A scoping review of nurse-led advance care planning

Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning in Adults in the U.S.- A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning involves discussing individuals' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.

"You don't want to know just about my lungs, you…want to know more about me". Patients and their caregivers' evaluation of a nurse-led COPD supportive care service

AIM

To evaluate a nurse-led model of supportive care in a COPD outpatient service from patient and caregiver perspectives.

DESIGN

Case study methodology.

METHODS

Data were collected from semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 12) and caregivers (n = 7) conducted between April 2020 and September 2022. A purposive sampling strategy was used. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis with an inductive approach. COREQ guidelines informed reporting of this study.

RESULTS

Eight categories were identified from the data evaluating of the model of care relating to the most helpful aspects of COPD supportive care and suggested improvements to the model of care. The categories were: guidance with managing symptoms; participating in advance care planning; home visiting; expert advice; continuity and trust; caring; caregiver support and improvements to the model of care.

CONCLUSION

In a nurse-led model of COPD supportive care, what patients and caregivers valued most was expert advice and guidance with symptom management, flexible home visiting, participation in advance care planning, caring and continuity within an ongoing trusted therapeutic relationship. Understanding what patients and caregivers value most is essential in designing and delivering models of care that meet the needs of patients living with chronic, life-limiting illness.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Nurses can lead effective models of supportive care that offer valuable support to patients living with COPD and their caregivers.

Establishing a Spanish-Focused Advance Care Planning Educational Session for Latina Breast Cancer Survivors

Minoritized groups including Latinos are less engaged in awareness and discussion of advance care planning (ACP) due to the United States English-dominated healthcare system that contributes to systemic inequities related to language and cultural barriers. Explicit interventions, such as a sole Spanish-speaking educational session, may begin discussions of ACP among Latina breast cancer survivors. However, what constitutes a culturally sensitive Spanish-language ACP educational session is currently unknown. To address this need, this current project (1) presented a nurse-led ACP educational session and (2) held a focus group to assess the acceptability of the Spanish-focused ACP educational session to a Spanish-speaking group of Latina breast cancer survivors. Thematic analysis revealed four themes: (1) familial involvement, (2) need for advance care planning education, (3) addressing language and cultural barriers, and (4) culturally sensitive and informative resources. Features of a culturally sensitive Spanish-focused ACP educational session were identified and found to reduce current barriers that hinder ACP conversations in Latina breast cancer survivors.

Experiences of Australian emergency doctors and nurses using advance care directives in the provision of care at the end of life

OBJECTIVE

An advance care directive is a legal document outlining the wishes made by a person about treatment options. However, there is increasing evidence that an advance care directive that has previously been documented may not always benefit the current prognosis of the patient. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the experiences of Australian emergency doctors and nurses concerning the use of previously documented advance care directives at the point of care for patients and their families.

METHODS

A qualitative study guided by a phenomenological interpretive approach was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ED doctors and nurses across Australia. Data were thematically analysed using a seven-stage data analysis framework.

RESULTS

An analysis of the interview data resulted in four major themes: (i) Benefits of Advance Care Directives; (ii) Knowledge and Awareness; (iii) Communication; and (iv) Availability of Advance Care Directive Information.

CONCLUSIONS

From the findings, advance care directives were believed to be beneficial in decision making when patients, families, and ED staff agreed with the decisions made. Advance care directives were often made a long time ago but were useful to start conversations around goals of care and end-of-life care relevant to the patient's current situation. Findings in the present study further reinforced that an advance care directive was beneficial when used alongside goals of care at the point of care in EDs.

Development of a Standardized Simulation: Advance Care Planning Conversations for Nurses

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning conversations focus on articulating and documenting patients' healthcare goals. These conversations should occur early and iteratively but are often not completed. Clinicians, specifically registered nurses, lack the needed training in advance care planning to have effective conversations; hands-on teaching modalities are necessary to enhance these communication skills.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to increase knowledge and comfort in communication about advance care planning; therefore, a validated and standardized simulation was developed and tested among registered nurses. We examined the feasibility of an advance care planning simulation called Conversations Had at Trying Times to explore changes in knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy among registered nurses.

METHODS

The National League of Nursing Jeffries simulation theory and Bandura's self-efficacy theory framed the study, which consisted of two stages: (a) simulation development and (b) simulation testing. Construct and content validity guided simulation development; standardization was achieved through International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning standards. Testing consisted of a pilot one-group pretest/posttest.

RESULTS

Conversations Had at Trying Times, a researcher-designed high-fidelity validated simulation, enhanced nurses' communication skills. Thirty-six registered nurses completed the simulation; knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy increased pre- to posttest. Postsimulation evaluations confirmed the feasibility of the simulation. The greatest variation in results was among registered nurses with less than a year of experience.

DISCUSSION

The study findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of the Conversations Had at Trying Times simulation in its development and outcome measurements of knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy in advance care planning. Simulation is an educational modality underutilized, and Conversations Had at Trying Times is one of the few validated simulations for nurses. Further analysis showed that years of experience was a significant factor. Younger, inexperienced nurses had positive outcomes, but not to the extent of other practicing nurses, which suggests that simulation tailoring is necessary for newer nurses or alternative education modalities need to be explored. In addition, more training in advance care planning communication is needed for newer nurses through nurse residency programs, staff development, and mentorship. Finally, advance care planning communication needs to be addressed in undergraduate education to better prepare new graduate nurses.

Education, Policy, and Advocacy in Predicting Use of Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Skilled Nursing Facilities

Nurses and social workers are uniquely positioned to advocate for patients' wishes for do-not-hospitalize (DNH) directives. The purpose of the current study was to explore the impact of DNH education, policy, and advocacy on the use of DNH orders by nurses (RNs and licensed practical nurses [LPNs]) and social workers employed in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). This multisite secondary analysis used cross-sectional survey data and analyzed responses of RNs, LPNs, and social workers (N = 354) from 29 urban SNFs. Mixed model regression was used to examine possible predictors of frequency of DNH orders within SNFs while adjusting for random effects. Results showed that having a DNH written policy, education on DNH orders, and having an advanced care planning advocate in the facility were strongly associated with a higher reported frequency of DNH discussions with residents and their families (p < 0.01 for each variable). [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(11), 45-52.].

"What Matters Most" to Older Adults With Cancer: Advance Care Planning

Approximately 1 in 3 adults have some type of advance directive. Advance care planning (ACP) is associated with greater use of supportive care services and decreased patient and family stress. Despite this, organizations continue to have difficulty in implementing effective programs for increasing ACP. Increasing knowledge and comfort of the health care team with end-of-life discussions and ACP is essential. Educational efforts should focus on decreasing known barriers to ACP discussions such as discomfort, unclear role, lack of experience, and limited education. Role playing and case discussions taught by geriatric resources nurses can help increase staff knowledge and comfort regarding ACP. Role playing allows staff to think about their own mortality and what will happen in various situations if ACP is not complete. Team members find that once they have completed their own ACP, they are more comfortable discussing ACP with patients and caregivers. Nurses should collaborate with social workers and chaplains for ACP education and discussing what matters most to them. Patients are encouraged to make sure that they provide advance directives to their health care providers. This article shares an interprofessional team approach to improving processes for ACP as a component of "what matters most" to older adults with cancer.

Advance care planning at life milestones

Much progress has been made in advance care planning (ACP), especially related to end of life and palliative care. These advances have moved thinking about ACP from a checklist approach to an upstream recognition that ACP is an iterative process that should begin early in adulthood and be revisited with each milestone or life-changing event. It is recognized that there are many stages and milestones in adult life that contribute to changing loci of responsibility and life goals. These changes impact how individuals view their lives, the complexity of health care, and the myriad of health conditions they may encounter. ACP discussions should routinely be started and reexamined at the time of key life events like starting a career or a marriage and not delayed until hospitalization, the occurrence of a serious accident, or the development of a catastrophic illness.