Brain network characteristics and cognitive performance in motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease: A resting state fMRI study

Brain connectivity for subtypes of parkinson's disease using structural MRI

Objective. Delineating Parkinson's disease (PD) into distinct subtypes is a major challenge. Most studies use clinical symptoms to label PD subtypes while our work uses an imaging-based data-mining approach to subtype PD. Our study comprises two major objectives - firstly, subtyping Parkinson's patients based on grey matter information from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans of human brains; secondly, comparative structural brain connectivity analysis of PD subtypes derived from the former step.Approach. Source-based-morphometry decomposition was performed on 131 Parkinson's patients and 78 healthy controls from PPMI dataset, to derive at components (regions) with significance in disease and high effect size. The loading coefficients of significant components were thresholded for arriving at subtypes. Further, regional grey matter maps of subtype-specific subjects were separately parcellated and employed for construction of subtype-specific association matrices using Pearson correlation. These association matrices were binarized using sparsity threshold and leveraged for structural brain connectivity analysis using network metrics.Main results. Two distinct Parkinson's subtypes (namely A and B) were detected employing loadings of two components satisfying the selection criteria, and a third subtype (AB) was detected, common to these two components. Subtype A subjects were highly weighted in inferior, middle and superior frontal gyri while subtype B subjects in inferior, middle and superior temporal gyri. Network metrics analyses through permutation test revealed significant inter-subtype differences (p < 0.05) in clustering coefficient, local efficiency, participation coefficient and betweenness centrality. Moreover, hubs were obtained using betweenness centrality and mean network degree.Significance. MRI-based data-driven subtypes show frontal and temporal lobes playing a key role in PD. Graph theory-driven brain network analyses could untangle subtype-specific differences in structural brain connections showing differential network architecture. Replication of these initial results in other Parkinson's datasets may be explored in future. Clinical Relevance- Investigating structural brain connections in Parkinson's disease may provide subtype-specific treatment.

Comparing the effects of augmented virtual reality treadmill training versus conventional treadmill training in patients with stage II-III Parkinson's disease: the VIRTREAD-PD randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Intensive treadmill training (TT) has been documented to improve gait parameters and functional independence in Parkinson's Disease (PD), but the optimal intervention protocol and the criteria for tailoring the intervention to patients' performances are lacking. TT may be integrated with augmented virtual reality (AVR), however, evidence of the effectiveness of this combined treatment is still limited. Moreover, prognostic biomarkers of rehabilitation, potentially useful to customize the treatment, are currently missing. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects on gait performances of TT + AVR versus TT alone in II-III stage PD patients with gait disturbance. Secondary aims are to assess the effects on balance, gait parameters and other motor and non-motor symptoms, and patient's satisfaction and adherence to the treatment. As an exploratory aim, the study attempts to identify biomarkers of neuroplasticity detecting changes in Neurofilament Light Chain concentration T0-T1 and to identify prognostic biomarkers associated to blood-derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Methods

Single-center, randomized controlled single-blind trial comparing TT + AVR vs. TT in II-III stage PD patients with gait disturbances. Assessment will be performed at baseline (T0), end of training (T1), 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3, phone interview) from T1. The primary outcome is difference in gait performance assessed with the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment gait scale at T1. Secondary outcomes are differences in gait performance at T2, in balance and spatial-temporal gait parameters at T1 and T2, patients' satisfaction and adherence. Changes in falls, functional mobility, functional autonomy, cognition, mood, and quality of life will be also assessed at different timepoints. The G*Power software was used to estimate a sample size of 20 subjects per group (power 0.95, α < 0.05), raised to 24 per group to compensate for potential drop-outs. Both interventions will be customized and progressive, based on the participant's performance, according to a predefined protocol.

Conclusion

This study will provide data on the possible superiority of AVR-associated TT over conventional TT in improving gait and other motor and non-motor symptoms in persons with PD and gait disturbances. Results of the exploratory analysis could add information in the field of biomarker research in PD rehabilitation.