Combined thalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonic tremor

Alternative Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in the Treatment of Isolated Dystonic Syndromes: A Multicenter Experience-Based Survey

BACKGROUND

The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated "primary" dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.

METHODS

A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.

RESULTS

The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.

Thalamic ventral-Oralis complex/rostral zona incerta deep brain stimulation for midline tremor

BACKGROUND

Midline Tremor is defined as an isolated or combined tremor that affects the neck, trunk, jaw, tongue, and/or voice and could be part of Essential Tremor (ET), or dystonic tremor. The clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation for Midline Tremor has been rarely reported. The Ventral Intermediate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus are the preferred targets, but with variable outcomes. Thalamic Ventral-Oralis (VO) complex and Zona Incerta (ZI) are emerging targets for tremor control in various etiologies.

OBJECTIVE

To report on neuroradiological, neurophysiological targeting and long-term efficacy of thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex and Zona Incerta deep brain stimulation in Midline Tremor.

METHODS

Three patients (two males and one female) with Midline Tremor in dystonic syndromes were recruited for this open-label study. Clinical, surgical, neurophysiological intraoperative testing and long-term follow-up data are reported.

RESULTS

Intraoperative testing and reconstruction of volume of tissue activated confirmed the position of the electrodes in the area stimulated between the thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex and Zona Incerta in all patients. All three patients showed optimal control of both tremor and dystonic features at short-term (6 months) and long-term follow-up (up to 6 years). No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

In the syndromes of Midline Tremor of various origins, the best target for DBS might be difficult to identify. Our results showed that thalamic Ventral-Oralis complex/Zona Incerta may be a viable and safe option even in specific forms of tremor with axial distribution.

Beyond Pallidal or Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Dystonia

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating dystonia. Both targets have shown effectiveness in improving symptoms, but post-operative outcomes can vary significantly among patients. This variability has led researchers to explore alternative neuromodulation targets that might offer more consistent results. Emerging research has highlighted several promising new targets for DBS in dystonia. This review examines pre-clinical and clinical data on novel DBS targets for dystonia and explores non-invasive neuromodulation studies that shed light on the disease's underlying pathological circuitry.

Effect of Thalamic versus Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation on Head Tremor in Dystonic and Essential Tremor Patients-A Retrospective Video-Blinded Study

BACKGROUND

Head tremor is common in dystonia syndromes and difficult to treat. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option in medically-refractory cases. In most DBS-centers, the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is targeted in patients with predominant dystonia and the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) in predominant tremor. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of GPi- versus Vim-DBS in dystonic or essential head tremor.

METHODS

All patients with dystonia or essential tremor (ET) (n = 381) who underwent DBS surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2020 were screened for head tremor in our database according to predefined selection criteria. Of the 33 patients meeting inclusion criteria tremor and dystonia severity were assessed at baseline, short- (mean 10 months) and long-term follow-up (41 months) by two blinded video-raters.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with dystonic head tremor received either GPi- (n = 12) or Vim-stimulation (n = 10), according to the prevailing clinical phenotype. These two groups were compared with 11 patients with ET, treated with Vim-stimulation. The reduction in head tremor from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up was 60-70% and did not differ significantly between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GPi-DBS effectively and sustainably reduced head tremor in idiopathic dystonia. The effect was comparable to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in dystonia patients with predominant limb tremor and to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in ET.

The Optimal Targeting for Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Differs between Dystonic and Essential Tremor: A 12-Month Prospective Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is increasingly used to treat drug-resistant essential tremor (ET). Data on MRgFUS thalamotomy in dystonic tremor (DT) are anecdotal.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate efficacy, safety, and differences in target coordinates of MRgFUS thalamotomy in DT versus ET.

METHODS

Ten patients with DT and 35 with ET who consecutively underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy were followed for 12 months. Although in both groups the initial surgical planning coordinates corresponded to the ventralis intermediate (Vim), the final target could be modified intraoperatively based on clinical response.

RESULTS

Tremor significantly improved in both groups. The thalamic lesion was significantly more anterior in DT than ET. Considering both ET and DT groups, the more anterior the lesion, the lower the odds ratio for adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

MRgFUS thalamotomy is safe and effective in DT and ET. Compared to classical Vim coordinates used for ET, more anterior targeting should be considered for DT.

Outcomes of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Tremor Syndromes

BACKGROUND

The current literature comparing outcomes after a unilateral magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy between tremor syndromes is limited and remains a possible preoperative factor that could help predict the long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to report on the outcomes between different tremor syndromes after a unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients underwent a unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy for tremor between November 2018 and May 2020 at St Vincent's Hospital Sydney. Each patient's tremor syndrome was classified prior to treatment. Clinical assessments, including the hand tremor score (HTS) and Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST), were performed at baseline and predefined intervals to 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients, comprising 30 essential tremor (ET), 24 dystonic tremor (DT), and 9 Parkinson's disease tremor (PDT) patients, returned for at least one follow-up. In the ET patients, at 24 months there was a 61% improvement in HTS and 50% improvement in QUEST compared to baseline. This is in comparison to PDT patients, where an initial benefit in HTS and QUEST was observed, which waned at each follow-up, remaining significant only up until 12 months. In the DT patients, similar results were observed to the ET patients: at 24 months there was a 61% improvement in HTS and 43% improvement in QUEST compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

These results support the use of unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy for the treatment of DT, which appears to have a similar expected outcome to patients diagnosed with ET. Patients with PDT should be warned that there is a risk of treatment failure. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Radiofrequency ablation of the pallidothalamic tract and ventral intermediate nucleus for dystonic tremor through the parietal approach

Background

The thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) and globus pallidus internus are far apart and cannot be captured using a single electrode.

Case Description

We describe our experience with a patient with dystonic tremors of the head and upper and lower extremities who showed symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency (RF) ablation using a parietal lobe approach with a single trajectory to capture the pallidothalamic tract and Vim. A 46-year-old man developed head tremors at 41 and a right-sided neck tilt three years later. Five years after the onset of the head tremors, tightness of the larynx during speech and tremors in both the upper and lower limbs also appeared. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) score was 24, and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM) score was 48. We captured the pallidothalamic tract and Vim along a single trajectory by locating the entry point in the inferior parietal lobule. One week after treatment, the TWSTRS and FTM scale scores were 9 (62.5%) and 30 (37.5%), respectively. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

This case suggests that in dystonic tremors involving abnormalities of the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuits, a single electrode can be used to approach both circuits through the parietal lobe approach.

The Challenge of Choosing the Right Stimulation Target for Dystonic Tremor-A Series of Instructive Cases

Background

Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is established for medically refractory tremor syndromes and globus pallidus stimulation (GPi-DBS) for medically refractory dystonia syndromes. For combined tremor and dystonia syndromes, the best target is unclear.

Objectives

We present four patients with two different profiles whose clinical course demonstrates that our current analysis of clinical symptomatology is not a sufficient predictor of surgical success.

Methods

Outcome parameters were assessed with observer-blinded video ratings and included the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin-Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) and the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS).

Results

Two patients with "predominant lateralized action tremor" of the hands and mild cervical dystonia showed no relevant tremor improvement after GPi-DBS, but UDRS improved (mean, 45%). Rescue ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim)-DBS electrodes were implanted and both patients benefited significantly with a mean tremor reduction of 51%.Two other patients with "axial-predominant action tremor of the trunk and head" associated with cervical dystonia underwent bilateral Vim-DBS implantation with little effect on tremor (24% reduction in mean FTM-TRS total score) and no effect on dystonic symptoms. GPi rescue DBS was implanted and showed a significant effect on tremor (63% reduction in mean FTM-TRS) and dystonia (49% reduction in UDRS).

Conclusions

The diagnosis of dystonic tremor alone is not a sufficient predictor to establish the differential indication of GPi- or Vim-DBS. Further criteria (eg, proximal-distal distribution of tremor/dystonia) are needed to avoid rescue surgery in the future. On the other hand, the course of our patients encourages rescue surgery in such severely disabled patients if the first target fails.