Hepatocellular Adenomas: WHO Classification and Immunohistochemical Workup

A practical diagnostic approach to hepatic masses

The differential diagnosis of hepatic mass lesions is broad and arriving at the right diagnosis can be challenging, especially on needle biopsies. The differential diagnosis of liver tumors in children is different from adults and is beyond the scope of this review. In adults, the approach varies depending on the age, gender, and presence of background liver disease. The lesions can be divided broadly into primary and metastatic (secondary), and the primary lesions can be further divided into those of hepatocellular origin and nonhepatocellular origin. The first category consists of benign and malignant lesions arising from hepatocytes, while the second category includes biliary, mesenchymal, hematopoietic, and vascular tumors. Discussion of nonepithelial neoplasms is beyond the scope of this review. The hepatocytic lesions comprise dysplastic nodules, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and the differential diagnosis can be challenging requiring clinicopathological correlation and application of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers. Liver is a common site for metastasis, sometimes presenting with an unknown primary site, and proper workup is the key to arriving at the correct diagnosis. The correct diagnosis in this setting requires a systematic approach with attention to histologic features, imaging findings, clinical presentation, and judicious use of IHC markers. The list of antibodies that can be used for this purpose keeps on growing continually. It is important for pathologists to be up to date with the sensitivity and specificity of these markers and their diagnostic role and clinical implications. The purpose of this review is to outline the differential diagnosis of hepatic masses in adults and discuss an algorithmic approach to make a right diagnosis.

Hepatocellular adenoma: Classification, variants and clinical relevance

Hepatocellular adenomas are benign tumors with two major complications, bleeding and malignant transformation. The overall narrative of hepatocellular adenoma has evolved over time. Solitary or multiple hepatocellular developing in the normal liver of women of child bearing age exposed to oral contraceptives still represents the most frequent clinical context, however, new associations are being recognized. Hepatocellular adenoma is discovered on a background of liver diseases such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, vascular diseases, and alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatocellular adenoma is also reported in men, young or older adults, and even in infants. On the morpho-molecular side, the great leap forward was the discovery that hepatocellular adenoma was not a single entity and that at least 3 different subtypes exist, with specific underlying gene mutations. These mutations affect the HNF1A gene, several genes leading to JAK/STAT3 pathway activation and the CTNNB1 gene. All of them are associated with more or less specific histopathological characteristics and can be recognized using immunohistochemistry either with specific antibodies or with surrogate markers. Liver pathologists and radiologists are the key actors in the identification of the different subtypes of hepatocellular adenoma by the recognition of their specific morphological features. The major impact of the classification of hepatocellular adenoma is to identify subjects who are at higher risk of malignant transformation. With the development of new molecular technologies, there is hope for a better understanding of the natural history of the different subtypes, and, particularly for their mechanisms of malignant transformation.