Aziz S, O'Dell K, Johns M, Schindler J, Merati A, Alanazi A, Watts S, Garber D, Nelson R, Bensoussan Y. A Novel Grading System for Supraglottic Stenosis Based on Morphology and Functional Status.
Laryngoscope 2022;
133:1442-1447. [PMID:
36054719 DOI:
10.1002/lary.30371]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Currently, no classification system exists to grade the severity of supraglottic stenosis. The aim of this investigation was to (1) develop a novel grading system for supraglottic stenosis that can both enhance communication between providers and relay information about patient functional status and (2) determine the reliability of the grading system.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of patients with supraglottic stenosis at three institutions from 2010-2021 was conducted. After demographic data were collected, two focus group meetings of five laryngologists were held to develop a grading system based on functional status and morphology of stenosis seen on laryngoscopy. Three laryngologists then used the grading system to rate 20 case examples of supraglottic stenosis. Quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the novel grading system.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight patients were included. Epiglottic and arytenoid fixation were morphological features associated with worse functional outcomes such as requiring a G-tube or a tracheostomy, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to almost perfect (Kw = 0.79-0.81) and intra-rater reliability was almost perfect for all raters (0.88-1.0) when using the novel grading system.
CONCLUSION
A grading system for supraglottic stenosis has been proposed with strong inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities. The proposed system has the advantage of being descriptive of both patient functionality and morphology of the stenosis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 3-According to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 level of evidence guidelines, this non-randomized retrospective cohort study is classified as level 3 evidence Laryngoscope, 2022.
Collapse