Improved prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis

Management of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

The peritoneum is the second most common site of metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Up to half of all patients that undergo curative-intent resection eventually develop peritoneal metastasis (PM), which accounts for significant morbidity and drives mortality. Despite recent advances in management, PM is associated with very poor prognosis, which is often measured in weeks to months. Clinical manifestations including bowel obstruction, ascites, and urinary obstruction have profound impact on quality of life. Even with relatively advanced disease, PM often remains occult on imaging and thus tend to be underdiagnosed and understudied. Many patients with peritoneal-only PM are excluded from clinical trials because response cannot be measured by standard radiographic criteria. Furthermore, as patients with PM are not eligible for surgical resection and low-volume peritoneal disease is often not amenable to percutaneous biopsy, tissue samples for peritoneal-specific translational studies are limited. Intraperitoneal therapeutics have been proposed as an attractive option for PM, as better penetration of tumor tissue can be achieved with less systemic toxicity compared with intravenous chemotherapy. Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), typically combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), is an option for select patients with PM from gynecologic or gastrointestinal primary, and for patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma. However, the incorporation of locoregional therapy for PM in patients with PDAC has been poorly studied given the aggressive nature of pancreatic cancer and overall poor prognosis. With recent advances in existing treatment options, there may be a subset of patients who may derive benefits from locoregional control with cytoreduction and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Critically, additional work is needed to determine PM-favorable clinical and tumoral predictive biomarkers to identify patients who may benefit from a more aggressive approach. We describe the current state of management of patients with peritoneal metastasis from PDAC and review the available data exploring peritoneal-directed therapy with cytoreductive surgery and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy applications in upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer, a review

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are the spread of tumor forms into the peritoneum as metastases from another organ. PM is a frequent condition in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer (colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, appendiceal, and cholangiocarcinoma); their presence confers a poor prognosis, reducing patient survival. The standard treatment consists of systemic chemotherapy according to current guidelines. In recent years, scientific evidence has shown how combined cytoreductive surgery (CRS) techniques followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can improve survival in this patient population. Despite the results still obtained, using this combined technique is still under discussion. This review aims to highlight the benefits and limitations of this combined procedure, which is already widely used to treat peritoneal metastases in gynecological tumors.

The Emerging Role of Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Pancreatic Cancer

Peritoneal spread is a frequent cause of metastasis in both the synchronous and metachronous settings for patients with pancreatic cancer. Recent improvements in systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer may now allow for the careful selection of patients with oligometastatic disease isolated to the peritoneum who may benefit from consolidative cytoreduction and HIPEC.

Combined Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients with Massive Malignant Ascites Secondary to Pancreatic Cancer: A Report of Two Patients

The prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastases from pancreatic cancer is poor, largely due to massive ascites, which precludes systemic treatment. Two patients with a poor performance status and malignant ascites were treated with cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy followed by combined chemotherapy with intraperitoneal paclitaxel, intravenous gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel. These patients achieved a survival of 19 and 36 weeks with a relatively good quality of life. Combined intraperitoneal paclitaxel and systemic chemotherapy may provide effective palliative management for some patients with peritoneal metastases from pancreatic cancer.

Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive).

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA.

CONCLUSION

GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.

Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics model with clinical-radiological characteristics for the identification of occult peritoneal metastases in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Occult peritoneal metastases (OPM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently overlooked during imaging. The authors aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning-based radiomics (DLR) model to identify OPM in PDAC before treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective, bicentric study included 302 patients with PDAC (training: n =167, OPM-positive, n =22; internal test: n =72, OPM-positive, n =9: external test, n =63, OPM-positive, n =9) who had undergone baseline CT examinations between January 2012 and October 2022. Handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and DLR features of the tumor and HCR features of peritoneum were extracted from CT images. Mutual information and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms were used for feature selection. A combined model, which incorporated the selected clinical-radiological, HCR, and DLR features, was developed using a logistic regression classifier using data from the training cohort and validated in the test cohorts.

RESULTS

Three clinical-radiological characteristics (carcinoembryonic antigen 19-9 and CT-based T and N stages), nine HCR features of the tumor, 14 DLR features of the tumor, and three HCR features of the peritoneum were retained after feature selection. The combined model yielded satisfactory predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.790-0.903), 0.845 (95% CI: 0.740-0.919), and 0.852 (95% CI: 0.740-0.929) in the training, internal test, and external test cohorts, respectively (all P <0.05). The combined model showed better discrimination than the clinical-radiological model in the training (AUC=0.853 vs. 0.612, P <0.001) and the total test (AUC=0.842 vs. 0.638, P <0.05) cohorts. The decision curves revealed that the combined model had greater clinical applicability than the clinical-radiological model.

CONCLUSIONS

The model combining CT-based DLR and clinical-radiological features showed satisfactory performance for predicting OPM in patients with PDAC.

Outcomes of lung oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer with lung oligometastasis may have favourable overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of pancreatic cancer with lung oligometastases including both synchronous and metachronous metastases.

METHODS

Consecutive pancreatic cancer patients with lung metastasis treated at our institution between February 2015 and December 2021 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and analysed according to the extent of lung metastases. Predictors for overall survival were analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A totoal of 171 patients were included (oligometastasis/polymetastasis/multi-organ metastasis: 34/50/87). Patients with oligometastases were more likely to undergo surgical resection (41% vs. 0% vs. 2%) and showed a longer median overall survival (41.3 vs. 17.6 vs. 13.1 months) compared with those with other types of metastases. Oligometastasis (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.76; P = 0.004) was identified as an independent factor predicting favourable overall survival in patients with lung-only metastasis. Disease status (synchronous vs. metachronous) was not associated with survival in patients with oligometastasis (29.4 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.527) and polymetastasis (17.9 vs. 16.7 months, P = 0.545). Selected patients who underwent surgical resection showed a median overall survival of 52.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung oligometastases presented a favourable prognosis. Surgical resection in selected patients was associated with a long median overall survival.

Oncologic Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Highly Selected Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastases (PM) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are currently treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy alone, with unsatisfactory results. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may provide an oncologic benefit for highly selected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PDAC and isolated PM who completed ≥ 6 months of systemic chemotherapy with objective response between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria as per our previously published PDAC CRS/HIPEC protocol. Patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC were compared with matched patients who underwent systemic therapy alone. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of PM and progression-free survival (PFS) from CRS/HIPEC was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients met the inclusion criteria: 38 underwent systemic therapy alone and 23 CRS/HIPEC. There were no differences in baseline prognostic factors, including age, sex, tumor size, tumor location, anatomic resectability, or serum cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 (p > 0.05). Median OS from PM diagnosis in patients who underwent systemic therapy alone was 19 months with 1, 2, and 3 year OS of 81%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. In contrast, median OS from PM diagnosis in patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC was 41 months with improved 1, 2, and 3 year OS of 91%, 66%, and 59%, respectively (p = 0.002). In the 21 patients who achieved complete cytoreduction (CC-0), no adjuvant therapy was administered and the median PFS was 17 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS/HIPEC in highly selected patients with PDAC and PM results in promising oncologic outcomes that are unlikely to be achieved with systemic chemotherapy alone. Further investigation is warranted and ongoing (NCT04858009).

Real-world dose reduction of standard and modified FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review, evidence-mapping, and meta-analysis

Background

FOLFIRINOX, used in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), is highly efficacious but also toxic. Various dose modifications for FOLFIRINOX have been introduced to reduce toxicity. However, these studies lack a unified pattern for 'planned' dose modification, and the 'actually administered' dose varied more.

Objective

To map a 10-year trend for 'planned' and 'actual' doses of FOLFIRINOX and investigate the clinical outcomes according to dose modification.

Data sources and methods

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted from January 2011 to September 2021. All studies for FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in MPC were considered. Selected studies were firstly classified according to prospective versus retrospective research, secondly standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, and thirdly 'planned' versus 'actual' dose. For evidence-mapping for the trend of dose modification, we developed a web-based interactive bubble-plot program (www.RDI-map.com). Objective response rate (ORR) and hematologic toxicity were set as endpoints for the comparison of clinical outcomes according to dose modification.

Results

A total of 37 studies were identified for evidence-mapping (11 prospective and 26 retrospective studies). There were 12 different types of 'planned' dose modification in FOLFIRINOX ranging 75-100% oxaliplatin, 75-100% irinotecan, 0-100% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus, and 75-133% 5-FU continuous injection. The 'actual' dose further decreased to 54-96%, 61-88%, 0-92%, and 63-98%, respectively. For the standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, the ORR was 28.2% (95% CI: 22.5-33.9%) and 33.8% (95% CI: 30.3-37.3%), respectively (p = 0.100), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 11.6% (95% CI: 0-16.0%) and 5.5% (95% CI: 0-8.9%), respectively (p = 0.030).

Conclusions

RDI-map.com enables multifactorial evidence-mapping for practical FOLFIRINOX dose reduction. The pattern of dose modification was not consistent across studies, and there was a significant gap between the 'planned' and 'actual' doses. Modified FOLFIRINOX showed similar efficacy to the standard regimen with reduced incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Is lung involvement a favorable prognostic factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases?-A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

For advanced pancreatic cancer, pulmonary metastases (PM) have been considered favorable factors compared to metastases of other sites, but it remains unknown whether the prognosis of patients with synchronous liver and lung metastases is better than that of non-PM.

METHODS

Data was derived from a two-decade cohort and included 932 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases (PACLM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance 360 selected cases, grouped into PM (n = 90) and non-PM (n = 270). Overall survival (OS) and survival-related factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

In PSM-adjusted data, the median OS was 7.3 and 5.8 months, for PM and non-PM, respectively (p = 0.16). Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender, poor performance status, higher hepatic tumor burden, ascites, elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and lactate dehydrogenase were factors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Chemotherapy was the only independent significant factor of favorable prognosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although lung involvement was indicated to be a favorable prognostic factor for patients with PACLM in the whole cohort, PM were not associated with better survivals in the subset of cases subjected to PSM adjustment.

Outcomes of pancreatic cancer with liver oligometastasis

BACKGROUND

Liver oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) may have favorable outcomes. This study aims to evaluate outcomes and factors associated with overall survival (OS) of these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated consecutive PC patients with liver metastasis treated at our institution between 2013 and 2020. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and analyzed according to the extent of liver metastasis. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were included (multi-organ metastasis/polymetastasis/oligometastasis 174/158/85). Oligometastasis showed a longer OS compared to other types of metastases (7.7 vs 8.2 vs 13.1 months). Age <70 years, performance status of 0, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <1000 U/mL were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. A prognostic index consisting of these four factors successfully stratified the prognosis of these patients (prognostic index; high vs low, 19.9 vs 8.3 months). Highly selected patients who underwent surgical resection showed a median OS of 54.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Oligometastasis presented a relatively favorable outcome. Our new prognostic index was useful in stratifying the prognosis of these patients. Multimodal treatment including surgery may have additional survival benefits for highly selected patients.

Survival impact of occult liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination compared with radiologically defined distant organ metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Characteristics and prognoses of patients with occult metastases (OM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared with radiologically defined metastases (RM) have been rarely reported.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the prognosis of OM compared with RM and to establish a treatment strategy for PDAC patients with OM.

METHODS

This single-institution, retrospective study evaluated patients with unresectable PDAC between 2008 and 2018. OM was defined as abdominal metastasis that was detected by staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy but not in the initial assessment of radiological images.

RESULTS

OM and RM were identified in 135 and 112 patients, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor diameter, and rate of local unresectability were significantly lower in the OM group. Median overall survival (OS) of OM was significantly better than that of RM (13.0 vs 8.9 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of OS, ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR 1.64, p = 0.009), NLR ≥5 (HR 1.97, p = 0.004), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥1000 (HR 1.68, p = 0.001), tumor diameter ≥40 mm (HR 1.40, p = 0.027), conversion surgery (HR 0.12, p < 0.001), and multiple lines of chemotherapy (HR 0.38, p < 0.001) were independent predictors. However, type of metastasis (OM vs RM) not an independent predictor (HR 1.10, p = 0.590).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of PDAC with OM was relatively better than that with RM, but general and nutritional statuses, primary tumor size and CA19-9, conversion surgery and multiple lines of chemotherapy were independent predictors but not tumor burden.

Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion for Pancreatic Cancer with Low-Volume Peritoneal Metastasis: Results from a Prospective Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Resection of oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically been ineffective, however modern systemic chemotherapy has improved survival. Thus, re-evaluating safety and outcomes of surgical resection in selected patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (PM) warrants consideration.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2021, patients with PDAC and positive cytology or limited PM without extraperitoneal metastasis and who had an objective response to ≥ 6 months of systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients underwent laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin/mitomycin C. If amenable to a complete cytoreduction, patients went on to cytoreduction and HIPEC.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 patients were enrolled and received a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-17) cycles of chemotherapy; 16 (89%) patients received chemoradiation. Laparoscopic HIPEC was completed in 17 patients, with a median length of stay of 1 day, and no grade III complications or hematological toxicities were observed. All 18 patients subsequently underwent a complete cytoreduction (CC-0) along with definitive treatment of the primary tumor, with formal resection (7/18), irreversible electroporation (IRE; 10/18), or intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT; 1/18). Median PCI was 2 (IQR 0-4), median LOS was 7 days (IQR 6-8), and 7 (39%) patients were readmitted. Eight (44%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher complications, including one 30-day mortality. At a median follow-up of 16 months, the median progression-free survival was 20 months and the median overall survival was 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreduction and HIPEC for selected patients with low-volume PM from PDAC is safe and feasible with favorable short-term outcomes. A phase II trial (NCT04858009) is now enrolling to further assess this multimodality approach in select patients.

Treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

To compare the treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as second-line treatment after gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV or mFFX after first-line GnP treatment between March 2014 and October 2021 in our hospital. Patient characteristics, treatment outcomes and adverse events were extracted for comparison.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixteen patients were included (nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV/mFFX: 50/166). Patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group were older, had poorer ECOG PS, and a higher rate of peritoneal metastasis than those in the mFFX group. Median overall survival was 9.5 and 9.8 months (P = 0.97), respectively, and the median progression-free survival was 4.5 vs 4.8 months (P = 0.61), respectively. Anorexia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the mFFX group, but there was no difference in grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in efficacy between nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV and mFFX after GnP. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV appears to be a viable alternative to mFFX as second-line treatment after GnP.

[Treatment options for peritoneal metastases from hepato-pancreato-biliary tumors and neuroendocrine tumors]

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) tumors has a low incidence and has rarely been studied as a stand-alone condition. The clinical relevance of PM in HPB tumors and GEP-NET arises from the fact that PM significantly worsens the prognosis of the underlying tumors. In GEP-NET, the particular situation is that PM has a negative prognostic impact compared to patients without metastases, which is not evident compared to patients with metastases in other locations. Complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS) is a curative treatment option for patients with PM in GEP-NET. Complete surgical resection should always be strived for, although patients may benefit from incomplete resection (70-90%) or resection of the primary tumor alone. Additional hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is currently not recommended. For nonresectable GEP-NET, systemic treatment is available that is oriented to the studies for generally metastasized GEP-NET. For PM in carcinomas of the bile duct and pancreatic carcinomas, there are no valid data or indications for CRS and HIPEC. In contrast, case series for PM in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after CRS or CRS/HIPEC show good survival outcomes that justify a surgical approach under the condition of a complete resection. Patients with PM in GEP-NET and HCC should therefore be referred to a center for peritoneal tumor surgery to evaluate the option of complete CRS and use it as a curative option.

Multiple Gastric Metastases after Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

A 67-year-old woman underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Recurrence in the form of lung metastasis was discovered eight months after surgery, and chemotherapy was initiated. Two years after the surgery, she was admitted for the evaluation of melena. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed multiple subepithelial lesions with ulceration from the gastric body to the fornix. The histopathology of biopsy specimens was consistent with ductal adenocarcinoma, which appeared similar to the resected pancreatic cancer. The patient was diagnosed with multiple gastric metastases of pancreatic cancer. We herein report a case of pancreatic cancer with multiple gastric metastases that occurred after surgery for pancreatic tail cancer.

Is Weight Loss During Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Prognostic?

BACKGROUND

Predicting poor survival outcomes early in palliative chemotherapy is important to the timing of palliative care. Weight loss during chemotherapy if prognostic would lead to early palliative care.

METHOD

We collected demographics, stage, chemotherapy, chemotherapy cycles, weight, healthcare utilization, comorbidities (Charleson Comorbid Index), tumor markers, and weight changes over 60 days. We defined 3 groups of patients: 1. Weight gain to <.5% weight loss, 2. Weight loss< 2% and 3. Weight loss of >2%. A Chi-square test assessed differences in weight during treatment. Time-to-event analysis was expressed in a Kaplan Meier curve.

RESULTS

93 individuals died of pancreatic cancer in 2018 and 2019. The median age was 71.2 years. Forty-three had stage I and II, 40 stages III and IV cancers, and 10 had unknown stages. Most received FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Thirty-six gained to lost < .5% during chemotherapy,8 lost < 2% and 49 patients lost > 2% of their weight. Mortality was available in 55 of 93 patients. Median survival was 16.6 months in those with weight gain to < .5% weight loss, 17.28 months for those with < 2% weight loss, and 20.5 months for those with > 2% weight loss (P = .42).

DISCUSSION

Weight loss over 60 days did not predict a poor prognosis in this small retrospective study; larger prospective studies may clarify the prognostic importance of weight loss during chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In this small retrospective study, weight loss over 60 days did not predict poor survival.

Optimizing Indications for Conversion Surgery Based on Analysis of 454 Consecutive Japanese Cases with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Who Received Modified FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of initially unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) has improved since the introduction of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) treatment. Nonetheless, the indications and optimal timing for conversion to resection remain unclear for UR-PC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of cases with initially UR-PC who received modified FFX or GNP treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 454 consecutive Japanese UR-PC cases who received modified FFX/GNP treatment. Cases were categorized according to resection status, and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a multivariable prognostic scoring model (0-4 points, higher score indicating more favorable prognostic factors).

RESULTS

The overall resection rate was 16% for locally advanced UR-PC (UR-LA) and 5% for metastatic UR-PC (UR-M). The resection group had better OS than the nonresection group (median OS time: not reached versus 13.0 months, P < 0.001). The independent prognostic factors were normalized CA19-9 concentration, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0, tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy, chemotherapy duration ≥ 8 months, and resection. Cases were grouped according to their prognostic score, and the results suggested that candidates for resection might have prognostic scores of 4 points in UR-M cases or 2-4 points in UR-LA cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratification according to prognostic score was useful in predicting the outcomes of UR-PC cases and may aid in identifying cases who might benefit from surgical treatment after responding to chemotherapy.

Treatment outcomes of erlotinib plus gemcitabine as late-line chemotherapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

With the introduction of modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer, erlotinib plus gemcitabine therapy is now occasionally used as late-line therapy. This study investigates outcomes of treatment with erlotinib plus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine as the third or later-line chemotherapy between March 2014 and December 2020 in our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were included (third line/fourth or later line = 42/14). All patients were previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and 45 patients were previously treated with modified FOLFIRINOX. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.6 and 4.6 months, respectively. The disease control rate was 21.4%. Performance status, modified Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify patients into good (n = 32) and poor (n = 24) prognostic groups. The median PFS and OS were longer in good than in poor prognostic group, but the difference in PFS was very small (PFS: 2.1 vs. 1.4 months, P = 0.01. OS: 6.8 vs. 2.4 months, P < 0.01). Interstitial pneumonia occurred in one patient (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits of erlotinib plus gemcitabine as late-line chemotherapy were limited, particularly with respect to PFS. Development of more effective third-line treatment options is desirable in the future.