Spread of segmental/multifocal idiopathic adult-onset dystonia to a third body site

Risk of Spreading in Adult-onset Dystonia

Background

Adult-onset dystonia can also spread to other parts of the body, although it is not as common as childhood-onset dystonia.

Objective

Our study aimed to examine the clinical factors determining spreading patterns in all adult-onset dystonia types.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with a diagnosis of isolated dystonia followed longitudinally at our center. We included patients reporting symptom onset after 18 years. We then compared the clinical factors between groups with and without spreading.

Results

Among 434 patients (396 focal, 29 segmental, and nine generalized onset dystonia. mean follow-up of 8.6 ± 7.8 years), 48 (11.1%) experienced spread of dystonia, with 37 progressing from focal to segmental, two from focal to generalized, two from segmental to generalized, and seven from focal to segmental to generalized dystonia. Blepharospasm was the most common focal dystonia noted to spread, followed by oromandibular dystonia, cervical dystonia, laryngeal dystonia, and upper extremity dystonia, in decreasing order. A spreading pattern was observed in approximately one in 10 dystonia patients, and the spreading was more frequent in the segmental dystonia group. While there was no difference between the spreading groups regarding sensory tricks, tremor, and gender, family history was more common in the non-spreading group (p = 0.023). Older age at onset was independently associated with increased odds of spreading (hazards ratio: 1.054, p < 0.001, B = 0.053).

Conclusion

Although risk factors for spread are variable, the underlying mechanisms are not fully known. Genetic factors may be possibly related to the spread, and future studies are needed on this subject.

Oromandibular dystonia: from onset to spread a multicenter italian study

BACKGROUND

Detailed information about the epidemiological and phenomenological differences among the aetiological subtypes of oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is lacking. Moreover, the OMD tendency to spread to other body sites has never been investigated.

AIM

To compare the main demographic and clinical features of OMD in different aetiological groups and assess the risk of spread.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from patients contained in the Italian Dystonia Registry. The risk of spread was assessed by Kaplan Meyer curves and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 273 patients (175 women) aged 55.7 years (SD 12.7) at OMD onset. Female predominance was observed. Idiopathic dystonia was diagnosed in 241 patients, acquired dystonia in 22. In 50/273 patients, dystonia started in the oromandibular region (focal OMD onset); in 96/273 patients the onset involved the oromandibular region and a neighbouring body site (segmental/multifocal OMD onset); and in 127/273 patients OMD was a site of spread from another body region. Sensory trick (ST) and positive family history predominated in the idiopathic group. No dystonia spread was detected in the acquired group, whereas spread mostly occurred within the first five years of history in 34% of the focal OMD onset idiopathic patients. Cox regression analysis revealed ST as a significant predictor of spread (HR, 12.1; 95% CI, 2.5 - 18.8; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This large study provides novel information about the clinical phenomenology of idiopathic and acquired OMD. We pointed out a possible role of oestrogens in favouring dystonia development. Moreover, we described for the first time the association between ST and dystonia spread, revealing possible common pathophysiological mechanisms. Our findings may be suggested as a referral point for future pathophysiological and therapeutic studies on OMD.

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics Associated with the Spread of New-Onset Laryngeal Dystonia

OBJECTIVES

Adult-onset idiopathic laryngeal dystonia (LD) can be associated with the risk of spread to muscles in the body. Subjects with extralaryngeal onset of dystonia have exhibited spread to the larynx. Previous studies analyze the spread of other dystonias but emphasis has not been placed on LD. The objective was to identify demographic and clinical factors contributing to the spread of dystonia to and from the larynx.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Dystonia Coalition (DC)-patients from 49 international clinical centers. Clinical and demographic data was taken from 143 out of 409 patients with diagnosed LD. Patient criteria included adult-onset LD diagnosed on exam with no co-morbid neurologic conditions and no dystonia in other locations.

RESULTS

Among the 143 patients, 94 (65.7%) patients were diagnosed with focal laryngeal onset, with the remainder having extralaryngeal onset. Family history and age at study were statistically significant indicators of a patient developing laryngeal versus extralaryngeal onset of dystonia. Among the laryngeal onset group, 21 cases (22.3%) had an average time of 5.81 ± 5.79 years to spread from diagnosis, most commonly to neck (61.9%). Among extralaryngeal onset patients, mean time of larynx spread was 7.92 ± 7.737 years, most commonly to neck (22.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicates approximately a quarter of patients with laryngeal-onset dystonia will exhibit spread. There were no demographic or clinical factors that were statistically predictive of the likelihood of spread from larynx. Patients with dystonia elsewhere in the body should be counseled on the possibility of spread to larynx, and vice versa.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:2295-2299, 2024.

Genetic Update and Treatment for Dystonia

A neurological condition called dystonia results in abnormal, uncontrollable postures or movements because of sporadic or continuous muscular spasms. Several varieties of dystonia can impact people of all ages, leading to severe impairment and a decreased standard of living. The discovery of genes causing variations of single or mixed dystonia has improved our understanding of the disease's etiology. Genetic dystonias are linked to several genes, including pathogenic variations of VPS16, TOR1A, THAP1, GNAL, and ANO3. Diagnosis of dystonia is primarily based on clinical symptoms, which can be challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other neurological conditions, such as Parkinson's disease. This review aims to summarize recent advances in the genetic origins and management of focal dystonia.

Early-onset inherited dystonias versus late-onset idiopathic dystonias: Same or different biological mechanisms?

Dystonia syndromes encompass a heterogeneous group of movement disorders which might be differentiated by several clinical-historical features. Among the latter, age-at-onset is probably the most important in predicting the likelihood both for the symptoms to spread from focal to generalized and for a genetic cause to be found. Accordingly, dystonia syndromes are generally stratified into early-onset and late-onset forms, the former having a greater likelihood of being monogenic disorders and the latter to be possibly multifactorial diseases, despite being currently labeled as idiopathic. Nonetheless, there are several similarities between these two groups of dystonia, including shared pathophysiological and biological mechanisms. Moreover, there is also initial evidence of age-related modifiers of early-onset dystonia syndromes and of critical periods of vulnerability of the sensorimotor network, during which a combination of genetic and non-genetic insults is more likely to produce symptoms. Based on these lines of evidence, we reappraise the double-hit hypothesis of dystonia, which would accommodate both similarities and differences between early-onset and late-onset dystonia in a single framework.

Improving the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin for Cervical Dystonia: A Scoping Review

Cervical dstonia (CD) is a chronic disorder with a significant detrimental impact on quality of life, requiring long-term treatment. Intramuscular injections of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) every 12 to 16 weeks have become the first-line option for CD. Despite the remarkable efficacy of BoNT as a treatment for CD, a significantly high proportion of patients report poor outcomes and discontinue the treatment. The reasons that drive sub-optimal response or treatment failure in a proportion of patients include but are not limited to inappropriate muscle targets and/or BoNT dosing, improper method of injections, subjective feeling of inefficacy, and the formation of neutralizing antibodies against the neurotoxin. The current review aims to complement published research focusing on the identification of the factors that might explain the failure of BoNT treatment in CD, highlighting possible solutions to improve its outcomes. Thus, the use of the new phenomenological classification of cervical dystonia known as COL-CAP might improve the identification of the muscle targets, but more sensitive information might come from the use of kinematic or scintigraphic techniques and the use of electromyographic or ultrasound guidance might ensure the accuracy of the injections. Suggestions are made for the development of a patient-centered model for the management of cervical dystonia and to emphasize that unmet needs in the field are to increase awareness about the non-motor spectrum of CD, which might influence the perception of the efficacy from BoNT injections, and the development of dedicated rehabilitation programs for CD that might enhance its effectiveness.

Validation of a guideline to reduce variability in diagnosing cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia is characterized by a variable pattern of neck muscle involvement. Due to the lack of a diagnostic test, cervical dystonia diagnosis is based on clinical examination and is therefore subjective. The present work was designed to provide practical guidance for clinicians in confirming or refuting suspected cervical dystonia.

METHODS

Participants were video recorded according to a standardized protocol to assess 6 main clinical features possibly contributing to cervical dystonia diagnosis: presence of repetitive, patterned head/neck movements/postures inducing head/neck deviation from neutral position (item 1); sensory trick (item 2); and red flags related to conditions mimicking dystonia that should be absent in dystonia (items 3-6). Inter-/intra-rater agreement among three independent raters was assessed by k statistics. To estimate sensitivity and specificity, the gold standard was cervical dystonia diagnosis reviewed at each site by independent senior neurologists.

RESULTS

The validation sample included 43 idiopathic cervical dystonia patients and 41 control subjects (12 normal subjects, 6 patients with isolated head tremor, 4 with chorea, 6 with tics, 4 with head ptosis due to myasthenia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 7 with orthopedic/rheumatologic neck diseases, and 2 with ocular torticollis). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was observed considering all the items except for an item related to capability to voluntarily suppress spasms (sensitivity: 96.1%; specificity: 81%).

CONCLUSIONS

An accurate diagnosis of cervical dystonia can be achieved if, in addition to the core motor features, we also consider some clinical features related to dystonia mimics that should be absent in dystonia.

Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: a 25-year follow-up

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) is the first-line treatment for idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) and is widely used in the clinical setting. To date, scanty data are available on the effectiveness of BoNT in treating acquired cervical dystonia (ACD). Here we present a long-term follow-up of ACD patients treated with BoNT/A that focused on safety and efficacy. The study included subjects who had received at least six treatments of three commercially available BoNT/A drugs [abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco) and onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona)]. Safety and efficacy were assessed based on patients' self-reports regarding adverse effects (AE), duration of improvement of dystonia and/or pain relief. Global clinical improvement was measured on a six-point scale. 23 patients with ACD were administered 739 treatments (A/Abo in 235, A/Inco in 72, A/Ona in 432) with a mean number of treatments of 31 ± 20 (range 6-76) and duration of 10 ± 6 weeks (range 2-25). The mean dose was 737 ± 292 U for A/Abo, 138 ± 108 U for A/Inco and 158 ± 80 U for A/Ona. The average benefit duration was 89 ± 26 (A/Abo), 88 ± 30 days (A/Inco), and 99 ± 55 days (A/Ona) (p = 0.011); global clinical improvement for all sessions was 4 ± 1. ANOVA one-way analysis indicated that A/Ona had the best profile in terms of duration (p < 0.05), whereas A/Abo had the best pain relief effect (p = 0.002). Side effects were reported in 9% of treatments (67/739), with ten treatments (1%) complicated by two side effects. Most side effects were rated mild to moderate; severe side effects occurred following three treatments with the three different BoNT; two required medical intervention. No allergic reactions were reported. Even after 25 years of repeated treatments, all serotypes of BoNT demonstrate positive effects in treating ACD with long-lasting efficacy and safety.

Dystonia, chorea, hemiballismus and other dyskinesias

Hyperkinesias are heterogeneous involuntary movements that significantly differ in terms of clinical and semeiological manifestations, including rhythm, regularity, speed, duration, and other factors that determine their appearance or suppression. Hyperkinesias are due to complex, variable, and largely undefined pathophysiological mechanisms that may involve different brain areas. In this chapter, we specifically focus on dystonia, chorea and hemiballismus, and other dyskinesias, specifically, levodopa-induced, tardive, and cranial dyskinesia. We address the role of neurophysiological studies aimed at explaining the pathophysiology of these conditions. We mainly refer to human studies using surface and invasive in-depth recordings, as well as spinal, brainstem, and transcortical reflexology and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. We discuss the extent to which the neurophysiological abnormalities observed in hyperkinesias may be explained by pathophysiological models. We highlight the most relevant issues that deserve future research efforts. The potential role of neurophysiological assessment in the clinical context of hyperkinesia is also discussed.

Sudden Onset, Fixed Dystonia and Acute Peripheral Trauma as Diagnostic Clues for Functional Dystonia

Background

The differentiation of functional dystonia from idiopathic dystonia may be clinically challenging.

Objective

To identify clinical features suggestive of functional dystonia to guide physicians to distinguish functional dystonia from idiopathic dystonia.

Methods

Patient data were extracted from the Italian Registry of Functional Motor Disorders and the Italian Registry of Adult Dystonia. Patients with functional and idiopathic dystonia were followed up at the same clinical sites, and they were similar in age and sex.

Results

We identified 113 patients with functional dystonia and 125 with idiopathic dystonia. Sudden onset of dystonia, evidence of fixed dystonia, and acute peripheral trauma before dystonia onset were more frequent in the functional dystonia group. No study variable alone achieved satisfactory sensitivity and specificity, whereas a combination of variables yielded 85% sensitivity and 98% specificity. A diagnostic algorithm was developed to reduce the risk of misclassifying functional dystonia.

Conclusion

Our findings extend the current diagnostic approach to functional dystonia by showing that clinical information about symptom onset, fixed dystonia, and history of peripheral trauma may provide key clues in the diagnosis of functional dystonia.