Endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis--single center experience of 112 cases

Lumen apposing metal stents vs. double pigtail plastic stents for the drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis

BACKGROUND

Few studies compared lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and standard double pigtail plastic stents (PS) for the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Albeit sometimes large, previously described cohorts display considerable heterogeneity and often pooled together data from several centers, involving multiple operators and techniques. Moreover, they often lack a control group for the comparison of outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of PS versus LAMS for the endoscopic drainage of infected WON.

METHODS

Thirty patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2017. The present study is a single-center, 1:1 case-control study. We compared patients undergoing endoscopic drainages of infected WON through LAMS (cases) or PS (controls). The primary endpoint was the clinical efficacy (resolution of the WON/sepsis), the secondary endpoint was safety (procedure-related complications).

RESULTS

Cases and controls were homogeneous in terms of etiology and clinical characteristics: 93% of cases and 86.7% of controls were clinically successfully treated, with no significant differences in rates of postoperative infections, bleedings, and stent migrations (respectively 13.3% vs. 21.4%; P=0.65; 13.3% vs. 0%; P=0.48; 13.3% vs. 7.1%; P=1.00). No difference was shown regarding the need for additional percutaneous or surgical treatments (33.3% vs. 13.3%; P=0.39). Cases, however, displayed a significantly prolonged mean hospital stay (90.2 days vs. 18.5 days; P<0.01) and a higher mean number of endoscopic procedures per patient (4.8 vs. 1.5; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PS might be not inferior to LAMS for the treatment WONs. Further prospective RCT is needed to compare clinical efficacy and safety in the two groups.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to systematically review outcomes related to treatment success, mortality, and adverse events of endoscopic management in patients with sterile walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

METHODS

We reviewed studies published from 2008 to 2018 from Medline and Embase that evaluated the endoscopic treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. The primary outcome was success of treatment in resolving the collection. Secondary outcomes included length of hospitalization, mortality rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Five studies were included, which entailed a total of 280 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years. The primary indication for endoscopic treatment was symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Four studies used endoscopic transmural drainage, one of them combining percutaneous drainage and 1 study performed transpapillary drainage. The pooled treatment success was 94.3% with a mean time to resolution of 77.8 days. The mean length of stay was 16.3 days, and mortality rate was 1.3%. The overall adverse event rate was 24.6%, with bleeding the most common adverse event (11%), followed by pancreatic fistula formation (3.4%) and perforation (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although endoscopic management of sterile pancreatic necrosis has a high rate of treatment success, there is a relatively high rate of adverse events, bleeding being the most common.

The Role of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Transmural Endoscopic Drainage of Postinflammatory Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Rapid development of advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic techniques contributed to the appearance of new biomedical materials including polymers, which are used for the production of different types of endoprostheses. Endotherapy (ET) of postinflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PPFCs) with the use of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is an effective method of treatment. This paper describes the high efficacy of ET and its potential complications, which are mostly related to the design of the LAMS used. The high efficacy of LAMS in the transmural drainage of PPFCs is associated with lower safety of treatment. Complications of ET presented in the manuscript are mainly related to endoprosthesis' construction. This paper presents possible directions of development in the field of transmural LAMSs, which in the future may contribute to the invention of an innovative type of LAMS based on new biomedical technologies. Possibly, subsequent novel endoprosthesis projects, based on the above results, will be able to meet the current needs and requirements associated with endoscopic transmural drainage procedures in cases of postinflammatory PPFCs. The ultimate goal is to improve safety of minimally invasive techniques for treatment of the local consequences of pancreatitis.

A Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Surgical Creation of a Cystogastrostomy to Drain Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis in 5500 Patients

Objective

To determine the success, morbidity, and mortality rates of endoscopic and surgical creation of pancreatic cystenterostomies for the drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, pseudocysts with necrotic debris, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Summary Background Data

Endoscopic methods of cystenterostomy creation to drain pancreatic pseudocysts (with and without necrotic debris) and infected peripancreatic fluid collections are perceived to be less morbid than surgery. Contemporary reports document a very high complication rate with endoscopic methods.

Methods

A meta-analysis of 5500 patients.

Results

Open and laparoscopic surgical techniques to drain chronic pancreatic pseudocysts, infected pancreatic fluid collections, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis are more successful with less morbidity and mortality than endoscopic methods.

Conclusions

In regards to a surgical step-up approach to treat chronic infected pancreatic fluid collections or walled-off pancreatic necrosis, surgical creation of a cystenterostomy is more successful with fewer complications than endoscopic methods and should be given priority if less invasive or conservative methods fail.

The continuum of complications in survivors of necrotizing pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing pancreatitis survivors develop complications beyond infected necrosis that often require invasive intervention. Remarkably few data have cataloged these late complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis resolution. We sought to identify the types and incidence of complications after necrotizing pancreatitis.

DESIGN

An observational study was performed evaluating 647 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis captured in a single-institution database between 2005 and 2017 at a tertiary care hospital. Retrospective review and analysis of newly diagnosed conditions attributable to necrotizing pancreatitis was performed. Exclusion criteria included the following: death before disease resolution (n = 57, 9%) and patients lost to follow-up (n = 12, 2%).

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients were followed for a median of 46 months (range, 8 months to 15 y) after necrotizing pancreatitis. In 489 (85%) patients 1 or more complications developed and included symptomatic disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (285 of 578, 49%), splanchnic vein thrombosis (257 of 572, 45%), new endocrine insufficiency (195 of 549, 35%), new exocrine insufficiency (108 of 571, 19%), symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (93 of 571, 16%), incisional hernia (89 of 420, 21%), biliary stricture (90 of 576, 16%), chronic pain (44 of 575, 8%), gastrointestinal fistula (44 of 578, 8%), pancreatic duct stricture (30 of 578, 5%), and duodenal stricture (28 of 578, 5%). During the follow-up period, a total of 340 (59%) patients required an invasive intervention after necrotizing pancreatitis resolution. Invasive pancreatobiliary intervention was required in 230 (40%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Late complications are common in necrotizing pancreatitis survivors. A broad variety of problems manifest themselves after resolution of the acute disease process and often require invasive intervention. Necrotizing pancreatitis patients should be followed lifelong by experienced clinicians.

Various Endoscopic Techniques for Treatment of Consequences of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Practical Updates for the Endoscopist

Despite great progress in acute pancreatitis (AP) treatment over the last 30 years, treatment of the consequences of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) remains controversial. While numerous reports on minimally invasive treatment of the consequences of ANP have been published, several aspects of interventional treatment, particularly endoscopy, are still unclear. In this article, we attempt to discuss these aspects and summarize the current knowledge on endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis. Endotherapy has been shown to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment modality in patients with consequences of ANP. The evolution of endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic drainage more effective and reduced the use of other minimally invasive therapies for pancreatic necrosis.

Spontaneous regression of asymptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis

INTRODUCTION

Asymptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) should be treated conservatively, irrespective of the extent and size of the necrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a strategy involving the observation of patients with asymptomatic WOPN over a long period of time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study involved the retrospective analysis of 368 patients hospitalized in our department between 2010 and 2016, due to acute pancreatitis and its consequences in the form of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collection.

RESULTS

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis was identified in 168/368 (46%) patients. 124/168 (74%) patients with WOPN required interventional treatment due to clinical symptoms arising from the presence of the WOPN. Asymptomatic WOPN was identified in 44/168 (26%) patients. The mean observation time of patients with asymptomatic WOPN was 417.02 days (range: 47-1149 days). Only 1 out of the 44 patients (2%) failed to complete the follow-up. Complete regression of WOPN occurred in 30/44 (68%) patients. The presence of symptoms related to WOPN were identified in 13/44 (30%) patients during the observation. The most frequent indication for interventional treatment of WOPN was infection of the pancreatic necrosis, which was identified in 6/13 patients (46%). Altogether, 137/168 (82%) patients with WOPN required interventional treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with WOPN required interventional treatment. This study provided evidence to support the view that careful observation of patients with asymptomatic WOPN is an efficient and safe treatment strategy. Long-term observation of such patients showed that most will experience spontaneous regression of asymptomatic WOPN without any other form of interventional treatment.

Analysis of a Step-Up Approach Versus Primary Open Surgical Necrosectomy in the Management of Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Experience in a Cohort of Patients at a US Academic Medical Center

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of providers have begun to use a minimally invasive step-up approach as opposed to traditional surgical necrosectomy in the management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Studies have shown mixed results, thus we hypothesized that the step-up approach is safer and associated with decreased mortality and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted from January 2010 to March 2015 who underwent interventions for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Primary outcomes included LOS after intervention and mortality, in-hospital and 90-day, with secondary outcomes of procedural complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients developed WOPN requiring intervention during the study period. In-hospital mortality was 5.6% (n = 2) in the step-up cohort compared with 18.2% (n = 6) in the surgical cohort (relative risk, 3.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-15.09). Ninety-day mortality was 9.1% (n = 3) in the step-up cohort and 21.9% (n = 7) in the surgical cohort (relative risk, 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-8.50). Postintervention LOS was 8 days in the step-up cohort and 17 days in the surgical cohort (P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

A step-up approach, as compared with primary surgical necrosectomy in the management of WOPN, results in clinically significant decreases in mortality and LOS.

[Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections]

Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) develops as a result of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, trauma, and postoperation. Although percutaneous drainage, surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Panceatogram are used as conventional treatments in complicated PFC, the clinical course of PFC is unsatisfactory due to its clinical success rate and the risk of procedure-related complications. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of PFC is a safe and effective modality for the management of PFC, particularly in patients with pancreas necrosis. A range of techniques and stents have been introduced and a newly designed metal stent is now available.

Single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage for extensive walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

In last three decades we have observed development in minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Endoscopic treatment of the consequences of acute necrotising pancreatitis is a accepted and common minimally invasive method.

AIM

Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the innovative endoscopic treatment method (single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage - SGTMD) in patients with extensive walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective analysis of 114 consecutive patients with symptomatic WOPN, who were treated endoscopically in our medical centre between 2011 and 2016.

RESULTS

Single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage was performed in 21/114 (18.42%) patients. Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in 12/21 (57.14%) patients. Complications of treatment appeared in 7/21 (33.33%) patients. The most common of complication was upper gastrointestinal bleeding treated conservatively with packed red blood cells transfusions. There were no deaths. Therapeutic success was reached in 20/21 (95.24%) patients. No patient required surgery. The medium time of follow-up was 22 months (16-47). During the observation the recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection was noticed in 1/21 (4.76%) patients. Long-term success of endoscopic treatment was achieved in 19/21 (90.47%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage is an effective method of endoscopic treatment for extensive walled-off pancreatic necrosis with an acceptable amount of complications. However, the method of interventional treatment of pancreatic necrosis should depend not only on the location of necrosis, but also on the experience of the medical centre.

The role of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis

BACKGROUND

The place of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of main pancreatic duct (MPD) disruption arising in the course of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the findings of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) in patients with walled-off necrosis (WON). It was attempted to evaluate the role of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in patients with WON.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis of results and complications with particular emphasis to all ERP procedures in the group of 226 patients was conducted, which underwent endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WON between years 2001 and 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Medical University of Gdańsk.

RESULTS

ERP was performed in 204/226 (90.27%) patients. Partial and complete disruption of the MPD were identified in 103 (50.49%) and 63 (30.89%) out of 204 patients, respectively. Endoscopic treatment was used in all 166 patients with MPD disruption. The success of endoscopic treatment of MPD disruption was achieved in 138/161 (85.71%) patients with WON. The therapeutic success of WON endotherapy was achieved in 214/226 (94.69%) patients. The mean follow-up duration was 56 (SD = 37.06) [range 14-158] months. Long-term success of treatment of WON was achieved in 182/226 (80.53%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MPD disruption occurs in the majority of patients with WON. Partial disruption of the MPD is more frequent than complete disruption of the duct. This study conducted on a large group of patients demonstrated that prosthesis insertion into the MPD in patients with disruption of the MPD in the course of ANP is one of the key elements in endoscopic treatment of WON. Passive transpapillary drainage is an effective method of treating MPD disruptions, which improves long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with WON.

The Development of Endoscopic Techniques for Treatment of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Endotherapy is a common method of treatment in patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). The aim of this study is to indicate the potential therapeutic possibilities created by the combination of several new endoscopic techniques and the evaluation of their efficacy in the treatment of WOPN.

Methods

The retrospective analysis of results and complications in the group of 101 patients, who underwent endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WOPN between years 2011 and 2015.

Results

Endoscopic treatment was started in 101 patients (71 men, 30 women; mean age 50.97 years) with symptomatic WOPN. Single transluminal gateway technique (SGT) was used in 93/101 (92.08%) patients. SGT in combination with multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) was exploited in 4/93 (4.30%) patients, while in combination with single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage (SGTMD) in 22/93 (23.66%) patients. Transpapillary access was used in 11/101 (10.89%) patients. 20/101 (19.80%) patients underwent percutaneous drainage. Fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in 19/101 (18.81%) patients. The combinations of endoscopic techniques depended on the extent of necrosis. Procedure-related complications occurred in 16/101 (15.84%) patients. The mortality rate was 0.99% (1/101 patient). Therapeutic success was achieved in 99/101 (98.02%) patients. The long-term success of endoscopic treatment was achieved in 97/101 (96.04%) patients with symptomatic WOPN.

Conclusions

Application of new endoscopic techniques in the treatment of the patients with symptomatic WOPN significantly improves the efficiency of endotherapy with an acceptable amount of complications.

Endoscopic treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis complicated with pancreaticocolonic fistula

Background

Pancreaticocolonic fistulas (PCFs) are serious complication of acute pancreatitis related with high mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of endoscopic treatment in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) complicated with PCF.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of results and complications in the group of 226 patients, who underwent endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WOPN between years 2001 and 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Medical University of Gdańsk.

Results

PCF was recognized in 21/226 (9.29%) patients. Transmural drainage was performed in 20/21 (95.24%) patients. Transpapillary drainage was used in 2/21 (9.52) patients. The mean time since the start of endotherapy to the diagnosis of a fistulas was 9 (3–21) days. Fluoroscopic nasocystic tube-check imaging of an existing drain was the initial imaging diagnosis of a PCF in 19/21 (90.48%) patients. The mean duration of endoscopic drainage of WOPN was 39.29 (15–87) days. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 10/21 (47.62%) patients and most of them were treated conservatively. Three patients required surgical treatment. One patient died during endotherapy. The closure of PCF was confirmed via imaging in 17/21 (80.95%) patients. The average time since the recognition till the closure of PCF was 21 (14–48) days. Complete therapeutic success of WOPN complicated with PCF was reached in 16/21 (76.19%) patients. Long-term success of endoscopic treatment was achieved in 15/21 (71.43%) patients.

Conclusions

Endoscopic treatment of patients with WOPN complicated with PCF is an effective method with an acceptable number of complications. The complete regression of the WOPN may lead to spontaneous closure of pancreaticocolonic fistulas.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-018-6032-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endoscopic drainage combined with percutaneous drainage in treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single-center experience

Introduction

In last three decades we have been observing development of minimally invasive walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) treatment techniques. The choice of access to the necrosis and technique of treatment depends not only on the position and spread of necrosis, but in the first place on the experience of the medical center.

Aim

To assess the effectiveness and safety of combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of WOPN.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 64 consecutive patients with symptomatic WOPN, who underwent endoscopic treatment in our department between 2011 and 2013.

Results

Additional percutaneous drainage was executed during endoscopic treatment in 20/64 (31.25%) patients. Complications of treatment occurred in 4/20 (20%) patients. Complications of treatment occurred in 4/20 (20%) patients. All these complications were related to endoscopic treatment. No complications related to percutaneous drainage were noted. There were no deaths. Therapeutic success was achieved in all 20 patients. No patients required surgery. The average time of endoscopic drainage was 41.4 (11–173) days. The mean number of endoscopic procedures was 4.2 (2–12). The average time of percutaneous drainage was 11.3 (5–20) days. The medium time of follow-up was 54 (48–64) months. During the observation the recurrence of WOPN was noted in 2/20 (10%) patients. Long-term success of combined drainage was achieved in 18/20 (90%) patients.

Conclusions

In selected patients with symptomatic WOPN combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage enables a high success rate with a low procedure-related complication rate.

Metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic transluminal drainage of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) is a good management option, although the optimal choice of drainage site stent is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) in terms of WON resolution, likelihood of resolution after 1 procedure, and adverse events.

METHODS

An expert librarian queried several databases to identify studies that assessed WON management, and selection was according to a priori criteria. Publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality were evaluated with the appropriate tools. We performed single and 2-arm meta-analyses for noncomparative and comparative studies using event rate random-effects model and odds ratio (OR)/difference in means, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 41 studies involving 2213 patients. In 2-arm study meta-analysis, WON resolution was more likely with MSs compared with PSs (OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.6; P < .001). Resolution with a single endoscopic procedure was similar between stents (47% vs 44%), although for those cases requiring more than 1 intervention, the MS group had fewer interventions, favored by a mean difference of -.9 procedures (95% CI, -1.283 to -.561). In single-arm study meta-analysis, when compared with PSs, MS use was associated with lower bleeding (5.6% vs 12.6%; P = .02), a trend toward lower perforation and stent occlusion (2.8% vs 4.3%, P = .2, and 9.5% vs 17.4%, P = .07), although with higher migration (8.1% vs 5.1%; P = .1).

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that MSs are superior for WON resolution, with fewer bleeding events, trend toward less occlusion and perforation rate, but increased migration rate compared with PSs.

Endoscopic treatment of multilocular walled-off pancreatic necrosis with the multiple transluminal gateway technique

The development of minimally invasive techniques allowed access to the necrotic cavity through transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, transmural and transpapillary routes. The choice of access to walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) should depend not only on the spread of necrosis, but also on the experience of the clinical center. Herein we describe treatment of a patient with multilocular symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis using minimally invasive techniques. The single transmural access (single transluminal gateway technique - SGT) to the necrotic collection of the patient was ineffective. The second gastrocystostomy was performed using the same minimally invasive technique as an extra way of access to the necrosis (multiple transluminal gateway technique - MTGT). In the described case the performance of the new technique consisting in endoscopic multiplexing transmural access (MTGT) was effective enough and led to complete recovery of the patient.

The role of endoscopic intervention in the management of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis, or less commonly, pancreatic trauma or surgery. The revised Atlanta Classification categorizes PFCs as acute or chronic, with further subclassification of acute collections into acute peripancreatic collections and acute necrotic collections and of chronic fluid collections into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Acute PFCs are generally only subjected to an intervention when they are infected and not responding to antibiotics and are not managed endoscopically. Chronic PFCs, both pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis, require intervention only when symptomatic or enlarging over time. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage has become the mainstay of management for chronic PFCs that require intervention. Developments in medical devices over the past few years have significantly simplified and shortened the duration of the procedure itself, but the optimum choice of stent in different clinical scenarios remains to be defined, as does the place of endoscopic necrosectomy. To optimize outcomes, these patients should undergo a careful preprocedure workup and discussion in a multidisciplinary environment and procedures should be carried out in high-volume pancreatic units.

Lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: When and for whom?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are increasingly being used for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC), their advantage over plastic stents is unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, 20 patients who underwent PFC drainage using LAMS were matched with 40 patients treated with plastic stents according to PFC type (walled-off necrosis [WON] vs pseudocyst) and procedural technique (conventional vs multi-gate). Main outcome measures were treatment success, reintervention, clinical and stent-related adverse events, procedural duration, length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospital costs.

RESULTS

At median follow up of 570 days, except for median procedural duration (8.5 vs 25 min, P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in treatment success (95.0 vs 92.5%, P = 0.99), reintervention (25.0 vs 30.0 %, P = 0.77), clinical (10.0 vs 12.5 %, P = 0.99) and stent-related adverse events (10.0 vs 2.5 %, P = 0.26) or median LOS (2 [IQR 1-5] vs 2 [IQR 1-7] days, P = 0.58) between patients treated with LAMS versus plastic stents. Although there was no difference for WON ($16 708 for LAMS vs $17 221 for plastic stents, P = 0.90), mean hospital costs were significantly lower for pseudocysts using plastic stents ($18 996 vs $58 649, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no difference in clinical outcomes, treating pseudocysts using plastic stents is less expensive. It is also possible that the short procedural duration is a surrogate marker for procedural complexity and this may drive the use of LAMS in sicker patients.

Evaluation of the AXIOS stent for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasound guided translumenal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has been widely practiced for over a decade, using conventional plastic and self-expandable metal stents. The use of such stents for transmural drainage is off-label and limited by the lack of lumen-to-lumen anchorage, which can lead to leakage, migration and tissue trauma.

AREAS COVERED

Novel stent designs dedicated to applications of translumenal drainage have recently emerged and promise to make transmural drainage quicker, safer, and more effective. Achieving faster resolution of the fluid collection, decreasing adverse events, decreasing recurrence rates, and lowering costs are critical to advancing the endoscopic management of PFCs. Expert commentary: Our paper suggests that the AXIOS stent is an innovative therapeutic approach for PFC drainage with excellent efficacy, safety, and relatively few adverse outcomes. Preliminary reports appear promising and large multicenter prospective studies are needed in the future to further determine its safety and efficacy.

Management of acute pancreatitis (AP) - Polish Pancreatic Club recommendations

The presented recommendations concern the current management of acute pancreatitis. The recommendations relate to the diagnostics and treatment of early and late phases of acute pancreatitis and complications of the disease taking into consideration surgical and endoscopic methods. All the recommendations were subjected to voting by the members of the Working Group of the Polish Pancreatic Club, who evaluated them every single time on a five-point scale, where A means full acceptance, B means acceptance with a certain reservation, C means acceptance with a serious reservation, D means rejection with a certain reservation and E means full rejection. The results of the vote, together with commentary, are provided for each recommendation.

Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct (PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.

Transpapillary drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) often coexists with disruption of the main pancreatic duct that manifests as a leak of contrast medium into the necrotic collection during endoscopic retrograde pancreatography.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment of patients with symptomatic WOPN and disruption of the main pancreatic duct, who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage as the only access to the necrosis cavity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 22 patients with symptomatic WOPN, active endoscopic transpapillary drainage was performed. During endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), partial disruption of the main pancreatic duct was observed in 14 patients and complete disruption in 8 patients. After the active drainage was finished, a transpapillary pancreatic stent was inserted into the main pancreatic duct, which was later exchanged after 6, 12 and 24 months or when no extravasation of contrast from the pancreatic duct was observed. The results of treatment and complications were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean duration of active drainage was 22 (range: 7-94) days. Complications of endotherapy occurred in 3/22 patients. The mean time of the main pancreatic duct stenting was 304 (range: 85-519) days. Success of endoscopic treatment of WOPN and pancreatic duct disruption was achieved in 20/22 patients. During a 1-year follow-up, recurrence of the collection was noted in 4/20 patients. Long-term success was achieved in 16/22 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with WOPN who cannot undergo transmural drainage when there is a communication between the necrotic collection and the main pancreatic duct, transpapillary access may be an effective and safe method of treatment.

Endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis using a lumen-apposing metal stent and irrigation technique

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is an area of great interest with many still unanswered questions, including the role of mechanical necrosectomy versus irrigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new method of endoscopic transmural necrosectomy.

METHODS

Patients with WOPN after necrotizing pancreatitis, who underwent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent with vigorous irrigation sessions, were prospectively recruited between September 2011 and August 2014. Initial endoscopic session was performed by EUS-guided drainage and lavage sessions by flushing saline through the stent. Technical and clinical success rates, number of repeat interventions, and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with 13 WOPN collections (median size 12.4 ± 2.94 cm) underwent endoscopic treatment. Clinical success was achieved in 100 % of cases after a median of three sessions per patient (range 2-8). The median length of hospitalization was 15.9 days. Median procedure time of the access session was 31 ± 10.16 min. No adverse events (AE) were described during the procedures or 24 h after. There were four AE (two infections and two bleedings) between sessions, but only two were severe (16.6 %). There was no need for surgery, and no mortalities occurred. Mean time to stent retrieval was 9 ± 3.4 weeks. Mean follow-up was 13 months with only one recurrence at 12 months after stent removal.

CONCLUSIONS

This new variant of irrigation endoscopic transmural necrosectomy without mechanical debridement helps to simplify the technique, is feasible, and has excellent outcomes in WOPN treatment.

Transpapillary drainage of pancreatic parenchymal necrosis

In the last two decades the strategy of treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis has changed. Endoscopic therapy of patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis has a high rate of efficiency. Here we present a description of a patient with parenchymal limited necrosis of the pancreas and a disruption of the main pancreatic duct. In the treatment, active transpapillary drainage of the pancreatic necrosis (through the major duodenal papilla) was performed and insertion of an endoprosthesis into the main pancreatic duct (through the minor duodenal papilla) was applied, which enabled a bypass over the infiltration and resulted in complete resolution.

The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in endoscopic debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis--A single center experience

BACKGROUND

In recent years the significance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has increased. In our center we have also performed EUS-guided cystostomy since 2011. Earlier we had performed this procedure without EUS. Introduction of EUS in our hospital has inspired us to perform a retrospective analysis of the influence of EUS use on the risk of complications and the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of patients with WOPN.

METHODS

Between years 2001 and 2013 176 patients with symptomatic WOPN underwent endoscopic treatment in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Medical University of Gdańsk. The results and complications of treatment in relation to the use of EUS during drainage/debridement were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

64 patients underwent EUS-guided drainage/debridement of WOPN (group 1). In the case of 112 patients endoscopic drainage/debridement was performed without EUS control (group 2). In group 1 therapeutic success was achieved in 60/64 (93.75%) patients in comparison to 104/112 (92.9%) patients in group 2 (P = 0.870). The mean duration of drainage/debridement in both groups was 25 days - 4-173 days in group 1 and 4-112 days in group 2 (P = 0.519). The complications of endotherapy occurred in 9/64 (14.06%) patients from group 1 in comparison to 29/112 (25.9%) patients from group 2 (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study the use of EUS during endoscopic drainage/debridement of WOPN significantly reduced the number of procedure-related complications, mainly gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it had no influence on the duration of treatment or the effectiveness of therapy.

Efficacy of metal and plastic stents for transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Metal stents are being used more frequently for transmural endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) despite lack of data. The present systematic review was conducted to compare the rates of treatment success, adverse events and recurrence between patients undergoing metal versus plastic stent placement for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFC.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify all published manuscripts that evaluated metal stents for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFC. All published studies from the same period involving plastic stent placement for PFC drainage that included >50 patients were also identified. Main outcome measures were to compare the rates of treatment success, adverse events and recurrence between the metal and plastic stent cohorts.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (881 patients) met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in overall treatment success between patients treated with plastic and metal stents (81% [95% CI, 77-84%] vs 82% [95% CI, 74-88%]) for both pseudocysts (85% [95% CI, 81-89%] vs 83% [95% CI, 74-89%]) and walled-off necrosis (70% [95% CI, 62-76%] vs 78% [95% CI, 50-93%]). Also, there was no difference in the rates of adverse events (16% [95% CI, 14-39%] vs 23% [95% CI, 16-33%]) or recurrence (10% [95% CI, 8-13%] vs 9% [95% CI, 4-19%]) between plastic and metal stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence does not support routine placement of metal stents for transmural drainage of PFC. Randomized trials are needed to justify the use of metal stents for PFC drainage.