity was not apparent up to 10 years between the age groups (p=0.073∼0.458). Aseptic loosening was observed with an earlier onset (3.1 to 18.9 years) trend than PE wear (9.8∼17.9 years), with most cases arising in the youngest groups. Flexion limitation and varus alignment were significant risks to aseptic loosening and PE wear (Cox proportional hazard regression: p=0.001 and 0.045, respectively).

DISCUSSION

A younger age (< 60 years), inability of postoperative deep flexion, and varus alignment were significant risk factors for aseptic loosening and PE wear after modern PS design in this Asian cohort. The difference in postoperative longevity affected by these factors was not obvious during the first 10 years but emerged over a second decade.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III; retrospective cohort study.

Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - there is no winner yet

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been extensively documented and it was attributed to numerous factors. In recent years, significant focus has been directed towards implant alignment and stability as potential causes and solutions to this issue. Surgeons are now exploring a more personalized approach to TKA, recognizing the importance of thoroughly understanding each individual patient's anatomy and functional morphology. A more comprehensive preoperative analysis of alignment and knee morphology is essential to address the unresolved questions in knee arthroplasty effectively. The crucial task of determining the most appropriate alignment strategy for each patient arises, given the substantial variability in bone resection resulting from the interplay of phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. This review aims to comprehensively present the definitions of different alignment techniques in all planes and discuss the consequences dependent on knee phenotypes.Level of evidence V.

A robotic-assisted simulation of kinematic alignment in TKA leads to excessive valgus and internal rotation in valgus knees

PURPOSE

Strategies to further improve patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty include the introduction of new alignment philosophies and more precise instruments such as navigation and robotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a combination of image-based robotic assistance and the use of modern alignment strategies on the resulting joint line obliquity as well as femoral component rotation and to compare this between varus, neutral and valgus knees.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 200 patients who received a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (MAKO®, Stryker) using functional alignment between 2018 and 2020. The patients were divided into a varus (103 patients), neutral (57 patients) and valgus (40 patients) group. The intraoperatively recorded bone cuts and resulting joint line obliquity were identified and compared to values obtained with a robotic computer simulation of kinematic alignment.

RESULTS

The mean femoral coronal alignment of the varus, neutral and valgus group, respectively, equalled 0.5° (± 1.1°), 1.1° (± 0.8°) and 1.6° (± 0.7°) of valgus with functional alignment and 2.1° (± 2.1°), 4.1° (± 1.7°) and 6.2° (± 1.7°) of valgus with kinematic alignment. The mean femoral axial alignment of the valgus group resulted in 0.8° (± 2.0°) of internal rotation with functional alignment and 3.9° (± 2.8°) of internal rotation with kinematic alignment. Overall, 186 knees (93%) could be balanced while respecting certain safe zones by using functional alignment as opposed to 54 knees (27% and none in the valgus group) when applying kinematic alignment. Kinematic alignment led to a combination of femoral component valgus and internal rotation of more than 3° in 22 valgus knees (55%), 10 neutral knees (18%) and 3 varus knees (3%) compared to none in each group when applying functional alignment with safe zones.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted kinematic alignment leads to a combination of excessive valgus and internal rotation of the femoral component in valgus and to a lesser extent also in neutral knees when compared with functional alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

PURPOSE

Patient-specific alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown promising patient-reported outcome measures; however, the clinical and biomechanical effects of restoring the native knee anatomy remain debated. The purpose of this study was to compare the gait pattern between a mechanically aligned TKA cohort (adjusted mechanical alignment-aMA) and a patient-specific alignment TKA cohort (inverse kinematic alignment-iKA).

METHODS

At two years postoperatively, the aMA and iKA groups, each with 15 patients, were analyzed in a retrospective case-control study. All patients underwent TKA with robotic assistance (Mako, Stryker) through an identical perioperative protocol. The patients' demographics were identical. The control group comprised 15 healthy participants matched for age and gender. Gait analysis was performed with a 3D motion capture system (VICON). Data collection was conducted by a blinded investigator. The primary outcomes were knee flexion during walking, knee adduction moment during walking and spatiotemporal parameters (STPs). The secondary outcomes were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).

RESULTS

During walking, the maximum knee flexion did not differ between the iKA group (53.0°) and the control group (55.1°), whereas the aMA group showed lower amplitudes of sagittal motion (47.4°). In addition, the native limb alignment in the iKA group was better restored, and although more in varus, the knee adduction moments in the iKA group were not increased (225 N mm/kg) compared to aMA group (276 N mm/kg). No significant differences in STPs were observed between patients receiving iKA and healthy controls. Six of 7 STPs differed significantly between patients receiving aMA and healthy controls. The OKS was significantly better in patients receiving iKA than aMA: 45.4 vs. 40.9; p = 0.05. The FJS was significantly better in patients receiving iKA than aMA: 84.8 vs. 55.5; p = 0.002.

CONCLUSION

At two years postoperatively, the gait pattern showed greater resemblance to that in healthy controls in patients receiving iKA rather than aMA. The restoration of the native coronal limb alignment does not lead to increased knee adduction moments due to the restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laxity, Balance, and Alignment of a Simulated Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Kinematic alignment (KA) and related personalized alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) target restoration of native joint line obliquity and alignment. In practice, deviations from exact restoration of the prearthritic joint surface are tolerated for either the femur or tibia to achieve ligamentous balance. It remains unknown what laxity, balance, and alignment would result if a pure resurfacing of both femur and tibia were performed in a KA TKA technique.

Methods

We used data from 382 robot-assisted TKA performed with a digital joint tensioner to simulate TKA with a pure resurfacing KA technique for both femur and tibia. All knees had the posterior cruciate ligament retained. Knees were subdivided into 4 groups based on preoperative coronal alignment: valgus, neutral, varus, and high varus. Medial and lateral laxity in extension and flexion, balance in extension and flexion, and coronal plane alignment were compared between groups using analysis of variance testing.

Results

In simulated pure resurfacing KA TKA across a range of preoperative coronal plane deformities, only 11%-31% of knees would have mediolateral extension ligament balance within ±1 mm, and 20%-41% would have a medial flexion gap that is looser than the lateral flexion gap. Over 45% of knees would have coronal hip-knee-ankle angle >3 degrees from mechanical neutral.

Conclusions

In simulations of pure resurfacing KA TKA, there was wide variability in the resulting laxity and alignment outcomes. Most knees had alignment and balance outcomes outside of normally accepted ranges. Techniques that deviate from pure resurfacing in order to achieve balance appear favorable.

Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment has recently become a hot topic in the orthopedics arthroplasty literature. Coronal plane alignment especially has gained increasing attention since it is considered a cornerstone for improved clinical outcomes. Various alignment techniques have been described, but none proved to be optimal and there is a lack of general consensus on which alignment provides best results. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the different types of coronal alignments in TKA, correctly defining the main principles and terms.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Inversed Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty by Asia Specific (Huang’s) Phenotypes, a Prospective Pilot Study

Inverse restricted kinematic alignment (irKA) was modified from restricted kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This prospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of irKA-TKA on all knee subtypes classified by Asia specific (Huang’s) phenotypes. A total of 96 knees that underwent irKA-TKA at one hospital between January 2018 and June 2020 were included, with 15 knees classified in Type 1, nine in Type 2, 15 in Type 3, 47 in Type 4, and 10 in Type 5 by Huang’s phenotypes. Outcomes were knee alignment measures and patient-reported satisfaction evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and traditional Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Follow-up was one year. Type 4 knee was most significantly corrected in all angles by irKA-TKA, followed by Type 2 and 3 knees. Type 5 and 1 knee were only significantly corrected in some angles. The correlation between FJS-12 and WOMAC was good at 6 months (Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.74) and moderate at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months during follow-up (r = 0.37~0.47). FJS-12 and WOMAC displayed comparable hip–knee–ankle angle cut-off value (4.71° vs. 6.20°), sensitivity (70.49% vs. 67.19%), specificity (84.00% vs. 85.71%), and Youden index (54.49% vs. 52.90%) in prediction of good prognosis. In conclusion, irKA-TKA corrects knee alignment in all knee types with increasing satisfaction for one-year follow-up. Knees with presurgical varus deformity are most recommended for irKA-TKA. Both presurgical scores of the traditional Chinese version of FJS-12 and WOMAC predict the prognosis of irKA-TKA.

The language of knee alignment : updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From 'mechanical' to 'adjusted mechanical' to 'restricted kinematic' to 'unrestricted kinematic' - and how constitutional alignment relates to these - there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102-108.

Digital TKA Alignment Training with a New Digital Simulation Tool (Knee-CAT) Improves Process Quality, Efficiency, and Confidence

Individual alignment techniques have been introduced to restore patients' unique anatomical variations during total knee arthroplasty. The transition from conventional mechanical alignment to individualised approaches, with the assistance of computer and/or robotic technologies, is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a digital training platform with real patient data to educate and simulate various modern alignment philosophies. The aim was to evaluate the training effect of the tool by measuring the process quality and efficiency, as well as the post-training surgeon's confidence with new alignment philosophies. Based on 1000 data sets, a web-based interactive TKA computer navigation simulator (Knee-CAT) was developed. Quantitative decisions on bone cuts were linked to the extension and flexion gap values. Eleven different alignment workflows were introduced. A fully automatic evaluation system for each workflow, with a comparison function for all workflows, was implemented to increase the learning effect. The results of 40 surgeons with different experience levels using the platform were assessed. Initial data were analysed regarding process quality and efficiency and compared after two training courses. Process quality measured by the percentage of correct decisions was increased by the two training courses from 45% to 87.5%. The main reasons for failure were wrong decisions on the joint line, tibia slope, femoral rotation, and gap balancing. Efficiency was obtained with a reduction in time spent per exercise from 4 min 28 s to 2 min 35 s (42%) after the training courses. All volunteers rated the training tool as helpful or extremely helpful for learning new alignment philosophies. Separating the learning experience from OR performance was mentioned as one of the main advantages. A novel digital simulation tool for the case-based learning of various alignment philosophies in TKA surgery was developed and introduced. The simulation tool, together with the training courses, improved surgeon confidence and their ability to learn new alignment techniques in a stress-free out-of-theatre environment and to become more time efficient in making correct alignment decisions.

Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment Better Restores the Native Joint Line Orientation While Achieving Similar Balance, Laxity, and Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle to Gap Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Both restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) and gap balancing aim for a balanced total knee arthroplasty by adjusting femoral component position based on ligamentous gaps. However, iKA targets a native tibial joint line vs resecting perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study compares how these 2 techniques impact the balance and laxity throughout flexion and joint line obliquity (JLO), arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK).

Methods

Two surgeons performed 75 robot-assisted iKA total knee arthroplasties. A digital joint tensioner collected laxity data throughout flexion before femoral resection. The femoral component position was determined using predictive gap-planning to optimize the balance throughout flexion. Planned gap balancing (pGB) simulations were performed for each case using neutral tibial resections. Mediolateral balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared among pGB, planned iKA (piKA), and final iKA.

Results

Both piKA and pGB had similar mediolateral balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4 mm. piKA had a lower mean absolute difference from native JLO than pGB (3 ± 2° vs 7 ± 4°, P < .001). aHKA was similar (P > .05) between pGB and piKA. piKA recreated a more native CPAK distribution, with types I-V being the most common ones, while most pGB knees were of type V, VII, and III. Final iKA and piKA had similar mediolateral balance and laxity, with a root-mean-square error <1.4 mm.

Conclusions

Although balance, laxity, and aHKA were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native JLO and CPAK phenotypes. The neutral tibial resection moved most pGB knees into types V, VII, and III. Surgeons should appreciate how the alignment strategy affects knee phenotypes.

Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?

Current limitations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) function and patient satisfaction stimulated us to question our practice. Our understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics has evolved over recent years as we now consider that a more personalized joint reconstruction may be a better-targeted goal for TKA. Implant design and surgical techniques must be advanced to better reproduce the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and ultimately provide a forgotten joint. The availability of precision tools as robotic assistance surgery can help us recreate patient anatomy and ensure components are not implanted in a position that may compromise long-term outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining in popularity and may be the future of orthopedic surgery. However, moving away from the concept of neutrally aligning every TKA dogma opens the door to new techniques emergence based on opinion and experience and leads to a certain amount of uncertainty among knee surgeons. Hence, it is important to clearly describe each technique and analyze their potential impacts and benefits. Personalized TKA techniques may be classified into 2 main families: unrestricted or restricted component orientation. In the restricted group, some will aim to reproduce native ligament laxity versus aiming for ligament isometry. When outside of their boundaries, all restricted techniques will induce anatomical changes. Similarly, most native knee having asymmetric ligaments laxity between compartments and within the same compartment during the arc of flexion; aiming for ligament isometry induces bony anatomy changes. In the current paper, we will summarize and discuss the impacts of the different robotic personalized alignment techniques, including kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and functional alignment (FA). With every surgical technique, there are limitations and shortcomings. As our implants are still far from the native knee, it is primordial to understand the impacts and benefits of each technique. Mid to long data will help us in defining the new standards.

Radiological Evaluation of the Phenotype of Indian Osteoarthritic Knees based on the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification (CPAK)

Background

Understanding constitutional alignment of the lower limb is essential to optimize alignment strategies during total knee arthroplasty. The coronal plane alignment of knee (CPAK) classification system was proposed as a comprehensive assessment tool based on coronal alignment and variations in joint line obliquity (JLO). This prospective observational cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the phenotype of knees in the Indian population based on the CPAK system.

Methods

Two cohorts of individuals (250 young healthy volunteers and 250 elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis) underwent radiological assessment with long-leg radiographs and were classified based on the CPAK system. Measurements included the mechanical and arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angles (mHKA, aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO), lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). Knees were grouped into 9 CPAK phenotypes based on aHKA and JLO.

Results

A total of 1000 knees were evaluated. In cohort-1 of healthy young adults, most knees were distributed in the CPAK class II phenotype (128 knees, 25.6%) followed by CPAK Type I (106 knees, 21.2%). In cohort-2 of elderly arthritic adults, most knees were distributed in Type I (294 knees, 58.8%) with constitutional varus and apex-distal joint line orientation.

Conclusion

The majority of the study population was found to have constitutional varus alignment. In addition, a high proportion of patients in both categories, especially arthritic patients undergoing TKA, were found to have varus alignment with an apex-distal oblique joint line. This classification may help optimize component positioning to restore constitutional alignment and joint line orientation during TKA.