A case of giardiasis expressing severe systemic symptoms and marked hypereosinophilia

Examining the molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Eimeria species in Japan: a comprehensive review

Globally, animals and humans suffer from diarrheal illnesses due to protozoan parasites such as Giardia and Eimeria species. The molecular epidemiology of these parasites in Japan is summarized in this review. In humans, researchers found only one main species of Giardia, which is most referred to as G. lamblia, but it's also known by different names like G. duodenalis or G. intestinalis. However, within this species, six assemblages (A, B, C, D, E, and F) were found in animals, and assemblage B was frequently recorded in human and monkey populations, whereas assemblages A and E were predominant in calves. Assemblage A was found in sika deer and assemblages A, C, D, and F were predominant in dogs, cats, and ferret. Eimeria bovis, E. zuernii, and other species found in animals made up the group of species known as Eimeria spp., with E. bovis and E. zuernii being the most common in cattle. Our review highlighted a notable lack of data investigations regarding these two pathogens in water and environmental sources. Giardia cysts were found in the few studies that have been done on water sources, suggesting that water may play a significant role in the transmission of Giardia species. Our review suggests that further research is necessary to fully comprehend the molecular diversity and dynamics of transmission of Giardia spp. and Eimeria spp. in humans, animals, and environmental sources in Japan.

The Influence of Giardia duodenalis on the Occurrence of Clinical Signs in Dogs

Giardia duodenalis infections are common in dogs and are mainly caused by assemblages C and D. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the presence of Giardia duodenalis and different Giardia assemblages detected in symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs and the occurrence of certain clinical signs. All the dogs included (n = 82) were clinically examined, and fecal samples were examined for other parasites and Clostridium spp. Also, G. duodenalis assemblages were detected and the occurrence of certain clinical signs was assessed. A total of 42/82 (51.2%) dogs were symptomatic and had one or more gastrointestinal signs, and 40/82 (48.8%) dogs were asymptomatic. G. duodenalis was found in 25/82 (30.5%) dogs: assemblage C in 10/25 (40%) and assemblage D in 15/25 (60%). Only Cryptosporidium spp. showed a higher coinfection rate with G. duodenalis but that did not have an influence on clinical sign appearance. There was no correlation between the presence of different assemblages of G. duodenalis and the sex of the host or the duration and appearance of certain clinical signs, except the presence of mucus in feces, which was more frequent in dogs invaded with G. duodenalis assemblage C. Further research of other assemblages is needed.

[Giardia duodenalis and its involvement in skin diseases]

BACKGOUND

Over the last thirty years, the scientific community has become increasingly interested in the intestinal flora, whether commensal or pathogenic, and its impact on other organs. In dermatology, the correlation between intestinal microbial agents and cutaneous lesions is well established. Giardia duodenalis, an intestinal parasite, has been particularly widely studied. The aim of this work is to provide a review of studies demonstrating the involvement of G. duodenalis in various forms of dermatosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data were obtained by an English-language literature search of Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar for the period 1975-2015. Among the thirty case reports since 1976, we selected the twenty most objective and clinically relevant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates that intestinal giardiasis may be an etiological factor, either alone or in combination with other agents, of various dermatoses through inflammatory and allergic mechanisms or intestinal hyperpermeability. The mucocutaneous lesions are varied: urticaria, angioedema, atopic dermatitis, erythema nodosum, Wells syndrome, among others. The role and origin of the infection are often unknown, and it is thus difficult to determine the interval between parasite infestation and the onset of skin lesions. Consequently, a fecal examination to identify G. duodenalis should be considered in chronic urticaria or angioedema, and where atopic dermatitis occurs in adulthood without any specific etiology. Therapeutic test should be done in every suspicion.

Hypereosinophilia in a Young Patient: Occam's Razor or Hickam's Dictum?

Hypereosinophilia is an uncommon clinical problem encountered in hematology practice. While most of such cases are secondary or reactive, a significant fraction of cases are due to clonal myeloproliferative disorders. We report a young patient who presented with marked hypereosinophilia and was investigated extensively for its cause. Finally a common tropical infection was responsible for such marked eosinophilia fulfilling the principle of Occam's razor. The case emphasizes the need to search for treatable reactive causes even in presence of marked hypereosinophilia in a tropical country.

Toxocarosis and putative DRESS syndrome in an oncological patient: a case report

Toxocarosis is a parasitic infection caused by Toxocara canis or Toxocara cati. Their definite hosts are the domestic dog and cat, where their adult forms live within the lumen of the small intestine. In humans, infective larvae hatch after ingestion of eggs, but the juvenile stages fail to develop into mature adult worms. Instead, they migrate through the body with the potential to affect virtually every body site. DRESS syndrome (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) is a serious cutaneous drug reaction, which also involves other organ systems. We report on a 45-year-old man who was admitted with fever up to 40 °C, skin rash and pruritus not responding to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Laboratory results showed a slightly elevated white blood cell count, with 62 % eosinophils. History revealed contact to roaming cats. Travel history was unremarkable. Extensive diagnostic workup was performed, and the patient was finally diagnosed with DRESS syndrome, responded to systemic corticosteroid therapy and was discharged. Serology for Toxocara came back positive a few days later. Stool was again sent for microscopy and was found positive for Giardia lamblia, which was treated with a 5-day course of metronidazole. The patient had again developed rash and eosinophilia (62 %). Total immunoglobulin (Ig)E was 1,689 U/l (normal limit: < 100 689 U/l). Follow-up serology showed a marked increase of Toxocara TES ELISA IgG (70 U, normal limit: < 20 U), confirming toxocarosis. Antiparasitic treatment with albendazole 400 mg bid for 5 days was initiated; eosinophilia resolved; and the patient had no further complaints. Although generalized exanthema due to Toxocara has not yet been described in literature, toxocarosis is known to cause a wide spectrum of cutaneous manifestations. Whether our patient had both, a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and a parasitic infection, or whether a hypersensitivity reaction to Toxocara antigen was mimicking a DRESS syndrome remains unclear.