Elevated customary alcohol consumption attenuates opioid effects

The Role of Endogenous Beta-Endorphin and Enkephalins in the Crosstalk Between Ethanol and Morphine

Background: There is clinical concern about the combined use of alcohol and opiates. Several lines of evidence support an interaction between alcohol and the endogenous opioid system. Thus, we hypothesized that ethanol, by causing the release of opioid peptides, may sensitize the system to the action of exogenous opioids such as morphine. Objectives: In this study, using the place conditioning paradigm, a model of reward, we determined whether a morphine challenge would alter the pre-established preference induced by ethanol conditioning in mice, and whether this response was mediated by the mu opioid receptor (MOP). Given that ethanol exposure stimulates the release of opioid peptides, we also assessed the role of beta-endorphin (β-END) and enkephalins (ENKs) in this response. Methods: Mice lacking MOPs, β-END, and/or ENKs, and their respective wild-type controls were tested for preconditioning place preference on day 1. Mice were then conditioned with ethanol (2 g/kg) versus saline on days 2 to 4 and then tested under a drug-free state for postconditioning place preference on day 5. On day 8, mice received a single injection of morphine (5 mg/kg) and were tested for place preference. On the test days, mice were placed in the central chamber and allowed to explore the chambers. The amount of time that mice spent in the drug-paired chamber was recorded. Results: We found that a challenge dose of morphine given on day 8 enhanced the conditioned place preference (CPP) response in mice previously conditioned with ethanol. This response was abolished in MOP-null mice, confirming the role of MOPs in this response. Although this enhanced response was not altered in mice lacking either β-END or ENKs compared to their wild-type littermates/controls, it was completely blunted in mice lacking both β-END and enkephalins. Conclusions: Together, these results suggest that these opioid peptides jointly mediate the crosstalk between the rewarding actions of morphine and ethanol.

Alcohol use disorder in the perioperative period: a summary and recommendations for anesthesiologists and pain physicians

Excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorder (AUD) increase the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aspiration, malnutrition, coagulopathies, seizures, and hemodynamic alterations are only a few of the major concerns related to acute alcohol intoxication and AUD. There are also numerous physiological effects, changes in medication metabolism and pharmacology, and adverse events related to chronic alcohol consumption. These are all important considerations for the anesthesiologist in the perioperative management of a patient with AUD. Pain perception and thresholds are altered in patients with acute and chronic alcohol use. Medications used to manage AUD symptoms, particularly naltrexone, can have significant perioperative implications. Patients on naltrexone who continue or stop this medication in the perioperative period are at an increased risk for undertreated pain or substance use relapse. This review highlights key considerations for the anesthesiologist and pain physician in the perioperative management of patients with active AUD (or those in recovery). It discusses the effects of acute and chronic alcohol use on pain perception and thresholds, provides guidance on the perioperative management of naltrexone and low-dose naltrexone, and reviews a multimodal approach to pain management.

Alcohol Use Disorder and Chronic Pain: An Overlooked Epidemic

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and chronic pain disorders are pervasive, multifaceted medical conditions that often co-occur. However, their comorbidity is often overlooked, despite its prevalence and clinical relevance. Individuals with AUD are more likely to experience chronic pain than the general population. Conversely, individuals with chronic pain commonly alleviate their pain with alcohol, which may escalate into AUD. This narrative review discusses the intricate relationship between AUD and chronic pain. Based on the literature available, the authors present a theoretical model explaining the reciprocal relationship between AUD and chronic pain across alcohol intoxication and withdrawal. They propose that the use of alcohol for analgesia rapidly gives way to acute tolerance, triggering the need for higher levels of alcohol consumption. Attempts at abstinence lead to alcohol withdrawal syndrome and hyperalgesia, increasing the risk of relapse. Chronic neurobiological changes lead to preoccupation with pain and cravings for alcohol, further entrenching both conditions. To stimulate research in this area, the authors review methodologies to improve the assessment of pain in AUD studies, including self-report and psychophysical methods. Further, they discuss pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies that may target both conditions, potentially improving both AUD and chronic pain outcomes simultaneously. Finally, the authors emphasize the need to manage both conditions concurrently, and encourage both the scientific community and clinicians to ensure that these intertwined conditions are not overlooked given their clinical significance.

Model-Based Analysis of the Influence of Alcohol Use and Age on Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Oral Oxycodone in Middle-Age and Older Community Dwelling Adults

Little is known on how opioid responses vary by age and in the presence of alcohol consumption. This model-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis quantified the impact of age and alcohol use on pupillometry and cold pressor test (CPT) PD based on data from an open label study of immediate-release 10 mg oral oxycodone in middle-age and older adults (age 35-85) without severe functional limitations. PK and pupillometry assessments were obtained on 11 occasions over 8 hours. CPT was administered at 1.5, 5 and 8 hours post oxycodone dosing. The study consisted of 62 older adults (age 60+) and 66 middle-age adults (age 35-59), with 82% meeting the unhealthy drinking criteria. Oral oxycodone PK were well described using a one compartment model with a sequential zero to first order absorption process. Recent alcohol use measures were selected a priori. for the analysis. Inhibitory Emax and linear direct effect PD models described the respective pupillometry and CPT data using simultaneous PK-PD analysis in MONOLIX. This analysis demonstrated an influence of age on clearance and bodyweight on the distribution volume of oxycodone, alcohol consumption was not noted to alter oxycodone PK. Oxycodone pupillometry PD were influenced by the level of subject-reported alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C), alcohol use biomarker blood phosphatidylethanol, previous cannabis use, and age. Over the opioid exposure range of the study, none of the covariables including alcohol and age were noted to affect CPT PD. Additional clinical studies are needed to further probe the clinical consequences of opioid-alcohol-age interaction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.