1
|
Chea M, Rigolot L, Canali A, Vergez F. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2150. [PMID: 38396825 PMCID: PMC10889505 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is of major importance in onco-hematology, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD measures the amount of leukemia cells remaining in a patient after treatment, and is an essential tool for disease monitoring, relapse prognosis, and guiding treatment decisions. Patients with a negative MRD tend to have superior disease-free and overall survival rates. Considerable effort has been made to standardize MRD practices. A variety of techniques, including flow cytometry and molecular methods, are used to assess MRD, each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. MRD is recognized not only as a predictive biomarker, but also as a prognostic tool and marker of treatment efficacy. Expected advances in MRD assessment encompass molecular techniques such as NGS and digital PCR, as well as optimization strategies such as unsupervised flow cytometry analysis and leukemic stem cell monitoring. At present, there is no perfect method for measuring MRD, and significant advances are expected in the future to fully integrate MRD assessment into the management of AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Chea
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
| | - Lucie Rigolot
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Alban Canali
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Francois Vergez
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soh KT, Conway A, Liu X, Wallace PK. Development of a 27-color panel for the detection of measurable residual disease in patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. Cytometry A 2022; 101:970-983. [PMID: 35716345 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluated by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is a surrogate for progression-free and overall survival in clinical trials and patient management. Due to the limited number of detection channels available in conventional flow cytometers, panels used for assessing AML MRD are typically split into multiple tubes. This cripples the simultaneous and correlated assessment of all myeloblast measurements. In response, we prototyped a single-tube 27-color MFC assay for the evaluation of AML MRD, incorporating all recommended markers. Marrow aspirates from 22 patients were processed for analysis using full spectrum flow cytometry (FSFC). The signal resolution of each marker was compared between samples stained with single antibody vs. the fully stained panel. The analytical accuracy for quantifying hematopoietic cells between our established 8-color assay and the new 27-color method were compared. Variations within an operator and between separate operators were assessed to evaluate the assays reproducibility. The limited of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), and lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of the 27-color method were empirically determined using limiting dilution experiments. The stability of antibody cocktails over a period of 120 h was also studied using cryopreserved marrow cells. The stain indices for all antibodies were lower in the fully stained panel compared to cells stained with one antibody but clear separations between negative and positive signals were achieved for all antibodies. Our results demonstrated a high concordance between the established 8-color method and the new 27-color assay for enumerating myeloblasts and MRD interpretation within and between operators. The data further showed that the single-tube 27-color assay easily achieved the minimum required detection sensitivity of 0.1%. When antibodies were combined, however, expression intensity of some antigens deteriorated significantly when stored. Our single-tube 27-color panel is a suitable, high sensitivity flow cytometric approach that can be used for AML MRD testing, which improves the correlation of aberrant antigens and detection of asynchronous differentiation patterns. Based on the stability study, we recommend the full panel be made prior to staining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Teong Soh
- Department of Flow and Image Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Alexis Conway
- Department of Flow and Image Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Xiaojun Liu
- Department of Flow and Image Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Paul K Wallace
- Department of Flow and Image Cytometry, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buccisano F, Palmieri R, Piciocchi A, Arena V, Maurillo L, Del Principe MI, Paterno G, Irno-Consalvo MA, Ottone T, Divona M, Conti C, Fraboni D, Lavorgna S, Arcese W, Voso MT, Venditti A. Clinical relevance of an objective flow cytometry approach based on limit of detection and limit of quantification for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia. A post-hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial. Haematologica 2022; 107:2823-2833. [PMID: 35295076 PMCID: PMC9713557 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Using a multiparametric flow cytometry assay, we assessed the predictive power of a threshold calculated applying the criteria of limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. This was a post-hoc analysis of 261 patients enrolled in the GIMEMA AML1310 prospective trial. According to the protocol design, using the predefined measurable residual disease (MRD) threshold of 0.035% bone marrow residual leukemic cells (RLC) calculated on mononuclear cells, 154 (59%) of the 261 patients were negative (MRD <0.035%) and 107 (41%) were positive (MRD ≥0.035%). Using LOD and LOQ, we selected the following categories of patients: (i) LODneg if RLC were below the LOD (74; 28.4%); (ii) LODpos-LOQneg if RLC were between the LOD and LOQ (43; 16.5%); and (iii) LOQpos if RLC were above the LOQ (144; 54.4%). Two-year overall survival of these three categories of patients was 75.4%, 79.8% and 66.4%, respectively (P=0.1197). Given their superimposable outcomes, the LODneg and LODpos-LOQneg categories were combined. Two-year overall survival of LODneg/LODpos-LOQneg patients was 77.0% versus 66.4% of LOQpos individuals (P=0.043). This figure was challenged in univariate analysis (P=0.046, hazard ratio=1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.54) which confirmed the independent role of the LOD-LOQ approach in determining overall survival. In the AML1310 protocol, using the threshold of 0.035%, 2-year overall survival of patients with MRD <0.035% and MRD ≥0.035% was 74.5% versus 66.4%, respectively (P=0.3521). In conclusion, the use of the LOD-LOQ method results in more sensitive detection of MRD that, in turn, translates into a more accurate recognition of patients with different outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Buccisano
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma,FB and RP contributed equally as co-first authors
| | - Raffaele Palmieri
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma,FB and RP contributed equally as co-first authors
| | | | | | - Luca Maurillo
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | | | | | | | - Tiziana Ottone
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - Mariadomenica Divona
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - Consuelo Conti
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - Daniela Fraboni
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - Serena Lavorgna
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - William Arcese
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma,Rome Transplant Network, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Voso
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| | - Adriano Venditti
- Ematologia, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, “Tor Vergata” Università di Roma
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heuser M, Freeman SD, Ossenkoppele GJ, Buccisano F, Hourigan CS, Ngai LL, Tettero JM, Bachas C, Baer C, Béné MC, Bücklein V, Czyz A, Denys B, Dillon R, Feuring-Buske M, Guzman ML, Haferlach T, Han L, Herzig JK, Jorgensen JL, Kern W, Konopleva MY, Lacombe F, Libura M, Majchrzak A, Maurillo L, Ofran Y, Philippe J, Plesa A, Preudhomme C, Ravandi F, Roumier C, Subklewe M, Thol F, van de Loosdrecht AA, van der Reijden BA, Venditti A, Wierzbowska A, Valk PJM, Wood BL, Walter RB, Thiede C, Döhner K, Roboz GJ, Cloos J. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2021; 138:2753-2767. [PMID: 34724563 PMCID: PMC8718623 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 90.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is used for prognostic, predictive, monitoring, and efficacy-response assessments. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MRD Working Party evaluated standardization and harmonization of MRD in an ongoing manner and has updated the 2018 ELN MRD recommendations based on significant developments in the field. New and revised recommendations were established during in-person and online meetings, and a 2-stage Delphi poll was conducted to optimize consensus. All recommendations are graded by levels of evidence and agreement. Major changes include technical specifications for next-generation sequencing-based MRD testing and integrative assessments of MRD irrespective of technology. Other topics include use of MRD as a prognostic and surrogate end point for drug testing; selection of the technique, material, and appropriate time points for MRD assessment; and clinical implications of MRD assessment. In addition to technical recommendations for flow- and molecular-MRD analysis, we provide MRD thresholds and define MRD response, and detail how MRD results should be reported and combined if several techniques are used. MRD assessment in AML is complex and clinically relevant, and standardized approaches to application, interpretation, technical conduct, and reporting are of critical importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sylvie D Freeman
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gert J Ossenkoppele
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Buccisano
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher S Hourigan
- Laboratory of Myeloid Malignancy, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lok Lam Ngai
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse M Tettero
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Costa Bachas
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marie-Christine Béné
- Department of Hematology and Biology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Veit Bücklein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Czyz
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms, and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Barbara Denys
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University
| | - Richard Dillon
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monica L Guzman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Julia K Herzig
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Francis Lacombe
- Hematology Biology, Flow Cytometry, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | | | - Agata Majchrzak
- Department of Experimental Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Lodz, Poland
| | - Luca Maurillo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Yishai Ofran
- Department of Hematology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem Israel
| | - Jan Philippe
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University
| | - Adriana Plesa
- Department of Hematology Laboratory, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Marion Subklewe
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Felicitas Thol
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arjan A van de Loosdrecht
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A van der Reijden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Adriano Venditti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Peter J M Valk
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brent L Wood
- Department of Hematopathology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA
| | - Roland B Walter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Christian Thiede
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany; and
- AgenDix GmbH, Dresden, Germany
| | - Konstanze Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gail J Roboz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jacqueline Cloos
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
AML/Normal Progenitor Balance Instead of Total Tumor Load (MRD) Accounts for Prognostic Impact of Flowcytometric Residual Disease in AML. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112597. [PMID: 34073205 PMCID: PMC8198261 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Measurable residual disease (MRD), taken as the percentage of white blood cells in acute myeloid leukemia, has important prognostic value, but false negatives and false positives can occur. Immature populations make up the most important part of MRD (now referred to as WBC-MRD). We explored the influence on prognostic impact of the two compartments of WBC-MRD: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (as % of WBC, PM%). Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. In the HOVON/SAKK study (H102; n = 300), using two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to be prognostically more discriminative than WBC-MRD. The PM% parameter had no prognostic impact and, moreover, resulted in WBC-MRD false positives/false negatives. Highly important for present clinical practice is the identification of a PM-MRD ≥ 10% but MRDnegative (MRD < 0.1, ELN consensus) poor prognosis subgroup. This suggests that a residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted. Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) in AML, assessed by multicolor flow cytometry, is an important prognostic factor. Progenitors are key populations in defining MRD, and cases of MRD involving these progenitors are calculated as percentage of WBC and referred to as white blood cell MRD (WBC-MRD). Two main compartments of WBC-MRD can be defined: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (referred to as primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (% of WBC, referred to as PM%), which is the main quantitative determinant of WBC-MRD. Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. We explored the relative contribution of each parameter to the prognostic impact. In the HOVON/SAKK study H102 (300 patients), based on two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to offer an independent prognostic parameter that was able to identify three patient groups with different prognoses with larger discriminative power than WBC-MRD. In line with this, the PM% parameter itself showed no prognostic impact, implying that the prognostic impact of WBC-MRD results from the PM-MRD parameter it contains. Moreover, the presence of the PM% parameter in WBC-MRD may cause WBC-MRD false positivity and WBC-MRD false negativity. For the latter, at present, it is clinically relevant that PM-MRD ≥ 10% identifies a patient sub-group with a poor prognosis that is currently classified as good prognosis MRDnegative using the European LeukemiaNet 0.1% consensus MRD cut-off value. These observations suggest that residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ngai LL, Kelder A, Janssen JJWM, Ossenkoppele GJ, Cloos J. MRD Tailored Therapy in AML: What We Have Learned So Far. Front Oncol 2021; 10:603636. [PMID: 33575214 PMCID: PMC7871983 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.603636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disease associated with a dismal survival, partly due to the frequent occurrence of relapse. Many patient- and leukemia-specific characteristics, such as age, cytogenetics, mutations, and measurable residual disease (MRD) after intensive chemotherapy, have shown to be valuable prognostic factors. MRD has become a rich field of research where many advances have been made regarding technical, biological, and clinical aspects, which will be the topic of this review. Since many laboratories involved in AML diagnostics have experience in immunophenotyping, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) based MRD is currently the most commonly used method. Although molecular, quantitative PCR based techniques may be more sensitive, their disadvantage is that they can only be applied in a subset of patients harboring the genetic aberration. Next-generation sequencing can assess and quantify mutations in many genes but currently does not offer highly sensitive MRD measurements on a routine basis. In order to provide reliable MRD results, MRD assay optimization and standardization is essential. Different techniques for MRD assessment are being evaluated, and combinations of the methods have shown promising results for improving its prognostic value. In this regard, the load of leukemic stem cells (LSC) has also been shown to add to the prognostic value of MFC-MRD. At this moment, MRD after intensive chemotherapy is most often used as a prognostic factor to help stratify patients, but also to select the most appropriate consolidation therapy. For example, to guide post-remission treatment for intermediate-risk patients where MRD positive patients receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation and MRD negative receive autologous stem cell transplantation. Other upcoming uses of MRD that are being investigated include: selecting the type of allogeneic stem cell transplantation therapy (donor, conditioning), monitoring after stem cell transplantation (to allow intervention), and determining drug efficacy for the use of a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jacqueline Cloos
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|